I have been active in the gambling field for several years and I can only agree with @GamblingBro. Gambling is a highly speculative thing, in which the vast majority lose money instead of winning. You should rather concentrate on other ways to earn money safely. Gambling is not one of them.

This is a nice development and in my opinion only the beginning. I have an RSS feed with crypto news from over 30 sources, most of which I read daily. What is striking is the amount of news lately about more and more companies and financial institutions planning or working on implementing crypto. I think the real push of adaptation will come in the next two years.

There was a time when I tried just that, too. I signed up at all the casinos that offered a free bonus. At three casinos I was lucky enough to make a profit after completing the wager. At one casino even a very good profit (at that time Bitcoin worth about $600). Unfortunately, all three casinos have made problems with the withdrawal. One suddenly demanded (without it being in the ToS) a KYC, the other accused me of having multiple accounts, which was not true. Only at one casino I finally received the payout, which was about $80. From my experience, I advise against it if you have the goal to make money with it.

I think the most interesting match of this matchday is Regensburg vs Schalke in the second division today. Regensburg is the league leader after three matchdays with 8-0 goals. They have a perfect run, while Schalke could only get four points from three games so far. If Schalke lose the game today against Regensburg, they are already close to the relegation places and that could cause a lot of unrest in the club. Schalke must win today in order not to lose the connection to the top early on. Will be very interesting!

This is not a good argument in my opinion. There are highly developed industrialized countries that have a similar population, for example the Netherlands or Sweden. Moreover, Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies are independent of the number of participants in the network, so it doesn't make sense to argue that this would work because Ecuador is a rather small country.

The best example that Bitcoin is well designed and decentralized was seen a few weeks ago. When the Chinese government shut down miners in the country virtually overnight, the mining output of around 200 exa-hash had collapsed to around 80 exa-hash. But the network adapted very quickly. There were no block generation outages or other problems. Only the price had fallen, but that has nothing to do with decentralization but with speculation. In the meantime, the exa-hash size has increased again, as the miners have moved out. For me this was a good proof how well decentralized and stable the whole system is, even if a big country bans mining activities.

Dafür dass sie seit 2018 im Prinzip nichts Zeigbares auf die Reihe bekommen haben, ist das schon eine ziemlich freche hohe Summe. Und das Interesse an der Plattform scheint auch nicht sonderlich zu sein, wenn man die Aussage richtig interpretiert, dass man diese jederzeit einem Investor präsentieren könnte.
Ich war noch nie ein großer Fan des Projekts, aber irgendwie scheint das langsam ein bisschen shady zu werden.

Agree! But it will also be exciting to see how well Neymar and Messi match up. They played together at Barcelona a few years ago and won the CL together once, but back then Messi was the absolute superstar and Neymar was "only" highly talented. Therefore, Messi was the undisputed leader, so the roles were clearly distributed. Today that is no longer the case and neither of the two will want to subordinate themselves in this star ensemble. That could create a lot of potential for conflict. It would be even more intense if Ronaldo were to switch to PSG.

From my point of view, not really. Both types work with probabilities, of course. But there are still factors in poker as in betting that you can not influence. In my opinion, their success is due to rationality and money or balance management. These are essential in both poker and betting. If these are applied consistently, then you can be very successful in both. Nevertheless, this alone is not enough, but you must also have background knowledge of sports betting or mental stability in poker to have constant success.

Sounds pretty shady!
If you're going to do a teaser like this here, you should already add some more info. For example, from which country the cooperating financial institution is. I assume that it is not from an industrialized or developed country. Because there the regulations are now so far in force that such offers are no longer so easy. So the only countries left are those where regulation is not yet in place, which then also represents an increased risk for investors for their investments.

I also expected it to be more difficult for Chelsea than many saw it. Villareal has a good team and they showed what they are capable of against Man United in the final.
I especially liked Tuchel's tactical move of changing the keeper for the penalty shootout. In retrospect, that was absolutely the right move. It also shows me how deeply he now knows his team, which makes Chelsea one of the top favorites for the Premier League and Champions League for me.

First, of course, you need good knowledge to hack. But it also depends on how difficult it is to find and exploit a security hole. Some software have very simple bugs, others need deep knowledge to exploit bugs. In addition, not all hackers are the same. Some do it to prove themselves or to build a reputation in the scene. They usually don't care if they profit monetarily from it. Others are only after the money. Generalizing it the way you did is not accurate in my opinion.

I agree! Leave it alone if you don't want to lose money.
It may be that the coin will make some profits initially, but it is a typical meme coin that will follow a pump-and-dump scheme and end up being worth little or nothing. The mentioned exchange is a good indicator of this. The promise to protect the rainforest is also a typical platitude.

You can't say that as a blanket statement. There are also people who bet every day without being addicted, those who do it as their main job or have a good side income. However, they do it professionally and are not guided by emotions. They usually have a strict money and balance management and thus also regularly in profit. I know that because I know people like that.

Ramos is out for the time being due to injury. When I see the team and the names, I can't help but think of the Galacticos of Real Madrid. A team of the then absolute superstars like Zidane, Ronaldo, Raul, Beckham, etc., which could never get a great triumph. I think the same will happen with this team. It's not a team but a mixture of superstars where everyone has their own vanities. This will not work

The problem with the BNB Chain is that it is largely centralized or the few nodes are mainly from Binance. Apart from the fact that this is not in the spirit of crypto, this is also fundamentally a danger. Binance is a company that has so far been able to successfully evade any control and regulation. If the company is banned, the chain will also be dead and any assets on the chain will be worthless.

I agree. In the long run, Bitcoin doesn't really care if Tesla or Amazon backs the coin. In the short term, however, it does matter, because depending on this, the purchases or sales of Bitcoin increase, depending on what the companies do. This has been seen quite impressively recently.

I don't understand why people are always afraid that governments should ban anything regarding crypto. That just doesn't work. Why would the government want to ban the creation of new software, because coins and smart contracts are nothing else. Moreover, you can simply deploy the code anonymously. So how do they want to punish or prosecute that? Besides, something like this is nowhere up for discussion. Not even in China. That has recently been banned mining, but not the possession of cryptocurrencies.

Do you mean the series StartUp aired on Crackle? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StartUp_(TV_series)

If so, it is already in the list. The series is not very new either. The first season premiered back in 2016. Unfortunately, it was discontinued after 3 seasons, although there would have been more to the story. Too bad, I was a fan of the series.

Meanwhile, the US has overtaken China and now leads with a gold medal. Even though the Games are not over yet, it looks like the US could remain the frontrunners.
What surprised me the most was Japan. Of course, it's always the case that the host does better than average, and that's how it was with the UK and Brazil recently. But I didn't expect them to do so well.