All good to protect BitCoin Incl BitCoin Script and it's Turing Completness All good to ensure the only open blockchain will be used properly Scalable Transparent -> will trigger lots of haters  |
|
|
|
U re jsut about names and ppl
The protocol 0.1 works - so why change ?
There is no reason why, except u want to say sth / dev sth / Feature sth - ON THE BASE LAYER
-> go & change TCP/IP - have fun
What? You can barely type words. You're not fit for the discussion of improvements between builds, of which there are several. Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19
You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again. Completely irrelevant. What your illiterate fellow cult member was inferring was that Satoshi's last version of Bitcoin was 0.1, which is simply not true. Focusing on 0.1 as if it were the end-all version of Bitcoin is just a talking point used by Craig, and nothing more. Completely irrelevant. Stay on RBF coin - have fun |
|
|
|
Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19
You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again. Thx - I bet it wasn't really interested. But great you came up with - cause it is really a tricky Thing - all that Bitcoin stuff |
|
|
|
Do you realize any transaction made from preev, weathersv and any other app is also a payment or micro transaction lol?
Then why wouldn't they be included in the payment figure? Its because its not actually a payment to anybody. Its somebody artificially upping BSV's transaction count in order to make it appear more popular than it actually is. Look at the active addresses -- that's all you need to know about actual usage of a coin. 0.2. 0.3. ... all Trollsensus
Wrong yet again. The last Satoshi build was version 0.3.19. 0.1 is pretty primitive and archaic in comparison, which is why Craig didn't just fork BSV from 0.1. BSV contains improvements made by Greg Maxwell, Peter Wuille and even Amaury Sechet. Your obsession with 0.1 stems from you swallowing yet another stupid CSW talking point hook, line and sinker. You know nothing about Bitcoin or its history. All you know is trolling. BSV, set in stone, until we change it, again. U re jsut about names and ppl The protocol 0.1 works - so why change ? There is no reason why, except u want to say sth / dev sth / Feature sth - ON THE BASE LAYER -> go & change TCP/IP - have fun |
|
|
|
Again "features" Bitcoin doesn't need, getting sold, stamped as 'consensus'. Sigh |
|
|
|
0.2. 0.3. ... all Trollsensus Segwit is not BitCoin |
|
|
|
My advice: Look into the Version 0.1 Set in Stone. No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level https://mobile.twitter.com/bitcoinnobody/status/1195451727828271104?p=vIt is all about law enforcments focussed on point - where miners need to alter a single UTXO - correct that and Job done Guess too easy but anarchos don't like it When ? Any time needed and 'global' enforcments come true ( like for Liberty Reserve ..) Oh - and sooner as too many play dumb IMHO |
|
|
|
Just hodl hide and wait wont help anything Use and spendl. Give it velocity medium of exchange unit of account. Here u go. |
|
|
|
Ooh, nice. But SoV is not some electronic blockchain application?  |
|
|
|
Getting more heat , and yes ctor was really totally irrelevant, but happy they are on the different side now https://twitter.com/SpartanPrairie/status/1195758489240580097?s=20And no, Satoshi was right about BitCoins privacy model. Only he stayed mostly anonymous himself... Money is a traceable thing. Anonymous things are crap. Satoshi knew that Trolls don't bite here, again Anonymous things are crap Why is crap ? It rather enables crime and corruption. U just invite thieves cause u got nothing against and u shit on the honest. It does not give anything back for the average ppk Good privacy is enough and u need to be compliant with money per default or ur money is tainted per se https://mobile.twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1195793630398689280When I think anonymous I don't think directly of corruption or crimes but "untraceable" fonction confidential just so that my neighbor doesn't get involved in my finances or my contracts but as you explain now i understand that this perspective is indeed largely plausible. Well for my part I find the work developed on BSV admirable to lead towards the direction of perfection! Personally just misses my finances "stuck" on other projects to be able to come.... One on the development of NFTs and the other on anonymity but nothing progresses as quickly as the surprising results of BSV after that is also a question of financial means and the number of protagonists. With BSV you are very, very far from DIY at the end of the string, it's obvious. Many here use themselves to plead bullshit while the observation is obvious segwit kills bitcoin btc, bsv is much superior in every respect. I hope that Christmas will come this year as it was two years ago, would be ideal to switch between high and low. I regret that the BSV masterpiece was not born in early 2018, but that is the way it is. U mixing up two things, u want privacy, that s what BitCoin will give u, especially used by billions in big blocks It is hard to find out for ur neighbors what u do, but u still can prove who has stolen ur coins if that value is higher than the work to do i.o. to find out the crime and trace it. Such that it make sense to kill government corruption and big crimes perfectly. Average Joe txs not affected, but if u need to proof u little guys are clean, u can show that in few secs. Anonymity kills such , and u invite corruption and fat crime, when Average Joe pays for with tainted coins and is used as human mixer. That is NOT BitCoin, never was, despite what the criminal Hijackers here will tell you and try to alter BitCoin to get more anno and anarcho. - > crime user go up |
|
|
|
Getting more heat , and yes ctor was really totally irrelevant, but happy they are on the different side now https://twitter.com/SpartanPrairie/status/1195758489240580097?s=20And no, Satoshi was right about BitCoins privacy model. Only he stayed mostly anonymous himself... Money is a traceable thing. Anonymous things are crap. Satoshi knew that Trolls don't bite here, again Anonymous things are crap Why is crap ? It rather enables crime and corruption. U just invite thieves cause u got nothing against and u shit on the honest. It does not give anything back for the average ppk Good privacy is enough and u need to be compliant with money per default or ur money is tainted per se https://mobile.twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1195793630398689280 |
|
|
|
Getting more heat , and yes ctor was really totally irrelevant, but happy they are on the different side now https://twitter.com/SpartanPrairie/status/1195758489240580097?s=20And no, Satoshi was right about BitCoins privacy model. Only he stayed mostly anonymous himself... Money is a traceable thing. Anonymous things are crap. Satoshi knew that Trolls don't bite here, again |
|
|
|
Many good things happened aftre bch did split off by ctor and dsv from BitCoin (Edit: look, they are just splitting and fighting again/still: https://twitter.com/SpartanPrairie/status/1195738628825239553?s=20) Now since lots of dark forces and anarchy / anonymity/ anti compliance folks/ protocol alterer are gone out of Original BitCoin things move on for clean stable and scalable BitCoin protocol https://twitter.com/liujackc/status/1195298816385118209We see lots have a serious problem with such transparency and open money ledger, but - lol - these guys Cannot come up with their stuff in public ( anonymous is not really sustainable, it only helps corruption) Only here they try to shut free speech and choice down. I hear the fear |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
