WhiteNotWright
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
|
|
July 01, 2014, 02:46:02 PM |
|
I think I voted more than once, is that possible to do? EDIT*** Yeah, sure can vote as many times as you'd like lol Without independent validation of the poll (kind of like the failed US elections lol), I doubt I would trust the results. But it is a great start to get some feedback finally. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
neoxxx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 351
Merit: 250
Source of knowledge is experience. A.E.
|
|
July 01, 2014, 02:48:50 PM Last edit: July 01, 2014, 03:04:41 PM by neoxxx |
|
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
|
July 01, 2014, 02:53:33 PM |
|
I like that everyone is charged up, good to have energy, but I agree with something in there about focusing on whats important and not side matters. I'd love to see more concepts from all of you on where WC should head.
|
|
|
|
Troubled
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
July 01, 2014, 02:53:56 PM |
|
This WOC seems fishy to me. I still can't understand why a coin needs another coin to be successful. Maybe the devs should concentrate on WC and get that noticed properly rather than take the limited resources away to make this WOC.
Is there going to be a vote on this new WOC and whether the community wants it? Has merge mining also been considered like VTC does instead of another stand alone coin?
Take my advice, drop to BTC while it's high and let these folks think about what they need to do. Newegg taking bitcoin now ' Take my advise and don't listen to this scammer everyone!!!! I can confirm he's the leader of scam pump group!!!!! I left his group and know his tricks!!!!!!! You look back at my messages you will know that I am honest in my words and have no pump and dump agenda or affiliation with any of that for which you speak. I am only trying to determine why there is a sudden interest in another coin that could have a potential impact on my holdings as an investor. Seriously, this is the second or third time you have stated this accusation against me and quite frankly, it's getting a little old. Just because I am not a lemming, fanboy or cheerleader does not make me someone that is trying to manipulate the coin. You folks are all the same (well most) with your head in the sand. This is why the coin is not doing well. Too many egos and not enough insight to fully realize what I am saying. Troll on my friend, troll on. That is a lie!!!! You can't even bother to hide how you talk!!!! You use all the same text patterns!!!! You encourage people to dump and call this community and its devs scammers, when it's you who scams!!! You change your tune with every post just a little because we a good community and talked you into a corner!!! You still can't tell us why whiteoutcoin is a bad idea, and that's because we all know you think its a good one and want to pump it up with your crappy group of amateurs!!!!!! It's clear you want WC at a low price right now why else would you tell everyone to dump and hold in bitcoin to teach the community a lesson!
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
|
July 01, 2014, 02:54:47 PM |
|
Cool! Seems a lot more accurate.
|
|
|
|
malbee
|
|
July 01, 2014, 02:56:22 PM |
|
This WOC seems fishy to me. I still can't understand why a coin needs another coin to be successful. Maybe the devs should concentrate on WC and get that noticed properly rather than take the limited resources away to make this WOC.
Is there going to be a vote on this new WOC and whether the community wants it? Has merge mining also been considered like VTC does instead of another stand alone coin?
Take my advice, drop to BTC while it's high and let these folks think about what they need to do. Newegg taking bitcoin now ' Take my advise and don't listen to this scammer everyone!!!! I can confirm he's the leader of scam pump group!!!!! I left his group and know his tricks!!!!!!! You look back at my messages you will know that I am honest in my words and have no pump and dump agenda or affiliation with any of that for which you speak. I am only trying to determine why there is a sudden interest in another coin that could have a potential impact on my holdings as an investor. Seriously, this is the second or third time you have stated this accusation against me and quite frankly, it's getting a little old. Just because I am not a lemming, fanboy or cheerleader does not make me someone that is trying to manipulate the coin. You folks are all the same (well most) with your head in the sand. This is why the coin is not doing well. Too many egos and not enough insight to fully realize what I am saying. Troll on my friend, troll on. That is a lie!!!! You can't even bother to hide how you talk!!!! You use all the same text patterns!!!! You encourage people to dump and call this community and its devs scammers, when it's you who scams!!! You change your tune with every post just a little because we a good community and talked you into a corner!!! You still can't tell us why whiteoutcoin is a bad idea, and that's because we all know you think its a good one and want to pump it up with your crappy group of amateurs!!!!!! It's clear you want WC at a low price right now why else would you tell everyone to dump and hold in bitcoin to teach the community a lesson! +1
|
|
|
|
Ownski
|
|
July 01, 2014, 02:59:25 PM |
|
I honestly don't understand why we are already talking about making another coin when we still haven't fixed the website and updated the wallet I think we are getting ahead of ourselves here.
|
Money is the oldest magic trick in the book.
|
|
|
Troubled
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:05:24 PM |
|
I honestly don't understand why we are already talking about making another coin when we still haven't fixed the website and updated the wallet I think we are getting ahead of ourselves here. All you do is complain and make WC look bad!!! Go find another coin with whitenotright since your probably best friends!!!
|
|
|
|
gerdab
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:05:37 PM |
|
initial idea: woc <==> wc <==> btc so we can make more wc volume exchange but if i have woc why i'll exchange it to wc, i ll exchange it to BTC directly. result: woc birth = wc death.
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:09:56 PM |
|
I honestly don't understand why we are already talking about making another coin when we still haven't fixed the website and updated the wallet I think we are getting ahead of ourselves here. I don't believe any of the websites are broke I kid, I kid... But seriously, Whitecoin.info is almost done. I got a sneak peak of the unfinished product and I'm excited to see it rolled out. As for the wallet... here's the site that shows the progress on the translations. Soooo many are soooo close to being done too! I think the wallet can be released and then the language files be made available, i'm not positive though. https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/whitecoin/
|
|
|
|
Troubled
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:11:54 PM |
|
initial idea: woc <==> wc <==> btc so we can make more wc volume exchange but if i have woc why i'll exchange it to wc, i ll exchange it to BTC directly. result: woc birth = wc death.
If you sell WOC to BTC after start this doesn't effect WC at all!!! Actually protects WC!!!!!
|
|
|
|
mogonzo
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:19:51 PM |
|
Hi Everyone, I gotta say I'm loving the passions that are coming out here, but I really do encourage everyone to keep this discourse civil. Whether or not WOC becomes a reality is of course still up for discussion, but I think it's clear that our community has been delivering some great results, putting in hard work, and is poised to offer some very innovative services. I'm heading out for Canada Day festivities now, but tomorrow is another big day for us. I didn't want to send out any press releases before the end of the holiday, but tomorrow we announce our existence to over 200 Canadian reporters directly. Shortly after that, we directly take on the harper government for their incredibly irresponsible stance on bitcoin via bill c-31. Happy Canada Day, eh!
|
|
|
|
WhiteNotWright
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:25:05 PM |
|
I honestly don't understand why we are already talking about making another coin when we still haven't fixed the website and updated the wallet I think we are getting ahead of ourselves here. All you do is complain and make WC look bad!!! Go find another coin with whitenotright since your probably best friends!!! Dude seriously. Whitecoin looks bad not because of anything I say, rather the lack of any meaningful innovations to the exiting coin. Answer is to spin up another crap alt to add to the 200+ collection. The fact this conversation about WOC is still going on is signal enough for me.
|
|
|
|
Ownski
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:26:09 PM |
|
I honestly don't understand why we are already talking about making another coin when we still haven't fixed the website and updated the wallet I think we are getting ahead of ourselves here. I don't believe any of the websites are broke I kid, I kid... But seriously, Whitecoin.info is almost done. I got a sneak peak of the unfinished product and I'm excited to see it rolled out. As for the wallet... here's the site that shows the progress on the translations. Soooo many are soooo close to being done too! I think the wallet can be released and then the language files be made available, i'm not positive though. https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/whitecoin/+1 Thats awesome! Can't wait to see it
|
Money is the oldest magic trick in the book.
|
|
|
Troubled
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:27:27 PM |
|
I honestly don't understand why we are already talking about making another coin when we still haven't fixed the website and updated the wallet I think we are getting ahead of ourselves here. All you do is complain and make WC look bad!!! Go find another coin with whitenotright since your probably best friends!!! Dude seriously. Whitecoin looks bad not because of anything I say, rather the lack of any meaningful innovations to the exiting coin. Answer is to spin up another crap alt to add to the 200+ collection. The fact this conversation about WOC is still going on is signal enough for me. Is this ownski revealed!?!?!?!?! WOULD SURE MAKE SENSE!!!!!!! Don't let the door hit you on the way out!!!!
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:31:56 PM |
|
Hi Everyone, I gotta say I'm loving the passions that are coming out here, but I really do encourage everyone to keep this discourse civil. Whether or not WOC becomes a reality is of course still up for discussion, but I think it's clear that our community has been delivering some great results, putting in hard work, and is poised to offer some very innovative services. I'm heading out for Canada Day festivities now, but tomorrow is another big day for us. I didn't want to send out any press releases before the end of the holiday, but tomorrow we announce our existence to over 200 Canadian reporters directly. Shortly after that, we directly take on the harper government for their incredibly irresponsible stance on bitcoin via bill c-31. Happy Canada Day, eh! You have an awesome day Mogonzo eh?!
|
|
|
|
delphs
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:40:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
|
July 01, 2014, 03:46:18 PM |
|
Haha, i must have missed that commercial. Good one!
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
|
July 01, 2014, 04:13:29 PM |
|
should be about PRIVACY and not ANON (overused and overhyped buzzword which has a negative stigma attached to it - from a serious business viewpoint - such as being used by criminals for illegal activities) if privacy option (whiteout) can be implemented without compromising security then it should be a feature of WC but if it cannot be implemented without compromising security then keep it separate from main coin if a separate WOC is used, how about some of these ideas: instead of forcing people to buy WOC with WC - reward people who buy AND keep WC (idea is to keep WC healthy and valued by tying WOC directly to WC instead of creating another competing coin): WOC distribution could be one time scheduled event (for example 1 month after a new wallet client version is released which supports WOC unlocking) 1. buy WC 2. transfer WC to wallet 3. "unlocks" ability to get WOC at specified date 4. WC has to be in a wallet (either local, or even exchange if its possible to work that out with them) 5. unlock event - calculates WOC amount from actual WC held in the wallet at the time of unlocking (at a rate of 1 WOC for 100 WC) 6. either add the ability to send unlocked WOC directly from WC wallet to a WOC wallet or create a redeemable code which can be either imported to WOC wallet or used to request WOC through WCF website (automated form: input redeemable code, target WOC address) or it could be implemented like bonus-stake-mining in addition to WC stake also calculate WOC bonus so people who buy AND keep WC will be rewarded with WOC additional bonus could include age of held WC, longer people keep WC in their wallets, they get better WOC bonus: 1 month age = 1 WOC for every 100 WC each additional month adds 10% to bonus 2 months = 2.2 WOC instead of 2 WOC (10% bonus) 3 months = 3.6 WOC instead of 3 WOC (20% bonus) etc 11 months = 22 WOC instead of 11 WOC (100% bonus) Thats a unique idea. I kinda like the idea of current WC holders getting a portion delivered in the wallet. I think it should account for a small to medium portion of the overall distribution though.
|
|
|
|
WhiteNotWright
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
|
|
July 01, 2014, 04:19:48 PM |
|
should be about PRIVACY and not ANON (overused and overhyped buzzword which has a negative stigma attached to it - from a serious business viewpoint - such as being used by criminals for illegal activities) if privacy option (whiteout) can be implemented without compromising security then it should be a feature of WC but if it cannot be implemented without compromising security then keep it separate from main coin if a separate WOC is used, how about some of these ideas: instead of forcing people to buy WOC with WC - reward people who buy AND keep WC (idea is to keep WC healthy and valued by tying WOC directly to WC instead of creating another competing coin): WOC distribution could be one time scheduled event (for example 1 month after a new wallet client version is released which supports WOC unlocking) 1. buy WC 2. transfer WC to wallet 3. "unlocks" ability to get WOC at specified date 4. WC has to be in a wallet (either local, or even exchange if its possible to work that out with them) 5. unlock event - calculates WOC amount from actual WC held in the wallet at the time of unlocking (at a rate of 1 WOC for 100 WC) 6. either add the ability to send unlocked WOC directly from WC wallet to a WOC wallet or create a redeemable code which can be either imported to WOC wallet or used to request WOC through WCF website (automated form: input redeemable code, target WOC address) or it could be implemented like bonus-stake-mining in addition to WC stake also calculate WOC bonus so people who buy AND keep WC will be rewarded with WOC additional bonus could include age of held WC, longer people keep WC in their wallets, they get better WOC bonus: 1 month age = 1 WOC for every 100 WC each additional month adds 10% to bonus 2 months = 2.2 WOC instead of 2 WOC (10% bonus) 3 months = 3.6 WOC instead of 3 WOC (20% bonus) etc 11 months = 22 WOC instead of 11 WOC (100% bonus) Thats a unique idea. I kinda like the idea of current WC holders getting a portion delivered in the wallet. I think it should account for a small to medium portion of the overall distribution though. You are seriously adding merit to my statement of what the WCF is trying to do with the WC. Buy continuing the discussion on WOC and how you are giving only a portion the the WC value to the new coin, thereby diluting the current investment in favor of trying to push out another ALT so you can offer miners more work. Classic manipulation and with that, a healthy exit of not only me, but anyone with half a brain to see what you folks are planning. Push that button, go ahead. I am not fooled and trust me when I say, my exit will be felt.
|
|
|
|
|