Aurum
|
|
June 01, 2014, 05:03:32 AM |
|
How does one get paid to mine CURE I've got a team set up at FAH with about 270,000 points.
|
ghghghfgh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
pastet89
|
|
June 01, 2014, 06:23:05 AM |
|
Any idea of estimated profit from the gpu folding. I don't mind helping but I need to at least break even.
Steve
1 7950 = 110k PPD = 3.67 Curecoins a day = $1.84/day = don't know what GPUs or profitability you have so I can't give you better numbers. This is ridicoulus. What am I doing wrong then? I am averaging 8 coins per day with 5 x R9 270, or this makes 1.6 coin per card!! I need more info than this - what numbers are you getting in PPD for each of those 270s. Between 50k and 60k. Rather 60k. 7950 > R9 270 I'm getting 88000 PPD for 2 x 7790 with 14.6 drivers. Don't think that You're off track. Thank you. 7950 makes 650 khs while r9 270 makes 475. This is a rough 50% difference so if you make 88K PPD this is OK. However, I am still thinking that both of us might off track, because someone else with 7950 stated he was making 110K PPD.
|
Cryptostats.es
|
|
|
cameronpalte
|
|
June 01, 2014, 06:38:17 AM |
|
Any idea of estimated profit from the gpu folding. I don't mind helping but I need to at least break even.
Steve
1 7950 = 110k PPD = 3.67 Curecoins a day = $1.84/day = don't know what GPUs or profitability you have so I can't give you better numbers. This is ridicoulus. What am I doing wrong then? I am averaging 8 coins per day with 5 x R9 270, or this makes 1.6 coin per card!! I need more info than this - what numbers are you getting in PPD for each of those 270s. Between 50k and 60k. Rather 60k. 7950 > R9 270 I'm getting 88000 PPD for 2 x 7790 with 14.6 drivers. Don't think that You're off track. Thank you. 7950 makes 650 khs while r9 270 makes 475. This is a rough 50% difference so if you make 88K PPD this is OK. However, I am still thinking that both of us might off track, because someone else with 7950 stated he was making 110K PPD. That was probably me - my 7950 runs stably between 100k PPD and 120k PPD. It was at 130k PPD earlier but too many failed work units. However, keep in mind that the difference for scrypt mining won't be the same for folding because their are additional factors. If I could afford it I would get my hands on a 270 to do more testing but as of now 60 each is decent. Especially with 5 I would guess their are some heating issues that lead to some downclocking versus my 1 card. You could try going to the official folding forums to see if they have any advice.
|
|
|
|
r3animation
|
|
June 01, 2014, 06:44:25 AM |
|
Any idea of estimated profit from the gpu folding. I don't mind helping but I need to at least break even.
Steve
1 7950 = 110k PPD = 3.67 Curecoins a day = $1.84/day = don't know what GPUs or profitability you have so I can't give you better numbers. This is ridicoulus. What am I doing wrong then? I am averaging 8 coins per day with 5 x R9 270, or this makes 1.6 coin per card!! I need more info than this - what numbers are you getting in PPD for each of those 270s. Between 50k and 60k. Rather 60k. 7950 > R9 270 I'm getting 88000 PPD for 2 x 7790 with 14.6 drivers. Don't think that You're off track. Thank you. 7950 makes 650 khs while r9 270 makes 475. This is a rough 50% difference so if you make 88K PPD this is OK. However, I am still thinking that both of us might off track, because someone else with 7950 stated he was making 110K PPD. With a 280x I'm making about 110k-120k PPD.
|
|
|
|
|
mistersushi
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 01, 2014, 07:36:41 AM |
|
Still interested in hear what the developers will do for promotion.
So would I!
|
|
|
|
boubou
|
|
June 01, 2014, 08:52:37 AM |
|
Still nothing on the folding pool after 24h. No way to check if both the folding account are well linked?
Check to see if you are getting points according to Stanford's folding website. If they show you as having points wait another 24 hours and if the pool doesn't show anything then they are misslinked - are your usernames the same for both (case matters)? I have 65,183 points on Stanford Folding website. On both the pool and Stanford webstie, it seems that I have the same name. It seems that the Stanford website do not matter about case, may be only the pool does? I first crate an account with Boudje on Stanford website, then another one with boudje, and on the new one I still see some stats of the former one. On the pool the account is boudje, like the second on I create (30h ago). The user ID on the pool is not the name of the account on the Stanford website, only the name of the account should match? The username of the pool should match your username that you are folding with and case does matter i.e. cameron and Cameron wouldn't be the same. If you are seeing points with Stanford's Folding Website and have the same user than your points will appear on cryptobullionpools within 36 hours from now. Thanks for your answer. The points should have appeared, I oppened a ticket on the pool website. By the way, My 2 R9 290 gave me: 90K and 10K ppd...way to low and a tweaking guide would be great. PS: what should we do when a work is stucked at 99.99%?
|
BEHNZiP6UZunp41vurNaQi4r2hvgG57yzi : BdG
|
|
|
pastet89
|
|
June 01, 2014, 09:12:46 AM |
|
Still nothing on the folding pool after 24h. No way to check if both the folding account are well linked?
Check to see if you are getting points according to Stanford's folding website. If they show you as having points wait another 24 hours and if the pool doesn't show anything then they are misslinked - are your usernames the same for both (case matters)? I have 65,183 points on Stanford Folding website. On both the pool and Stanford webstie, it seems that I have the same name. It seems that the Stanford website do not matter about case, may be only the pool does? I first crate an account with Boudje on Stanford website, then another one with boudje, and on the new one I still see some stats of the former one. On the pool the account is boudje, like the second on I create (30h ago). The user ID on the pool is not the name of the account on the Stanford website, only the name of the account should match? The username of the pool should match your username that you are folding with and case does matter i.e. cameron and Cameron wouldn't be the same. If you are seeing points with Stanford's Folding Website and have the same user than your points will appear on cryptobullionpools within 36 hours from now. Thanks for your answer. The points should have appeared, I oppened a ticket on the pool website. By the way, My 2 R9 290 gave me: 90K and 10K ppd...way to low and a tweaking guide would be great. PS: what should we do when a work is stucked at 99.99%? Pause and restart.
|
Cryptostats.es
|
|
|
pastet89
|
|
June 01, 2014, 09:13:36 AM |
|
Any idea of estimated profit from the gpu folding. I don't mind helping but I need to at least break even.
Steve
1 7950 = 110k PPD = 3.67 Curecoins a day = $1.84/day = don't know what GPUs or profitability you have so I can't give you better numbers. This is ridicoulus. What am I doing wrong then? I am averaging 8 coins per day with 5 x R9 270, or this makes 1.6 coin per card!! I need more info than this - what numbers are you getting in PPD for each of those 270s. Between 50k and 60k. Rather 60k. 7950 > R9 270 I'm getting 88000 PPD for 2 x 7790 with 14.6 drivers. Don't think that You're off track. Thank you. 7950 makes 650 khs while r9 270 makes 475. This is a rough 50% difference so if you make 88K PPD this is OK. However, I am still thinking that both of us might off track, because someone else with 7950 stated he was making 110K PPD. That was probably me - my 7950 runs stably between 100k PPD and 120k PPD. It was at 130k PPD earlier but too many failed work units. However, keep in mind that the difference for scrypt mining won't be the same for folding because their are additional factors. If I could afford it I would get my hands on a 270 to do more testing but as of now 60 each is decent. Especially with 5 I would guess their are some heating issues that lead to some downclocking versus my 1 card. You could try going to the official folding forums to see if they have any advice. Well, it is still strange then as the other guy with 7950 is getting only 80K. Are you using an Intel CPU? Mine is AMD.
|
Cryptostats.es
|
|
|
WilderX
|
|
June 01, 2014, 09:23:53 AM |
|
See360 - Rx in the lead... most horrible logo IMO. Must be the haters voting for that and want to see curecoin gone.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
June 01, 2014, 09:35:10 AM |
|
See360 - Rx in the lead... most horrible logo IMO. Must be the haters voting for that and want to see curecoin gone. That rx styling is trademarked by rehab
|
|
|
|
chup
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
|
June 01, 2014, 11:34:38 AM |
|
Any idea of estimated profit from the gpu folding. I don't mind helping but I need to at least break even.
Steve
1 7950 = 110k PPD = 3.67 Curecoins a day = $1.84/day = don't know what GPUs or profitability you have so I can't give you better numbers. This is ridicoulus. What am I doing wrong then? I am averaging 8 coins per day with 5 x R9 270, or this makes 1.6 coin per card!! I need more info than this - what numbers are you getting in PPD for each of those 270s. Between 50k and 60k. Rather 60k. 7950 > R9 270 I'm getting 88000 PPD for 2 x 7790 with 14.6 drivers. Don't think that You're off track. Thank you. 7950 makes 650 khs while r9 270 makes 475. This is a rough 50% difference so if you make 88K PPD this is OK. However, I am still thinking that both of us might off track, because someone else with 7950 stated he was making 110K PPD. That was probably me - my 7950 runs stably between 100k PPD and 120k PPD. It was at 130k PPD earlier but too many failed work units. However, keep in mind that the difference for scrypt mining won't be the same for folding because their are additional factors. If I could afford it I would get my hands on a 270 to do more testing but as of now 60 each is decent. Especially with 5 I would guess their are some heating issues that lead to some downclocking versus my 1 card. You could try going to the official folding forums to see if they have any advice. Well, it is still strange then as the other guy with 7950 is getting only 80K. Are you using an Intel CPU? Mine is AMD. I did not mention my 7950 but two 7790. Indeed my 7950 is stable at 91-96K PPD with 14.4 drivers and no overclock. Actually it is also rock stable at core on 975 MHz so I can't explain why I'm on factory 925. Maybe because of too many people asking what to do when stucked on 99,99%?
|
|
|
|
|
LasersHurt
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
June 01, 2014, 12:09:42 PM |
|
See360 - Rx in the lead... most horrible logo IMO. Must be the haters voting for that and want to see curecoin gone. That rx styling is trademarked by rehab It's worth noting that whatever wins, we'll do some due-diligence to make sure there are no issues with copyright/trademark/etc. The user-selected winner isn't necessarily guaranteed if there's a problem with using it. Not super likely, but worth noting.
|
|
|
|
primeGPU
|
|
June 01, 2014, 12:21:47 PM Last edit: June 01, 2014, 12:34:50 PM by primeGPU |
|
See360 - Rx in the lead... most horrible logo IMO. Must be the haters voting for that and want to see curecoin gone. That rx styling is trademarked by rehab It's worth noting that whatever wins, we'll do some due-diligence to make sure there are no issues with copyright/trademark/etc. The user-selected winner isn't necessarily guaranteed if there's a problem with using it. Not super likely, but worth noting. Anonymous voting was a bad idea. mmihail - "Silver Caduceus" design had ~15% an hour ago. Right now it has 33%. How about re-voting on another platform. e.g. right here in the thread? FWIW, I voted for "See360 - Rx". EDIT: Spent 10 minutes to prove my point and voted the ugliest design (DNA Man) into into first place.
|
|
|
|
Aboy68
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
June 01, 2014, 12:54:53 PM |
|
Input to DEV team:
HOT feature: I find this to be really hot feature to a coin: anonymous functions/transactions. Its the beginning of a new trend with cross-blockchain transaction anonymity. That are a reason for people to trade with curecoin if we have this feature.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
22naru
|
|
June 01, 2014, 01:20:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
boubou
|
|
June 01, 2014, 01:36:42 PM |
|
The fact that I still did not got any coins appearing on the pool after 2 days started to bother me a little. No answer to my tickets on the pool either (even if they probaly did not work on sunday)
|
BEHNZiP6UZunp41vurNaQi4r2hvgG57yzi : BdG
|
|
|
D3V0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 01, 2014, 02:49:35 PM |
|
The fact that I still did not got any coins appearing on the pool after 2 days started to bother me a little. No answer to my tickets on the pool either (even if they probaly did not work on sunday)
Which pool? The folding pool generally takes 48 hours to catch up to start with. And then after that updates once every 24 hours. Make sure your folding name on F@H and your pool name are identical or your points will get lost. Edit: And yes, I and everyone else would love it if they WOULD UPDATE THE POOL INFO to reflect this.
|
|
|
|
|