GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)

[SDRebel]

@Paul Revere - Thought you might want to help this poor soul out with a little of your patented technical analysis:

Man, I bought 2 more BTC worth of XPY around .00400.  Now I'm in for 6 BTC.  Now I'm down but my average is still slightly below $1 so I feel good.

That 50% jump in price a few days ago was me showing up on the scene and killing the trolls.   haha, no, it was the news by Garza that there is something big coming in about 2 weeks, but I like my version better.

have you seen today?

What?  Seen what?

back to under 0.003

[Vlad2Vlad]

I have asked a lot of relevant questions regarding many aspects of XPY had Garza and most have gone unanswered. 

Such as?

Let's get real.  I have been so clear the past week.  Just read the last 10 pages.

Like why isn't the price of XPY 5 cents given the massive bad press and the huge inflation?  Who is buying so much.

Why is the volume of a supposed total ScamCoin often number 1 in volume?

Many questions like these which make no sense and nobody had a logical answer.

[clownius]

The dates are not important.  The content is what matters.  Some of those emails were absolutely atrocious.

oh.. haha.

the date isn't important? at worst, "he" was sitting on emails for 2-3 months and just decided to release them. that seems mildly important from a context standpoint. "he" claimed "he" has someones lost ipad/iphone from Miami. That date's them back to mid/early January that "he's" had them. So, at best, he was sitting on them for a month+. Not important?  

The dates aren't important in the grand scheme.  Did this person sit on the emails for longer than they should have?  Possibly.  Or, maybe they were scared of posting them until they knew they could do it in a way that wasn't traced back to them.

It truly does not matter.  The content of the emails is damning, and can be provably linked back to geniusesatwork.com and btc.com.

Thats one brutal article.  True but its gotta burn

I hope you have everything well secured i see a massive tantrum incoming from HT.

P.S  I love crypto evidence

[bananafana]

So there is a MASSIVE motive to destroy the image of XPY and Garza, and any coin or dev which threatens the crypto status quo.  This is a fact.  

No there's not. XPY is a broken, hyper-inflating peercoin clone. Garza has not delivered on any of the big promises about features and programs. Not a single one. XPY and Garza are not a threat to any legitimate coins.

[Mr Felt]

Could this mean we're also getting closer to figuring out whether Joe Mordica is a zombie or not? 

[bananafana]

I have asked a lot of relevant questions regarding many aspects of XPY had Garza and most have gone unanswered. 

Such as?

Let's get real.  I have been so clear the past week.  Just read the last 10 pages.

Like why isn't the price of XPY 5 cents given the massive bad press and the huge inflation?  Who is buying so much.

Why is the volume of a supposed total ScamCoin often number 1 in volume?

Many questions like these which make no sense and nobody had a logical answer.

Who is buying so much is an excellent question, and it's gone unanswered because nobody knows. A lot of the volume is bots and traders but that's not enough to explain it. Some of the HT faithful are still buying.

We can rule out some really stupid answers, though, such as your own answer. It's not because anyone who got millions of coins for zero cost in the 97% premine, and who gets coins for free from the special 3000% inflationary stakers, is buying on cryptsy. That's just idiotic.

[neochronos]

I have asked a lot of relevant questions regarding many aspects of XPY had Garza and most have gone unanswered. 

Such as?

Let's get real.  I have been so clear the past week.  Just read the last 10 pages.

Like why isn't the price of XPY 5 cents given the massive bad press and the huge inflation?  Who is buying so much.

Why is the volume of a supposed total ScamCoin often number 1 in volume?

Many questions like these which make no sense and nobody had a logical answer.

You've been answered.  You just simply spin more shit when you are answered.
Seems to me you're a shit-coin spinner and there's nothing more to it than that.

Who's buying XPY - well you are as you've stated.  I bet that's BS too.  You probably are holding some XPY and want to see the value increase so you can dump at a higher yield (probably not gonna happen).
Other than that, who else is buying?  Mostly XPY faithful, or holders, most of which are crypto-newbs.  They think this coin will somehow pull out and rise like a phoenix from the flame if they can just buy up all those coins that are dumping.  95% of all coins are owned by 100 or less people.  99.5% are held by 1000 or less.  So say all the dumpers are out of coins.  Then what?  Who's going to buy more coin?  You'll merely have 100 people holding coins that aren't used, aren't being bought, and aren't being sold.  The coins will just be sitting there, staking, making more coins that aren't doing anything.

Volume
XPY volume is never even top 10 these days.  Cryptsy you say.  Well that's the only exchange XPY has any real volume on, but Cryptsy is a grain of sand when comparing the overall crypto volume.

[bananafana]

@sdrebel -- on HT you wrote "i believe a fair comparison would be that faking a dkim signature is as easy as solving a btc block. it can happen, but it takes a shitload of computing power to do it"

Nope, that's not right, if by solving a block you mean a miner generating a new block.

It's more like faking a DKIM signature is like finding the private key for an already-generated address, i.e., being able to spend someone else's bitcoins without knowing their private key. Bitcoin is secure because that's so *extremely* computationally difficult. Much harder than generating a candidate block for the blockchain.

[qwerty555]

Have you guys ever heard of BlakeCoin?  It's one of the best coded NEW code coins out there.  

Its founder, BlueDragon, is one of the best coders in the world of crypto.  BlakeCoin is superior to Bitcoin on many levels.

When BlakeCoin launched, its entire market cap was less than $10,000.

You guys know what happened to that coin?  Some anonymous source [from China] was DDOS'ing it daily.  They were spending about $10,000 per day attacking Blake to try and kill it.  They did this for weeks and even now attack it but spend much less.

There are powerful people in crypto trying to kill any coin with any potential.  If someone was spending that kind of money to kill a coin nobody knew or ever heard about, then imagine what they would do to a coin like XPY which came in with HUGE press and fireworks and is backed by millions of dollars and directly and outright targeted to replace Bitcoin.

This is a big reason why I question everything.  There are powerful people invested in coins like Bitcoin, Ripple, etc., which do not want any viable deep pocket coins to come out this year when Bitcoin gets pushed mainstream.  

This is the year when the leaders of crypto will be cemented.  The future crypto players will be decided this year.

So there is a MASSIVE motive to destroy the image of XPY and Garza, and any coin or dev which threatens the crypto status quo.  This is a fact.  

Just a fact any rational person should keep in the back of their mind when investing in crypto.

LOL maybe true but Garza has been his own worst enemy by not delivering on time , or at all, promising things where there is no real need to promise ( unless you are after more buyers)  The slow roll out and negative publicity due to that is predominantly his own doing and giving ( lots of) fuel to the detractors

[Coin Brief]

Could this mean we're also getting closer to figuring out whether Joe Mordica is a zombie or not? 

Heh, I looked into that.  There were actually 2 Joe Mordicas in the same city, at the same University.  GAW's Joe Mordica is 2 years older, and has a different middle name, than the one that died.

[TheMage]

Vlad2Vlad,

I've witnessed no less than 3 separate personalities from you in the span of a few months. You either need to seek medical attention for some untreated/undiagnosed issues or you sold your account and are no longer Vlad2Vlad.

[Mr Felt]

Could this mean we're also getting closer to figuring out whether Joe Mordica is a zombie or not? 

Heh, I looked into that.  There were actually 2 Joe Mordicas in the same city, at the same University.  GAW's Joe Mordica is 2 years older, and has a different middle name, than the one that died.

Excellent! Good digging.

[SDRebel]

Have you guys ever heard of BlakeCoin?  It's one of the best coded NEW code coins out there.  

Its founder, BlueDragon, is one of the best coders in the world of crypto.  BlakeCoin is superior to Bitcoin on many levels.

When BlakeCoin launched, its entire market cap was less than $10,000.

You guys know what happened to that coin?  Some anonymous source [from China] was DDOS'ing it daily.  They were spending about $10,000 per day attacking Blake to try and kill it.  They did this for weeks and even now attack it but spend much less.

There are powerful people in crypto trying to kill any coin with any potential.  If someone was spending that kind of money to kill a coin nobody knew or ever heard about, then imagine what they would do to a coin like XPY which came in with HUGE press and fireworks and is backed by millions of dollars and directly and outright targeted to replace Bitcoin.

This is a big reason why I question everything.  There are powerful people invested in coins like Bitcoin, Ripple, etc., which do not want any viable deep pocket coins to come out this year when Bitcoin gets pushed mainstream.  

This is the year when the leaders of crypto will be cemented.  The future crypto players will be decided this year.

So there is a MASSIVE motive to destroy the image of XPY and Garza, and any coin or dev which threatens the crypto status quo.  This is a fact.  

Just a fact any rational person should keep in the back of their mind when investing in crypto.

syntaks has been reported a similar concerted effort against neos

[SDRebel]

The dates are not important.  The content is what matters.  Some of those emails were absolutely atrocious.

oh.. haha.

the date isn't important? at worst, "he" was sitting on emails for 2-3 months and just decided to release them. that seems mildly important from a context standpoint. "he" claimed "he" has someones lost ipad/iphone from Miami. That date's them back to mid/early January that "he's" had them. So, at best, he was sitting on them for a month+. Not important?  

The dates aren't important in the grand scheme.  Did this person sit on the emails for longer than they should have?  Possibly.  Or, maybe they were scared of posting them until they knew they could do it in a way that wasn't traced back to them.

It truly does not matter.  The content of the emails is damning, and can be provably linked back to geniusesatwork.com and btc.com.

Thats one brutal article.  True but its gotta burn

I hope you have everything well secured i see a massive tantrum incoming from HT.

P.S  I love crypto evidence

HTers can't even spell DKIM, including their fearless leader. Few will be swayed by this unfortunately.

I am still hopeful that this Rishab character will show his face. That is if his "investors" haven't offed him already.

True that. Rishab made his investors lose hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars...plus him living in a third-world country (it seems he is/was in India)...then anything can happen

[SDRebel]

I have asked a lot of relevant questions regarding many aspects of XPY had Garza and most have gone unanswered. 

Such as?

Let's get real.  I have been so clear the past week.  Just read the last 10 pages.

Like why isn't the price of XPY 5 cents given the massive bad press and the huge inflation?  Who is buying so much.

Why is the volume of a supposed total ScamCoin often number 1 in volume?

Many questions like these which make no sense and nobody had a logical answer.

the 5 cents may be coming soon now down to 0.0026

[kken01]

these ppl are demented and sick

[verloren]

these ppl are demented and sick

I'm pretty sure stuff in the public domain can be used for criminal proceedings. Makes them a bit weird if they don't think that.

[SDRebel]

@sdrebel -- on HT you wrote "i believe a fair comparison would be that faking a dkim signature is as easy as solving a btc block. it can happen, but it takes a shitload of computing power to do it"

Nope, that's not right, if by solving a block you mean a miner generating a new block.

It's more like faking a DKIM signature is like finding the private key for an already-generated address, i.e., being able to spend someone else's bitcoins without knowing their private key. Bitcoin is secure because that's so *extremely* computationally difficult. Much harder than generating a candidate block for the blockchain.

this is probably over my head...but isn't that basically the same as solving a block? or not because solving a block is an approximation and for the KDIM we would need the exact key?

[kken01]

I'm pretty sure stuff in the public domain can be used for criminal proceedings. Makes them a bit weird if they don't think that.

yes of course otherwise people would publish everything and get away with anything. it makes no logical sense to believe otherwise

but the guy is sick. trying to protect his Lord and Savior, while he is mocking and stealing from everyone 

[SDRebel]

these ppl are demented and sick

he is high with bad shit