I think inflation is not a problem. Firstly because it is not high and secondly because the network is growing faster than new coins are being created. If inflation were a problem, the price per Ether would have decreased rather than increased in the past. So I expect that the additional burning mechanism will rather ensure that ETHER will develop even better in price.

It has always been the case over the last few years that ManCity and PSG have been the highest favorites, and they have never won. It will be the same again this year. Even if PSG gets Messi, they won't win the CL. For one simple reason: they are not a real team. In the last few years, teams that were a united team have always won. Real Madrid, Bayern Munich and Chelsea.

If he moves, it will definitely be to England. He grew up there because of his father, and the way which football is played in the Premier League suits him. Barcelona will certainly not be in a better financial position next season. The debts are far too high for that. And Real can't afford such high sums at the moment either.

One should not complain. I don't think the development is good and I also think it's good that some leagues in Europe (the Bundesliga for instance) don't go this way. But on the other hand, it is the fans who make these high transfer sums possible by going to the stadium for horrendous prices, spending a lot of money on TV subscriptions and fan merchandise. If this were not the case, such transfers would not be possible, despite investors.

I hope you are aware that 100% interest is not serious at all and also not sustainable. Also, recommending such projects is not serious too. Good staking projects that get the staking profits mostly from transaction fees pay between 4-8%(annually) at the moment. Anything above 10% is more or less a Ponzi or retained tokens are distributed. But this indicates that the project can't find enough stakers. That's then the next sign that this can't go well for long and you shouldn't invest in it.

Das geht meines Wissens nach nicht. Deshalb wirst du auch bei der Erstellung des Wallets dazu aufgefordert den Seed abzuschreiben und die Backup-Datei zu erstellen. Ich würde an deiner Stelle einfach ein neues Wallet bzw. neuen Seed erstellen und die Tokens dorthin transferieren.

The odds are always adjusted according to how bets are placed. If many bettors bet on many goals, then the odds for few goals are increased and those for many goals are decreased. In principle, the betting provider only thinks about the initial odds, but as soon as the first bets are placed, the further setting of the odds happens purely on algorithms.

Oh, I almost forget!

I also added "Shiny_Flakes: The Teenage Drug Lord", a Netflix documentary about a German teenage drug lord who set up and run one of the most thriving drug marketplaces from his children's room from 2014-2015 before he was caught. He was sentenced to 7 years in prison and released early in 2020 for good behavior.  He plays himself in the documentary.

In total, he took about $4 million or 15k bitcoin in 1.5 years. Of that, only $300k in Bitcoin has been recovered by police to date. Only one out of three wallets could be cracked.  

The guy is the model for the Netflix series "How to sell drugs online (fast)".

Official trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMl93KgG72Y

Unfortunately, I'm not technically deep enough to really say whether the planned changes will really lead to a reduction in fees. What I have read suggests that the fees can really drop significantly in times when the network has normal traffic rates.
But if there is hype again (cryptokitties or NFT for instance), then fees will increase massively again. Whether as strong as before the change remains to be seen. I hope that Ethereum gets this problem under control, even if I am not particularly positive. It would definitely be a gamechanger.

There is also no call by any serious politician in the U.S. and the Western world in general for a Bitcoin ban. Even the central banks do not do that. What they almost all call for, however, is regulation of Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. That will happen sooner or later in most countries around the world. But there won't be a ban, at least not in the free part of the world. It may already happen in China or other dictatorships, even if it is difficult to implement. But even in China, only commercial mining was recently banned, private ownership of Bitcoin is still allowed.

Fand heute morgen ein interessantes Video auf Youtube von Mission Money mit Prof. Philipp Sandner. Ich war überrascht wie positiv er zur weiteren Bitcoin-Entwicklung (auch des Preises) steht. Er bringt dabei die aktuelle wirtschaftliche Situation, Notenbank-Politik und Inflation mit Bitcoin zusammen. Er geht dabei auch detailliert auf das Stock-To-Flow-Modell ein. Kann ich nur empfehlen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzFQW-mtnFs

Thank you very much for the tip! I didn't know there was a movie that mentioned Bitcoin so early and addressed the topic. Is there any proof? To the game a film snippet about it on youtube?


Thanks, added ot the list


Thanks, added to the list, too

Yes, that's what some media is speculating. The only question is whether Bayern needs such a player. They have Goretzka, Tolison and Müller in the position Sabitzer plays. Furthermore, another two players can take this position. In addition, Sabitzer is also no longer the youngest player. I think Nagelsmann certainly has interest, since he knows the player well. But we should wait and see how the first season goes for the new coach. Should he not do well, he could soon be history at Bayern and the matter Sabitzer thus be done.

If that turns out to be true and Lukkaku really does join Chelsea, I think Timo Werner will leave the club. He's having a bad season and it seems like he can't cope with English football. In addition, he would then certainly only a supplementary player and no longer set. But such a young player must be set to be able to develop further. There is already interest from other clubs.

I would also recommend and list ycharts.com [1] which shows a ton of good Bitcoin indicators which other similar sites don't. Besides well-known indicators like average bock size, average confirmation time, average difficulty and so on, it also shows data like average transaction fee, average miner revenue per day etc. I check the site regularly to get an overview of what the Bitcoin network looks like right now and where it's headed.

[1] https://ycharts.com/indicators/reports/bitcoin_statistics

As always, it depends on what NFT artwork you invest in. If it's uniquely good artwork, then it may well be worth investing in today and get a good price development in the future. However, most offers are currently in my opinion bad and totally overpriced by the hype. That is why I do not see the vast majority as a good investment.

Did you try Ethereum Classic instead? Fees are much cheaper as on Ethereum and the tech is the same. You can develop your ideas their and later, if you have more money, you can easily transfer it.
There are other cheap blockchain you can implement your ideas with, however, they is mostly less documentation available which make it a bigger challenger. I can recommend Waves Platform for example (documentation there is okay).

I don't think so either. We're already halfway through the Olympics and most of the competitions where the U.S. generally does very well are already over. So there won't be that many gold medals for the U.S. overall and China's lead is already too big. Overall, however, I am also surprised by the positive performance of Japan.

Funnily enough, those kids don't even have to do it themselves. In some countries, "gambling" apps are already pre-installed with Windows. I don't normally use Windows, but when I bought a PC a few months ago, Windows was already installed as standard OS. When I first booted it up, I was surprised to see what apps were pre-installed. Some fell directly or indirectly into the gambling category. Maybe this is due to countries where gambling is treated rather liberally.

This is because still most cryptocurrency are dependent on the price trend of Bitcoin. You can say, similar to the US dollar, bitcoin is also a leading currency in its environment. If bitcoin falls, altcoins fall as well. If bitcoin rises, altcoins also rise. Usually there is always a small delay, but so far this rule has always applied. Maybe some altcoins can decouple from Bitcoin at some point and start an independent price development. This would be desirable for the entire crypto market.