Bitcoin Forum
April 21, 2018, 10:06:10 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 [1861] 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 ... 1944 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency  (Read 4232811 times)
uslfd
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 09:58:27 PM
 #37201

those who believe in monero, what do you think about the onion?  Huh ^^

It's garbage that has nothing more going for it other than shills pushing it, kind of like are doing here. Not to mention the paid sig campain that they are calling an airdrop. It is nothing but one big lie and as long as you scumsuckers get paid to shill it it will continue to drag idiot n00bs into it.

So if it is a big lie how it is possible that I am getting over 1000USD weekly just for the Signature?


Simple. That is obviously a lie also.

it is not a lie.
You get every week an airdrop, Arround 7% of your Holding. All the Holdings are getting for free during the airdrops between week 1 and 18 and now its arround 1000USD weekly before it was arround 600USD weekly.

Better read first before you tell Bullshit.

Edit:

Here you see the weekly Reports,

last time over 410 USers took part on the Airdrop.

https://deeponion.org/report.php?date=2017-11-17

And you see its real
Yes, onion is so much better than Monero. Why don't you fuck off to their thread and tell them that?
Give a man some coins he'll spam for a day, teach a man to fork coins he'll fork them all day long.

Wow it seems I was in right with ONIONS. It is raising fast as hell

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/deeponion/


coz it's got layers ! LAYERS I tell you! Warning: peeling back might make you cry...  

$ONIONs are steadily growing and getting more attention..
I value privacy and look for projects with a great potential, hence I am currently keeping my eye on Monero, DeepOnion.

Please could we mainly focus on MONERO here?
I agree deeponion may have huge potential but still

▌▌   Anonymous and Untraceable     ›› ››   DeepOnion  ‹‹ ‹‹     TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED    ▌▌
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬     ANN  Whitepaper  FACEBOOK  Twitter  Youtube  Forum     ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▌▌   ••  JOIN AIRDROP 🚀  ••  |||   Download DeepOnion   |||   ✅ Verified with DeepVault    ▌▌
1524305170
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524305170

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524305170
Reply with quote  #2

1524305170
Report to moderator
1524305170
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524305170

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524305170
Reply with quote  #2

1524305170
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1524305170
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524305170

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524305170
Reply with quote  #2

1524305170
Report to moderator
1524305170
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524305170

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524305170
Reply with quote  #2

1524305170
Report to moderator
1524305170
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524305170

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524305170
Reply with quote  #2

1524305170
Report to moderator
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1048



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:02:40 PM
 #37202

Please could we mainly focus on MONERO here?
I know all of you, the ONIONers have to make XX amount of posts every week to meet your sales target - but please - spare us this tiring sales pitch of your lovely coin - keep it to yourself.

If you are going to bump one of them please at least don't bump a whole wall of text of garbage as well.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Millionero
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 358
Merit: 263


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:12:40 PM
 #37203

You know I think we should talk about the community being open to changes to the cryptographic hashing algorithm. It's not cryptonight specifically that we are wedded to but the opposition to application specific hardware in mining.

How do you guys feel about a hard fork away from cryptonight and into something different if A) a good new hashing algorithm presents its self and B) asics begin to be deployed at scale for mining cryptonight based cryptocurrencies? The advantages are twofold. One, we will be building community consensus around the idea that the hashing algorithm is a flexible thing and so avoid being forced to face the prospect of a bitcoin cash type situation. But also the acknowledgement of this consensus within our community will help to discourage the development of cryptonight hashing ASICS.

Thoughts?
I think I read a Monero update or something that said the devs are investigating that.
phishead
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 738
Merit: 509


Keep what's important, and know who's your friend


View Profile WWW
December 05, 2017, 10:26:36 PM
 #37204

You know I think we should talk about the community being open to changes to the cryptographic hashing algorithm. It's not cryptonight specifically that we are wedded to but the opposition to application specific hardware in mining.

How do you guys feel about a hard fork away from cryptonight and into something different if A) a good new hashing algorithm presents its self and B) asics begin to be deployed at scale for mining cryptonight based cryptocurrencies? The advantages are twofold. One, we will be building community consensus around the idea that the hashing algorithm is a flexible thing and so avoid being forced to face the prospect of a bitcoin cash type situation. But also the acknowledgement of this consensus within our community will help to discourage the development of cryptonight hashing ASICS.

Thoughts?
I think I read a Monero update or something that said the devs are investigating that.

I’m pretty sure Surae and the MRL gang is on the case. I remember at the NY meetup him basically talking about (I’m paraphrasing here) how he inherently doesn’t trust the algorithm because it was created by the bytecoin devs.

aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1019


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:48:16 PM
 #37205

Fees are becoming onerous again.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1111



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:53:28 PM
 #37206

You know I think we should talk about the community being open to changes to the cryptographic hashing algorithm. It's not cryptonight specifically that we are wedded to but the opposition to application specific hardware in mining.

How do you guys feel about a hard fork away from cryptonight and into something different if A) a good new hashing algorithm presents its self and B) asics begin to be deployed at scale for mining cryptonight based cryptocurrencies? The advantages are twofold. One, we will be building community consensus around the idea that the hashing algorithm is a flexible thing and so avoid being forced to face the prospect of a bitcoin cash type situation. But also the acknowledgement of this consensus within our community will help to discourage the development of cryptonight hashing ASICS.

Thoughts?

Ready to fork off as required.  I'm here for the Monero Project, not cryptonight.  The Team has done an outstanding job thus far, proving themselves to be the best in the field, attracting more of the same to the snowball.  When they say it's time to upgrade, we upgrade.  I expect there will be minimal fuss (from those not developing ASICs)
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1111



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 10:59:28 PM
 #37207

Fees are becoming onerous again.

There may be a few uncomfortable months as price rockets, until all the fancy tx size reducing code is thoroughly reviewed.  Then an axe will be taken to the fees with the next hardfork.  I love how fast the team has dug in to test and implement improvements.  Only in Monero.   Would have been nice to precede Coralreef, but I certainly can't complain about speed of development (anymore).  Rock On, Monero!
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1048



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 11:19:18 PM
 #37208

Fees are becoming onerous again.

until all the fancy tx size reducing code is thoroughly reviewed.  Then an axe will be taken to the fees with the next hardfork.

Are you speaking of mimblewimble?

Ready to fork off as required.  I'm here for the Monero Project, not cryptonight.  The Team has done an outstanding job thus far, proving themselves to be the best in the field, attracting more of the same to the snowball.  When they say it's time to upgrade, we upgrade.  I expect there will be minimal fuss (from those not developing ASICs)

Good good. This is just the sort of sentiment that will make it worth nobodies time to ever even try to produce cryptonight asics.

I think I read a Monero update or something that said the devs are investigating that.

I’m pretty sure Surae and the MRL gang is on the case. I remember at the NY meetup him basically talking about (I’m paraphrasing here) how he inherently doesn’t trust the algorithm because it was created by the bytecoin devs.

Awesome. Good to know.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
MoneroCrusher
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 05, 2017, 11:34:57 PM
 #37209

what timeline are we looking at for changing mining algo?
let me break even first, please...

INTENSE COIN  (https://intensecoin.com/) ★ BLOCKCHAIN BACKED P2P VPN ★ Whitepaper (https://intensecoin.com/whitepaper.pdf)
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1111



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 11:53:09 PM
 #37210

Fees are becoming onerous again.

until all the fancy tx size reducing code is thoroughly reviewed.  Then an axe will be taken to the fees with the next hardfork.

Are you speaking of mimblewimble?



Bullet Proofs, and other tasty treats. Reducing Tx size by an order of magnitude will confer the same on Tx cost.
 I love how all this stuff is proposed for bitcoin, and the Team says, Oh good, we can use that!  While everyone else sits on their thumbs, or waves their hands.  Or one of each, IDFK.
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1111



View Profile
December 05, 2017, 11:55:45 PM
 #37211

what timeline are we looking at for changing mining algo?
let me break even first, please...

Shouldn't make much difference for the miner or end user.  Upgrade software, and carry on as if you were normal.  Unless ASICs had already made inroads, in which case CPU/GPU miners would get a boost as the hash rate drops instantly.
MoneroCrusher
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 12:06:12 AM
 #37212

what timeline are we looking at for changing mining algo?
let me break even first, please...

Shouldn't make much difference for the miner or end user.  Upgrade software, and carry on as if you were normal.  Unless ASICs had already made inroads, in which case CPU/GPU miners would get a boost as the hash rate drops instantly.
is there any reason to believe that there are already ASICs hashing away cryptonote?
about timeline, is this only an idea right now or is it planned already?

INTENSE COIN  (https://intensecoin.com/) ★ BLOCKCHAIN BACKED P2P VPN ★ Whitepaper (https://intensecoin.com/whitepaper.pdf)
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1111



View Profile
December 06, 2017, 12:13:45 AM
 #37213

what timeline are we looking at for changing mining algo?
let me break even first, please...

Shouldn't make much difference for the miner or end user.  Upgrade software, and carry on as if you were normal.  Unless ASICs had already made inroads, in which case CPU/GPU miners would get a boost as the hash rate drops instantly.
is there any reason to believe that there are already ASICs hashing away cryptonote?
about timeline, is this only an idea right now or is it planned already?

If there are, they are running at a loss.  They are not cheap to develop/produce, so there needs to be a strong case for increased hashing speed/scale to be profitable.  Network rate would show any such increase, and existing miners would be bitching left and right about how it's no longer profitable to mine Monero.  So far, so good.
MoneroCrusher
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 12:19:57 AM
 #37214

what timeline are we looking at for changing mining algo?
let me break even first, please...

Shouldn't make much difference for the miner or end user.  Upgrade software, and carry on as if you were normal.  Unless ASICs had already made inroads, in which case CPU/GPU miners would get a boost as the hash rate drops instantly.
is there any reason to believe that there are already ASICs hashing away cryptonote?
about timeline, is this only an idea right now or is it planned already?

If there are, they are running at a loss.  They are not cheap to develop/produce, so there needs to be a strong case for increased hashing speed/scale to be profitable.  Network rate would show any such increase, and existing miners would be bitching left and right about how it's no longer profitable to mine Monero.  So far, so good.
maybe it would still be a good idea to change PoW (not affecting GPU and CPU mining) just to scare away people even thinking about developping an ASIC. I'm pretty sure there will be one in developtment, if it isnt already stealthily hashing away..
do you know if there are any specific plans already in dev team to do that?

INTENSE COIN  (https://intensecoin.com/) ★ BLOCKCHAIN BACKED P2P VPN ★ Whitepaper (https://intensecoin.com/whitepaper.pdf)
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1111



View Profile
December 06, 2017, 12:29:52 AM
 #37215

what timeline are we looking at for changing mining algo?
let me break even first, please...

Shouldn't make much difference for the miner or end user.  Upgrade software, and carry on as if you were normal.  Unless ASICs had already made inroads, in which case CPU/GPU miners would get a boost as the hash rate drops instantly.
is there any reason to believe that there are already ASICs hashing away cryptonote?
about timeline, is this only an idea right now or is it planned already?

If there are, they are running at a loss.  They are not cheap to develop/produce, so there needs to be a strong case for increased hashing speed/scale to be profitable.  Network rate would show any such increase, and existing miners would be bitching left and right about how it's no longer profitable to mine Monero.  So far, so good.
maybe it would still be a good idea to change PoW (not affecting GPU and CPU mining) just to scare away people even thinking about developping an ASIC. I'm pretty sure there will be one in developtment, if it isnt already stealthily hashing away..
do you know if there are any specific plans already in dev team to do that?

Cryptonight is specifically ASIC resistant.  Meaning current ASIC's technology can't do much better than CPU/GPU.  SHOULD that change in future, changes will be made to defeat them.  Yes, it is already being investigated.  Just read a few posts above.
jimhuang
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 06, 2017, 01:12:00 AM
 #37216

what happen to xmr ,it's already double those days
getmoremoney343
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 01:24:45 AM
 #37217

How many thread do this coin need?
Millionero
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 358
Merit: 263


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 01:29:55 AM
 #37218

While everyone else sits on their thumbs, or waves their hands.  Or one of each, IDFK.
Or they sit on their thumbs and wave their hands simultaneously, thus inserting thumbs where the sun don't shine.
Also, there's twiddling.  You didn't mention that.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1026


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
December 06, 2017, 02:13:07 AM
 #37219

You know I think we should talk about the community being open to changes to the cryptographic hashing algorithm. It's not cryptonight specifically that we are wedded to but the opposition to application specific hardware in mining.

How do you guys feel about a hard fork away from cryptonight and into something different if A) a good new hashing algorithm presents its self and B) asics begin to be deployed at scale for mining cryptonight based cryptocurrencies? The advantages are twofold. One, we will be building community consensus around the idea that the hashing algorithm is a flexible thing and so avoid being forced to face the prospect of a bitcoin cash type situation. But also the acknowledgement of this consensus within our community will help to discourage the development of cryptonight hashing ASICS.

Thoughts?

Well eventually we are going to have to goto a quantum resistant POW (or POW replacement?)  But I'm not seeing any reason to rush ATM, not as long as we remain ASIC resistant. That also begs the question how do we know when there is an asic? We blame alot of hash on botnets but we cannot verify it's not asic afaik. Also as I stated years ago we should not change until there is a asic because that will show those that develop i that they wasted their time and effort. We should have a backup just in case though ready to go.

I'd also like to see a paper I can comprehend on ZK-Starks but thats another discussion and hopefully NobleSir will write something for us plebs after he digests it. Lol

BITSLER                 ▄███
               ▄████▀
             ▄████▀
           ▄████▀  ▄██▄
         ▄████▀    ▀████▄
       ▄████▀        ▀████▄
     ▄████▀            ▀████▄
   ▄████▀                ▀████▄
 ▄████▀ ▄████▄      ▄████▄ ▀████▄
█████   ██████      ██████   █████
 ▀████▄ ▀████▀      ▀████▀ ▄████▀
   ▀████▄                ▄████▀
     ▀████▄            ▄████▀
       ▀████▄        ▄████▀
         ▀████▄    ▄████▀
           ▀████▄▄████▀
             ▀██████▀
               ▀▀▀▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄            
▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀    ▄▄█▄▄ ▀▀▄         
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄      
█  ▀▄▄  ▀█▀▀ ▄      ▀████   ▀▀▄   
█ █▄  ▀▄   ▀████       ▀▀ ▄██▄ ▀▀▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
█  ▀▀       ▀▄▄ ▀████      ▄▄▄▀▀▀  █
█            ▄ ▀▄    ▄▄▄▀▀▀   ▄▄  █
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
█ ▄▄   ███   ▀██  █           ▀▀  █ 
█ ███  ▀██       █        ▄▄      █ 
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  
▀▄            █        ▀▀      █  
▀▀▄   ███▄  █   ▄▄          █   
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀    
▀▀▄   █   ▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀         
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▀▀▀▀              
              ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
          ▄▄████████████████▄▄
        ▄██████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄
▄     ▄█████▀             ▀█████▄
██▄▄ █████▀                ▀█████
 ████████            ▄██      █████
  ████████▄         ███▀       ████▄
  █████████▀▀     ▄███▀        █████
   █▀▀▀          █████         █████
     ▄▄▄         ████          █████
   █████          ▀▀           ████▀
    █████                     █████
     █████▄                 ▄█████
      ▀█████▄             ▄█████▀
        ▀██████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀
          ▀▀████████████████▀▀
              ▀▀▀██████▀▀▀
            ▄▄▄███████▄▄▄
         ▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀▀▀█▄
       █▀▀ ▄█████████████▄ ▀▀█
     █▀▀ ███████████████████ ▀▀█
    █▀ ███████████████████████ ▀█
   █▀ ███████████████▀▀ ███████ ▀█
 ▄█▀ ██████████████▀      ▀█████ ▀█▄
███ ███████████▀▀            ▀▀██ ███
███ ███████▀▀                     ███
███ ▀▀▀▀                          ███
▀██▄                             ▄██▀
  ▀█▄                            ▀▀
    █▄       █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█
     █▄      ▀█████████▀
      ▀█▄      ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
        ▀▀█▄▄  ▄▄▄
            ▀▀█████
[]
Anon136
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1048



View Profile
December 06, 2017, 02:15:56 AM
 #37220

Fees are becoming onerous again.

until all the fancy tx size reducing code is thoroughly reviewed.  Then an axe will be taken to the fees with the next hardfork.

Are you speaking of mimblewimble?



Bullet Proofs, and other tasty treats. Reducing Tx size by an order of magnitude will confer the same on Tx cost.
 I love how all this stuff is proposed for bitcoin, and the Team says, Oh good, we can use that!  While everyone else sits on their thumbs, or waves their hands.  Or one of each, IDFK.

IKR? I heard FP talking about mimblewimble so I went and did a little research on it. Turns out the thing that is preventing them from implementing it on bitcoin (besides endless governance problems) is that you cant do any sort of on chain scripting with it. But monero doesn't try to be anything other than a currency so its a perfect fit. My crypto investment strategy has been to focus on projects that may be able to address the shortcomings of bitcoin. Namely the lack of scalability, fungibility and privacy. I took a big position in monero because it deals with the latter two but its starting to look like it might also be one of the best bets for scalability too!

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Pages: « 1 ... 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 [1861] 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 ... 1944 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!