Scientific proof that God exists?

[Horacewoodwood]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

[BADecker]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

[Horacewoodwood]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

[AiloveYouks21]

If you like I'll tell you about my supernatural encounters. Though this would be derailing the thread as it's not relevant.

[Horacewoodwood]

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

[BADecker]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?

That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.

I feel so sad for you 
My heart breaks for you and your problems 
I'll even pray for you 

[BADecker]

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.

[Horacewoodwood]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?

That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.

I feel so sad for you 
My heart breaks for you and your problems 
I'll even pray for you 

Dear pathetic cunt, trying different methods of refering to me won't make you look better. I don't think nature might be a human being, you talked about it as if it were, you cheap shit. Nobody has been there at the beginning to see how life sprung on earth, but we all found out through research and, a little tip, it implied absolutely no god. I am sure dogs are smarter than some people, and I gave you as an example. With a little bit of effort and a dog I can even prove a dog is far more smarter than you. As for the religion shit, save that for yourself. Questioning things instead of believing them blindly makes me exactly the opposite of a religious man. But aside from that, you still haven't done what I've asked you, apologist. Prove that your child molesting, cat ass licking religion is the right one and then, based on the characteristics of your God, define it. Untill then, fuck off outta here, you apologist cunt.

P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.

The term is not appropriate because the Higgs boson is real and proven while God is not. Get outta here, apologist cat ass licker.

[BADecker]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?

That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.

I feel so sad for you 
My heart breaks for you and your problems 
I'll even pray for you 

Dear pathetic cunt, trying different methods of refering to me won't make you look better. I don't think nature might be a human being, you talked about it as if it were, you cheap shit. Nobody has been there at the beginning to see how life sprung on earth, but we all found out through research and, a little tip, it implied absolutely no god. I am sure dogs are smarter than some people, and I gave you as an example. With a little bit of effort and a dog I can even prove a dog is far more smarter than you. As for the religion shit, save that for yourself. Questioning things instead of believing them blindly makes me exactly the opposite of a religious man. But aside from that, you still haven't done what I've asked you, apologist. Prove that your child molesting, cat ass licking religion is the right one and then, based on the characteristics of your God, define it. Untill then, fuck off outta here, you apologist cunt.

P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.

The term is not appropriate because the Higgs boson is real and proven while God is not. Get outta here, apologist cat ass licker.

God is proven:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Thanks for all your talk against me. God has seen it, and will bless me extra because of it. You still have a chance to change. Do so, before it is too late for you.

God hardens the hearts of people into the way that they want to be. If you don't change soon, He will harden your heart into being against Him in a way that you won't be able to get out of once you realize He exists.

[tukangkopi]

If I were to say to you that our sun is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me? NO.

This is most likely because there is no (scientific) evidence..

If I were to say that Sirius is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me, YES, 'cause the Dogon tribe of Mali says so..

But the dogon also point out that the binary sirius is a mirror of our own sun.. meaning ours is a binary star.

But our sun is not a binary star according to science.

So how anyone expects to prove the existance of god when all possible science explaining the truth above is..

?

[stats]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?

That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.

I feel so sad for you 
My heart breaks for you and your problems 
I'll even pray for you 

Dear pathetic cunt, trying different methods of refering to me won't make you look better. I don't think nature might be a human being, you talked about it as if it were, you cheap shit. Nobody has been there at the beginning to see how life sprung on earth, but we all found out through research and, a little tip, it implied absolutely no god. I am sure dogs are smarter than some people, and I gave you as an example. With a little bit of effort and a dog I can even prove a dog is far more smarter than you. As for the religion shit, save that for yourself. Questioning things instead of believing them blindly makes me exactly the opposite of a religious man. But aside from that, you still haven't done what I've asked you, apologist. Prove that your child molesting, cat ass licking religion is the right one and then, based on the characteristics of your God, define it. Untill then, fuck off outta here, you apologist cunt.

P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.

The term is not appropriate because the Higgs boson is real and proven while God is not. Get outta here, apologist cat ass licker.

God is proven:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Thanks for all your talk against me. God has seen it, and will bless me extra because of it. You still have a chance to change. Do so, before it is too late for you.

God hardens the hearts of people into the way that they want to be. If you don't change soon, He will harden your heart into being against Him in a way that you won't be able to get out of once you realize He exists.

Let me get this right.....

* you claim your god is real
* your god represents your religion
* you claim when something is not known to be truth or fact this creates religion.......
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg18858102#msg18858102

Yep, you are delusional.

[Horacewoodwood]

If I were to say to you that our sun is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me? NO.

This is most likely because there is no (scientific) evidence..

If I were to say that Sirius is a binary star orbiting it's own dark star, would you believe me, YES, 'cause the Dogon tribe of Mali says so..

But the dogon also point out that the binary sirius is a mirror of our own sun.. meaning ours is a binary star.

But our sun is not a binary star according to science.

So how anyone expects to prove the existance of god when all possible science explaining the truth above is..

?

Neither the Sun, nor Sirius are binary stars. Sirius is a binary star system because it has two stars that orbit each other, Sirius A and Sirius B. The Sun is a yellow dwarf. As for the rest, it makes no sense or maybe you talk a different language. Also, no, I would not believe Sirius was a binary star system solely based on the Dogon tribe of Mali sayings. That's why I can;t believe in the existence of a God only because the same beings that invented santa claus say there is one.

[Horacewoodwood]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?

That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.

I feel so sad for you 
My heart breaks for you and your problems 
I'll even pray for you 

Dear pathetic cunt, trying different methods of refering to me won't make you look better. I don't think nature might be a human being, you talked about it as if it were, you cheap shit. Nobody has been there at the beginning to see how life sprung on earth, but we all found out through research and, a little tip, it implied absolutely no god. I am sure dogs are smarter than some people, and I gave you as an example. With a little bit of effort and a dog I can even prove a dog is far more smarter than you. As for the religion shit, save that for yourself. Questioning things instead of believing them blindly makes me exactly the opposite of a religious man. But aside from that, you still haven't done what I've asked you, apologist. Prove that your child molesting, cat ass licking religion is the right one and then, based on the characteristics of your God, define it. Untill then, fuck off outta here, you apologist cunt.

P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.

The term is not appropriate because the Higgs boson is real and proven while God is not. Get outta here, apologist cat ass licker.

God is proven:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Thanks for all your talk against me. God has seen it, and will bless me extra because of it. You still have a chance to change. Do so, before it is too late for you.

God hardens the hearts of people into the way that they want to be. If you don't change soon, He will harden your heart into being against Him in a way that you won't be able to get out of once you realize He exists.

You are still solely trying to look good in the eyes of the readers instead of proving anything, hence the different methods of being aggressive or passive. When everyone tells you that you're an idiot, you have no choice but to check that shit out. You can, of course, say 'No I'm not', but that will not make you less of an idiot. If you were to be serious in your attempt to prove god, you would at least try and listen to what everyone else has to say. But you are not trying to do any scientific research, you're just a cheap ass licking apologist that tries to shove his God shit story up the throat of decent people that do not give a single plain fuck about a cult of beggars that believe in some miraculous unexplained creature based on the witness of some drunk fishermen. That is why you deserve to be called an apologist cunt, a child molesting cult supporter, a braindead primitive piece of crap, because you insult the intelligence of decent human beings with your nasty, disgusting methods of doing religious propaganda. Again, I tell you, fuck off outta here, apologist. You belong in a cave, not in modern society.

[lilit]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?

That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.

I feel so sad for you 
My heart breaks for you and your problems 
I'll even pray for you 

Dear pathetic cunt, trying different methods of refering to me won't make you look better. I don't think nature might be a human being, you talked about it as if it were, you cheap shit. Nobody has been there at the beginning to see how life sprung on earth, but we all found out through research and, a little tip, it implied absolutely no god. I am sure dogs are smarter than some people, and I gave you as an example. With a little bit of effort and a dog I can even prove a dog is far more smarter than you. As for the religion shit, save that for yourself. Questioning things instead of believing them blindly makes me exactly the opposite of a religious man. But aside from that, you still haven't done what I've asked you, apologist. Prove that your child molesting, cat ass licking religion is the right one and then, based on the characteristics of your God, define it. Untill then, fuck off outta here, you apologist cunt.

P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.

The term is not appropriate because the Higgs boson is real and proven while God is not. Get outta here, apologist cat ass licker.

God is proven:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Thanks for all your talk against me. God has seen it, and will bless me extra because of it. You still have a chance to change. Do so, before it is too late for you.

God hardens the hearts of people into the way that they want to be. If you don't change soon, He will harden your heart into being against Him in a way that you won't be able to get out of once you realize He exists.

You are still solely trying to look good in the eyes of the readers instead of proving anything, hence the different methods of being aggressive or passive. When everyone tells you that you're an idiot, you have no choice but to check that shit out. You can, of course, say 'No I'm not', but that will not make you less of an idiot. If you were to be serious in your attempt to prove god, you would at least try and listen to what everyone else has to say. But you are not trying to do any scientific research, you're just a cheap ass licking apologist that tries to shove his God shit story up the throat of decent people that do not give a single plain fuck about a cult of beggars that believe in some miraculous unexplained creature based on the witness of some drunk fishermen. That is why you deserve to be called an apologist cunt, a child molesting cult supporter, a braindead primitive piece of crap, because you insult the intelligence of decent human beings with your nasty, disgusting methods of doing religious propaganda. Again, I tell you, fuck off outta here, apologist. You belong in a cave, not in modern society.

You did not think that it was because of disputes on the topic of religion, many people have always killed each other? And now we are raising this issue more and more often, and at the same time many are trying to offend the opponent and his faith.

[BADecker]

You are still solely trying to look good in the eyes of the readers instead of proving anything, hence the different methods of being aggressive or passive.

I look good in the eyes of readers for two reasons. The first is the scientific proof that God exists. Science has proven God, not me:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

The second reason is that you and jokers like you deny the proof without being able to rebut it. So, you are upholding me for showing the proof, and the proof because it is proof. I don't have any need to uphold myself. You are doing it for me. Thank you 

When everyone tells you that you're an idiot, you have no choice but to check that shit out.

Whether or not I am an idiot, nobody rebuts the proof that God exists. Since this is so, whether I am an idiot or not, you are an ignoramus for suggesting that God doesn't exist in the face of the proof you can't seem to rebut.

You can, of course, say 'No I'm not', but that will not make you less of an idiot. If you were to be serious in your attempt to prove god, you would at least try and listen to what everyone else has to say.

Scientific proof IS listening to what others say. And it is even stronger since you and the others haven't been able to rebut the proof. Thanks for helping to uphold the proof that God exists. 

But you are not trying to do any scientific research, you're just a cheap ass licking apologist that tries to shove his God shit story up the throat of decent people that do not give a single plain fuck about a cult of beggars that believe in some miraculous unexplained creature based on the witness of some drunk fishermen.

Did you know tthat you are a pretty good typist? Too bad you are all mixed up about the things that you type. You are doing much of what you suggest I am doing, while I am not doing it.

You haven't shown any proof that God doesn't exist. You haven't even rebutted the proof that He does exist. You are such a good typist.

That is why you deserve to be called an apologist cunt, a child molesting cult supporter, a braindead primitive piece of crap, because you insult the intelligence of decent human beings with your nasty, disgusting methods of doing religious propaganda. Again, I tell you, fuck off outta here, apologist. You belong in a cave, not in modern society.

You poor baby. Sounds like Mommy dropped you when you were little, and on your head, at that. One question. Are you headed for the funny farm? or are you there already?

 

[qwik2learn]

More researchers confirm that Paul (who never met Jesus) invented the new religion of Christianity. Paul's teaching of justification was also invented, it did not come from Jesus.

http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/122502/our-abraham-not-theirs

So why should we choose the narrative of Paul? The mainstream churches would like you to believe Paul's teaching exclusively, they ask you to believe that the "Bible" is "inerrant" in order to keep you ignorant of other narratives like PJ #2. The mainstream cults do not want any investigation of GOD'S WORD outside of Paul's word.

[Horacewoodwood]

You are still solely trying to look good in the eyes of the readers instead of proving anything, hence the different methods of being aggressive or passive.

I look good in the eyes of readers for two reasons. The first is the scientific proof that God exists. Science has proven God, not me:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

The second reason is that you and jokers like you deny the proof without being able to rebut it. So, you are upholding me for showing the proof, and the proof because it is proof. I don't have any need to uphold myself. You are doing it for me. Thank you 

When everyone tells you that you're an idiot, you have no choice but to check that shit out.

Whether or not I am an idiot, nobody rebuts the proof that God exists. Since this is so, whether I am an idiot or not, you are an ignoramus for suggesting that God doesn't exist in the face of the proof you can't seem to rebut.

You can, of course, say 'No I'm not', but that will not make you less of an idiot. If you were to be serious in your attempt to prove god, you would at least try and listen to what everyone else has to say.

Scientific proof IS listening to what others say. And it is even stronger since you and the others haven't been able to rebut the proof. Thanks for helping to uphold the proof that God exists. 

But you are not trying to do any scientific research, you're just a cheap ass licking apologist that tries to shove his God shit story up the throat of decent people that do not give a single plain fuck about a cult of beggars that believe in some miraculous unexplained creature based on the witness of some drunk fishermen.

Did you know tthat you are a pretty good typist? Too bad you are all mixed up about the things that you type. You are doing much of what you suggest I am doing, while I am not doing it.

You haven't shown any proof that God doesn't exist. You haven't even rebutted the proof that He does exist. You are such a good typist.

That is why you deserve to be called an apologist cunt, a child molesting cult supporter, a braindead primitive piece of crap, because you insult the intelligence of decent human beings with your nasty, disgusting methods of doing religious propaganda. Again, I tell you, fuck off outta here, apologist. You belong in a cave, not in modern society.

You poor baby. Sounds like Mommy dropped you when you were little, and on your head, at that. One question. Are you headed for the funny farm? or are you there already?

 

Trying to get smart with me and all you do is say 'You did not rebut my proof'. Here you go, you apologist cunt, hopefully you vanish the fuck outta here after this.

1.Machine-like nature of the universe - obviously, you know nothing of the universe. If you would, you would know that there is a lot we don't know about it in order to call it machine-like. But hey, you're used to finding excuses for something you don't know about. Nothing proofs anything here except you talk about shit that you don't know.
2. This is solely an assumption based on the fact that you believe that the universe has a creator (and you specifically know who, that is the flaw with you retards).
3. Quantum mathematics? Really? You call your shit scientifically based on the fact that you use fancy words? Randomness is not and was never what you defined it to be. Randomness means the lack of predictability, of a pattern, not the lack of the cause. I strongly believe you are a cunt more than a retard and you intentionally wrongly defined randomness in order to prove your bullshit. The remaining bullshit in your proof at this point is again an assumption, not proof. You assume that everything has a cause, so the universe must have God as a cause. Let us quickly cut the crap: we know there must be a cause to the big bang. We don't know what was that cause. Neither you. The only difference between you and people like me is that we try to find out through research. Apologists like you take the short way to the nobrain area and say 'It's God'. That's what you need to prove, that the one responsible for the universe is a God or the God. Until now, all you do is prove that there must be a cause to the universe. We already knew that, dipshit.
4. The nations look for God - here comes the propaganda. You really call this scientific proof? Have you ever read a scientific work, you mustering retard? Let's see some probability now. What is more probable:
a. A super intelligent and powerfull being created the universe and humans. Based on the logic of Badecker, something must have created the God. If he is so intelligent, how could he know something far more intelligent did not create him? If this is so, why are we losing time with this mediocre intelligent loser, let's hunt for the big one. Also, how far will this go, to the infinite?
b. Humans, who tend to use their imagination, fantasising about how powerfull they could be if they got smarter, invented a God as a protector, in the fear of predators. Later on, that became a religion and as man became more and more intelligent, religion became a way of controling other people hence the ones who invented and control it fantasize about having that power and act as if they would. Other examples of Godlike stories created by humans: nearly every superhero, fantasy movies, fantasy games, santa claus, local legends. For me, the this is far more probable. In fact, I attribute the God thing a percentage of 0.001% of probability.

Finally, I reach to my conclusion that I've said before without needing to write all of this for an apologist cunt to drop the 'you didn't prove I'm wrong' bullshit. The conclusion is all of that is pure assumption and intentionally error. Absolutely no proof anywhere that God is the cause of universe. All that you prove is that the Universe must have a cause, and we already know that, because it has been already proven. Your job is to prove that the cause is specifically your God. Good luck with that. Thank you a lot for wasting my time with your apologistic crap that does follow a pattern. Now fuck off outta here, you brainless cultist.

[Horacewoodwood]

I think the existence of God can not be proved by science. Either you believe, or you do not.

It can not be proved at all. You may believe in whatever you want to believe in, but claiming it is the truth and one must not offend your god, for example, changes the situation. In that case, it needs proof. Since religion claims its story to be true and their God to be the ruler, then they must prove it or begone.

Proof and scientific proof that God exists is found right here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Complete bullshit. This is not proof, this is a joke this monkey keeps repeating hoping someone might actually believe that shit. Next!

Look at how much smarter whatever made nature is than humans. Nature does the below all day, everyday, billions of times over throughout the earth. Humans are only trying to copy nature enough that they can do it one time.

Firestorm brewing as scientists work to create synthetic human DNA

The same group is getting back together in New York City next week.

To the meeting organizers, last year's secretive measures were, counterintuitively, to make sure as many people heard about the project as possible. They were submitting a paper about the project to a scientific journal and were discouraged from sharing the information publicly before it was published.

But there's another reason why this group of scientists, while encouraging debate and public involvement, would be wary of attracting too much attention. Their project is an effort to synthesize DNA, including human DNA. Researchers will start with simpler organisms, such as microbes and plants, but hope to ultimately create strands of human genetic code. One of the group's organizers, Jef Boeke, director of the Institute for Systems Genetics at NYU School of Medicine, told CNBC that incorporating synthesized DNA into mammalian (or even human) cells could happen in four to five years.

Read more at http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/synthetic-dna-scientist-says-it-could-be-inside-humans-within-5-years.html.

There are dogs much smarter than humans, we can take you for an example. However, nature is not a person, it doesn't 'do' stuff and there's no smarter being that made it. Badecker is a bullshitting apologist that repeats the same links over and over again even though every sane being told him it's complete bullshit. Please ignore him, he forgot to get to his lobotomy.

P.S. You selectively answered my replies. You chose the one tht did not put you in difficulty. Bitch.

You poor, little thing you. Did Mommy treat you so harshly when you were little? Do you actually think that nature might be a human being? Are you trying to tell us you were there at the beginning, so you saw how nature was made? Do you lack simple science understanding so that you don't even know the simple basics of science? Has your religion dragged you so far down the scale of intelligence that you think dogs are smarter than people?

That's okay, little fella. There are lots of folks out there who will be more than glad to help you with your problems. Then, after you get the help you so badly need, you can start studying up on science so that you can finally learn how things really work... how the universe was created by God... and the scientific proof of it.

I feel so sad for you 
My heart breaks for you and your problems 
I'll even pray for you 

Dear pathetic cunt, trying different methods of refering to me won't make you look better. I don't think nature might be a human being, you talked about it as if it were, you cheap shit. Nobody has been there at the beginning to see how life sprung on earth, but we all found out through research and, a little tip, it implied absolutely no god. I am sure dogs are smarter than some people, and I gave you as an example. With a little bit of effort and a dog I can even prove a dog is far more smarter than you. As for the religion shit, save that for yourself. Questioning things instead of believing them blindly makes me exactly the opposite of a religious man. But aside from that, you still haven't done what I've asked you, apologist. Prove that your child molesting, cat ass licking religion is the right one and then, based on the characteristics of your God, define it. Untill then, fuck off outta here, you apologist cunt.

P.S. I have no issue, I usually do not use offensive language, but in your case, the words that I am using actually resemble your characteristics. None of those words are inappropriate for your characterisation. If they seem offensive, it is because you with your whole mentality and presence here are offensive. That is why I've told you and I will keep telling you to fuck off. You are so dumb it is actually an insult for life on earth in 2017. Isis is less insulting than you are and they kill people.

If the 'GOD' particle exist's, then what more needs to be discussed?

The God particle is called a Higgs boson. The 'God' thing is a nickname that physicists dislike (Higgs himself dislikes it) and it was given to the particle in a book. It's all about the interpretation of someone, nothing to do with the proof of a God.

And, the term is not really appropriate. Why not? God is far greater and more fundamental than the Higgs boson.

The term is not appropriate because the Higgs boson is real and proven while God is not. Get outta here, apologist cat ass licker.

God is proven:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1355109.msg14047133#msg14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.msg16803380#msg16803380.

Thanks for all your talk against me. God has seen it, and will bless me extra because of it. You still have a chance to change. Do so, before it is too late for you.

God hardens the hearts of people into the way that they want to be. If you don't change soon, He will harden your heart into being against Him in a way that you won't be able to get out of once you realize He exists.

You are still solely trying to look good in the eyes of the readers instead of proving anything, hence the different methods of being aggressive or passive. When everyone tells you that you're an idiot, you have no choice but to check that shit out. You can, of course, say 'No I'm not', but that will not make you less of an idiot. If you were to be serious in your attempt to prove god, you would at least try and listen to what everyone else has to say. But you are not trying to do any scientific research, you're just a cheap ass licking apologist that tries to shove his God shit story up the throat of decent people that do not give a single plain fuck about a cult of beggars that believe in some miraculous unexplained creature based on the witness of some drunk fishermen. That is why you deserve to be called an apologist cunt, a child molesting cult supporter, a braindead primitive piece of crap, because you insult the intelligence of decent human beings with your nasty, disgusting methods of doing religious propaganda. Again, I tell you, fuck off outta here, apologist. You belong in a cave, not in modern society.

You did not think that it was because of disputes on the topic of religion, many people have always killed each other? And now we are raising this issue more and more often, and at the same time many are trying to offend the opponent and his faith.

I strongly believe those disputes were between different religions, and yes it is still happening today, between different religions. I failed to see any atheist lately go and detonate himself over some religious people that disagreed with him. As for offending, there is nothing more offensive than a primitive religion that still exists and rules over. I donlt go on the street and offend religious people, I have no interest in that. What I do try to offend and make unconfortobale are fake fuckers like Badecker who only do religious propaganda and try to stick to the scientific side, claiming science is in their favour. I do offend these fuckers and their faith because their way of thinking we are stupid enogh to be fooled by them is insulting.

[BADecker]

More researchers confirm that Paul (who never met Jesus) invented the new religion of Christianity. Paul's teaching of justification was also invented, it did not come from Jesus.

http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/books/122502/our-abraham-not-theirs

So why should we choose the narrative of Paul? The mainstream churches would like you to believe Paul's teaching exclusively, they ask you to believe that the "Bible" is "inerrant" in order to keep you ignorant of other narratives like PJ #2. The mainstream cults do not want any investigation of GOD'S WORD outside of Paul's word.

Actually, the Old Testament is not a Paul thing at all. You can find the nation of Israel, today, that upholds the Torah and the Tanakh, the O.T., completely separate from anything that Paul wrote.

When you check out the New Testament, you will find that it upholds the O.T.  This shows that even if Paul manipulated some of the N.T. to His liking, he did it at God's direction. However, the Council of Nicea was the place where the false teachings were scrapped, refining the N.T. into something that is pure.

[BADecker]

Oh, wow. I almost can't believe it. You are actually being drawn into stating something useful, sort of.

Trying to get smart with me and all you do is say 'You did not rebut my proof'. Here you go, you apologist cunt, hopefully you vanish the fuck outta here after this.

1.Machine-like nature of the universe - obviously, you know nothing of the universe. If you would, you would know that there is a lot we don't know about it in order to call it machine-like. But hey, you're used to finding excuses for something you don't know about. Nothing proofs anything here except you talk about shit that you don't know.

LOL! Then why is it that every last machine that people have and use comes from examples shown in the universe... examples that have been around for thousands of years into the past, long before anybody looked to see what they are.

2. This is solely an assumption based on the fact that you believe that the universe has a creator (and you specifically know who, that is the flaw with you retards).

You say "this." What "this" are you talking about. Science scientifically proves that God exists. This throws out the idea of believing it. You can't believe what you know. Rather, you believe what God says - his predictions and explanations - not that He exists.

3. Quantum mathematics? Really? You call your shit scientifically based on the fact that you use fancy words? Randomness is not and was never what you defined it to be. Randomness means the lack of predictability, of a pattern, not the lack of the cause. I strongly believe you are a cunt more than a retard and you intentionally wrongly defined randomness in order to prove your bullshit. The remaining bullshit in your proof at this point is again an assumption, not proof. You assume that everything has a cause, so the universe must have God as a cause. Let us quickly cut the crap: we know there must be a cause to the big bang. We don't know what was that cause. Neither you. The only difference between you and people like me is that we try to find out through research. Apologists like you take the short way to the nobrain area and say 'It's God'. That's what you need to prove, that the one responsible for the universe is a God or the God. Until now, all you do is prove that there must be a cause to the universe. We already knew that, dipshit.

LOL! Just as I have said. Pure random has never been witnessed anywhere. All that has been witnessed - and in overwhelming abundance - is cause and effect. Just because cause and effect are often not observable by people because of their lack of any real abiblity, doesn't mean that there is any randomness. Stop blabbing, and get down to something that makes sense.

4. The nations look for God - here comes the propaganda. You really call this scientific proof? Have you ever read a scientific work, you mustering retard?

You poor baby. You can't take it, can you, when someone proves your religion is foolish

Let's see some probability now. What is more probable:
a. A super intelligent and powerfull being created the universe and humans. Based on the logic of Badecker, something must have created the God. If he is so intelligent, how could he know something far more intelligent did not create him? If this is so, why are we losing time with this mediocre intelligent loser, let's hunt for the big one. Also, how far will this go, to the infinite?

You talk so silly. When a builder builds a shed, is he part of it? Do the laws of the shed hold true in the builder? Is the builder made out of wood and nails like the shed? Does he have shingles on his head like the shed has shingles on its roof? In the same way, the physics of the universe is not necessarily something that applies to God, even in the least.

b. Humans, who tend to use their imagination, fantasising about how powerfull they could be if they got smarter, invented a God as a protector, in the fear of predators. Later on, that became a religion and as man became more and more intelligent, religion became a way of controling other people hence the ones who invented and control it fantasize about having that power and act as if they would. Other examples of Godlike stories created by humans: nearly every superhero, fantasy movies, fantasy games, santa claus, local legends. For me, the this is far more probable. In fact, I attribute the God thing a percentage of 0.001% of probability.

Wow! You just described scientists. The only two differences are, they don't say the word "God," and they don't have the facts like God does.

Finally, I reach to my conclusion that I've said before without needing to write all of this for an apologist cunt to drop the 'you didn't prove I'm wrong' bullshit. The conclusion is all of that is pure assumption and intentionally error. Absolutely no proof anywhere that God is the cause of universe. All that you prove is that the Universe must have a cause, and we already know that, because it has been already proven. Your job is to prove that the cause is specifically your God. Good luck with that. Thank you a lot for wasting my time with your apologistic crap that does follow a pattern. Now fuck off outta here, you brainless cultist.

Thanks for the non-rebuttal. Most of what you say is simply talk against me personally. You poor baby. It kinda tickles watching the rabies spittle dribbling out of your mouth. Be careful, now. You just might bite yourself in the forehead. However, if you really want to, I'll tell you how you can do it. Stand on a chair, so you can reach way up there. LOL!