Scientific proof that God exists?

[Vod]

So, can you even get on topic and show the proof for or against the existence of God? Or do you simply like to blab a lot?

After 400 pages, there has been no proof than any god exists. 

I do like to help you overcome your brainwashing though.

[1715584828]

1715584828

[1715584828]

1715584828

[1715584828]

1715584828

[Philopolymath]

Walter Russell defined God as the CAUSE /Creator of this SEEMING Universe..
Just because Vod is an arrogant idiot both too stupid and shallow to investigate.
His IGNORANT OPINION has no relation to the fact that there IS a valid scientific explanation of the SEEMING existence of MATTER and it's CREATION.
His OPINION is NOT a scientific reality.
Russell's RESULTS are a validation of his treatise..Which is exactly meets the criteria of scientific proof.
And It HAS BEEN empirically tested by far greater men..(TESLA for one) then the same ignorant commentator .

[Philopolymath]

And there you have it..
But stay stupid and arrogant vod..that way you will always be my bitch...

[BADecker]

So, can you even get on topic and show the proof for or against the existence of God? Or do you simply like to blab a lot?

After 400 pages, there has been no proof than any god exists.  

I do like to help you overcome your brainwashing though.

Simply speaking, entropy shows that there was a beginning to the universe, and that complexity has been declining ever since.

Complexity as it still exists, after thousands of years of decline, shows that whatever caused the universe had complexity in it.

Cause and effect in all things shows us that the complexity of whatever started the universe was complex beyond any hint of intelligence that we have... and way beyond even determining how intelligent that intelligence was. In addition, C&E shows us that everything was programmed to happen as it has, and is happening.

This all proves that God did it. Whatever God is, the word "God" is the best word we have to express where the universe came from, even though our definitions of the word "God" are way too weak to express the magnitude of what God is.

[valucash]

I really doubt there is any scientific proof to describe god existence.

You are a proof that God exist, the human body is too complex to be an accident of nature.

[Vod]

Simply speaking, entropy shows that there was a beginning to the universe, and that complexity has been declining ever since.

Exactly.  Entropy helps proves evolution - the change of the complexity.

No where does it say evolution always makes something more complex.

[Przemax]

Simply speaking, entropy shows that there was a beginning to the universe, and that complexity has been declining ever since.

Exactly.  Entropy helps proves evolution - the change of the complexity.

No where does it say evolution always makes something more complex.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_biological_complexity

[Vod]

If you don't know what you are talking about, I suggest posting in "Beginners and Help"

[Przemax]

If you don't know what you are talking about, I suggest posting in "Beginners and Help"

I was picturing you.

Evolution changes does not go backward. Thats what evolution teaches. So if something is complex it cannot decomplex itself. Thats like basics of evolution one should know to be able to talk about it. So its against the entropy.

[Vod]

Evolution changes does not go backward. Thats what evolution teaches. So if something is complex it cannot decomplex itself. Thats like basics of evolution one should know to talk about it. So its against the entropy.

Changes never go backward.  If I become less complex, that is moving forward in the evolutionary chain.

[Przemax]

Evolution changes does not go backward. Thats what evolution teaches. So if something is complex it cannot decomplex itself. Thats like basics of evolution one should know to talk about it. So its against the entropy.

Changes never go backward.  If I become less complex, that is moving forward in the evolutionary chain.

Evolution says that you cannot be less complex (what you have stays in you). Thats why they invent shits like a tail bone is there because of being unable to lose complexity.

Tail bone is useful to attach muscles there, for example to take a dump or have better sex life. So it is not what evolution says.

[Vod]

Evolution says that you cannot be less complex (what you have stays in you). Thats why they invent shits like a tail bone is there because of unable to lose complexity.

Evolution simply states things change over time naturally.

[Przemax]

Evolution says that you cannot be less complex (what you have stays in you). Thats why they invent shits like a tail bone is there because of unable to lose complexity.

Evolution simply states things change over time naturally.

That's what you say lol.

[Vod]

Evolution says that you cannot be less complex (what you have stays in you). Thats why they invent shits like a tail bone is there because of unable to lose complexity.

Evolution simply states things change over time naturally.

That's what you say lol.

That's what evolution is.   The appendix is evolving out of the human body.  Things that aren't needed disappear as part of evolution.

[Przemax]

[Vod]

A picture!!!!   Proof the earth is older than 6,000 years!

[Przemax]

Evolution says that you cannot be less complex (what you have stays in you). Thats why they invent shits like a tail bone is there because of unable to lose complexity.

Evolution simply states things change over time naturally.

That's what you say lol.

That's what evolution is.   The appendix is evolving out of the human body.  Things that aren't needed disappear as part of evolution.

They never disappear. Period. Thats how evolutionists see it. You are not one of them. You think you are talking about evolution. You are not.

For example the bronchi was not under the process of disappearing. It according to that sci-fi become ear. Ear is way more complex. Etc etc etc. They count bones and features to count complexity. That is just sci-fi but least they want to be seen as logical and rational.

[Vod]

They never disappear. Period. Thats how evolutionists see it. You are not one of them. You think you are talking about evolution. You are not.

As an evolutionist, I know things can disappear over time.  The appendix is a great example of evolution.  Dogs are another.

[Przemax]

They never disappear. Period. Thats how evolutionists see it. You are not one of them. You think you are talking about evolution. You are not.

As an evolutionist, I know things can disappear over time.  The appendix is a great example of evolution.  Dogs are another.

Dogs are what? Dogs disappear? Are you just trolling or what? Evolutionists (you re not one of them) claims that appendix is useless... And its not gone because of evolution not going backward. Do you understand?

[Vod]

Dogs are what? Dogs disappear? Are you just trolling or what? Evolutionists (you re not one of them) claims that appendix is useless... So it should be gone. It is not gone.... Not sure if you are just trolling.

Dogs are proof of evolution.

The appendix is disappearing as man evolves... as an evolutionist I know it is useless, but I also know removal takes many generations.