Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 11:41:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 902898 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Billbags
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Brainwashed this way


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 05:42:46 PM
Last edit: August 16, 2014, 09:24:15 PM by Billbags
 #7641

Hi MBW, if you don't mind me asking, how are you balancing your hash power between pools for variance. I have 1.1Th here which gets me about 0.02+/- a day and 4.5th at another pool that's score based so I get 0.02+/- every block(0-8 blocks a day depending on luck, but averages 4-5 over time). I'm just trying to get a feel for what other people are doing lately.

Listen: meat beat manifesto ~ Edge of no control (pt.1)
Read:"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." ~ George Orwell
Think: http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html
1710848460
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710848460

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710848460
Reply with quote  #2

1710848460
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710848460
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710848460

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710848460
Reply with quote  #2

1710848460
Report to moderator
1710848460
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710848460

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710848460
Reply with quote  #2

1710848460
Report to moderator
1710848460
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710848460

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710848460
Reply with quote  #2

1710848460
Report to moderator
MoreBloodWine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 05:46:17 PM
 #7642

Hi MBW, if you don't mind me asking, how are you balancing your hash power between pools for variance. I have 1.1Th here which gets me about 0.02+/- a day and 4.5th at another pool that's score based so I get 0.02+/- every block(0-8 blocks a day depending on luck, but averages 4-5 over time).
I actually have everything pointed here ~5Th with some OC on my four S3's. I have two other pools I use with failover.

So I don't have any real distribution going on. I do have one S3 though pointed at another pool right now so I can test something but I still have ~4.7 here.

To be decided...
Billbags
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Brainwashed this way


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 05:48:13 PM
 #7643

Thanks for the info, wish I could get your elect rates!!!!!

Listen: meat beat manifesto ~ Edge of no control (pt.1)
Read:"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." ~ George Orwell
Think: http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html
MoreBloodWine
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 06:06:03 PM
 #7644

Thanks for the info, wish I could get your elect rates!!!!!
Lol I don't tehnically pay for it at home even though my rates only around 0.092 pe kWh.

Everything's hosted at my friends business who has free electricity written in to his lease... he does some internet stuff. Anyway, this is where people begin to hate me lol

This is what he's hosting for me...

3 x 1Th Dragon
4 x 440Gh/s S3 OC @ freq 237.5
1 x Prospector200 (200Gh machine)

All for about $1 per 50 watts / $20 per 1,000 watts.

So all in all I pay him about $100 a month right now for hosting ~5Th for me.

The prospector mines just enough to pay for most of the hosting costs but it's pretty much end of life since it wont be proitable much longer. I'll basically run everything to the point to where they make enough to run them with no profit.

To be decided...
mtnminer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 17, 2014, 12:22:45 AM
 #7645

Hello Eleuthria and fellow pool members

It appears on my end that pool payouts have not processed since 09:28:01 AM this morning on BTC Guild.  Is anyone else experiencing this issues, my miners are running great, and I typically receive a payout about every 3 hours, until today.  I hope this issue is resolved soon and I will keep hashing and looking for an update.

Thanks
gshaw
mtnminer
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 17, 2014, 12:29:38 AM
 #7646

Hello Eleuthria and fellow pool members

It appears on my end that pool payouts have not processed since 09:28:01 AM this morning on BTC Guild.  Is anyone else experiencing this issues, my miners are running great, and I typically receive a payout about every 3 hours, until today.  I hope this issue is resolved soon and I will keep hashing and looking for an update.

Thanks
gshaw
mtnminer

We have only found TWO blocks since 930 am-(1145am,645pm), so unless your scoring enough to get a payout with every single block found..........
navigator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 17, 2014, 06:46:08 PM
 #7647

I've been seeing people talk about combining workers and wondering which is the correct way to set the difficulty. Say I want to connect 4 S3's to the same worker ID, do I set the difficulty as I would an individual miner or do I add all the hashrates together and set the difficulty based on that.

I set mine individually. I have 3 workers(s1,s2,s3). I set the S1 worker to 128 and point all my S1's to that worker. Is this correct?
os2sam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3577
Merit: 1090


Think for yourself


View Profile
August 17, 2014, 07:07:01 PM
 #7648

I've been seeing people talk about combining workers and wondering which is the correct way to set the difficulty. Say I want to connect 4 S3's to the same worker ID, do I set the difficulty as I would an individual miner or do I add all the hashrates together and set the difficulty based on that.

I set mine individually. I have 3 workers(s1,s2,s3). I set the S1 worker to 128 and point all my S1's to that worker. Is this correct?

You set the difficulty per the combined hashrate of all the devices on that mining software instance.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Billbags
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Brainwashed this way


View Profile
August 17, 2014, 08:53:21 PM
 #7649

I've been seeing people talk about combining workers and wondering which is the correct way to set the difficulty. Say I want to connect 4 S3's to the same worker ID, do I set the difficulty as I would an individual miner or do I add all the hashrates together and set the difficulty based on that.

I set mine individually. I have 3 workers(s1,s2,s3). I set the S1 worker to 128 and point all my S1's to that worker. Is this correct?
[/quote



https://support.cex.io/hc/en-us/articles/201442486-What-is-stratum-difficulty-and-what-do-I-set-there-


The same is true for BTCguild.

Listen: meat beat manifesto ~ Edge of no control (pt.1)
Read:"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." ~ George Orwell
Think: http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html
GigaBit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 506


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
August 17, 2014, 10:06:11 PM
 #7650

I've been seeing people talk about combining workers and wondering which is the correct way to set the difficulty. Say I want to connect 4 S3's to the same worker ID, do I set the difficulty as I would an individual miner or do I add all the hashrates together and set the difficulty based on that.

I set mine individually. I have 3 workers(s1,s2,s3). I set the S1 worker to 128 and point all my S1's to that worker. Is this correct?

You set the difficulty per the combined hashrate of all the devices on that mining software instance.

That makes no sense, don't put a bunch of S3's on one worker, you lose way too much hash power by doing so.

Do yourself that favor and just make one worker per S3.

All pools that are worth a shit allow you to set up your workers, or better yet on a few, the website detects them for you as entered in your miner software.

Take the time and do it right, you won't complain later about why you're running 2TH/s and only get 1.65TH/s avg.

Too many assholes at the low difficulties, slows your ass down, flooded in tiny shares.

Machines of anything more than 1GH/s should be placed as their own individual worker and difficulty according to builder specs.

If you MUST use only 1 worker, set the difficulty to either 256 or 512, maybe 1024 at most, depends on the pool so test those difficulties out.

This only works when it's all the same miner type, if you run 4 S3's in 1 worker, use the highest difficulty setting possible for those machine types.

Higher value shares just turn up a better pay without having to work as much because everyone wants the easy shares which is BS.

Don't put a ridiculously high difficulty for nothing, you won't get your money's worth but don't just put difficulty of 1 either.

I use 256 on an S1 and works perfectly, purrs like a kitten; S3's run at 512 perfectly too.

Think of it as a video game, you're going against an opponent with 150K health (Bitcoin Network HashPower because you compete in hashing power) but if you have one of the best sword in the game (s3 - 450 to 500 damage) and didn't update your skill (Personal Difficulty Vs. Opponent Difficulty) yeah ok you kill the opponent over time but takes a lot longer and face it, in bitcoin, time is money. 

In Bitcoin, all you need to do to increase your skill is by setting (your character's) difficulty yourself on the pool side where possible from 1 or 0 to whatever the fuck you want.

Not all pools allow to set your own difficulty.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
August 17, 2014, 10:46:51 PM
 #7651

That makes no sense, don't put a bunch of S3's on one worker, you lose way too much hash power by doing so.

This is flat out wrong.  You do not lose ANY hash power by putting multiple machines on one worker on ANY pool.  It's not recommended purely because it means idle notifications won't work unless all machines go down at the same time, and the stats will be merged for all hardware.  But you don't lose any speed.


I've been seeing people talk about combining workers and wondering which is the correct way to set the difficulty. Say I want to connect 4 S3's to the same worker ID, do I set the difficulty as I would an individual miner or do I add all the hashrates together and set the difficulty based on that.

I set mine individually. I have 3 workers(s1,s2,s3). I set the S1 worker to 128 and point all my S1's to that worker. Is this correct?

You set the difficulty per the combined hashrate of all the devices on that mining software instance.

This is the correct answer.  If your workers share a single miner instance (either a single BFGMiner or a single stratum proxy), you should set the difficulty to the combined speed, since vardifficulty will be doing that whether you want it to or not (and it works the same on every pool).

If your workers are running their own miner instance, you just use that miner's speed.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 18, 2014, 12:51:35 AM
 #7652

That makes no sense, don't put a bunch of S3's on one worker, you lose way too much hash power by doing so.

This is flat out wrong.  You do not lose ANY hash power by putting multiple machines on one worker on ANY pool.  It's not recommended purely because it means idle notifications won't work unless all machines go down at the same time, and the stats will be merged for all hardware.  But you don't lose any speed.


I've been seeing people talk about combining workers and wondering which is the correct way to set the difficulty. Say I want to connect 4 S3's to the same worker ID, do I set the difficulty as I would an individual miner or do I add all the hashrates together and set the difficulty based on that.

I set mine individually. I have 3 workers(s1,s2,s3). I set the S1 worker to 128 and point all my S1's to that worker. Is this correct?

You set the difficulty per the combined hashrate of all the devices on that mining software instance.

This is the correct answer.  If your workers share a single miner instance (either a single BFGMiner or a single stratum proxy), you should set the difficulty to the combined speed, since vardifficulty will be doing that whether you want it to or not (and it works the same on every pool).

If your workers are running their own miner instance, you just use that miner's speed.
I think the confusing part of this is that he is claiming to have multiple S1, multiple S2, multiple S3.
Instead of running individual worker for each individual device, it appears that he is only using 3 workers. One for each Model of Device.
 The Antminer S1, S2, S3, all have the miner instance built in to the firmware of each individual device but he seems to say that he is pointing All S1's (multiple devices) to the same (single) worker. Then using a new worker for his S2's, etc.
 
  If he created a single worker per device (S1a, S1b, S1c, S2a, S2b...) under one account name; then he would be able to distinguish the performance achieved on the pool for each individual device and the recommended "diff" should be set according to the speed of that individual device.
  If in his view, listing the devices individually is to busy of a presentation of the miner information, then he may intentionally decide to continue pointing each "model" of equipment (S1,S2,S3) to one of his three workers.
 If that is what he does, the pool software will interpret the hash rate of say worker S1, which may actually have 3 devices pointed at it, as say 1500 GH/s and eventually send a signal to him that "Diff is changed to 1024" for that S1 worker.

 I'm not using S1,S2, ...etc. equipment but combining multiple USB devices which are all on the same "instance" of miner software, would increase "Diff" ex.-30 U2+'s would be Diff:32. And will operate very well that way.
 You could create 30 separate workers and run 30 separate instances of BFG Miner at Diff:2 but that would be silly in the case of 2 GH/s miners.
  Antminer S1, S2, S3 all have the CG Miner software installed individually on each device, nothing you can do about that, but in my opinion..... it would be "better" to assign each device its own worker and set the Diff:? to the speed of that device, both on the device and under worker settings of the pool he's on if that is possible and it is on BTC Guild.
navigator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 18, 2014, 02:26:19 AM
 #7653

I am doing it the way hurricandave described. My miners never really go down so I don't need individual stats for each device often or idle notifications. When I do want to look at each miner I use AntMonitor. If I connect 4 S3's to the same worker and set the difficulty to 2048, each S3 would be using 2048 difficulty. So I set it to 256 instead. Now I can connect as many S3's to that worker as I want and each one gets the correct difficulty. It also makes it quicker for me when switching pools, since I don't have to label each miner with a unique worker name.
edonkey
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1150
Merit: 1004



View Profile
August 18, 2014, 03:01:52 AM
 #7654

Ack! Bad luck for too long! Not enough air! Passing out...

Someone give my S3's a good home when I'm gone.

Was I helpful?   BTC: 3G1Ubof5u8K9iJkM8We2f3amYZgGVdvpHr
hurricandave
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 18, 2014, 03:02:18 AM
 #7655

I am doing it the way hurricandave described. My miners never really go down so I don't need individual stats for each device often or idle notifications. When I do want to look at each miner I use AntMonitor. If I connect 4 S3's to the same worker and set the difficulty to 2048, each S3 would be using 2048 difficulty. So I set it to 256 instead. Now I can connect as many S3's to that worker as I want and each one gets the correct difficulty. It also makes it quicker for me when switching pools, since I don't have to label each miner with a unique worker name.
Just keep in mind that having 4 S3 devices pointed at a single worker, will be seen by the Pool Server, as a single device and the Server is instructed to adjust the Diff:?? automatically higher when needed. It may take awhile, especially when using an established worker with accumulated stats but eventually it will tell your S3 worker to increase Diff:?? to the combined speed of your devices because the worker setting tab is only your instruction to "Set" a "Minimum" Diff:256 in your case.
 CG Miner is modified to run on the S3 by Bitmain and I don't know if it is able to ignore the new minimum "Diff:?? Set Request" if it is transmitted by the Pool Server to your workers. Nor do I know whether the GUI from Bitmain is displaying the change correctly if it does happen.
  These changes usually don't have a dramatic effect on the overall performance of the device and are largely intended to help control size and frequency of communications between your device and the pool server over the internet connections on both ends.
  Where negative statistics may show up, is in discards/rejects, as there are times when your device may begin submitting "Old Diff Shares", "Lower than Expected/Accepted Diff:?? Shares", following momentary internet connection disruptions or restarts, if you have a difference in the settings of your device and your "Pool Adjusted Profile".
cowboy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 18, 2014, 09:03:07 PM
 #7656

hallo freunde ,

ich bin hier neu und brauche hilfe.Ich habe ein windows7 64bit version laptop.Ich habe bfgminer software herunter geladen aber ich bekomme keinen arbeiter zum arbeiten.Oder geht es mit dem nur laptop nur nicht.Ich bekomme den bfgminer software zum laufen aber es wird keinen pools akzeptiert.

Kann mir einer dabei helfen und beschreiben welche probleme ich habe.

Danke!
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

3D Printed!


View Profile
August 20, 2014, 07:43:10 PM
 #7657

hallo freunde ,

ich bin hier neu und brauche hilfe.Ich habe ein windows7 64bit version laptop.Ich habe bfgminer software herunter geladen aber ich bekomme keinen arbeiter zum arbeiten.Oder geht es mit dem nur laptop nur nicht.Ich bekomme den bfgminer software zum laufen aber es wird keinen pools akzeptiert.

Kann mir einer dabei helfen und beschreiben welche probleme ich habe.

Danke!

Guten tag!

Mein Deutsch ist ein bisschen eingerostet, so bin ich mit Google übersetzen, aber ich war in der Lage, die meisten von dem, was Sie geschrieben zu lesen.
Schauen Sie sich MultiMiner App, ist es eine wunderbare GUI-Stil Frontend Bergmann mit BFGminer (und andere) als Back-End Bergmann.
Hier ist der Link zum Thread im Forum ...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=248173.0
Und der Link zu der Website ...
www.multiminerapp.com
Auch welche Art von Bergmann oder Hardware sind Sie versucht, mit mir?
Bitte entschuldigen Sie meine schlechte Grammatik Kollegen und haben eine wunderbare Tag!

    Bitcoin-Scratchticket.com       Win Bitcoin Playing Scratchtickets        Provably Fair   
*Got LootCrate?*
*My Stuff For Sale thread/s*   www.CryptoCause.org   Ask me about SEGMining Hosting!
"Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly impossible" - Edwin Land
Taugeran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


CCNA: There i fixed the internet.


View Profile
August 21, 2014, 12:53:49 AM
 #7658

hallo freunde ,

ich bin hier neu und brauche hilfe.Ich habe ein windows7 64bit version laptop.Ich habe bfgminer software herunter geladen aber ich bekomme keinen arbeiter zum arbeiten.Oder geht es mit dem nur laptop nur nicht.Ich bekomme den bfgminer software zum laufen aber es wird keinen pools akzeptiert.

Kann mir einer dabei helfen und beschreiben welche probleme ich habe.

Danke!

Guten tag!

Mein Deutsch ist ein bisschen eingerostet, so bin ich mit Google übersetzen, aber ich war in der Lage, die meisten von dem, was Sie geschrieben zu lesen.
Schauen Sie sich MultiMiner App, ist es eine wunderbare GUI-Stil Frontend Bergmann mit BFGminer (und andere) als Back-End Bergmann.
Hier ist der Link zum Thread im Forum ...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=248173.0
Und der Link zu der Website ...
www.multiminerapp.com
Auch welche Art von Bergmann oder Hardware sind Sie versucht, mit mir?
Bitte entschuldigen Sie meine schlechte Grammatik Kollegen und haben eine wunderbare Tag!


Linguistics: +1

Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s
tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1
Come join Coinbase
mstrongbow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250

3D Printed!


View Profile
August 21, 2014, 05:00:20 AM
 #7659

hallo freunde ,

ich bin hier neu und brauche hilfe.Ich habe ein windows7 64bit version laptop.Ich habe bfgminer software herunter geladen aber ich bekomme keinen arbeiter zum arbeiten.Oder geht es mit dem nur laptop nur nicht.Ich bekomme den bfgminer software zum laufen aber es wird keinen pools akzeptiert.

Kann mir einer dabei helfen und beschreiben welche probleme ich habe.

Danke!

Guten tag!

Mein Deutsch ist ein bisschen eingerostet, so bin ich mit Google übersetzen, aber ich war in der Lage, die meisten von dem, was Sie geschrieben zu lesen.
Schauen Sie sich MultiMiner App, ist es eine wunderbare GUI-Stil Frontend Bergmann mit BFGminer (und andere) als Back-End Bergmann.
Hier ist der Link zum Thread im Forum ...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=248173.0
Und der Link zu der Website ...
www.multiminerapp.com
Auch welche Art von Bergmann oder Hardware sind Sie versucht, mit mir?
Bitte entschuldigen Sie meine schlechte Grammatik Kollegen und haben eine wunderbare Tag!


Linguistics: +1

Thanks I think  Grin
I lived in Germany for a few years and used to speak German fluently. Miss that place!

    Bitcoin-Scratchticket.com       Win Bitcoin Playing Scratchtickets        Provably Fair   
*Got LootCrate?*
*My Stuff For Sale thread/s*   www.CryptoCause.org   Ask me about SEGMining Hosting!
"Don't undertake a project unless it is manifestly important and nearly impossible" - Edwin Land
Billbags
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Brainwashed this way


View Profile
August 21, 2014, 06:04:07 PM
Last edit: August 21, 2014, 09:02:26 PM by Billbags
 #7660

Has anyone heard if the "Primer Jurisdiction" released by The Bitcoin Foundation and their Lawyers could be used as a legal tool to help keep BTCguild open? Does this release have any legal merritt as a "reccomendation guide" that would prevent an indictment or is it just something to be used as a defence in court when accused of breaking US/State laws? Any insights would be greatly welcome.

http://cointelegraph.com/news/112320/bitcoin-foundation-releases-a-primer-on-jurisdictions-for-btc-businesses

 https://bitcoinfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Bitcoin-Jurisdiction-Primer.pdf

Listen: meat beat manifesto ~ Edge of no control (pt.1)
Read:"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." ~ George Orwell
Think: http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html
Pages: « 1 ... 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 [383] 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!