Bitcoin Forum
August 14, 2025, 11:01:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 [106] 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 ... 325 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2145110 times)
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 07:31:43 PM
 #2101

So I had something very strange happen yesterday:

I got a "socket send failed" error, then why are all the below showing up as 1.1.1.1 - this isn't something I've done. I am not trying to run a proxy or workaround the devfee. It then went on to connect to mine.cryptoescrow.eu:3333 for some time and mine, but not to my wallet address as there's nothing showing up in the stats for that page.

Can you please explain the below?
...

Miner resolves pool URL before connecting, i.e. gets pool IP, DNS server that you use returned 1.1.1.1 for some reason so miner used it. I never saw such thing, if DNS failed to resolve name it returns error and you will see "cannot resolve ..." error message. But your DNS server returned wrong IP instead of error. Check your internet/ISP settings.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
pgxz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 10:27:52 PM
 #2102

So I had something very strange happen yesterday:

I got a "socket send failed" error, then why are all the below showing up as 1.1.1.1 - this isn't something I've done. I am not trying to run a proxy or workaround the devfee. It then went on to connect to mine.cryptoescrow.eu:3333 for some time and mine, but not to my wallet address as there's nothing showing up in the stats for that page.

Can you please explain the below?
...

Miner resolves pool URL before connecting, i.e. gets pool IP, DNS server that you use returned 1.1.1.1 for some reason so miner used it. I never saw such thing, if DNS failed to resolve name it returns error and you will see "cannot resolve ..." error message. But your DNS server returned wrong IP instead of error. Check your internet/ISP settings.
use some proxy?
Strannik-74
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 102



View Profile
October 14, 2014, 10:52:48 PM
 #2103

           v6.1        v9.1
280X    504h/s    594h/s
270X    360h/s    450h/s (Elpida)
ZXSpectrum
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
October 14, 2014, 11:07:38 PM
 #2104

So I had something very strange happen yesterday:

I got a "socket send failed" error, then why are all the below showing up as 1.1.1.1 - this isn't something I've done. I am not trying to run a proxy or workaround the devfee. It then went on to connect to mine.cryptoescrow.eu:3333 for some time and mine, but not to my wallet address as there's nothing showing up in the stats for that page.

Can you please explain the below?
...

Miner resolves pool URL before connecting, i.e. gets pool IP, DNS server that you use returned 1.1.1.1 for some reason so miner used it. I never saw such thing, if DNS failed to resolve name it returns error and you will see "cannot resolve ..." error message. But your DNS server returned wrong IP instead of error. Check your internet/ISP settings.

Internet didn't go down as I was connected in via teamviewer when this happened. Doubt my DNS was returning 1.1.1.1 for all of those. What about why it went to mine to another pool without my wallet address?
Hatch
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 15, 2014, 05:03:47 AM
 #2105

Ugh!!

Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 15, 2014, 07:21:07 AM
 #2106

Ugh!!



For old cards like 5xxx and 6xxx use "-a 3" mode only. Now I added it to OP.
Miner cannot recognize all cards and set correct mode, default mode for unknown cards is "-a 4" which is good for 2xx and 7xxx cards but may fail on old cards.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
fussyqbert
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 16, 2014, 04:13:11 PM
 #2107

When mining at MinerGate, I get lots of bad shares. It logs something to the tune of "blockexpired" - "cannot convert blob data"

Does anyone have information or a solution to this problem?
bensam123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 423
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 02:01:38 AM
 #2108

Yeah, Minergate has always had issues. I've talked to them off and on over a month and a half about it in their thread and they still haven't fixed it. Not sure what causes it.
Farthom
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 04:04:08 AM
 #2109

Checked my miner today and found it outputting all kinds of negative number jargon. Negative hash rate, negative mining time. WTF!

Speed: -5940 h/s, TotalHashes: 53089K, DevHashes: 1326K Mining time: -2:-31
10/16/14-20:56:18 - SHARE FOUND (target 250012) - (GPU 5 of 6)
GPU 0 t=74C fan=57; GPU 1 t=75C fan=61; GPU 2 t=74C fan=56;

Miner appears to still be working. Restarting it corrected the problem. No idea what happened, figured I'd report it.
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 07:04:13 AM
 #2110

Checked my miner today and found it outputting all kinds of negative number jargon. Negative hash rate, negative mining time. WTF!

Speed: -5940 h/s, TotalHashes: 53089K, DevHashes: 1326K Mining time: -2:-31
10/16/14-20:56:18 - SHARE FOUND (target 250012) - (GPU 5 of 6)
GPU 0 t=74C fan=57; GPU 1 t=75C fan=61; GPU 2 t=74C fan=56;

Miner appears to still be working. Restarting it corrected the problem. No idea what happened, figured I'd report it.

You changed time on your PC.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
ol92
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 445
Merit: 255


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 09:53:04 AM
 #2111

Checked my miner today and found it outputting all kinds of negative number jargon. Negative hash rate, negative mining time. WTF!

Speed: -5940 h/s, TotalHashes: 53089K, DevHashes: 1326K Mining time: -2:-31
10/16/14-20:56:18 - SHARE FOUND (target 250012) - (GPU 5 of 6)
GPU 0 t=74C fan=57; GPU 1 t=75C fan=61; GPU 2 t=74C fan=56;

Miner appears to still be working. Restarting it corrected the problem. No idea what happened, figured I'd report it.

You changed time on your PC.
probably due to the so called BCX time warp attack on monero   Wink
allcoinminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 504


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 01:42:37 PM
 #2112

Checked my miner today and found it outputting all kinds of negative number jargon. Negative hash rate, negative mining time. WTF!

Speed: -5940 h/s, TotalHashes: 53089K, DevHashes: 1326K Mining time: -2:-31
10/16/14-20:56:18 - SHARE FOUND (target 250012) - (GPU 5 of 6)
GPU 0 t=74C fan=57; GPU 1 t=75C fan=61; GPU 2 t=74C fan=56;

Miner appears to still be working. Restarting it corrected the problem. No idea what happened, figured I'd report it.

Which GPU is  this?
burnbabyburn71
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 02:42:06 PM
 #2113

           v6.1        v9.1
280X    504h/s    594h/s
270X    360h/s    450h/s (Elpida)
I get 510h/s with my 270x Elpida

Web Dev | General Graphics Design | Windows/Linux Wallet Compiles | Certified member of the BCs
daeminium
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 252



View Profile
October 18, 2014, 03:29:47 PM
 #2114

catalyst 14.9 drivers, work fine?
Pilotseye
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 18, 2014, 06:32:20 PM
 #2115

catalyst 14.9 drivers, work fine?

Yes, at least for me  Wink
nrg_wolf
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 19, 2014, 02:25:01 AM
 #2116

           v6.1        v9.1
280X    504h/s    594h/s
270X    360h/s    450h/s (Elpida)
I get 510h/s with my 270x Elpida

and yet a 280x with elpida can barley do 500h/s when OCed.... lol some major work needed for elpida cards.....
E9800
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 250
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 02:33:01 AM
 #2117

           v6.1        v9.1
280X    504h/s    594h/s
270X    360h/s    450h/s (Elpida)
I get 510h/s with my 270x Elpida

and yet a 280x with elpida can barley do 500h/s when OCed.... lol some major work needed for elpida cards.....
Agreed. My R7 265's are almost as fast as my 280X's with Elpida

R7 265 Hynix (425) 1 Card
R9 280X Elpida (490) 1 Card
burnbabyburn71
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 06:57:43 AM
 #2118

           v6.1        v9.1
280X    504h/s    594h/s
270X    360h/s    450h/s (Elpida)
I get 510h/s with my 270x Elpida

and yet a 280x with elpida can barley do 500h/s when OCed.... lol some major work needed for elpida cards.....

My 270x has elpida memory though? Mine is OC'd as well:

core: 1300mhz
memory: 1500mhz

Temperatures are around 61 degrees celsius

Web Dev | General Graphics Design | Windows/Linux Wallet Compiles | Certified member of the BCs
shulio
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016


View Profile
October 19, 2014, 11:16:25 AM
Last edit: October 19, 2014, 11:33:31 AM by shulio
 #2119

windows 8.1 64, 14.9 driver, 6xr9 270. Windows detect 6 cards but claymore uses only 5.

WARNING: Linking two modules of different data layouts!
nitro64
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 21, 2014, 09:28:47 AM
 #2120

Troubleshooting:
Hey all I have a problem and that I was hoping someone could help me with.  It appears I have done everything right with this miner and it seems to mine but neither my wallet nor my associates ever receives any Monero.  Here’s the code we used, I’m running v9.0 on Windows 7 SP1, none of the cards are overclocked, is rebooted a couple times a week
   
“setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u wallet -p hossflat12@gmail.com
-o stratum+tcp://moria.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u wallet -p hossflat12@gmail.com -tt 80 -dbg 1”

Obviously I omitted my wallet but that’s the code. I have allocated a little over 16 gb in virtual memory
https://i.imgur.com/quXzO34.png
And here is a screen shot of the program
https://i.imgur.com/hkAF6pI.png
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Pages: « 1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 [106] 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 ... 325 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!