|
sorehammer
|
 |
June 24, 2014, 09:00:34 PM |
|
but where are the pictures of the shipping crates they are so fond of showing when they get a delivery eh
|
|
|
|
Majixagi
Member
 Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 24, 2014, 09:10:41 PM |
|
Well I know that some have been ordered before minersource was a reseller and those have not been delivered yet. I suspect they haven't been shipped yet. If X-1 starts showing up at microcenter or "in stock" at minersource I'm going to be seriously disturbed.
|
has not sold out
|
|
|
|
dogjunior
|
|
June 24, 2014, 09:45:35 PM |
|
I can't wait for the Friday update. Hope there is news about shipping X-3. They are way late especially after they talked about being on schedule or ahead of schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tempestb
|
|
June 24, 2014, 09:51:57 PM |
|
I can't wait for the Friday update. Hope there is news about shipping X-3. They are way late especially after they talked about being on schedule or ahead of schedule.
Forget it. Do yourself a favor and expect the Thursday update (That is now the Friday update) to say that they are waiting on the manufacturer of the backplanes and expect to receive them late next week with shipping to begin the following week. |
1D7JwRnoungL1YQy7sJMsqmA8BHkPcKGDJ
We mine as we dream... Alone
|
|
|
|
bobsag3
|
|
June 24, 2014, 11:54:14 PM |
|
Power consumption numbers:
1200Mhz - 120-130gh - ~115-120w on my killawatt
1100Mhz - 112 - 118GH - ~107W
1000Mhz - 98 - 109GH - 98W
Have not tested 800 yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fivejonnyfive
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:05:31 AM |
|
Power consumption numbers:
1200Mhz - 120-130gh - ~115-120w on my killawatt
1100Mhz - 112 - 118GH - ~107W
1000Mhz - 98 - 109GH - 98W
Have not tested 800 yet.
Under 1w/gh. Not bad. Not bad at all! |
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:10:32 AM |
|
Under 1w/gh. Not bad. Not bad at all!
Actually, it's quite horrible. It's not even close to what was promised. Prospero X-1 will scan 100Ghash while using less than 55 Watts and Prospero X-3 will be able to scan an outstanding 2000Ghash while using less than 1050 Watt.
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
david105396
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:16:30 AM |
|
Under 1w/gh. Not bad. Not bad at all!
Actually, it's quite horrible. It's not even close to what was promised. Prospero X-1 will scan 100Ghash while using less than 55 Watts and Prospero X-3 will be able to scan an outstanding 2000Ghash while using less than 1050 Watt.
That was our first design before the delay. This design was expected at 0.75Watt/Ghash. The chip can still be fine tuned to get a better efficiency. |
Black Arrow Support
|
|
|
drewage
Member
Offline
Activity: 262
Merit: 10
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:18:20 AM |
|
Under 1w/gh. Not bad. Not bad at all!
Actually, it's quite horrible. It's not even close to what was promised. Prospero X-1 will scan 100Ghash while using less than 55 Watts and Prospero X-3 will be able to scan an outstanding 2000Ghash while using less than 1050 Watt.
Not trying to stoke the fire, I'm genuinely curious, but are there any machines that are currently available that are using .55 W/Ghash? |
|
|
|
|
ernie-
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:24:22 AM |
|
Not trying to stoke the fire, I'm genuinely curious, but are there any machines that are currently available that are using .55 W/Ghash?
The ASICminer BE200 40nm chip is 0.35J/GHash at rated voltage. Though as usual people will over clock them straight away thinking more is better. Here is a neat little video of BE200 immersion testing. http://vimeo.com/98321051 |
|
|
|
|
drewage
Member
Offline
Activity: 262
Merit: 10
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:28:11 AM |
|
Not trying to stoke the fire, I'm genuinely curious, but are there any machines that are currently available that are using .55 W/Ghash?
The ASICminer 40nm chip is 0.35J/GHash at rated voltage. Not to be obtuse but what machines use the AM 40nm chip? |
|
|
|
|
bobsag3
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:28:19 AM |
|
Not trying to stoke the fire, I'm genuinely curious, but are there any machines that are currently available that are using .55 W/Ghash?
The ASICminer BE200 40nm chip is 0.35J/GHash at rated voltage. Though as usual people will over clock them straight away thinking more is better. Speaking as someone who has their products in hand, no they dont. They get effective about 1.1-1.2w/gh. |
|
|
|
|
coolmusic
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:33:31 AM |
|
Power consumption numbers:
1200Mhz - 120-130gh - ~115-120w on my killawatt
1100Mhz - 112 - 118GH - ~107W
1000Mhz - 98 - 109GH - 98W
Have not tested 800 yet.
Under 1w/gh. Not bad. Not bad at all! under 1w/gh AT THE WALL (not at chip level) is pretty awesome |
|
|
|
|
Unacceptable
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:38:03 AM |
|
Power consumption numbers:
1200Mhz - 120-130gh - ~115-120w on my killawatt
1100Mhz - 112 - 118GH - ~107W
1000Mhz - 98 - 109GH - 98W
Have not tested 800 yet.
Under 1w/gh. Not bad. Not bad at all! under 1w/gh AT THE WALL (not at chip level) is pretty awesome .90 watts per GH,not bad.....just not what they were shooting for  I don't think anyone cept Bitfury came close to predicted specs..............Even ole Friedcat missed by quite abit!!!!! On the second round  |
"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole." -Raylan Givens Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan  |
|
|
|
bobsag3
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:40:05 AM |
|
Power consumption numbers:
1200Mhz - 120-130gh - ~115-120w on my killawatt
1100Mhz - 112 - 118GH - ~107W
1000Mhz - 98 - 109GH - 98W
Have not tested 800 yet.
Under 1w/gh. Not bad. Not bad at all! under 1w/gh AT THE WALL (not at chip level) is pretty awesome .90 watts per GH,not bad.....just not what they were shooting for I don't think anyone cept Bitfury came close to predicted specs..............Even ole Friedcat missed by quite abit!!!!! On the second round The chip is considerably more efficient in the X3, the X1 has ~15-20w in overhead of the LCD+ controller, where as each X1 has 20w of overhead per 1th. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dot99lr
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:44:13 AM |
|
Anybody get a shipping confirmation from MS? Anybody?
Bobsag, how many went out or are going out today? Any pictures of the delivery? Hope we're not waiting for the power cords before you ship them. Any idea of future shipments? So many questions...
Any news? |
|
|
|
|
|
ernie-
|
|
June 25, 2014, 01:22:00 AM |
|
Speaking as someone who has their products in hand, no they dont. They get effective about 1.1-1.2w/gh.
Rockminer is not a great example, they run their core VDD at 0.72v whereas the BE200 can go as low a 0.55v. |
|
|
|
|
|
tempestb
|
|
June 25, 2014, 03:32:38 AM |
|
BFL's Monarch is really good on power, but you know... you'd have better chances of finding a leprechaun's pot of gold than ever getting your hands on one.
|
1D7JwRnoungL1YQy7sJMsqmA8BHkPcKGDJ
We mine as we dream... Alone
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 25, 2014, 04:11:49 AM |
|
Speaking as someone who has their products in hand, no they dont. They get effective about 1.1-1.2w/gh.
Rockminer is not a great example, they run their core VDD at 0.72v whereas the BE200 can go as low a 0.55v. What's the W/GH ratio for end system at 0.55v? |
|
|
|
|
ernie-
|
|
June 25, 2014, 04:18:22 AM |
|
Speaking as someone who has their products in hand, no they dont. They get effective about 1.1-1.2w/gh.
Rockminer is not a great example, they run their core VDD at 0.72v whereas the BE200 can go as low a 0.55v. What's the W/GH ratio for end system at 0.55v? Who knows, they quote only the chip specs, have to wait until someone under clocks a system properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
