Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2017, 05:39:18 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BitcoinMax.com] Closed  (Read 184264 times)
zyk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 05:33:26 PM
 #1841

zykloogish is not understandable so fast, please read again, this is not CNBC...

and tell me then, which point of past performance i missed.

Cheers Zyk
1498239558
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1498239558

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1498239558
Reply with quote  #2

1498239558
Report to moderator
1498239558
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1498239558

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1498239558
Reply with quote  #2

1498239558
Report to moderator
POLONIEX TRADING SIGNALS
+50% Profit and more via TELEGRAM
ALTCOINTRADER.CO
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1498239558
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1498239558

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1498239558
Reply with quote  #2

1498239558
Report to moderator
1498239558
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1498239558

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1498239558
Reply with quote  #2

1498239558
Report to moderator
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


I heart thebaron


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 05:35:08 PM
 #1842

zykloogish is not understandable so fast, please read again, this is not CNBC...

and tell me then, which point of past performance i missed.

Cheers Zyk

I am refraining from telling you anything, in fear that you might continue to respond.

ErebusBat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560

I am the one who knocks


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 05:38:57 PM
 #1843

I am refraining from telling you anything, in fear that you might continue to respond.
lulz

Seriously though zyk... .you are a good sport

░▒▓█ Coinroll.it - 1% House Edge Dice Game █▓▒░ • Coinroll Thread • *FREE* 100 BTC Raffle

Signup for CEX.io BitFury exchange and get GHS Instantly!  Don't wait for shipping, mine NOW!
zyk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 05:55:14 PM
 #1844

zykloogish is not understandable so fast, please read again, this is not CNBC...

and tell me then, which point of past performance i missed.

Cheers Zyk

I am refraining from telling you anything, in fear that you might continue to respond.

 Cheesy LOL  Cheesy

if you want me to shut up donate to :  16jQSmD8jW8PFUMk4n1LSbguL91ZsbJ4eY


then i´ll keep quiet ...............                   until asked or the question marks are threatening to overwhelm the forum

Thanks Zyk
MelMan2002
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434



View Profile
August 30, 2012, 06:06:09 PM
 #1845

I have started a thread where lenders that wish can give their information to pirate.

What are you getting yourself into?
What do you mean?


I mean: why would pirateat40 accept any information regarding bitcoinmax users coming from someone who isn't payb.tc?
I agree it isn't foolproof.  But given that payb.tc has as much stated that he will not forward ANY information to pirate I feel as though I need to do something.

At the very least it would let pirate get an idea of how much/many people are willing to deal with him directly.

Pirate in no way shape or form expressed that he wanted said information to 'deal' with anyone directly. He very well may send a 'one-way' notice of default to each individual name he receives. Some very minuscle percentage of funds to the address provided. And then do absolutly zero dealings thereafter. From a semi-legal standpoint, him sending even .00000001 BTC to each individual address with a notice of default could be enough to prove he had made sufficient effort to renumerate and be off the hook after that.

Of course I have no way of knowing what his true intentions are. No one does except for him.

You may be on to something there.  I'm not a lawyer by any means but I do know that if you are evicting someone for failing to pay rent then accepting a partial payment from the renter can delay the eviction process.  So maybe he wants an address so that he can pay a miniscule amount and then he can say "Look!  They accepted a partial payment!".

Like I said, I'm no lawyer and such a thing may not apply in this case...
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456



View Profile
August 30, 2012, 06:11:26 PM
 #1846

You may be on to something there.  I'm not a lawyer by any means but I do know that if you are evicting someone for failing to pay rent then accepting a partial payment from the renter can delay the eviction process.  So maybe he wants an address so that he can pay a miniscule amount and then he can say "Look!  They accepted a partial payment!".

Like I said, I'm no lawyer and such a thing may not apply in this case...

You can't refuse a payment made to a bitcoin address that is known to someone.
Just because he sent a payment doesn't mean you accepted it as a settlement for any amount owed.

memvola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 06:22:10 PM
 #1847

Like I said, I'm no lawyer and such a thing may not apply in this case...

Regardless of pirate's real motives, the PPT relation will have to break at some point.

payb.tc says pirate is only responsible for his account and the underlying accounts should be opaque. That is the ideal PPT relation by contracts of payb.tc with both sides.

However, in the ideal relation, the depositors' demands go through the PPT to pirate.

So, will the depositors sue payb.tc, and will payb.tc sue upstream? Is this the promise? If it is not, what is the place of PPT in this process?

I think it's best for everyone if payb.tc ceases involvement. (EDIT: Well, this statement is of course invalid if payb.tc will pursue legally on behalf of his depositors, when and if it gets to that point. In other words, he can't say no now and then decide not to get involved in a future point.)
eroxors
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770


Think. Positive. Thoughts.


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 06:35:47 PM
 #1848

payb.tc, I sent you a PM about a errant deposit yesterday.

Don't get caught up in the game and have a nice day!
memvola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 06:39:07 PM
 #1849

Like I said, I'm no lawyer and such a thing may not apply in this case...

Regardless of pirate's real motives, the PPT relation will have to break at some point.

payb.tc says pirate is only responsible for his account and the underlying accounts should be opaque. That is the ideal PPT relation by contracts of payb.tc with both sides.

However, in the ideal relation, the depositors' demands go through the PPT to pirate.

So, will the depositors sue payb.tc, and will payb.tc sue upstream? Is this the promise? If it is not, what is the place of PPT in this process?

I think it's best for everyone if payb.tc ceases involvement.


We put our coin to bitcoinmax ... they will come back thru the same channel ... If the BTC come back from pirate, i'm shure the ppt will do his best to distribute fairly .

And what if the money doesn't come? Will payb.tc will still act on behalf of the depositors? That is what I was talking about.

(EDIT: In yet other words: The depositors put their coin to bitcoinmax. But do they expect them from bitcoinmax? No. The PPT mechanism is already broken, both sides aren't opaque to each other anymore.)
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652



View Profile
August 30, 2012, 06:42:06 PM
 #1850

What happens if next week/month pirate announces that everyone's coins are ready to be sent (full or partial) and all he has to do is press the send confirm button. Oh but wait, he can't press that confirm button yet because he's waiting for the PPT operators to submit their account lists.

The pressure on the PPT operators would be massive. Not a position I would envy to be in.



memvola
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 06:52:34 PM
 #1851

The reality is one of these two:

  • Pirate is responsible to bitcoinmax and bitcoinmax is responsible to the depositors. (In this case I wouldn't want to be bitcoinmax.)
  • Pirate is responsible to the depositors. (Yet he doesn't know who he's responsible to.)

I don't in any way to endorse pirate here, or whatever ulterior motive he has for requesting the data. It just seems to me that the rules if this game suggest that giving the data might make more sense than not giving it.
policja71
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 07:04:39 PM
 #1852

I just hope pirate doesnt pull the payb.tc didnt comply with my requests so you all get nothing card
bitcoinBull
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826


rippleFanatic


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 07:11:10 PM
 #1853

I just hope pirate doesnt pull the payb.tc didnt comply with my requests so you all get nothing card

His excuse doesn't matter. Whatever it is, you'll get nothing.

College of Bucking Bulls Knowledge
BCbitcoin
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 07:12:44 PM
 #1854

It's concerning that paybtc isn't explicitly stating that any payment will go first to repay principal (total deposits - total withdrawals) first before any "interest" is paid. In this case, the "interest" was just the btc of the new depositors.

In the event that paybtc did a straight percentage based payout across all his accounts just based on the current balance he would be running his own ponzi scheme.

This too could be the motivation in not handing over the details. The only reason to hide the details of a sub account would be if that sub account had withdrawn more than it had deposited and therefore revealed the location where other peoples btc went.
ErebusBat
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560

I am the one who knocks


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 07:13:39 PM
 #1855

I just hope pirate doesnt pull the payb.tc didnt comply with my requests so you all get nothing card
This is my worry as well, which is why I started this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=104690.0

░▒▓█ Coinroll.it - 1% House Edge Dice Game █▓▒░ • Coinroll Thread • *FREE* 100 BTC Raffle

Signup for CEX.io BitFury exchange and get GHS Instantly!  Don't wait for shipping, mine NOW!
zyk
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 07:20:13 PM
 #1856

Am really sorry but as nobody donated , won´t keep my mouth shut, may be

1. if anything changes in bitcoinmax OP, that it is freed from pirates shenanigans

or

2. all bitcoinmax investors have jumped ship, cause payb.tc ´s feet are to small for his shoes to stand in...,

as he apparently doesn´t see any future of bitcoinmax , where he would like to invest his panic - hoarded coins in.

Cheers Zyk
Michail1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 919


Www.Michail.Com


View Profile WWW
August 30, 2012, 07:29:50 PM
 #1857

http://gucomics.com/comic/?cdate=20100326

RoloTonyBrownTown
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350



View Profile
August 30, 2012, 08:42:14 PM
 #1858

I just hope pirate doesnt pull the payb.tc didnt comply with my requests so you all get nothing card

Yep, that's a concern.

Smoovious
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504

Scattering my bits around the net since 1980


View Profile
August 30, 2012, 08:49:13 PM
 #1859

+13
IveBeenBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
August 30, 2012, 09:08:50 PM
 #1860

I just hope pirate doesnt pull the payb.tc didnt comply with my requests so you all get nothing card

Yep, that's a concern.

If Pirate says that, he was never intending to pay anything in the first place. How much longer are you going to let him lead you around by the nose? If he pays anything, it will be because he wants to make good with his depositors to the extent of his ability. Whether he accomplishes that through paying out to a passthrough or paying directly, he can satisfy that motivation...if that is indeed his motivation...either way.

And the talk about legal precedents and lawsuits is pointless.

The idea is that a guy named Pirate who is (maybe) Trenton Shavers and who (probably) lives in Texas would be sued in a real court by a bunch of internet personas for his failure to make good on a secret business plan paying 7% per week, compounded, in a newfangled currency? The idea that this will ever see the light of day in a real courtroom is laughable.

If Pirate pays anything, it will be out of the goodness of his heart and that's it.

I'm glad Goat and Payb.tc have drawn their line in the sand despite the depositors' wailing and gnashing of teeth. It will bring this whole sorry episode to a conclusion that much faster. Yes I do have a decent amount of money in Bitcoinmax. I put it there with the realization that it could disappear at any time and I would have no practical recourse.
Pages: « 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 [93] 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!