Oh, wow guys guys, you do not have to do this at all. Winz.io could simply just make a big signature campaign that pays well to people and you could simply just have tens of famous bitcointalk people write about you everywhere they go and you could pay bonus for 1 message per day on this topic as well so you could keep this place active too.

There is no need to get a newbie army to keep bumping this thread up because that is not going to get you any attention at all. I am not saying it was intentionally done since I can't prove it was, but that doesn't really good at all. Plus look at all the messages, they are reeking of "let's write and be done with it" hurry and that rushing is never really helpful towards your casino at all, you need good quality posters at least.

Lol seeing the hugeness of USDT scares the hell out of me, am I really the only one? I have been fighting against XRP for years now, it is one of the first scam coins that was ever created but humanity somehow liked it so I guess it got a pass, however at the end of the day I have realized that people will not listen to me and it will keep going higher and higher. Now same goes for USDT and it just continues like this. I have zero influence over people and nobody really cares what I say, so I guess I will do it again with the same result.

USDT is a scam coin run by people and people could die, people could lie, people could fly, do not put your money into something that is attached to people, you will end up as the person who gets upset about it and that is why I think you should stay away.

This is why I love TA people and the short term traders. Right now we have two topics about how bitcoin could break the biggest bull very quickly very soon because it looks like 20k+ is very possible even 100k is at our reach, and there is a topic here about how the target is 5.5k, I can't talk about which one is right and which one is wrong, because I am not an expert and I can't say anything.

However, even the idea that someone can look at TA and say 5.5k while the other person could look at it and say 100k could very well be enough reason that people either don't know how to use TA at all, or basically it is a proof that TA could be looked from anywhere you want and you could see whatever you want, people could literally draw any conclusion they could want.

Probably he referred the miners by using the term "mining pool".

Unlike you mentioned, price increase will not happen immediately following the halving. That is where the point, OP is referring. Until, prices turn profitable, definitely miners will suffer which may lead to less number of miners in a mining pool; and probably OP is mentioning that situation as a damage .

The time gap between halving and BTC prices to become profitable for miners must be a struggling period for both miners and common bitcoiners. Yes, we are the people who suffer because of 100x more tx fees than usual. People who make 1 or 2 transaction per month may not suffer but the others. So, halvings do damage not only the miners but also the frequent BTC transactor. The only consoling thing is, expectation of higher value for BTC in near future as past halving have done that so why not this time as well .

New traders (which I was once upon a time) have one thing in their mind, it is the fact that bitcoin is valuable and it is scarce so it will always worth more in the future. So they can buy and sell to make a profit, or they could buy and hold until they could sell for a profit.

Obviously, there are weak hands who get in at high and get out at low because they are afraid but those people do not really understand crypto all that very well, they are always afraid of what bitcoin could do and think that people who call bitcoin dead could be right. Hence, I still think that many traders who are not very experienced divide into two, people who will buy and sell and basically be active all the time until they get out, or people who do not really get it and only buy because they want to get rich quickly.

Sounding like a specialized portal for both bitcoin and gambling worlds. Must be a great idea and I am not sure how people are missing this kind of combination so far. I remember crypto-games.net (now crtpto.games) once tried like crypto-news but unable to sustain due to lack of support and traffic from crypto community. One probable reason must be they were not innovating but tried like another portal for crypto news. But, here I see combination of bitcoin and gambling world as a new innovation which may assure minimum success in this crypto space.

I like to suggest to go for short term campaigns (like signature, twitter) initially which may make your protal more familiar among most crypto adopters.

I tried the same, but not directing me to anywhere but I only error page is being shown to me. Tried twice same problem persists, not sure, what I am missing out here. Before that, I availed 100 credits instantly just after registering using the code "FREE100" (seeming like this bonus not a specific one for this forum members but available all the new registrants) and able to start gambling just after registering.

Please let me know whether depositing cryptos using coinpayments options is working or under maintenance or anything like that..

Both live chat and deposit using coinpayments option are loading one the same page/same tab by leaving the gambling hence I need to use back button in browser to get back to the game. I guess, opening such things into new tab will be more convenient.

After noticing lack of activities from other gamblers on this thread, I just came to know this is your second topic for the same casino. The last post on old topic was on October 13, 2019 and this topic was launched on March 25, 2020, could you explain the gap? I notice your old topic is not yet locked, you may lock either one.

Why not work on removing your negative trust by explaining and making your casino activities more transparent? Without making yourself clear (in all means), you may not find any differences both in your casino and in this topic; people may keep ignoring.

You have to consider the positive with the negatives as well and I feel like negatives outweight the positives a million times. Definitely the environment is a lot better these days, we are going to live the coolest summer in the past 10 years according to scientists all thanks to the virus.

However even though some families are closer, some families are further apart, people are getting divorced at a higher rate (well they can't just yet, but they already applied) or there are more domestic violence as well, which means as you can see there are positives in everything but there are negatives which are higher and worse so I think positives which I agree that it exists, are looking unimportant when you consider the biggest negative, tens of thousands of people dead.

I always love "worlds debt" thing whenever it is said . Like who do we owe to? Do we owe to mars? Is it sun because it gave us life? Should we pay the Sun that much money to keep firing? Who the hell does the earth owe to? There are not that many places that will take it, there are more debts in the world that there are places owed, so it makes no sense at all, there is no mathematically possible way to pay all the debt back, if some people do, there are not enough for others to do it.

In any case, crypto doesn't have to be big like these, companies are fine, richest people are fine, but we do not need to be bigger than US stock markets for example, reaching to that 50 richest people level would be more than enough for us to actually be big enough for us.

I am not going to lie I laughed when I saw "it drops back to 19k and reaches a new high" part, I can't prove it won't happen and I have to say it sounds quite possible and also way too realistic . If one day bitcoin reaches to let's say 50k and drops to 19k I can guarantee %100 that there will be people who will be like "ITS GOING TO 3K AGAIN" even those days, even if its 50k to 20k that we are talking about. I am sick and tired of those people but they exist so we have to learn to live with them.

At the end of the day bitcoin could always go up, it could always be 50k to 100k, that could be today or in 10 years, the thing that matters is not "if" it will be, its "when" it will be, if bitcoin reaches 50k for the first time in 2040, that is not good at all, if it does it by 2023, that is awesome, so timing is very important.

When there is a decrease in the volume of bitcoin, know that there is also a chance that bitcoin could potentially go up as well. Because if there is less volume that means there is usually less liquidity as well, so what you can do with X amount of bitcoin/dollars is much harsher when there is lower volume compared to having a huge volume where X means nothing to the market.

In this case, if the volume is low, and someone puts millions of dollars worth of purchase on bitcoin right now, that means the price could increase very fast without anyone touching it since there isn't enough volume to stop it. This doesn't mean it will happen, the drop could still happen, I just wanted to point out that there is %50 chance that it could be towards downwards or it could be upwards.

You can definitely make advertisement on facebook, there are tons of pages with crypto focus there as well. Do not think of facebook just a place where elderly hang out, even they moved to instagram these days and right now there is no place you can't see elderly hanging around, so you need to make advertisement focus on point. Facebook groups that are based on crypto?

Specifically how to get free bitcoin? Works. Twitter people who have a lot of followers regarding crypto? Works. Instagram pages about crypto that has a lot of followers? Works. As long as you find your audience, it doesn't matter where they are, you can check the weirdest places and as long as it works, it works. Hence you should always look at who you are advertising to, not where you are advertising at.

How could people really not understand why people join the competition but can understand they could gamble? I mean joining the competition is a way of gambling as well, it is just so happens that you gamble with gambling and I get that that is usually quite rare and you do not see it all the time, but gamblers will gamble and that is what they do, so there is really not that much shocking value to it.

You gamble a bit and you risk a bit, you gamble a lot, you risk a lot, that is normal on everything else as well, even on a simple dice game if you wager 1 btc and win another 1 btc, you always have the option to put them together and wager 2 bitcoin together, you could either go back to zero like you never won, your you will get to 4 bitcoin instead. Think of it like that.

That is why I always supported the idea that there should be "some" fans, not really a lot but we are talking about a HUGE stadium and putting like 100 people there couldn't be worse than right now would it? Plus teams could decide on who will come, it could be literally family of the players or their friends or whatever which means the people who will come to view the games would be known people to the team and not "some fans". That way you would have some support.

Right now we are talking about a system where league mostly ended with fans, but the rest will be without fans so if there is any changes the teams could just blame not having any fans at all, and use that an excuse for their losses and all that. I am not sure if this could be done but it looks like not that much more dangerous.

The thing is, in order to make sure that you are the one who sent the link is not something viable, if your friend went to the website way before he clicked from you, but didn't register from google, register from you, that still doesn't work. So in this situation, I am sure that what happened was your friend clicked a link and went to bitkong and checked but didn't played or registered at all, after that you sent a link and he clicked on that link and registered from it and deposited and played but since he clicked on the first google search first way before, his cookies registered there, which is why I think it wouldn't work.

I am not sure if this is exactly what happened but this could be the issue you are having right now. Hopefully you will figure out what the situation was.

It is probably about having a lot more people involved which means there is probably not that much more profit to make but there is more people who are sharing those profits. Honestly not everyone is a bad trader, sure there are some but the amount of people who are getting into trading learns from the better traders, we didn't had that chance we learned it by losing money and testing stuff, but now the new traders hear the bad ideas from us and we warn them so they are starting with more knowledge.

This is why I think it is getting harder because there is a lot of new people who learn from the old ones and we have to share our trading strategies with them and we are doing the same thing while the profit is same but our shares get smaller and smaller.

Everyone tries to promote their thing, that is not really that big of a deal anymore because everyone is doing and if you are doing something and not promoting like this when everyone else is doing it, you are not really doing it properly anymore. I know it sucks and I know we want the world to be better but as long as it is allowed and others are doing it, new places will keep popping up and doing this nowadays, that is about as good as you can hope right now.

Do not really care about what people are promoting these days, just consider what you are doing as a good thing and close your eyes to other peoples stuff they are trying to shove to your face. I have a system and I like my system and I do not care what others are saying I just want to continue doing what I do.

It is not even the experienced traders, anyone who knows what they are doing will diversify their portfolio and that is basically the thing that is taught at everywhere. If you have money that you can invest you should definitely put it in many things and altcoins are a big part of it. Definitely if you want keep it some on USDT, however put some on bitcoin as well, and put some on altcoins as well.

I would say the bigger the altcoin is, the bigger share it should get, and the smaller it is, smaller it should be on your portfolio. 50% bitcoin, 20% USDT, 10% ethereum, 5% eos, and basically just 3-5% everything else. That way you would be doing fine without really risking any of your money all at the same time, you would be doing fine no matter what happens.

Just because a currency has a low volume doesn't mean it should get delisted right away. That is why I always supported this B-side exchange inside the exchange to help out the small coins. Think of it like a second division in football, this way you would have the big ones that have over 100 btc volume per day or whatever (volume could be anything you want) and there will also be a "smaller coins" exchange part where it will not be even paired and only paired with ethereum, I know there are ones who are listed on ethereum already, I mean this will be strictly for the smaller volume ones.

This way you are still making some money, but the smaller ones are separated as well to no confuse people neither. Think of it like stocks and penny stocks.