Scientific proof that God exists?

[HawkinsAntonio]

There is a lot of scientific evidence about God in many forums as well as on YouTube; now there are many worship god because they believe he exists.

[HatfieldMark]

I think God does not exist because he does not help me in many severe cases.

[BTC_BTC]

Humans, animals, plants, and all the contents of life are scientific proof that God exists, we exist because God created us. About the theory of human origins has been mentioned in some Bibles that man comes from one father and one mother, but everything is back to your beliefs. You also have the right not to believe.

[QuestionAuthority]

So many technically useless points regarding GOD.. hmm..

"Let me get this right. You're searching for scientific evidence of a hypothesis that cannot be tested. -
That's incredibly naive."

The proof is the fact that the religion started among a group of illiterate cave dwellers that were afraid of everything that they couldn’t comprehend. It has to be true if Bedouin tribesmen believe it. Also the proof of gods love is everywhere. Just last week I was complaining that there were too many school children in Texas so god sent a kid to school with a gun to kill some of them.

http://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/father-of-accused-texas-shooter-believes-bullying-was-behind-rampage-1526920563

[Jhon dse]

What a good question, i have a question too for you, do you know who make this world? It so small example scientific that god is exist, Do not think weird weird just think about where we are from where it can be created if your logic can achieve that?

[Tommy len]

As for me I don't belive in God, neither in any esoteric nonsense. But I fully understand the conception of a religon that's based on the faith alone and requires no evidence or proves. 

[Thing thing]

Religion and science do not go along because religion is based solely on revelation and faith. Yes, religious people have no choice but to admit scientific discoveries, but however, what they do with it is take it for granted and use it in their advantage by claiming 'that is another evidence of how majestic is God'.

[HugoHeasia]

It is a far more knowledgeable and complex for the human to do so because we are not equipped to have supernatural powers that's why we couldn't find a scientific proof that it is true. Me as a Christian, relies on the bible alone. And also, it is contradicting for religion and science.

[cryptohoodz]

The hypothesis is a contradiction. Science and religion do not speak the same language..
A believer in God does not use scientific rules/empirical evidence to validate assumptions or test a hypothesis. Atheists/scientists do.
Sure, there are people that claim certain historical artifacts from religious books are proof that religion exists, but that doesn't proof a non-scientific reality.

To be critical, both parties should be aware of their paradigms and limitations.

Interestingly, atheism is increasing. Several reasons for this trend from my pov:
- there is more information (internet etc.). so people have a better understanding of their world and solutions to their problems.
- society is more dynamic and religion has difficulty to adapt. nowadays young people's main concerns in western countries are where do they offer free wifi (!) and how do i get likes on my instagram. reading a book that's 2000 years old isn't very appealing to a lot of young people.
- values change. nowadays people want to maximize their potential and enjoy life. it's not a priority anymore for most people devote a large part of your life to God and/or the reward of a life in heaven.

[xtraelv]

There is a reason it is called "faith".  It cannot be scientifically proven.

You don't need faith or belief to be a good person.  Just empathy.

People are basically killing each other to see who's got the better imaginary friend.

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

Faith itself is not bad as long as the person does good. It is a like a comfy blanket or pacifier for adults.

[expertofexperts]

It all depend whether you believe in them or not. For me in a neutral party. Its yes or no from me. But if he really exist then why is there unbalance in society?

[HikariShin]

I believe in god

[belphegory]

The Bible is the living proof that God exists.
It's just like the wind,  you don't see it but you can feel it that's why you believe that there's a wind.

You mean the "proof" that has been handed down 30-50 years of oral passing on before being written down?
The mis-quoted, mis-translated to the umteenth time, copy of a copy so called "inerrent" word of god?

That proof??

[zebrabounties]

Isn't this the question, that we all trying to find the answer for

[enzieclarke]

It doesn't need proof that GOD exists. We should have definitely know that there is  a supreme being which GOD

[love_you_much]

Perhaps that is just theory, but we still believe that God exists and protects us.

[PETER2680]

Lol,  this is totally rubbish first they said men came from the evolution of apes., now there is chromosomes Now. All bullshit. God's work is unexplainable.

[SadEmo]

I don't need any proof because faight is enough for me...

[BADecker]

SBB, Im bad mouthing you cos you are just too easy.  Anything and everything you say is meant to prove that you are supposedly of such high intellect that only you can understand the science needed to prove your ridiculous god.

And so I stand by my previous statement: You are assuming things based on your beliefs and views. Your basic science is collective and coloured with YOUR opinion. I'm not badmouthing science, I love science. I refuse to refute your so called science purely because your putting your beliefs in certain scientific fields that YOU believe means god. Do you understand SBB? I have always been talking about the root cause of WHY and HOW you put your faith in your so called science-which-explains-god....not the actual science.

People could believe that the square root of the angle of the sun divided by the length of a bird's wings could mean god.....any of these things individually exists. Put them together and to THEM it means god. As does your collection of so called science mean god to YOU. None of these proves the scientific existence of god.

See SBB? Probably not....your prolly gonna come back with some witty comment about not talking science in a science thread when your JUST TOO DENSE to understand what I'm actually saying. Sorry I'm talking over your head, its that pesky cognitive dissonance again.

 

There you go, doing the exact thing that you claim I am doing.

Cause and effect is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, if nothing else. That isn't me. It is standard science.

Entropy is standard science and is visible everywhere.

Complexity is standard science and is visible everywhere.

I can't help it you are too biased against science to understand that these 3 things could not exist in a universe without God.

Now, don't misunderstand. The God of the universe is not being described by science very much. Perhaps even the word "God" is an improper word to use. If you feel that way, use other terms, like "Almighty, Divine Intelligence." or "The great First Cause," or "The Father of All," or any other words that describe God more accurately. But don't go on ignoring standard science which is all around you.

[Astargath]

SBB, Im bad mouthing you cos you are just too easy.  Anything and everything you say is meant to prove that you are supposedly of such high intellect that only you can understand the science needed to prove your ridiculous god.

And so I stand by my previous statement: You are assuming things based on your beliefs and views. Your basic science is collective and coloured with YOUR opinion. I'm not badmouthing science, I love science. I refuse to refute your so called science purely because your putting your beliefs in certain scientific fields that YOU believe means god. Do you understand SBB? I have always been talking about the root cause of WHY and HOW you put your faith in your so called science-which-explains-god....not the actual science.

People could believe that the square root of the angle of the sun divided by the length of a bird's wings could mean god.....any of these things individually exists. Put them together and to THEM it means god. As does your collection of so called science mean god to YOU. None of these proves the scientific existence of god.

See SBB? Probably not....your prolly gonna come back with some witty comment about not talking science in a science thread when your JUST TOO DENSE to understand what I'm actually saying. Sorry I'm talking over your head, its that pesky cognitive dissonance again.

 

There you go, doing the exact thing that you claim I am doing.

Cause and effect is upheld by Newton's 3rd Law, if nothing else. That isn't me. It is standard science.

Entropy is standard science and is visible everywhere.

Complexity is standard science and is visible everywhere.

I can't help it you are too biased against science to understand that these 3 things could not exist in a universe without God.

Now, don't misunderstand. The God of the universe is not being described by science very much. Perhaps even the word "God" is an improper word to use. If you feel that way, use other terms, like "Almighty, Divine Intelligence." or "The great First Cause," or "The Father of All," or any other words that describe God more accurately. But don't go on ignoring standard science which is all around you.

''these 3 things could not exist in a universe without God.'' You are saying those 3 things exist and they do but you are not proving how they all together prove god. How do you know they can't exist without a god?