|
lovecoin99
|
 |
May 15, 2014, 06:21:52 AM |
|
ok, dev has done a lot work, i'm in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
sumgye
|
|
May 15, 2014, 06:25:04 AM |
|
I was wondering if anyone's considered hitting this thing from the third angle. We've got GPU's hitting the folding pretty hard. We've got SHA256 ASIC's hitting the mining end pretty hard. What about a multipool so the SCRYPT ASIC's can hit the value end of things? Then all mining hardware could be used to develop and support CureCoin. Just a thought.
We have nothing useful for scrypt asics to do and it would effectively require a hard fork for nothing. Asics secure network GPUs fold Scrypt Asics would be worse at securing the network especially because their are a lot less. Scrypt Asics can't fold. No no, scrypt asics could mine at a MultiPool, like BlackCoin's or CinniCoin's multipool. Basically they would mine Scrypt Based altcoins, and the multipool would automatically trade them for CureCoins. It's a proven technique that allows Scrypt miners to apply buy pressure to coins that are otherwise unobtainable for them. It wouldn't require any change to the wallet or network. The Scrypt Miners literally just buy coins in exchange for their hashpower. Buy pressure created by these pools is almost none.... I think BCpool last time I looks was creating 7BTC of buy pressure... That is nothing. Those multipools are basically hype machines for people that do not do the math. Sounds like it would work though. Totally agree. First of all these pools are always associated with sh*tcoins that are desperately looking to create some hype/ fake demand. Copying an idea for the tenth time just doesnt work anyway. You need to be ahead of the curve just like this coin is to create some value  Can anyone elaborate on a few technical aspects of the coin ? # If there is no hard cap for the coins how was the 5% premine done ? 5% of ∞ is ?  # How does the " Network balancing" mentioned in the OP work ? How does an increase in SHA256 difficulty affect folders ? I completely agree about not copying the idea with under the false premise to boost value of the coin. It could have some limited effect, but MultiPools aren't going to raise the value of this coin - eventhough that's the tired stereotype that's been attached to the idea. Rather, I propose a MultiPool for an entirely different purpose: it's ability to include mining hardware that would otherwise be excluded from participating in the CureCoin project: namely Scrypt ASIC's. Anyway, I'm just tossing the idea out. It's nothing the dev's need worry about, but if the community takes hold of it it might be a good idea. Who knows? I just thought I'd throw it out there. |
|
|
|
|
crypto4jan
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1015
Business Developer EnergyParty
|
|
May 15, 2014, 06:30:32 AM |
|
After long time of waiting my first payment is arrived.
0.270088 CUR for Valid: 3822
Now I a at 70K points so I expected around to get 5 CURE for this in total now.
Curecoin is a good coin!
|
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
May 15, 2014, 06:32:22 AM |
|
I was wondering if anyone's considered hitting this thing from the third angle. We've got GPU's hitting the folding pretty hard. We've got SHA256 ASIC's hitting the mining end pretty hard. What about a multipool so the SCRYPT ASIC's can hit the value end of things? Then all mining hardware could be used to develop and support CureCoin. Just a thought.
We have nothing useful for scrypt asics to do and it would effectively require a hard fork for nothing. Asics secure network GPUs fold Scrypt Asics would be worse at securing the network especially because their are a lot less. Scrypt Asics can't fold. No no, scrypt asics could mine at a MultiPool, like BlackCoin's or CinniCoin's multipool. Basically they would mine Scrypt Based altcoins, and the multipool would automatically trade them for CureCoins. It's a proven technique that allows Scrypt miners to apply buy pressure to coins that are otherwise unobtainable for them. It wouldn't require any change to the wallet or network. The Scrypt Miners literally just buy coins in exchange for their hashpower. Buy pressure created by these pools is almost none.... I think BCpool last time I looks was creating 7BTC of buy pressure... That is nothing. Those multipools are basically hype machines for people that do not do the math. Sounds like it would work though. Totally agree. First of all these pools are always associated with sh*tcoins that are desperately looking to create some hype/ fake demand. Copying an idea for the tenth time just doesnt work anyway. You need to be ahead of the curve just like this coin is to create some value Can anyone elaborate on a few technical aspects of the coin ? # If there is no hard cap for the coins how was the 5% premine done ? 5% of ∞ is ? # How does the " Network balancing" mentioned in the OP work ? How does an increase in SHA256 difficulty affect folders ? Ok, fact that the coins for the folders were all premined doesnt look so good  I wonder why couldnt that just be divided between the miners and folders as the coins are minted ? So essentially one person is in control of ~80% of the coins ? Paying folders is done manually ? What happens if the developer dies in a plane crash etc and takes the private keys with him ? Just trying to get some clarity here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sumgye
|
|
May 15, 2014, 06:42:56 AM |
|
I was wondering if anyone's considered hitting this thing from the third angle. We've got GPU's hitting the folding pretty hard. We've got SHA256 ASIC's hitting the mining end pretty hard. What about a multipool so the SCRYPT ASIC's can hit the value end of things? Then all mining hardware could be used to develop and support CureCoin. Just a thought.
We have nothing useful for scrypt asics to do and it would effectively require a hard fork for nothing. Asics secure network GPUs fold Scrypt Asics would be worse at securing the network especially because their are a lot less. Scrypt Asics can't fold. No no, scrypt asics could mine at a MultiPool, like BlackCoin's or CinniCoin's multipool. Basically they would mine Scrypt Based altcoins, and the multipool would automatically trade them for CureCoins. It's a proven technique that allows Scrypt miners to apply buy pressure to coins that are otherwise unobtainable for them. It wouldn't require any change to the wallet or network. The Scrypt Miners literally just buy coins in exchange for their hashpower. Buy pressure created by these pools is almost none.... I think BCpool last time I looks was creating 7BTC of buy pressure... That is nothing. Those multipools are basically hype machines for people that do not do the math. Sounds like it would work though. Totally agree. First of all these pools are always associated with sh*tcoins that are desperately looking to create some hype/ fake demand. Copying an idea for the tenth time just doesnt work anyway. You need to be ahead of the curve just like this coin is to create some value Can anyone elaborate on a few technical aspects of the coin ? # If there is no hard cap for the coins how was the 5% premine done ? 5% of ∞ is ? # How does the " Network balancing" mentioned in the OP work ? How does an increase in SHA256 difficulty affect folders ? Ok, fact that the coins for the folders were all premined doesnt look so good I wonder why couldnt that just be divided between the miners and folders as the coins are minted ? So essentially one person is in control of ~80% of the coins ? Paying folders is done manually ? What happens if the developer dies in a plane crash etc and takes the private keys with him ? Just trying to get some clarity here. Yeah, that is literally my only concern. I'd very much like to see a hardfork that releases the coins to the folding pool as the blocks are minted, instead of having them premined. I have not a single doubt that the Dev's intentions are honorable, and that, quite frankly, this is his baby and he would never do anything to harm it. But what happens if this coin outlives him? Can we trust the people that follow? Wouldn't it be easier to make the necessary changes to ensure the coin's survival while it's still young? I'm on board either way. I think this project is too important not to take part. But the premine is an issue, and one that does concern me. |
|
|
|
|
shenjing85
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Spectiv VR Crowdsale: 12/08/17
|
|
May 15, 2014, 06:46:28 AM |
|
Good luck with your coin-project!
|
▄▄████████████▄▄
▄███▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▀███▄▄
▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀██▄
▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███
▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄█████████████▄
▄██░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█▌
▐██░░░░░░░░▄█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄░░░░░░░░▀█▌
▐██░░░░░░▄███▀▀███████████████▀▀██▄░░░░░░██▌
████▄░░▄██▀███████▄██████▄████████▀██▄░░░▐██
██░▀████▀██████████████████████████████▄░░██
██░░░▀██▄█████████████████████████▄██▀▀██▄██
██▌░░░░▀███▄████████▀▀▀▀███████▄██▀░░░░░▀███
▐██░░░░░░░▀███▄▄███████████▄▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░██▌
▐██░░░░░░░░░░▀▀████████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌
▀██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌
▀███▀▀▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀
▀██▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀
▀███▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄██▀
▀████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄███▀
▀▀▀██████████▀▀▀
| | | | | |
|
|
|
|
r3animation
|
|
May 15, 2014, 06:51:44 AM |
|
I was wondering if anyone's considered hitting this thing from the third angle. We've got GPU's hitting the folding pretty hard. We've got SHA256 ASIC's hitting the mining end pretty hard. What about a multipool so the SCRYPT ASIC's can hit the value end of things? Then all mining hardware could be used to develop and support CureCoin. Just a thought.
We have nothing useful for scrypt asics to do and it would effectively require a hard fork for nothing. Asics secure network GPUs fold Scrypt Asics would be worse at securing the network especially because their are a lot less. Scrypt Asics can't fold. No no, scrypt asics could mine at a MultiPool, like BlackCoin's or CinniCoin's multipool. Basically they would mine Scrypt Based altcoins, and the multipool would automatically trade them for CureCoins. It's a proven technique that allows Scrypt miners to apply buy pressure to coins that are otherwise unobtainable for them. It wouldn't require any change to the wallet or network. The Scrypt Miners literally just buy coins in exchange for their hashpower. Buy pressure created by these pools is almost none.... I think BCpool last time I looks was creating 7BTC of buy pressure... That is nothing. Those multipools are basically hype machines for people that do not do the math. Sounds like it would work though. Totally agree. First of all these pools are always associated with sh*tcoins that are desperately looking to create some hype/ fake demand. Copying an idea for the tenth time just doesnt work anyway. You need to be ahead of the curve just like this coin is to create some value Can anyone elaborate on a few technical aspects of the coin ? # If there is no hard cap for the coins how was the 5% premine done ? 5% of ∞ is ? # How does the " Network balancing" mentioned in the OP work ? How does an increase in SHA256 difficulty affect folders ? Ok, fact that the coins for the folders were all premined doesnt look so good I wonder why couldnt that just be divided between the miners and folders as the coins are minted ? So essentially one person is in control of ~80% of the coins ? Paying folders is done manually ? What happens if the developer dies in a plane crash etc and takes the private keys with him ? Just trying to get some clarity here. Yeah, that is literally my only concern. I'd very much like to see a hardfork that releases the coins to the folding pool as the blocks are minted, instead of having them premined. I have not a single doubt that the Dev's intentions are honorable, and that, quite frankly, this is his baby and he would never do anything to harm it. But what happens if this coin outlives him? Can we trust the people that follow? Wouldn't it be easier to make the necessary changes to ensure the coin's survival while it's still young? I'm on board either way. I think this project is too important not to take part. But the premine is an issue, and one that does concern me. You have to also understand that F@H is not under the dev's control. It's under Stanford University and it has been going on since 2000. Since folding is not mining and vice versa, you can't just depend on the miners solving blocks and the mining pools giving the coins to the folding pool so that they can payout to the folders. I can't think of a better system that the dev has already implemented except maybe increasing payouts to twice a day instead of once. |
|
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:06:46 AM |
|
I also wish that dev would bring more light to the whole premine thing - Starting with a blockexplorer, what sort of systems are in place to distribute the folding premine and ending with a audit from KPMG,PwC etc showing all the coins really are the property of CURECOIN LLC.
I am not trying to bash the coin but I cant see big exchanges adopting the coin or investors putting serious cash in it without some clarity on the matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sumgye
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:08:53 AM |
|
I was wondering if anyone's considered hitting this thing from the third angle. We've got GPU's hitting the folding pretty hard. We've got SHA256 ASIC's hitting the mining end pretty hard. What about a multipool so the SCRYPT ASIC's can hit the value end of things? Then all mining hardware could be used to develop and support CureCoin. Just a thought.
We have nothing useful for scrypt asics to do and it would effectively require a hard fork for nothing. Asics secure network GPUs fold Scrypt Asics would be worse at securing the network especially because their are a lot less. Scrypt Asics can't fold. No no, scrypt asics could mine at a MultiPool, like BlackCoin's or CinniCoin's multipool. Basically they would mine Scrypt Based altcoins, and the multipool would automatically trade them for CureCoins. It's a proven technique that allows Scrypt miners to apply buy pressure to coins that are otherwise unobtainable for them. It wouldn't require any change to the wallet or network. The Scrypt Miners literally just buy coins in exchange for their hashpower. Buy pressure created by these pools is almost none.... I think BCpool last time I looks was creating 7BTC of buy pressure... That is nothing. Those multipools are basically hype machines for people that do not do the math. Sounds like it would work though. Totally agree. First of all these pools are always associated with sh*tcoins that are desperately looking to create some hype/ fake demand. Copying an idea for the tenth time just doesnt work anyway. You need to be ahead of the curve just like this coin is to create some value Can anyone elaborate on a few technical aspects of the coin ? # If there is no hard cap for the coins how was the 5% premine done ? 5% of ∞ is ? # How does the " Network balancing" mentioned in the OP work ? How does an increase in SHA256 difficulty affect folders ? Ok, fact that the coins for the folders were all premined doesnt look so good I wonder why couldnt that just be divided between the miners and folders as the coins are minted ? So essentially one person is in control of ~80% of the coins ? Paying folders is done manually ? What happens if the developer dies in a plane crash etc and takes the private keys with him ? Just trying to get some clarity here. Yeah, that is literally my only concern. I'd very much like to see a hardfork that releases the coins to the folding pool as the blocks are minted, instead of having them premined. I have not a single doubt that the Dev's intentions are honorable, and that, quite frankly, this is his baby and he would never do anything to harm it. But what happens if this coin outlives him? Can we trust the people that follow? Wouldn't it be easier to make the necessary changes to ensure the coin's survival while it's still young? I'm on board either way. I think this project is too important not to take part. But the premine is an issue, and one that does concern me. You have to also understand that F@H is not under the dev's control. It's under Stanford University and it has been going on since 2000. Since folding is not mining and vice versa, you can't just depend on the miners solving blocks and the mining pools giving the coins to the folding pool so that they can payout to the folders. I can't think of a better system that the dev has already implemented except maybe increasing payouts to twice a day instead of once. What I was thinking was have each minted block pay 20%(13 coins) to the block solver and 80%(52 coins) to the folding pool wallet. The folding pool wallet would still need to be tightly secured, and payouts would still need to be paid from it similar to how they are now, but there's security in the fact that if that wallet does somehow become compromised or abused then only several thousand coins are stolen before the problem can be fixed. Not 21 million coins. There's something unsettling about knowing that almost 80% of all the coins that there will ever be is just sitting pretty in a wallet somewhere. It will also make it difficult to check how many curecoins are actually in circulation - because the only way to do that is to exclude that one particular wallet, which is a little unsettling by itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
r3animation
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:09:13 AM |
|
I dont see why mining pools couldnt give 80% of the coins to a centralized folding pool ?
I also wish that dev would bring more light to the whole premine thing - Starting with a blockexplorer, what sort of systems are in place to distribute the folding premine and ending with a audit from KPMG,PwC etc showing all the coins really are the property of CURECOIN LLC.
I am not trying to bash the coin but I cant see big exchanges adopting the coin or investors putting serious cash in it without some clarity on the matter.
Would you trust the pool op to do it? If I were to solo mine with say 10th/s (which is possible by renting on betarigs or leaserig), I would have 1/10 of the network (100 th/s last I saw). What's to stop me from hoarding the coins and not passing them along to the folding pool? |
|
|
|
|
|
meelvanchris
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:11:35 AM |
|
I dont see why mining pools couldnt give 80% of the coins to a centralized folding pool ?
I also wish that dev would bring more light to the whole premine thing - Starting with a blockexplorer, what sort of systems are in place to distribute the folding premine and ending with a audit from KPMG,PwC etc showing all the coins really are the property of CURECOIN LLC.
I am not trying to bash the coin but I cant see big exchanges adopting the coin or investors putting serious cash in it without some clarity on the matter.
Im no economist or legalist for that matter.. so excuse me it it is a silly question... but having all coins the property of curecoin llc...couldnt that mean i could have to sumit my hard earned curecoins to curecoin llc at any time? |
|
|
|
|
kqpahv
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:19:15 AM |
|
I dont see why mining pools couldnt give 80% of the coins to a centralized folding pool ?
I also wish that dev would bring more light to the whole premine thing - Starting with a blockexplorer, what sort of systems are in place to distribute the folding premine and ending with a audit from KPMG,PwC etc showing all the coins really are the property of CURECOIN LLC.
I am not trying to bash the coin but I cant see big exchanges adopting the coin or investors putting serious cash in it without some clarity on the matter.
Would you trust the pool op to do it? If I were to solo mine with say 10th/s (which is possible by renting on betarigs or leaserig), I would have 1/10 of the network (100 th/s last I saw). What's to stop me from hoarding the coins and not passing them along to the folding pool? Yeah, I dont know what happened to my brain there, realized it too a minute after the post  I guess there is no better way then.
Im no economist or legalist for that matter.. so excuse me it it is a silly question... but having all coins the property of curecoin llc...couldnt that mean i could have to sumit my hard earned curecoins to curecoin llc at any time?
Well you are giving them away and this can be checked from the ledger/blockexplorer. Microsoft owns windows but it doesnt mean they can summit from me The matter is a bit complex for me also but I actually wouldnt worry about Curecoin LLC summiting the coins  |
|
|
|
|
|
r3animation
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:28:47 AM |
|
I dont see why mining pools couldnt give 80% of the coins to a centralized folding pool ?
I also wish that dev would bring more light to the whole premine thing - Starting with a blockexplorer, what sort of systems are in place to distribute the folding premine and ending with a audit from KPMG,PwC etc showing all the coins really are the property of CURECOIN LLC.
I am not trying to bash the coin but I cant see big exchanges adopting the coin or investors putting serious cash in it without some clarity on the matter.
Would you trust the pool op to do it? If I were to solo mine with say 10th/s (which is possible by renting on betarigs or leaserig), I would have 1/10 of the network (100 th/s last I saw). What's to stop me from hoarding the coins and not passing them along to the folding pool? Yeah, I dont know what happened to my brain there, realized it too a minute after the post I guess there is no better way then. No worries, it's good to have a discussion about this to find improvements in the system. |
|
|
|
|
|
meelvanchris
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:30:00 AM |
|
yes.. and a welcome change from all the : where are my coins posts |
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:32:45 AM |
|
I also wish that dev would bring more light to the whole premine thing - Starting with a blockexplorer, what sort of systems are in place to distribute the folding premine and ending with a audit from KPMG,PwC etc showing all the coins really are the property of CURECOIN LLC.
I am not trying to bash the coin but I cant see big exchanges adopting the coin or investors putting serious cash in it without some clarity on the matter.
There is already far more clarity on the matter than any other coin premine I have seen https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg6688632#msg6688632hopefully more to come (block explorer is definitely needed) |
|
|
|
|
liyanhong
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:39:36 AM |
|
This looks very interesting. I have a pretty powerful gaming PC that I will use for folding. I've tested it for about 5 minutes, it showed me a rough 100k points per day. How much coins would this roughly equal?
Before I start using it 24/7 I will need to put some new cooling paste on the CPU, it is hitting 90c+ degrees...lol.
Thanks
See here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg6722773#msg6722773EDIT: What do you have for hardware? Not sure what you consider pretty powerful but a system with a single 7870/7950/270/280 should get 100k PPD. You should be able to get a lot more than that if you have something like crossfire 290Xs or whatever. thanks for your help, I have solved the problem, and now it works so welll |
Bwincoin - 100% Free POS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=624842.0).BHFaxAshgX8gtDDRiKBa1km9WmBFhRTP5k
|
|
|
m3ct0n
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
May 15, 2014, 07:51:17 AM |
|
I also wish that dev would bring more light to the whole premine thing - Starting with a blockexplorer, what sort of systems are in place to distribute the folding premine and ending with a audit from KPMG,PwC etc showing all the coins really are the property of CURECOIN LLC.
I am not trying to bash the coin but I cant see big exchanges adopting the coin or investors putting serious cash in it without some clarity on the matter.
There is already far more clarity on the matter than any other coin premine I have seen https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg6688632#msg6688632hopefully more to come (block explorer is definitely needed) It's a BETA and it's my first block explorer... If u want to donate :p CureCoin: BSnuDaT8GHyCCf18LJhQkBXjoAbiCMqdGp |
|
|
|
|
|
add1ct3dd
|
|
May 15, 2014, 08:03:24 AM |
|
Pool is still going strong :]
|
|
|
|
matt608
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Gambling Investment Fund
|
|
May 15, 2014, 08:19:56 AM |
|
How's the Mac wallet coming along?
|
|
|
|
|
