chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
April 30, 2015, 09:22:08 AM |
|
Definitly a pool problem.. well we have had the donation miner running via the donation link on westahsh without any major issues that we can speak of ... obviously issues arise here and then - but westhash is a lot more stable that yaamp ... it really looks like a yaamp stratum issue - so we will keep the donation for quark on westhash until yaamp can fix it ... x11 had been running for hours and the stratum proxy is still connected with yaamp ... so - agreed ... its a yaamp pool issue ... anyone know anyone there to inform them? ... or just a support ticket ... btw - havent had time to setup the other algos - but they will be up within the next day ... too much on my plate unfortunately ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
April 30, 2015, 09:42:05 AM |
|
well we have had the donation miner running via the donation link on westahsh without any major issues that we can speak of ... obviously issues arise here and then - but westhash is a lot more stable that yaamp ... it really looks like a yaamp stratum issue - so we will keep the donation for quark on westhash until yaamp can fix it ... x11 had been running for hours and the stratum proxy is still connected with yaamp ... so - agreed ... its a yaamp pool issue ... anyone know anyone there to inform them? ... or just a support ticket ... btw - havent had time to setup the other algos - but they will be up within the next day ... too much on my plate unfortunately ... #crysx
Westhash is looking good, thanks alot for your support.
|
|
|
|
SDFG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 0
|
|
April 30, 2015, 09:51:42 AM |
|
Prompt heshreyt GTX 660Ti ,670 ?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:00:09 AM |
|
Prompt heshreyt GTX 660Ti ,670 ?
?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
SDFG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 0
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:03:11 AM |
|
khash/s ))
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:04:57 AM |
|
well we have had the donation miner running via the donation link on westahsh without any major issues that we can speak of ... obviously issues arise here and then - but westhash is a lot more stable that yaamp ... it really looks like a yaamp stratum issue - so we will keep the donation for quark on westhash until yaamp can fix it ... x11 had been running for hours and the stratum proxy is still connected with yaamp ... so - agreed ... its a yaamp pool issue ... anyone know anyone there to inform them? ... or just a support ticket ... btw - havent had time to setup the other algos - but they will be up within the next day ... too much on my plate unfortunately ... #crysx
Westhash is looking good, thanks alot for your support. all good sp ... tanx so much for putting a great deal of effort into this highly optimized miner ... when the official domain ( granitecoin.com ) propagates - we will have the systems permanently setup for donations to you and the other awesome devs ... so the only change that will be required from these test systems is to drop the 'x' on granitecoinx.com ... everything else will be the same ... im actually quite interested in the spreadx11 algo ... the private miner works really well and works seamlessly with the pool we mine on ( nonce-pool ) ... you have incorporated the spread algo into ccminer - but this just refuses to mine with the pool altogether ... are you going to have this supported with ccminer and working with the pool ( like the private spreadminer ) with all the optimizations? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:10:39 AM |
|
khash/s ))
This fork only works for the latest NVIDIA cards. Compute 5.0 or newer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDACompute 3.5 might work, but it is not tested in a while. (you need to build your own binaries and add compute_35 in the projectfile/makefile)
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:12:37 AM |
|
khash/s ))
This fork only works for the latest NVIDIA cards. Compute 5.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDACompute 3.5 might work, but it is not tested in a while. (you need to build your own binaries and add compute_35 in the projectfile/makefile) arent 750ti cards compute 5.0? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:12:59 AM |
|
all good sp ... im actually quite interested in the spreadx11 algo ... the private miner works really well and works seamlessly with the pool we mine on ( nonce-pool ) ...
It's been a while since the last private spreadcoin miner. I might release build 8 to the donators this weekend
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:13:46 AM |
|
khash/s ))
This fork only works for the latest NVIDIA cards. Compute 5.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDACompute 3.5 might work, but it is not tested in a while. (you need to build your own binaries and add compute_35 in the projectfile/makefile) arent 750ti cards compute 5.0? ... #crysx yes they are. But the 660Ti is compute 3.0.
|
|
|
|
SDFG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 0
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:14:17 AM |
|
Thank you)
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:16:13 AM |
|
khash/s ))
This fork only works for the latest NVIDIA cards. Compute 5.0 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDACompute 3.5 might work, but it is not tested in a while. (you need to build your own binaries and add compute_35 in the projectfile/makefile) arent 750ti cards compute 5.0? ... #crysx yes they are. But the 660Ti is compute 3.0. ok - agreed ... but 75% of the farm we have are gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards ... the spread algo in this ccminer fork wont work with the pool - but the private spreadminer does - and that is built for compute 5.0 also isnt it? ... or am i missing the point here ... as i am really tired right this minute ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:28:49 AM |
|
ok - agreed ... but 75% of the farm we have are gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards ... the spread algo in this ccminer fork wont work with the pool - but the private spreadminer does - and that is built for compute 5.0 also isnt it? ... or am i missing the point here ... as i am really tired right this minute ... #crysx
You are mixing threads here. There was a guy who asked if he could use this version to mine on the gtx660ti. Your gigabytes will work just fine, and I will make you richer. he-he
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
April 30, 2015, 10:47:10 AM |
|
ok - agreed ... but 75% of the farm we have are gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards ... the spread algo in this ccminer fork wont work with the pool - but the private spreadminer does - and that is built for compute 5.0 also isnt it? ... or am i missing the point here ... as i am really tired right this minute ... #crysx
You are mixing threads here. There was a guy who asked if he could use this version to mine on the gtx660ti. Your gigabytes will work just fine, and I will make you richer. he-he not mixing threads at all sp ... there is -a spread algo in your fork - and i tried using it only to find it will not run with the pool that we mine ( which is nonce-pool ) ... the private ( paid ) spreadminer that you optimized and forked from tsiv works just fine with the pool ... what i was wondering is whether the -a spread algo that in THIS fork of ccminer ( that doesnt work with pool mining ) is going to be replaced with the optimized version that you sent privately ( which works flawlessly with the pool ) and will be incorporated into this fork? ... that would be fantastic if this is so ... and we would have no issue donating much more hashpower to see that happen ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
April 30, 2015, 11:02:30 AM |
|
what i was wondering is whether the -a spread algo that in THIS fork of ccminer ( that doesnt work with pool mining ) is going to be replaced with the optimized version that you sent privately ( which works flawlessly with the pool ) and will be incorporated into this fork? ... that would be fantastic if this is so ... and we would have no issue donating much more hashpower to see that happen ...
Ok. I can merge the kernals into the latest branch. Still private for the donators.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
April 30, 2015, 11:10:36 AM |
|
what i was wondering is whether the -a spread algo that in THIS fork of ccminer ( that doesnt work with pool mining ) is going to be replaced with the optimized version that you sent privately ( which works flawlessly with the pool ) and will be incorporated into this fork? ... that would be fantastic if this is so ... and we would have no issue donating much more hashpower to see that happen ...
Ok. I can merge the kernals into the latest branch. Still private for the donators. if you want to keep it private - that is entirely up to you ... but that would be great if you could ... the last one we compiled here works great - and you have done some great work with the optimizations ... that is so much appreciated sp ... tanx ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 30, 2015, 11:26:16 AM |
|
what i was wondering is whether the -a spread algo that in THIS fork of ccminer ( that doesnt work with pool mining ) is going to be replaced with the optimized version that you sent privately ( which works flawlessly with the pool ) and will be incorporated into this fork? ... that would be fantastic if this is so ... and we would have no issue donating much more hashpower to see that happen ...
Ok. I can merge the kernals into the latest branch. Still private for the donators. Any updates soon on the private cryptonight miner soon?
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
April 30, 2015, 12:30:01 PM |
|
I think cryptonight should be merged into ccminer as well.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
April 30, 2015, 01:23:16 PM |
|
I think cryptonight should be merged into ccminer as well.
this fork is going to be one hell of a miner ... you could say a forking hell of a miner ... tanx so much sp ... donations still mining for you ... will add the other algos tomorrow afternoon adelaide time ... westhash is running fine with quark - which confirms it is a yaamp issue ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
flipclip
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
April 30, 2015, 02:39:22 PM |
|
Which improvement we could expect on QUBIt with GTX970/750Ti
... Especially when I have both of the cards on same rig - its total mess using the "g" parameter... Couldn't you start up two instances of ccminer utilizing the -d? One instance would be for your 970 the other instance for your 750Ti, and you could set the -i -g parameters per instance.
|
|
|
|
|