Looking at what is happening, I will say such an amazing thing at once - but there are positive changes in everything that is happening! Yes Yes ! Now I will explain. This does not apply to any specific countries, this is a general picture.
The whole world, in recent decades, began to suffer from laziness and infantilism. The West "was tired of working, the East decided that it was possible" the West gave it the "magic wand" of technology, some countries decided that after 9/11 they could continue to engage in terror, violence, and the West would not react, and most international structures and institutions simply money-burners and structures that, according to the protocol, "express concern" on any event, but do not take any steps. Moreover, these international structures began to quietly earn money on international "assistance" programs. And so it would continue to degrade, degenerate, and rotten ... if not for the last inadequate trick of Russia.
The world shook. More precisely, in 2014, the world turned a blind eye to this, they say, it's okay, the main thing is that we live quietly and calmly. And then the year 2022 came, when the Kremlin terrorists realized that, in fact, impunity reigned in the world, and for some, cowardice and a huge dependence on the "Kremlin that feeds them" ... The protective trigger worked at the first stage in several countries. The United States and Britain - as "senior" observers of the world, and Poland, Latvia, Liva, Estonia and some other European countries - who realized that it was time to remember such aggression and occupation by the USSR. And they began to help Ukraine. And then so many "pustules" were revealed, "tensions" arose in so many international relations, so many had their eyes opened that the world began to return to a normal, albeit not so comfortable, state. One of the reasons - it turned out that global and deep integration with some countries / regimes - is fraught with real and global risks. And that it is worth reconsidering our views on relations with them, on the indulgences that they have been given for the last 20-30 years, and in general on international mechanisms that, in general, have deprived the world of immunity from idiots and criminals. Yes, these changes will not be fast, but they are already running. And back already, no one will return in the near future, remembering the "lessons of history" of the beginning of the 21st century.
Not really convinced of all this. - After 9/11 countries such as Afghanistan can be sure that supporting terrorism at state level get you 20 years of foreign occupation. Even an opposing stance to US gets you an invasion (Iraq). - Most countries want it quiet and calm. The CCP is happy with peace, as they simply ignore most of the regualtions, continue business and win the money game. China will not conquer the US, they will re-posses the US. The RF was thought to be a commercial partner, hence what looks like laziness (actually I interpret it as pacifism). But that has ended, back to cold war thanks to Adolf Putin and his Pychos. |
|
|
|
If he is a rich person and has more income he probably won't be so disappointed but if he is just a small gambler then it would be better to always have financial and time limits on gambling. I agree with your suggestion because that way it can make a gambler at least minimize the loss of large amounts of money. A rich person still can get rekt because his money is limited, there's no any single person in this world have unlimited money including Elon Musk. A rich person might bet with max amount and if he keep gamble everyday, he could become poor and sold all of his assets in order to play and recover all of his losses. So either rich or poor person, they need to set a limit how much they can afford to lose, the difference is the amount of the money. For someone like Elon Musk, gambling all the money he has away will take a very long time, and even after gambling away all the money he has, he still can not be ever poor because of the kind of investments he already has .. So in as much as I agree with you that no body's money if unlimited anywhere, I still believe that there are people who have excess money that even if they decide to stop working and start gambling everyday, it can take tens, and for some, hundreds of years before them to ever become poor, if at all, this is possible. Curious that we are talking about Elon. This guy has actually made a career of gambling, except that he does not play casino style odds, but rather do or die business. There was a moment in which they nearly bankrupted Paypal before selling it for a fortune, there was a moment in which he had to put all his personal wealth to make Tesla go ahead,... for his "size", he is quite an addict to gambling. |
|
|
|
This is an easy one for the platform to wiggle around based off the terms and conditions you signed up for when registering on their website.
It is important to note that it is possible that it was truly a network lag (7 seconds is not such a ridiculous time), and you can I expect the site to compensate any resulting situation from network lags.
You can choose to avoid the platform on the basis of their lags and also their unsatisfactory support team.
7 seconds of lag on such a system of betting is certainly an eternity. The system should provide the performance needed for all the games and options they are offering so that the users have the right experience when playing games that require real time decisions such as the one that seem to be case here. I think this is an issue for this casino and they should deal with it adequately. |
|
|
|
|
The advice would be quite generic: what are exactly your strengths and how do you intend to generate leads to the casinos that would use your services? Are you a big infliencer that can bring thousands of hits on a bespoke fashion or are you just looking for a "click here" quick campaign with no frills and thrills that potentially anyone could join without experience?
|
|
|
|
Hello, to begin with, in order to eliminate possible misunderstandings, you could confirm that you are the owner of this script, for example, by adding the footer of the icon with a link to the current bitcointalk thread to your web page, for example, next to the list of accepted cryptocurrencies.
Beyond ownership, we are talking about a system that is going to deal with random events and managing money and wins and loses. The chances of having backdoors, hacks or even unintentionally poorly written code is far too high for anyone willing to invest. What guarantees can you provide about the code integrity? How can you certify this to be true? |
|
|
|
Hi All, We just launched our new Bitcoin/Lightning LIVE Roulette Site - www.NakamotoRoulette.comWould appreciate feedback and comments or anything else the community has to say  -- Nakamoto Roulette Edit: some common questions popping up I think should be included up top;
- We accept normal Bitcoin as well as instant Lightning Deposits - We offer INSTANT humanless Withdrawals ('no questions asked'). - We do not have any KYC nor will we, EVER. - We will not get a gaming license for a host of reasons including KYC and other limitations. - We are as anonymous as possible, private and confidential and share no data to anyone. ever. some immediate features being implemented are;- All players automatically get a 'share code / affiliate link' which they can gain back 50% of GGR (revenue) month-to-month for any players they invite or attract. - Many many more games (and not just Roulette). All sounds interesting and well put, and I would think that people are likely to try it. Now, if you post as newby and request any short of deposit without any particular proof and promise stuff that is pretty much illegal in most jurisdictions, I am afraid that it looks far too shady. This would be what anyone wanting people to put deposits into an scam would say. Is that the case?? |
|
|
|
Again, you are not. You are trying to make it look like that is a "balanced" position which is not. Ukraine did not amass troops in the RF border, did not send a column of tanks to Moscow, did not try to take land away from the Russian Federation. "standing with the people" is an empty phrase to launder the attack of the RF on Ukraine.# Your links are meaningless (apart for leading to a pay-wall for data). Your reference to drinking in Mariupol,...proof please? When you look at history, Russia and Ukraine have been friends at times and enemies at times. And the borders between them changed many times over hundreds of years. Ukraine amassed troops on the Donbas border... and started killing and harming both Ukrainian people and Russian people who were associated with them. There was a Ukraine military build-up on the border about a week before Russia started its police action. Russia simply intervened to stop this stupid Ukrainian harming of its own citizens, and Russian people who were living in the Donbas area for decades. This Ukrainian almost-massacre didn't happen until the US and Nato started getting into the governmental affairs of Ukraine. So, let's see some details that clearly justify the Ukraine government's Donbas attack. Just because the Donbas was considered to be part of Ukraine isn't enough. Governments don't start attacking their own country for nothing. Explain to us clearly... why... with some details about what the people of Donbas were doing to harm Ukraine. If you can't, standing with the Ukraine government ISN'T standing with Ukraine. And maybe not even if you can. It's like standing with Hitler or Stalin, who both killed their own people.  If you look at history, properly, you will see that the Russians originally came from Kyiv. But that is irrelevant, because we are not in the middle ages nor under the Napoleonic empire nor in Stalin's regime (not yet anyaway). The independence of a country is based on the will of the people who live in there. It is quite evident that a majority of Ukrainians would rather manage their own business instead of letting Adolf Putin manage them for the benefit of the Kleptocrats of Moscow and St Petersbourgh. Again, you seem not to need any justification to make allegations. Anything goes, anything is good just because you say it and some "media" out there says so. I guess all your posts here are just to feed the algorithm, not really intended for human consumption. |
|
|
|
Knowing myself, I would have started a military resistance to stop the advance of the invader, much like the president of Ukraine is doing right now, however I would also try to negotiate and see if there is some diplomatic way out from the conflict.
I do not like war, and since I have used some of my time investigating about its cruelty, I would try to save as many lives as possible.
That's exactly what the Russian government did when the Ukraine military inappropriately attacked the Donbas. In BADecker world, Ukraine attacked the Donbas. But in the real world the Donbas was (and still is) Ukraine, so you are accusing Ukraine of "inappropriately" attacking Ukraine. The fact is that Putin has been waging a war in the Donbas for several years, that is, after "inappropriately" annexing Crimea by force. Generals, advisors and even tanks of the RF army have been in the Donbas in a (what a coincidence!) undeclared war. |
|
|
|
It would be literally my job to protect my country. So of course. Why an earth they would surrender?
What's the alternative? Let the enemy walk all over you and rape and kill your women and chidren and rob you blind? And after they walked over you they would just keep on going all over europe.
As far as I know, Ukraine did not "declare war", simply had to defend the country in order for such country to continue existing as an individual entity with its own government. If your question is if it was a wise decision to fight such a defence, I think that given the situation and knowing what we now know, it was a reasonable decision. |
|
|
|
Again, you are not. You are trying to make it look like that is a "balanced" position which is not. Ukraine did not amass troops in the RF border, did not send a column of tanks to Moscow, did not try to take land away from the Russian Federation. "standing with the people" is an empty phrase to launder the attack of the RF on Ukraine.# Your links are meaningless (apart for leading to a pay-wall for data). Your reference to drinking in Mariupol,...proof please? |
|
|
|
If someone haven't saw yet, there is some interesting news from Belarus. Someone blew up Russian plane nearby to Minsk. There isn't just simple plane, it have radar which is able to detect activated air defence systems and and target it. There is just few such planes in service and each is worth $330m. It was done either by Ukrainian drones or Belarus partisans did it https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/27/belarus-anti-war-partisans-russian-plane-drones-machulishchy-damage-claimMaybe it's not same level like sinking Moskva ship, but still impressive. Imagine how much your country and "most powerful" army needs to suck when your 5 day war takes a over a year and took lives of nearly 200k of your soldiers. At the same time whole world hates you and lots of them are not planning to go "back to normal" even when Putin dies and war is over. And according to Putin, everything is going as planned. If they really planned everything in the way as it's going now, someone is doing their job terrible. It's sort of sad and funny how some western trolls in are totally unaware of their privileges of free speech and they are using that freedom to praise dictators who take that freedom away from their own citizens.
Well, trolls always have to go against common sense. They pretend that they know something more and have to search for conspiracy theories everywhere. But somehow they don't want to move to mother Russia and enjoy life there, they prefer to live in evil West. One of them around here is all about not helping Ukraine, because he does not want to "spend money" on it. That's all. All the "pro-Putin", "alternative sources", and all the singing of defeats is finally reduced to a tight fisted cheap person that does not understand that to keep the world safe is not free - and is not even his or her life at the stake, is just money. I wonder what would be if he or she was actually called to combat. |
|
|
|
|
Have you checked your attitude towards money lately? What is "your dream"? bigger home, a bigger car, private schools, branded drink, gold?...
Money for for things that are important in life: you family, your people, health, well being, ... Do not be afraid to spend the money on your people when they really need it, but be wary of spending it on stupid things and if you think your car and your clothes are important, you may want to start thinking if you have any significant goal in life and where does it get you in the next 10 years.
|
|
|
|
While all the weirdos in the forum discuss on invisible friends (AKA "god"), the possible "zombies" fighting for Ukraine (does not say much about the RF army to be contained and driven back by "zombies" does it?) the POTUS has gone to Kiev and once more gave a clear statement of support to Ukraine - which, as opposed to the words in the posts here, come with a substantial economic and military aid package.
The "peace plan" from China does not seem to convince anyone.
The POTUS isn't king. Let him use his own funds if he wants to support Ukraine. Not the funds of the people who don't. Sometimes I wonder if you are confused or trying to confuse others. The POTUS and government of the US manage the budget of the US. Not just for this matter but for all matters. YOU do not get to say what people want - they are the ones representing the people and have the right to manage the country in their name. Many could argue that they would rather not have roads, or an army or a federal government or even not funding the police but until they are a voting majority they do not manage the country. You do not like spending money to help Ukraine? Get it voted. Anyway you will pay a larger bill later on if the RF gets a hold on the very few allies that the US has left in the world. ...
Including that the family is the union of a man and a woman. But these sacred texts are now in doubt.
...
"Sacred text" (I assume you are talking about the Christian mythologic stories) are "sacred" just because a bunch of people believe so. They are not "now in doubt" they have been in doubt since they were written (BTW many years after any possible original even had happened, which means that they cannot be accurate, not to mention the 1000 translations from anything "original" and the "cleaning" by the church). Anyone trying to make any literal interpretation of these mythological stories does not even understand where they come from and, furthermore, arrogates him or herself with the ability to understand texts that are cryptic in nature. For example, these "texts" state that the sun moves around the earth, which basically force Galileo to "admit he was wrong" to save his life, while it is now clear that the "texts" and the interpretation were wrong. How many wrong things are going to happen because people like you believe in imaginary friends and think that facts and non-facts are just a "point of view"? Like in Ukraine, who is invading who, who is the absolutist despot, who could stop the war and how - there are very hard facts being muddied to smoke-curtain a blatant aggression. You are trying to make standing with Ukraine equal to standing with the Russian Federation. Nice try, but they are not. One is the aggressor, the other is defending and this is not a symmetrical situation. Putin is shelling cities in Ukraine, Ukraine is not shelling cities in the RF. Putin is destroying the energy infrastructure in Ukraine, Ukraine is not doing so in the RF. What you try to make look like a "balanced position" is not such and you "do not stand with the people" if you do not stand with Ukraine. |
|
|
|
The majority of American adults believe that more than 150 years after the 13th Amendment ended slavery in the country, the legacy of slavery still affects how black people are treated in modern American culture. According to a recent Pew Research Center study, more than four out of ten respondents believe that racial equality has not been sufficiently advanced in the country. There is also some doubt that black people will ever enjoy equal rights with white people.
It is in the human nature to fear, despise and dislike anything considered "different", but it is also in our nature to mature and be rational about these instincts. It is not just racism, but also different cultures, religions or ways of thinking. So, racism has not "come", it is something that humans just have by default, so unless you become aware of this, it will be there in all your decisions. Part of becoming adult is deciding what is right and wrong in our own nature, so most people will decide that racism, while quite natural, is undesirable and avoid racist attitudes. In people who are at a more mature level, racism as such dissapears. Of course, all people are to a point racist. White, black, "yellow", "red" and all. This is applicable to anyone. |
|
|
|
I feel very sorry for the people in this war. Think about the children that gets hurt. No wonder the kids wants to revenge this when they are grown ups. People die in the war. This is real life's that is in danger. There are many countries supporting both sides of this war. Why can't we just live in peace. This is SAD. Why do Putin fight with his own people.
Imperialism is inherently evil. Russian imperialism is the root cause of this war. It is US imperialism that pushed Russia into the war. WTF are you talking about? How? When was the last time the US annexed a foreign country or territory? What 'pushed' Russia was a delusion of an old alcoholic and his alcoholic friends. He is full-on Putin propaganda as usual and pretty much pretending to understand and interpret "gods will" (his imaginary friend). Under those conditions, you only need to say things, no need to reason, no need to argue and certainly no need for any short of verifiable source. In a modern Europe, the RF has no say on what the citizens of country want to do with their future. |
|
|
|
|
While all the weirdos in the forum discuss on invisible friends (AKA "god"), the possible "zombies" fighting for Ukraine (does not say much about the RF army to be contained and driven back by "zombies" does it?) the POTUS has gone to Kiev and once more gave a clear statement of support to Ukraine - which, as opposed to the words in the posts here, come with a substantial economic and military aid package.
The "peace plan" from China does not seem to convince anyone.
|
|
|
|
<...>
Pero en otra parte previa del artículo que cita: <…> the pensioner was compensated £110,000 by her bank after the financial ombudsman found she had been the victim of a sophisticated scam <…>
Parece que es, por tanto, el banco el que apoquinó la cantidad, aunque fuese gracias a las gestiones del Defensor del Pueblo. Veo que en UK este tipo de pago a timadores se puede tipificar como un "authorized push payment". Muchos bancos de UK tienen un acuerdo voluntario para devolver el importe bajo ciertos requisitos. Aquí no conocemos la película, pero por especular, igual le devolvieron el importe sacado previo a empezar a recibir avisos del banco (supongo que en algún momento podría haber empezado a recibirlos), aunque la reiteración durante un largo periodo de tiempo debería haber jugado en su contra. La ultima vez que fui a sacar libras de una de mis cuentas bancarias (en UK claro) me hicieron un interrogatorio que ni en las peliculas. "Hay alguien esperando fuera para q le des el dinero?", "Alguien te ha pedido ese dinero por telefono?", "Que vas a pagar?", "Conoces bien a la persona a la que vas a pagar?"... Lo mas gracioso es que - Si claro que hay alguien esperando q le de el dinero, si me ha dicho la cifra por wassap y no no conozco muy bien a la persona.... Es el contratista que me estaba haciendo una reforma. Cachondeito aparte, los bancos han tomado buena nota de que si no hacen todo eso, luego pagan las consecuencias del timo. |
|
|
|
We can not avoid the fact that one a gambler saw a new casino then the curiosity will showed up and then try that new casino if there are many new games or what are the platform and offer. If a gambler found a good and trusted casino who offered a good amount if you they win then for sure they will choose that casino. Cause every gambler has a decision to choose for his/her game.
It is not uncommon for gamblers interested in a new casino to always try it out, especially if there are great promotional offers that are easy to achieve such as getting free spins for just a $10 deposit. with $ 10 we can try the casino game and try to get the bonus that is given. on the other hand we can also feel whether the casino is a scam or not. using $10 is a small amount that can be used to see if the casino deserves a positive review from us. because if we spend $10 and we are lucky to win at a new casino and after that we make an instant withdrawal and the funds go in quickly, the new casino deserves a positive review. but don't rush to give positive reviews on new casinos the first time we play and successful withdrawal of funds it's not one of the best. because it could be a trap. as we know, several times there have been gamblers who have bet at casinos for the first time, gamblers have no problems withdrawing funds, but after using large funds, the casino actually bans their accounts for no reason. so need to be careful for new casino. for new games, yes, that's what all gamblers want, every casino at least releases new games that gamblers can play so they don't get bored with games that are just that. Yes you are right that mate, so it's a good decision to try a new casino with a small amount of betting and after a few trials and without any problem in withdrawal the second step is to make our deposit much bigger, and if that's work and no problem in withdrawal then it's recommendable enough to another gamblers. But in first and second try then we should not trust easily especially in new casino and after how many time and there's no problem then it will be recommended . there is another way to test the new casino as @redsun114 said usually a new casino provides a faucet for its new customers to test the casino before making the first deposit. but for me it is still not effective. because there can be manipulation in new casinos like when we use a faucet everything looks fine but when we make the first deposit in the end everything turns into problems like suspension of funds or banned accounts. I'm not saying new casinos are all bad, but we as gamblers are free to do some testing before making large deposits at new casinos. Indeed, casinos usually provide faucets for gamblers who have just joined the casino with the aim of being able to test play there, but it seems that with faucets we can only test the game so we cannot test every transaction such as deposits and withdrawals whether it is really safe or not. No. Here, I actually think that the advice given by @Shamm is quite good because that way we can gamble all transaction services at a new casino. But still in testing use the lowest money. And it's true that not all new casinos are bad, but we must always be vigilant and do research first to really be able to trust a new casino. My take on faucets is that when you do not see the product or it is not clear how the company providing you with a "service" is making the money, it is very likely that the product is you and the money is being made with your effort. Think Facebook - everyone is generating free content for Zuky. I mean that a good game and site would not need such an incentive for adoption. |
|
|
|
|
It seem like a typical and not really good attempt to generate hype. I guess the next think from the OP will be to sell the "method" or the "bot". Now, I am going to give the OP the benefit of the doubt. In case you really run that simulation in real conditions, you are most likely facing an statistical issue with any random number generator that in the long term may provide wrong results.
|
|
|
|
Do sport like football betting and MMA betting carries the same risks or one is more profitable to bet on than the other? Which one is more likely to easily predict than the other? Also, I need a platform where football prediction is certain, is there any of you guys using any reliable platform?
I watch and read predictions in threads and on youtube but normally without any information or knowledge a gambler will be based on the odds alone. To me, football is a lot harder to predict given that the sport is played by a team. I would still be watching sports predictions if I would bet on a particular match. I bet on NBA without knowledge recently and still get to win but also lose some. Some gamblers are probably making things simple by just doing it that way. No analysis nor knowledge of who are on those teams, they just look at the bookmaker's favorite and bet. Upset matches rarely happen anyway. Not the ideal way to bet really, it is like letting others have the real fun of predicting, digging into the available information, looking for the right opportunity and take a calculated risk but thinking of getting the advantage of a superior knowledge, even if that is as a result of investing more time than other people, perhaps even the bookies in some cases. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
