Colloidal silver is actually a prophylactic against argyria, instead of a cause as some would have you believe.
Ionic silver will try to plate out on any silver particles it finds. Since there will be colloidal silver which already passed into the blood, there will be lots of particles for it to plate out on. So in short order the silver in the silver chloride plates out onto the colloidal particles already there, and they grow by a small amount. This is insufficient to cause them to get caught up into tissues, and they eventually get removed by the kidneys.
So, as it turns out, colloidal silver is actually a prophylactic against argyria, instead of a cause as some would have you believe.
Please do not take medical advice from an idiot on the internet The topic is atheism... what do Edgar Cayce or Allen Watts have to do with atheism? |
|
|
|
This is waaaaaay off-topic... can we get back to atheism?
OK, you bring up one "blue man" who grossly misused CS... But atheism is harmful for health for so many more individuals, as we have already discussed ITT. Furthermore: in the below thread we have evidence that those who meditate can improve their health and DNA, so already this is plenty of reason to seek to understand meditation and meditators; therefore, I have pointed you to Alan Watts as introductory material, so now you can add this thread to your reading list as well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.msg14735612#msg14735612Now, I point you to Alan Watts' book and meditation because those who have meditated extensively are not EVER inclined to tell you that this ego is the sole form of experience for YOUR awareness. I also pointed you to Cayce because he discussed these topics extensively and regardless of what is presented to anyone else, I have presented to you the successful and fulfilled predictions mentioned in my source, you only attempted to address one of them or change the subject to failed predictions, but were mistaken about the danger of ingesting CS when it is prepared properly. No one who has educated themselves is really at risk of becoming blue, so I suggest you likewise educate yourself about meditation before the health effects of that ego get to YOU. The point about Moloch is, he proves that atheism exists by one main method only. You and I and a lot of people can show Moloch the scientific reasons why God exists, and why atheism is religion. So, what can Moloch do except to use the only scientific field which can bypass all the others? If Moloch and knowledgeable atheists were truthful and honest, they would have ceased to exist as atheists long ago. But because they aren't truthful and honest - to say nothing about the fact that they are not forthright - they absolutely MUST go to the one science that might have any kind of a chance of proving that atheism is right, and that God doesn't exist. Which science is this? It is Political Science. Moloch isn't a master of Political Science. At least not the way he is using it regarding atheism and God in this forum. Rather, he is training himself to be a master of it... or he is a master and is just playing with us because he doesn't have anything better to do. How is Moloch using Political Science? Through his continual propaganda. In other words, he talks, talks, talks, without anything to back up what he is saying, while throwing in enough REAL knowledge in a twisted form, so that he looks good. Whatever Moloch's goal, he is simply talking with hot air. He is propagandizing. And he is getting really good at it. He is getting so good that I can't see him not applying the words that I am saying here to us rather than himself. The difference is, you and I have the other sciences to back up what we say, while he does not. But as long as he can convince us, by means of using Political Science, that he is using the other sciences, we wind up batting at the air, because Moloch answers with Political Science, one of sciences that we don't use. I don't really blame him. I kind of feel sorry for him. He is like the proverbial rat with his back to the wall, and all there is left to do is fight, with whatever means and methods are left to him. It's all he and other atheists have. If they want to reach their goal - whatever it is, although it includes a lot of pure propaganda - the only thing they have left is Political Science. And with our posts, we are helping him (and others like him) to learn to use it proficiently and effectively. I feel sad for you Yeah, I know. The brunt of more of your Political Science will come later. Your expression of sadness is simply the start of the prologue. I could give 2 fucks about you, yet you spend all year thinking about me... sad day for you How long did it take to write that hateful monologue? How many hateful monologues about me have you written in various threads? How much of your life have you wasted thinking about me? Hours? Days? Weeks? Here it comes! Take the focus off atheism and start the ad hominem attacks. Favorite Political Science ploy. Is there an instruction manual for how you do this? Or are you simply winging it? Stop projecting your own faults onto me I didn't change the subject... you decided to write a 9 paragraph monologue about me You even started with my quote asking the other guy to get on topic! This is waaaaaay off-topic... can we get back to atheism?
Please refrain from posting bullshit slander about me and stay on topic, ok? Why do you insist on acting like a child? |
|
|
|
This is waaaaaay off-topic... can we get back to atheism?
OK, you bring up one "blue man" who grossly misused CS... But atheism is harmful for health for so many more individuals, as we have already discussed ITT. Furthermore: in the below thread we have evidence that those who meditate can improve their health and DNA, so already this is plenty of reason to seek to understand meditation and meditators; therefore, I have pointed you to Alan Watts as introductory material, so now you can add this thread to your reading list as well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.msg14735612#msg14735612Now, I point you to Alan Watts' book and meditation because those who have meditated extensively are not EVER inclined to tell you that this ego is the sole form of experience for YOUR awareness. I also pointed you to Cayce because he discussed these topics extensively and regardless of what is presented to anyone else, I have presented to you the successful and fulfilled predictions mentioned in my source, you only attempted to address one of them or change the subject to failed predictions, but were mistaken about the danger of ingesting CS when it is prepared properly. No one who has educated themselves is really at risk of becoming blue, so I suggest you likewise educate yourself about meditation before the health effects of that ego get to YOU. The point about Moloch is, he proves that atheism exists by one main method only. You and I and a lot of people can show Moloch the scientific reasons why God exists, and why atheism is religion. So, what can Moloch do except to use the only scientific field which can bypass all the others? If Moloch and knowledgeable atheists were truthful and honest, they would have ceased to exist as atheists long ago. But because they aren't truthful and honest - to say nothing about the fact that they are not forthright - they absolutely MUST go to the one science that might have any kind of a chance of proving that atheism is right, and that God doesn't exist. Which science is this? It is Political Science. Moloch isn't a master of Political Science. At least not the way he is using it regarding atheism and God in this forum. Rather, he is training himself to be a master of it... or he is a master and is just playing with us because he doesn't have anything better to do. How is Moloch using Political Science? Through his continual propaganda. In other words, he talks, talks, talks, without anything to back up what he is saying, while throwing in enough REAL knowledge in a twisted form, so that he looks good. Whatever Moloch's goal, he is simply talking with hot air. He is propagandizing. And he is getting really good at it. He is getting so good that I can't see him not applying the words that I am saying here to us rather than himself. The difference is, you and I have the other sciences to back up what we say, while he does not. But as long as he can convince us, by means of using Political Science, that he is using the other sciences, we wind up batting at the air, because Moloch answers with Political Science, one of sciences that we don't use. I don't really blame him. I kind of feel sorry for him. He is like the proverbial rat with his back to the wall, and all there is left to do is fight, with whatever means and methods are left to him. It's all he and other atheists have. If they want to reach their goal - whatever it is, although it includes a lot of pure propaganda - the only thing they have left is Political Science. And with our posts, we are helping him (and others like him) to learn to use it proficiently and effectively. I feel sad for you Yeah, I know. The brunt of more of your Political Science will come later. Your expression of sadness is simply the start of the prologue. I could give 2 fucks about you, yet you spend all year thinking about me... sad day for you How long did it take to write that hateful monologue? How many hateful monologues about me have you written in various threads? How much of your life have you wasted thinking about me? Hours? Days? Weeks? |
|
|
|
This is waaaaaay off-topic... can we get back to atheism?
OK, you bring up one "blue man" who grossly misused CS... But atheism is harmful for health for so many more individuals, as we have already discussed ITT. Furthermore: in the below thread we have evidence that those who meditate can improve their health and DNA, so already this is plenty of reason to seek to understand meditation and meditators; therefore, I have pointed you to Alan Watts as introductory material, so now you can add this thread to your reading list as well: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1454732.msg14735612#msg14735612Now, I point you to Alan Watts' book and meditation because those who have meditated extensively are not EVER inclined to tell you that this ego is the sole form of experience for YOUR awareness. I also pointed you to Cayce because he discussed these topics extensively and regardless of what is presented to anyone else, I have presented to you the successful and fulfilled predictions mentioned in my source, you only attempted to address one of them or change the subject to failed predictions, but were mistaken about the danger of ingesting CS when it is prepared properly. No one who has educated themselves is really at risk of becoming blue, so I suggest you likewise educate yourself about meditation before the health effects of that ego get to YOU. The point about Moloch is, he proves that atheism exists by one main method only. You and I and a lot of people can show Moloch the scientific reasons why God exists, and why atheism is religion. So, what can Moloch do except to use the only scientific field which can bypass all the others? If Moloch and knowledgeable atheists were truthful and honest, they would have ceased to exist as atheists long ago. But because they aren't truthful and honest - to say nothing about the fact that they are not forthright - they absolutely MUST go to the one science that might have any kind of a chance of proving that atheism is right, and that God doesn't exist. Which science is this? It is Political Science. Moloch isn't a master of Political Science. At least not the way he is using it regarding atheism and God in this forum. Rather, he is training himself to be a master of it... or he is a master and is just playing with us because he doesn't have anything better to do. How is Moloch using Political Science? Through his continual propaganda. In other words, he talks, talks, talks, without anything to back up what he is saying, while throwing in enough REAL knowledge in a twisted form, so that he looks good. Whatever Moloch's goal, he is simply talking with hot air. He is propagandizing. And he is getting really good at it. He is getting so good that I can't see him not applying the words that I am saying here to us rather than himself. The difference is, you and I have the other sciences to back up what we say, while he does not. But as long as he can convince us, by means of using Political Science, that he is using the other sciences, we wind up batting at the air, because Moloch answers with Political Science, one of sciences that we don't use. I don't really blame him. I kind of feel sorry for him. He is like the proverbial rat with his back to the wall, and all there is left to do is fight, with whatever means and methods are left to him. It's all he and other atheists have. If they want to reach their goal - whatever it is, although it includes a lot of pure propaganda - the only thing they have left is Political Science. And with our posts, we are helping him (and others like him) to learn to use it proficiently and effectively. I feel sad for you |
|
|
|
No one who has educated themselves is really at risk of becoming blue, so I suggest you likewise educate yourself about meditation before the health effects of that ego get to YOU.
Seriously you stupid fuck DO NOT GIVE OUT IGNORANT MEDICAL ADVICE YOU COULD KILL SOMEONE! |
|
|
|
Every presidential election of my life has been between a giant douche and a turd sandwich South Park Douche and Turdhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVwh8PW6r88Stan: I think voting is great, I just didn't care this time because it was between a giant douche and a turd sandwich
PETA guy: But Stan... Don't you know? It's always between a giant douche and a turd sandwich...
Nearly every election since the beginning of time has been between some douche and some turd...
They're the only people who suck up enough to make it that far in politics
Debate 2004: Giant Douche vs Turd Sandwichhttp://southpark.cc.com/clips/154582/debate-2004 |
|
|
|
Moloch keeps spamming this thread with demons that have nothing to do with the question in the subject nor with atheism itself
   The pentagram of Venus is probably the source of all the madness we see into this world: I'm trying to relate the pentagram of Venus with the star of David and the Orion's belt. Finding this relationship can be the clue to understand the world as we know it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_biasConfirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities. It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs....
Quoting myself: Moloch keeps spamming this thread with demons that have nothing to do with the question in the subject nor with atheism itself
Your post have been reported to moderator. How can you claim Baphomet has nothing to do with atheism? Do some fucking research kid... god damnit The picture of the statue is atheism in action... read a damn newspaper... jesús h fucking christ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet#Modern_interpretations_and_usageIn 2014 The Satanic Temple commissioned an 8 1/2 foot statue of Baphomet to stand alongside a monument of the Ten Commandments at Oklahoma State Capitol "respect for diversity and religious minorities" were cited as reasons for erecting the monument. After the Ten Commandments monument was vandalized plans to erect the Baphomet statue were put on hold as the Satanic Temple did not want their statue to stand alone by the Oklahoma capitol. The Oklahoma Supreme Court declared all religious displays illegal and On 25 July, 2015 the statue was erected near a warehouse in Detroit, as a symbol of the modern Satanist movement. The Satanic Temple may take the statue to Arkansas where another 10 Commandments monument is proposed.
You exemplify the reason atheists hate religion... it's because of ignorant religitards like you |
|
|
|
Moloch keeps spamming this thread with demons that have nothing to do with the question in the subject nor with atheism itself
The pentagram of Venus is probably the source of all the madness we see into this world: I'm trying to relate the pentagram of Venus with the star of David and the Orion's belt. Finding this relationship can be the clue to understand the world as we know it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_biasConfirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities. It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs....
|
|
|
|
Hey Moloch, I think that you could do more reading and thereby gain knowledge; you have accepted that claim as factual, but my sources say otherwise; check out these facts which counter the claim that you are making:
Argyria can only be expected when high levels of silver SALTS are taken.
Ionic silver will try to plate out on any silver particles it finds. Since there will be colloidal silver which already passed into the blood, there will be lots of particles for it to plate out on. So in short order the silver in the silver chloride plates out onto the colloidal particles already there, and they grow by a small amount. This is insufficient to cause them to get caught up into tissues, and they eventually get removed by the kidneys.
So, as it turns out, colloidal silver is actually a prophylactic against argyria, instead of a cause as some would have you believe.
How do you intend to refute the above facts?
The science shows that it is not only silver "salts"... any ionic silver will suffice You see... the thing is... the silver ions form their own salts when they come in contact with a negatively charged ion... that's how chemistry works When the Ag+ ion comes in contact with any negative ion, they form a bond... creating a salt... that's chemistry 101 Here's the kicker... Argyria is specifically caused when the Ag+ ion bonds with a S- ion (Sulfer)... that's the specific salt you need to avoid... but simply avoiding AgS will not work, because you have plenty of Sulfer in your body already... that's the problem... When you take large amounts of Ag+, it bonds to the S- ions already present in your body... Argyria occurs when these ions, instead of being expelled in your urine like normal... instead migrate to your skin, where they stay forever... like a tattoo... it's not particularly harmful, but you will look like a smurf This can even happen when the Ag+ is applied externally as in the case of Paul Karason:  You can see his face is purple, and his hands... because that is where the silver touched... his arms are normal because he did not apply silver to his arms This is waaaaaay off-topic... can we get back to atheism? |
|
|
|
I agree with the premise of the thread, but not necessarily the reasoning behind it...
I would argue that the predominant factor is religion... religious people are dumb... religious people also tend to vote republican (simply because republicans cater to their demands/ideals)... herego, republicans are dumb by proxy, but not for the assumed reason in the OP
Though, I suppose you could argue that it's not, "religious people are dumb", but rather "dumb people are religious"...
Is this the new, "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"
I also read about religion and intelligence and would agree with your findings that low iq people usually are very religious. And very religious people usually tend to discriminate against other religions and certain religious groups. ( i.e. there is only one true religion ) One such group that sets a great example would probaly be the KKK. Don't forget, religious people also argued in favor of slavery (racism) James Thornwell, a minister, wrote in 1860, "The parties in this conflict are not merely Abolitionists and slaveholders, they are Atheists, Socialists, Communists, Red Republicans, Jacobins on the one side and the friends of order and regulated freedom on the other." (by regulated freedom, he means the freedom to own slaves as your property... not freedom for black people) (in much the same way that today, "religious freedom/liberty" means freedom to discriminate against homosexuals) http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/12/how-the-bible-was-used-to-justify-slavery/They used the exact same passages from the bible as they use to condone their homophobia (with the addition of the part about Noah's son, Ham... god curses his decendants to be "servants", which religious people decided means black slaves... Ham = black = slaves) Slavery is condoned in the bible in at least a dozen different places... and condemned zero times The bible is all about tribalism... and hating anyone who doesn't look and believe like you do... it's full of genocide... the Israelites murdered countless civilizations... literal genocide, several times in the old testament |
|
|
|
There is no co-relation between both but there are lots of intelligent people who are raciest as well.
It is society's way to make the population abide by a certain way of conduct. Even if they were intelligent, they would not be unless to conform the way society would portray them. intelligence can be measured by an iq test. do we agree on such basic stuffs? if not please refrain from posting here and create your own thread. wtf seems i hit a point or why are only trolls coming here?  No I DO NOT. Psychology also plays a role in it too. A crazy like Charlie Manson can take the test as well saying he is intelligent but DO YOU see him as that? If so, then more intelligent people with a higher score on those tests will beg to Differ.  I believe Charles Manson would get an A+ on both an IQ test, and Hare's Psychopathy checklist... Just because he's a psychopath, does not mean he isn't also intelligent... most psychopaths are both intelligent and outgoing... the guy you'd least suspect |
|
|
|
I agree with the premise of the thread, but not necessarily the reasoning behind it... I would argue that the predominant factor is religion... religious people are dumb... religious people also tend to vote republican (simply because republicans cater to their demands/ideals)... herego, republicans are dumb by proxy, but not for the assumed reason in the OP Though, I suppose you could argue that it's not, "religious people are dumb", but rather "dumb people are religious"... Is this the new, "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"    |
|
|
|
|
It's like reading the National Enquirer
99% of it is bullshit, but its entertaining, right?
|
|
|
|
In politics, everything is possible and ''no'' is never absolute but relative ''no'' which can change according to circumstances and politic reality.
If Hillary will need Bernie in order to secure her victory, I have no doubt that she will accept all his conditions and that Bernie will help her to become President.
It will not be such bad outcome, after all.
Obama fight with Hillary a lot but after elections offered her position in the White House.
Same story can happen again.
In most cases you might be correct, but not this time Bernie is a man of principles... he has morals, etc... he will not bend... it will not happen Bernie is not some sleazy politician... that much is obvious... stop pretending he's a sleazebag like the rest of them... he is not Bernie cannot be bought or bribed... it has never happened... Example... Martin Shkreli donated the maximum contribution ($2700) to Bernie's campaign in an attempt to get a meeting about him raising HIV meds from $13.50 to $750/pill... Bernie declined the meeting, and donated his contribution to charity... you cannot bribe Bernie... he wont accept it https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2015/10/15/bernie-sanders-rejects-ceo-martin-shkreli-campaign-donation/FcSKxu1VIr7pubg9cI3CQN/story.htmlOn the other hand, Hillary accepts bribes... it costs $225,000  |
|
|
|
Colloidal silver is actually a prophylactic against argyria, instead of a cause as some would have you believe. Based upon all available evidence... it's the cause... the only cause... and most definitely the cause of argyria 100% of the time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ArgyriaArgyria or argyrosis (from Ancient Greek: ἄργυρος argyros silver) is a condition caused by inappropriate exposure to chemical compounds of the element silver, or to silver dust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyria#Causehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyria#Colloidal_silverIt's provably the cause... go put some on your skin and watch it turn purple... it happens (be aware it will never turn back to normal color; you will forever look like a smurf) |
|
|
|
|
Wasn't the number was chosen based upon computer maxint limitations?
The thing is... all values in a tx are in satoshi... so sending 1 BTC, is in the tx as 100000000 satoshi
If you send 21mil bitcoin, you would need to handle the integer in satoshi value:
2,100,000,000,000,000 (51 bits)
So you have the limitation of maxint, based on your programming language
Also... if you are going to change it to 12 decimal places... you have to re-code everything... the smallest unit is no longer 1 satoshi, but 1/10000 satoshi... that screws up everything... not just bitcoin core, but every business/website/wallet that creates or decodes raw transactions... its going to think its worth 10,000 times the value it really is
|
|
|
|
|
I could be wrong, but I remember reading somewhere that bitcoin core has already addressed the duplicate nonce issue... something about forcing it to increment... you cannot use a nonce equal to or less than the last one your key used to sign a tx?
Or is this different from the k value?
|
|
|
|
|
I hear the only candidate with a higher DISapproval rating than Hillary... is Trump...
Both the parties hate their candidate so much
It's a race to see whether more Democrats vote for Trump, or more Republicans vote for Hillary...
It's basically the opposite of an election
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
