Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 09, 2014, 07:12:30 PM |
|
V 9.0 gives me about 13.5% better hashrate across all of my rigs. At least that is what miner shows, but I've left it mining for some time now and pool shows only half of hashrate. Also, one of my rigs reports "SOMETHING WRONG WITH DEVFEE CONNECTION" form time to time. I didn't have same issue wih V 6.1. Anyone else has issues like that?
PM me the log file, I'll check it. I too see today half of hashrate on pool.. version 9.0, catalyst 13.12. It can be pool-related problem. But you can PM me the log file, I'll check it.
|
|
|
|
Ik88
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
October 09, 2014, 07:16:52 PM |
|
V 9.0 gives me about 13.5% better hashrate across all of my rigs. At least that is what miner shows, but I've left it mining for some time now and pool shows only half of hashrate. Also, one of my rigs reports "SOMETHING WRONG WITH DEVFEE CONNECTION" form time to time. I didn't have same issue wih V 6.1. Anyone else has issues like that?
PM me the log file, I'll check it. I too see today half of hashrate on pool.. version 9.0, catalyst 13.12. It can be pool-related problem. But you can PM me the log file, I'll check it. Thank for fast answer and a desire to understand Some time was exactly half.. 30 - 15.. it's not exactly the fluctuation
|
*Link Removed*
|
|
|
trimac
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
October 09, 2014, 08:14:37 PM |
|
V 9.0 gives me about 13.5% better hashrate across all of my rigs. At least that is what miner shows, but I've left it mining for some time now and pool shows only half of hashrate. Also, one of my rigs reports "SOMETHING WRONG WITH DEVFEE CONNECTION" form time to time. I didn't have same issue wih V 6.1. Anyone else has issues like that?
PM me the log file, I'll check it. I too see today half of hashrate on pool.. version 9.0, catalyst 13.12. It can be pool-related problem. But you can PM me the log file, I'll check it. I'm mining on dwarfpool, after I tested with V9 for approx 3 hrs I went back to 6.1 and got correct hashrate displayed on pool side. I will PM you logs as soon as I can, and I plan to test V9 tomorrow again just to sate my curiosity
|
|
|
|
Eastwind
|
|
October 09, 2014, 08:33:47 PM |
|
v9.0 is available:
- Improved speed by 5-15%, depends on card: About 810 h/s on stock 290X (Hynix memory). About 710 h/s on stock 290X (Elpida memory). About 690 h/s on stock 290 (Elpida memory). About 550 h/s on stock 280X (Hynix memory). About 440 h/s on stock 270X (Elpida memory). About 410 h/s on stock 270 (Elpida memory). - Reduced dev fee, now it is 2.5%. - Improved "-li" option, Windows freezes even less. - Best "-a" and "-h" values are set automatically for 290X,290,280X,270X,270,6950_2GB cards.
Note: For cards that are not in this list you need to check different "-a" and "-h" values to get max speed.
~25 watt/card less power consumption (Compared to v. 6.1), 25 hash/card improvement (290 Trix Hynix) 2.5% more share (due to reduced fees) Really great improvement over all. Do you use -a 1?
|
|
|
|
Ik88
Member
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2014, 01:18:17 AM |
|
v 9.0 have many mistake below..
buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":
|
*Link Removed*
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 05:49:49 AM |
|
v 9.0 have many mistake below..
buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":
And I still did not get any logs from you... This text is not error.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 01:22:33 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
|
|
|
|
wayla
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Wayla is sometimes a man!
|
|
October 10, 2014, 03:23:48 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
9.1 no linux version?
|
And sometimes a woMAN.................
|
|
|
Ptah
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2014, 03:35:15 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
Thx works fine on my 5970 510+h/s Cat 13.12
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 04:28:50 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
9.1 no linux version? I'm working on it, will be available next week.
|
|
|
|
bitwolf
|
|
October 10, 2014, 06:27:20 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
Thx works fine on my 5970 510+h/s Cat 13.12 I am sorry to disappoint but the problem is fixed at only 10%. I have about 10 cores from 58** serie and only 1 and sometimes 2 cores dont make problems. And the problem is not in the cards or in the rigs. Everything is on stock settings and otherwise working just fine. But with v9 and v9.1 (i cant remember what happens with v8) it still gives a lot of server responce errors. The funny part is that they are all pool dependent. Least errors I get with cryptoescrow at 5000 diff. I use 14.6 diff RCs. Should I update the driver to 14.9? Which drivers did u test with? P.S. With all my other AMD cards I have absolutely no problems and I am very happy with the hash increase. 3 of the rings are mixed 5850 cards with R9 serie cards. R9 cards work super. But when it comes to accepting the share from the 5850 card - the usual server responce error appears and it says the this share is with too low difficulty...
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 06:43:47 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
Thx works fine on my 5970 510+h/s Cat 13.12 I am sorry to disappoint but the problem is fixed at only 10%. I have about 10 cores from 58** serie and only 1 and sometimes 2 cores dont make problems. And the problem is not in the cards or in the rigs. Everything is on stock settings and otherwise working just fine. But with v9 and v9.1 (i cant remember what happens with v8) it still gives a lot of server responce errors. The funny part is that they are all pool dependent. Least errors I get with cryptoescrow at 5000 diff. I use 14.6 diff RCs. Should I update the driver to 14.9? Which drivers did u test with? P.S. With all my other AMD cards I have absolutely no problems and I am very happy with the hash increase. 3 of the rings are mixed 5850 cards with R9 serie cards. R9 cards work super. But when it comes to accepting the share from the 5850 card - the usual server responce error appears and it says the this share is with too low difficulty... Make sure that you use "-a 3" for old cards like 6xxx and 5xxx. If it does not help, PM me the log file.
|
|
|
|
omnik
|
|
October 10, 2014, 08:07:02 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
GBT R9 270 (non X) - 418 h/s each. 14.7 driver, 1020/1400... Elpida. -a 1 (auto-selected). Power Color R9 280X - 559 h/s each. 14.7 driver, 1060/1500... Hynix. -a 4 (auto-selected). Power Color R9 270x - 446 h/s each. 14.7 driver, 1100/1425... Elpida. -a 1 (auto-selected). Good work! I hope it will report at the pool as it supposed to. This was usualy issue with your miner. Any comparison in power consumption vs 6.1, 8.0 and 9.0? BR
|
|
|
|
infofront
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2866
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
|
October 10, 2014, 08:10:21 PM |
|
Can we expect to see an updated linux miner?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 10, 2014, 08:51:08 PM |
|
Can we expect to see an updated linux miner?
I already answered this question. On this page
|
|
|
|
ZXSpectrum
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2014, 09:06:33 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
9.1 gets flagged as malware in google chrome, have you added some dlls which could cause this?
|
|
|
|
Chicken76
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2014, 09:52:55 PM |
|
Claymore, have you tested it on the new R9 285? Does it work? If it does, what kind of hashrates can we expect?
|
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 10, 2014, 10:29:24 PM Last edit: October 11, 2014, 10:25:31 AM by anatolikostis |
|
7970 @1080/1500 hc 832 -a 4 591h/s
290(hynix) @1050/1375 hc 1280 -a 4 818h/s
290x(elpida) @1050/1375 hc 1376 -a 4 840h/s
|
|
|
|
onetwentyfive
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2014, 10:38:46 PM |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
9.1 gets flagged as malware in google chrome, have you added some dlls which could cause this? In Chrome go to 'Settings' and under 'Privacy' uncheck the 'Enable phishing and malware prevention' box, that will let you download it. Just don't forget to re-check the box when you're done.
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
October 11, 2014, 08:55:49 AM Last edit: October 11, 2014, 09:16:59 AM by Claymore |
|
v9.1 is available:
- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools. - Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).
9.1 gets flagged as malware in google chrome, have you added some dlls which could cause this? I tried it and confirmed that Chrome does not want to download all versions, even v7. It's really paranoid filter, I have no idea why it decided to block files. I remember it worked in past...
|
|
|
|
|