The only suggestion is that let your work, your push and dedication speak for you, it is not really easy to gain the trust of users, especially in a market where we have so many other companies doing the same thing, but you can still make your own way, the market is too big for everyone to make it in their own space.

So if you want to gain my trust, you must first have a very good platform interface, your site must be very users friendly, you should be able to offer me lots of bonuses and discounts on my trade, your site must be highly secured to protect my investment or trade, and finally you should try and have volume on your exchange overtime that will keep your project running.

I am not entirely sure if single game is path to success or not. I am not saying having multiple games would get you anywhere else than a single game neither, I am just trying to say that we can't really know about it. How can you calculate if one game focusing would make you bigger than having multiple games, it is not like something we can calculate and see how it is, all casinos are different from each other so it will always be something that is impossible to calculate.

You can't just look at dice games out there and casinos out there and assume one is better than the other because of this or that hence this is something subjective and can't be calculated. I prefer many games for example because I get bored of dice time to time and want to play other games but that is just me, are there other people like me? sure. Are there people who just like one game? Sure. So this is not a question that has one answer.

I think when bitcoin goes higher only the people who had money in casino already would gamble or new people that joined in the crypto world would gamble. I feel like when bitcoin goes higher it is the sensible thing to trade it and calculate your loss/profit first, after that if you are in profit maybe you can play with the excess for sure.

Like if you bought bitcoin at 4 thousand but its not close to 6 thousand you can gamble the 2 thousand away (you can even win if you are lucky) and keep the 4 thousand, that way you are not losing money from your pocket but you are losing money from your potential profits which is always easier to handle than actually losing money you deposited. Think of it like a promotion stake has done that increased your moneys worth and gamble that way .

The advantage of investing into this website is that if bitcoin price goes down you have more btc so you are in profit, if btc price goes up you still have more btc so you earn double. Basically investing here never disappointing, there is absolutely no scenario where investing into the bankroll could be a bad business decision, I don't know why but I prefer to invest into bustabit more .

I know they are basically the same thing for owners sake and shouldn't matter but that was the first one I invested into and I just didn't feel like switching teams you know? However, if I had seen this one first I would totally invest here as well. This place (and bustabit of course) is one of the most technically run well oiled machine place I have ever seen in crypto, not from marketing not from design not from community support and all that but purely amazing development that is unparalleled anywhere.

Lol, some people can be so funny with their comments, are you the one that killed and buried sir satoshi, for the fact he chooses to stay off doesn’t mean he is dead, he purposely did that and we can testify to it using the forum as an example.

when he created it and built it to some extent, he felt there is a reason for him to stay temporarily anonymous, that is why he handed over the Forum to group of gurus he trust with it, probably people that are technically inclined and first created account, even the people he handed over the forum to never met him or have the opportunity even chat with him. So satoshi is alive and I am sure he is controlling things and making the blockchain technology better.

If not because of the issues of scammers that has hijacked the whitepaper, I think the whitepaper should have been enough to pass judgment on them, because they have a section in the whitepaper where they put all the details of the teams  and developers, so one can make a research using their details on the whitepaper to know them.

This is no longer useful as scammers now fill their whitepapers too with fake faces of people that knows nothing about the project or even exist, but we can still do something, if we investors and bounty hunters can all agree on one thing, maybe we all design the type of information that needs to be on the whitepaper and any whitepaper that does not have the information should not be read or paid attention to.

Any knowledgeable trader now will tell you that crypto market is where the money is, many trader has lived on their lives in forex before crypto and has never seen a market place as amazing as that of crypto market, the volatility in the crypto market can never be compared to that of forex market, so op should better try the both out first directly and stop basing it on assumption or imagination.

The reality is there for everyone to face and we can say that Crypto trading and forex trading are not mate when it comes to profit. Crypto market supersedes that of forex market with a very far gap.

I see that so many exchanges are now beginning to come up with IEO projects, it’s a good and welcome development, at least the concentration and the rush will be reduced and many people will get the chance to participate anytime and any day.

This will actually be my first time of hearing about Bitbox, and they must have been very popular too for them to be able to conduct IEO project, I will research on it and give a feedback if the IEO projects are worth waiting for, but I still prefer to join IEO projects from exchanges like Binance, it gives more confidence to all these other ones because of the good reputation that they have, but we can still give this one the benefit of doubt too.

I don’t know if that is the main reason for delisting coins because I have a portfolio that I have already renamed BAG HOLDER. LOL. Most of the tokens there are already dead but they have still not been delisted, just that they have no trade volume at all and I don’t know how to even get rid of them, because no one seems to be interested in the sell order that I have placed.

I just believe that once a token has been delisted from an exchange, it must have been having issue with other exchanges too and that will be the end of it all, just to forget about it and count those projects has one of those Ponzi scheme we have falling into.

I think the newer casinos and even some older ones accept bitcoin investment option because they want to remove the risk of running out of money during gambling operations. Most of the casinos you see like bustabit and all that actually put their own money into that bankroll as well, hell its almost always the biggest portion when it starts early on.

They just want to give the gamblers a chance to win much more and not have the risk of running out of money, even if you have 1000 bitcoins that you can bankroll a casino and allow people to win up to 30 bitcoins at max, isn't it better that you risk your 1000 bitcoin less and still have a 5000 bitcoin bankroll ? You both make investors rich, you give yourself less risk and you end up with bigger max bet for gamblers, its all around win for everyone.

I really do not think that dude is really into bitcointalk as much as we think he is. Of course if you are going to make a raffle for winning lambo you are going to open an account here and share that here as well but dude is basically running a raffle company nowadays, he sold his house as well and now he is selling a lambo which all made him some hefty profits I am sure.

The trouble here is that bitcointalk forum doesn't like the "write and leave" approach by these type of companies, if you are going to write here than you have to keep following as well. Last time the OP of this topic was active was April 3rd. Now I am not saying you have to answer every single question because sometimes it gets repetitive but if you don't check the topic for a month than you might as well not have started the topic at all.

Dude, I am sorry to say that you must also be an unserious person to have believed in such holding, are you the project developer to have held such quantity of the token, we are talking of trillion mate, how much did they even raise for the whole ICO for you to get that token amount in your wallet.

Aside this, have you ever see any coin circulating supply that has ever been up to trillion? Something is not so right about your holding and except you are just pulling our legs, you need to really check your wallet if it has not been hacked, because you cannot get solution to what you are looking for, no one can help you out as they are not ethereum developers or the project developers, so it will be better you contact them directly.

The already listed ones too, are they ready to also show their faces? They are all birds of same feather, they are strictly working with the benefit of blockchain technology but they are not following same rule with their users through this KYC of a thing.

I think the reason why most of these ICO would not show their face is because they are also not even sure of the success of the project they are promoting too, their whitepaper is basically constructed through speculation and not real about it, anyway, at least if we concentrate on already existing projects, even though there is not guarantee that those ones will not fail too, but at least we still got the chance of surviving our investment.

This is not the holding we are talking about mate, from what you have just shared, I think it shows to me like majority of your holdings are shit holding and it would be very unwise for you not to have BTC now that you still got the chance to buy from its cheap price.

You can’t completely rely on tokens you worked for compared to the ones you directly invested in, so I will give a brief advise that you sell part of your holding if they have entered exchange to use and buy BTC, in case others later becomes worthless too, so that you will not be in sorrow when altcoins pumps.

The government may not really want to be directly involved because they feel like they will not be able to monitor the income of such company is making for them to be able to calculate proper tax, so the tactics I think they will use is to impose a very bug tax on them that will enforce them in tendering their company income for proper taxing, so they are still indirectly having control of their system without legalizing it.

Government are just too consumed with power and control that they  fail to see the benefit cryptocurrency will bring directly to them if they accept it, that is why I like what some smaller countries are already doing, by embracing crypto which may make their economy boom.

I think he is really having his ways in this because BSV is actually getting stronger and always on the green zone, when bitcoin delisted the BSV, I actually thought that it will have some effect on the coin but it didn’t, which means whatever strategy the guy is using is really getting him the popularity he needs.

The only part I don’t like is him playing with law, he should have limited his game to the crypto environment and having to use legal means is way beyond his capacity and I don’t think too that any judicial system will listen to him. The court he is even going to, will they even be able to understand what the whole satoshi thing is all about. He is just looking for a way to shut the podcater’s mouth up.

Most of the websites mentioned here are already good, trusted website is not something really hard to come by in bitcoin world, the only difference between a regular casino that could potentially scam you and the trusted websites that we all know that won't scam you is the previous works they have done in those regards.

Some websites have been hacked, some websites have been complained about and all kinds of bad stuff happened and they came out of it without any problems at all, they managed to break all those problems and kept the customers happy whatever the cost was and now we are here talking about them as trusted websites. As long as you do whats best for your customers and give them the benefit of the doubt and keep them happy no matter what happens to your casino than you will be trusted.

Decentralized casinos do exists, they are the dapp versions rooted from certain coins, right now the most known one is eosbet which is a decentralized casino and right now they basically have dice only (they have crash and baccarat too but I really think dice is what draws people to their website). It is not a "casino" perse but they are really getting there.

There are other examples too if you check the dapp world and see but they are basically the same except couple of trust issues removed, after all if you trust your dice website than decentralized is not really important, for example I trust primedice enough that its basically as trustworthy as decentralized for me, same with stake too. So all in all it all depends on what you are looking for but they do exist out there if you look for it or at least google it.

I think the house always wins is an understatement because casinos are not marketing themselves like go play until you lose or go do something silly but they are literally just saying "why don't you try to win some?" like come at me type of encouragement, they are literally saying "come try winning, you can't" and people love that and go actually lose money like the marketing literally says.

I am not even joking think about it what does casinos do for promotion? They give bonuses, like you put in 100 dollars they give you 100 more for free, fully knowing you will lose 200 total and give you more time to stay there and enjoy your loss. Its really not some sort of exaggeration by me, its literally casinos saying "you can't win" to our faces and we still manage to have fun with it .

I would not say that their aggressiveness is attached to IEO in particular but because of the exchanges they are coming from, Binance is the one that started this issue of IEO as a solution to the scam being found in ICO, and based on the people’s trust for Binance, they believe that whatever comes from these exchange will be a great one.

So, when they see an IEO coming through such type of exchange, they will be aggressive about it based on the reputation they have built, I am sure that when other exchanges that are not well known begins to introduce their own IEO too, there might not be so much aggression towards IEO.