Also bei mir kommt die Meldung auch wenn ich die Waves Adresse nicht eingebe. Gerade extra nochmals geprüft.


Ich frage mich auch wieso es für Waves überhaupt eine Gateway benötigt. Das war doch früher nur für die gewrappten Coins wie BTC, ETH, LTC usw. Wurde das in den letzten Monaten geändert (hab mich längere Zeit nicht wirklich mit Krypto/Waves beschäftigt gehabt)?

According to the website FCBInside, Bayern Munich is interested to buy Manuel Koné from Borussia M'Gladbach, also a Bundesliga team. The clubs wants him as a "holding six" before the defense a position that coach Tuchel believes is currently not well-filled. The website also states that Bayern is not interested in Joao Palhinha from FC Fulham anymore for this position, because Fulham wants to much money for him.

Es gab gestern ein kleines Zeitfenster, da ging es für mich. Was aber interessant war und was mich noch mehr irritiert, direkt nach meiner Transaktion (war im mittleren zweistelligen Waves-Bereich, also kein Vermögen) kam direkt die Meldung wieder. Meine Transaktion ging mit einer Verzögerung zwar raus, aber in den nächsten Minuten sah ich weiterhin die Meldung, dass die Gateway nicht mehr erreichbar ist. Für mich macht das den Anschein als wäre da vielleicht so eine Art Thresold und wenn der unterlaufen wird, kommt die Meldung.

Ich logge mich ja nicht mehr alzuoft in die Waves App ein, aber jedes Mal wenn ich das tue und irgendwas machen möchte, dann funktioniert es nicht. Aktuell scheint die Waves Gateway nicht mehr zu funktionieren, sodass man nicht mal Waves transferieren kann. Ist das noch bei jemanden so 

This is nothing new. Outside of crypto sites, advertising fraud is already a big problem on Google Ads. In the last few months I have clicked on ads from supposedly large companies several times (even the domain was identical) and then ended up on some scam site. Google has become very lax when it comes to checking such ads. This will certainly also happen with crypto advertising that is permitted again, probably even on a larger scale. There is a good article about this.
article

Is it possible to buy ARRR on a decentralized exchange like the Komodo DEX?
All exchanges in my research that list ARRR or where you can trade the coin are central, such as CoinEx, Gate.io or FMFW.

I've read posts like this before and I always wonder what such users want to say. There are three reasons why you gamble. Firstly, you try your luck because you don't have a lot of money at the moment and you want to try to make a lot out of a little. But the probabilities speak against it. Secondly, you have too much money and don't know what to do with it. When you're bored, you simply gamble with it in the casino. For most people it actually doesn't matter whether you win or lose, simply because they don't care about the money. Third, you're addicted. Then it's an addiction, but certainly not fun. In the end you usually lose either way, unless you are actually very lucky.

Swapping services within an app mostly cost much less transaction fees than exchanging coins the normal way. For this reason, transaction costs are not necessarily the decisive criterion. However, as you wrote, Lightning is also an option if it is offered by crypto payment providers, but this has not been the case with all providers I have seen so far.

War völlig wertfrei gemeint  


Stimme dir da zu. Allerdings irritiert mich auch der Preis der Collectibles ein wenig, was auf eine geringe Nachfrage schließen lässt. 0.2 Tezos sind nicht mal 20 Euro-Cent. Scheint die Werbung auf den Autos bisher nicht viel zu bewirken.

Tezos hat seit Kurzem eine Partnerschaft mit dem Formel 1 Team von McLaren. Dadurch kann man vom McLaren F1 Team Collectibles als NFTs erwerben. Hatte das auf einem Plakat bei ner Liveübertragung gesehen. Ganz cool, aber wohl nur für eingefleischte Fans etwas.

https://objkt.com/collection/mclaren-f1-team-23-collectibles

There are many altcoins with low fees, but only a few are accepted by crypto payment providers like Bitpay which can be integrated in shops. I would strongly recommend to use Litecoin. It is accepted by many shops/payment providers and has very less fees (depends how busy the network is, but usually fees are less than 0.5 cent per transaction).

I think most people who are a bit longer in crypto made this experience. At the beginning everyone tries to chase the next big coin and invests in a various of amount of different coins which are praised from random people. But if you've been around for a longer time in crypo space, you'll eventually realize that the really successful way is to simply hold on to the good quality coins.

Genau sowas habe ich gemeint. Ob es ninjastic war, welche ich früher schon benutzt hatte, weiß ich gar nicht mehr, zumindest hatte ich die Seite anders in Erinnerung.


Tatsächlich meine ich sowas wie ninjastic. Aber interessanter Thread, kannte ich noch gar nicht 

I sticked with my long term investments and did not really bought a notable amount of new coins (only a few alts to speculate with).
The hodling paid off and the performance was more than I hoped for. Next year will be exciting when the halving takes place. Before the event, I will position myself with a few strategic investments, as in the past this has always been a good opportunity to make nice profits.

The entire club did a good job pre-season. The player purchases were all well done and very well thought out. And Alonso did a great job of turning the players into a well-functioning team.

However, it will be exciting to see what things look like after the winter break. Some of Bayer's top players will travel to the Africa Cup of Nations and then it will become clear whether the second line of players can maintain the current level or not.

Ich erinnere mich schwach, dass es früher mal ein Tool oder Service gab, mit dem man früher hier im Forum gepostete Bitcoin-Adressen finden und extrahieren konnte um zum Beispiel diese zu signieren um sicherzustellen, dass der Account nicht kompromentiert wurde und man noch der tatsächliche Eigentümer ist. Gibt es dieses Tool bzw. Service noch und falls ja, wo kann ich es finden?

Danke Euch schon Mal im Voraus!

After some time of less activity here in the forum, I will now be regularly active again. For this reason, I'm thinking about redesigning this thread or even restarting it from scratch. I'm just wondering in which format I should do this, since Bitcoin and crypto are now anchored in the mainstream and there are a lot of mentions in films/series, unlike when I started the thread a few years ago .

Do you have any ideas on how to start a new thread? Should the list still be in the OP or should I keep an external list (e.g. Google Spreadsheets) to have the opportunity to sort/filter? Or should we no longer keep a list at all and just continue the course of the thread with the mentions as documentation?

Thanks a lot for accepting me! I'm glad to be back in a campaign managed by you

As far as I know, there are currently no more virtual debit cards that you can use to pay without KYC. A few years ago there were many of such cards that could be used without KYC up to a certain daily or monthly limit. Since a lot of fraud has been carried out as a result, the providers (Mastercard, Visa) do not allow giving out (virtual) cards without knowing their customers anymore.

Username: tyz
Segwit Bitcoin address: bc1qeae9w0zk0learx3n8vs2qwyzjaa56mm64mn8wt
BC.Game User ID: 27225548