Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
November 16, 2014, 06:25:40 PM |
|
I have a "generate" transaction in my wallet that, after more than 700 confirmations, is not in the balance yet. But it shows on "listaccounts". Is that normal?
This is really odd, does it show as confirmed in listtransactions? "account" : "", "category" : "generate", "amount" : xxx, "confirmations" : 1435, "generated" : true, "blockindex" : 1, Wow, that's a mystery. If you do "gettransaction txid" (replacing txid with the txid of that transaction) and then dump the private key (dumpprivkey address) replacing address with the address receiving the coins in the transaction, then import that on another wallet, does the transaction appear properly? I'll try importing the privkey on another wallet, but for now some more info: - the address is the same where I receive the folding payouts, i.e. the only one having transaction - there is just another address in the wallet but with no activity - I've tried both repairwallet and -rescan without success Oh, now that's very odd. It might be an orphaned PoS block that the wallet didn't recognize properly, though it would seem -rescan would fix that issue... Perhaps redownloading the blockchain would help, but that's a stretch. If you PM me some details about the transaction, I can send you some curecoin to make up for it
|
|
|
|
Vorksholk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1713
Merit: 1029
|
|
November 16, 2014, 06:26:04 PM |
|
Any news dev.
How are we getting along on the cc 2.0?
Going great! This weekend I'm finalizing the code for Merkle signatures (including the certificates used for folding mintage), and hopefully wrapping up the specs of the transaction formatting. The Curecoin 2.0 transaction system is fairly basic at this point. On the in-progress list: Blockchain database (need to optimize for performance and storage space) Certificate formatting (this is more of just a final approval on the existing specifications we discussed months ago) P2P Networking (a fair amount to do here) GUI Then the upcoming list (all of which are non-essential items which can be added later, but would be nice at launch): -Light merchant 'scripting? not even.' language: Can tell daemon to perform job x upon completion of condition y ->Example 1: Send "x8cmeob" to 192.168.0.12 when <address> receives 8 CUR ->Example 2: Append "x8cmeob" to file "transactions.txt" when <address> receives 8 CUR -Basic accounting features built-into GUI wallet (group addresses into an account, produce transaction records for a given account, etc.) -Some indication/measure of network health and connection quality Curecoin 2.0 will be cross-platform at launch, with a compiled binary available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X. For anyone interested in the practicality of Merkle signatures for a cryptocurrency network, an address capable of signing 8192 transactions takes around 3 seconds to generate on modern hardware using one core. People will be able to choose what capacity address they would like to use. More capacious (more possible transaction signatures) take longer to generate. Lowest possible will likely be 4096 transactions, with the highest being either 32768 or 65535. 4096 will be far more than 99.99% of use cases. Signature verification takes a trivial amount of time. Signatures are small enough in size to not produce blockchain bloat. Private keys require less than a megabyte each. Sounds awesome man, anychance the source for folding pools will be released? I'd really like to get franko folders back up and going since ive got so many frk now to fund it. On official cc2.0 release, we'll be helping with getting third-party pools set up, and pool mining will be built into the certificate format , and if everything goes according to plan we'll have some very rudimentary java source code for a pool backend, or at the very least a very detailed guide that a capable programmer could use to build a pool, with all the protocol information required. If you're talking about the cc1.0-style pool, I'd be more than happy to help you with setting up the payment backend to start rewarding people for folding with Frankos yea CC1.0 is completly fine and if there is anything i can do to help with cc2 just let me know. Ive been a believer of this project since its inception. Thank you! Sent you a PM with some more information, let me know where you want to go from there.
|
|
|
|
cryptoconomist
|
|
November 26, 2014, 06:14:40 PM |
|
Unfortunately this coin is slowly dying....
Please dev. hurry up with the cc 2.0 before it is too late
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1010
|
|
November 26, 2014, 08:40:43 PM |
|
Unfortunately this coin is slowly dying....
Please dev. hurry up with the cc 2.0 before it is too late
At the very least, update the OP with current info or give a community member the power to do so? Please?
|
|
|
|
jm1978
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
November 27, 2014, 10:58:19 AM |
|
Hi! Im looking for the block explorer of CureCoin but i dont find it. Maybe someone can put me on the right direction? The address in the OP does not work. Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
December 02, 2014, 09:12:50 AM |
|
nice, I was waiting for that, thank you!
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1010
|
|
December 02, 2014, 04:22:51 PM |
|
Why not add a link to the Mac wallet?
|
|
|
|
cygnusxi (OP)
|
|
December 02, 2014, 09:24:39 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cygnusxi (OP)
|
|
December 03, 2014, 10:36:38 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
December 07, 2014, 12:24:47 PM |
|
this coin needs some serious promotion.
|
|
|
|
cygnusxi (OP)
|
|
December 08, 2014, 12:16:23 AM |
|
this coin needs some serious promotion.
To quote some guy who ran a IC manufacturing co in the 80's " there will never be a need for a PC in every house " Takes time for potential to sink in, see the following Topic: Curecoin Petaflops crushes all of Boinc during launch still 2x faster then grid https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=885920.0Topic: Fold for Curecoins with AMD GPU based Linux farm? New AMD drivers F@H friendly <- see foldingforum.org and search core17 for linux vs ocore poll to see more, and guess what team they were referring to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=885864.0
|
|
|
|
ranlo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1007
|
|
December 08, 2014, 04:25:40 AM |
|
this coin needs some serious promotion.
To quote some guy who ran a IC manufacturing co in the 80's " there will never be a need for a PC in every house " Takes time for potential to sink in, see the following Topic: Curecoin Petaflops crushes all of Boinc during launch still 2x faster then grid https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=885920.0Topic: Fold for Curecoins with AMD GPU based Linux farm? New AMD drivers F@H friendly <- see foldingforum.org and search core17 for linux vs ocore poll to see more, and guess what team they were referring to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=885864.0PCs have value. We can use them. Without adoption, Curecoin has nothing to back it up. Just like PCs needed marketed to get people interested (hint: you still see marketing for them on every TV channel, in every magazine, etc.), so does the coin.
|
|
|
|
duplan
|
|
December 08, 2014, 09:29:11 AM |
|
I could not find The Full SPECS of the CureCoin , anywhere . 1. How many CureCoins are there supposed to be in existence ?
2. How many CureCoins have already been pre-mined ?
3. How many CureCoins are already in circulation ? Thank You in Advance for trying to answer all my questions
|
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1010
|
|
December 08, 2014, 07:12:07 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ryohazuki89
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
December 10, 2014, 07:39:19 PM |
|
Is that valid? I know coinmarketcap was constantly changing the numbers for curecoin market cap.
|
|
|
|
|
cygnusxi (OP)
|
|
December 10, 2014, 10:32:11 PM |
|
Is that valid? I know coinmarketcap was constantly changing the numbers for curecoin market cap. That number should be very accurate. They had only changed it twice to my knowledge. At first they had it right, then somehow... lost our api link or something for a while ?? I emailed them and they fixed it pretty quickly and now its reporting based on the correct api.
|
|
|
|
cygnusxi (OP)
|
|
December 10, 2014, 10:39:50 PM |
|
That is the coins to be issued , previous link was on coinmarketcap is for coins in circulation. Note that number is from PoW and does not include coins minted from PoS.
|
|
|
|
|