I wonder whether Ronaldo is really a reinforcement for Man United in terms of play. The president of Juve recently said that the Ronaldo signing was a mistake and that Juve has become worse as a result. He was referring primarily to last season. Ronaldo has certainly exceeded his performance peak. I think for Man United it's more about prestige and less about improving. In principle, the same as with Messi and PSG. The only good transfer would be Mbappe and Real Madrid.

Being a long time Hodler, I have been checking my Tezos Coins irregularly. So far I have always used TezBox. But unfortunately I had to realize that TezBox is no longer developed and it is not recommended to continue using the site/service. That's why I'm looking for a good alternative and hope you can recommend me one. The service should be web-based and secure, so without local installation. Furthermore I should be able to log in with my seed. Any recommendations?

Bei Betcoin ist eben nach langem mal wieder ein Platz freigeworden. Bounty-Manger ist Hhampuz und die Kampagne läuft schon seit über 1,5 Jahren durchgehend. Wer Interesse hat sollte sich am besten schnell bewerben

Hier geht's zum Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265892.msg57799570#msg57799570

update: scheint nun vergeben zu sein

I don't understand why Perez is portrayed so positively and as a great negotiator. The guy just throws money around and has brought Real Madrid to a debt of almost 1 billion dollars (900 million euros) and now wants to spend another €180 million for Mpappe? It will not remain with the 180 million, if you include all the fees for players, consultants and others. A disaster in terms of financial policy. Anyone who celebrates something like this has lost touch with reality.

This is a very common misconception. It is true that many of the encryption algorithms currently in use are quite vulnerable to quantum computing. But there are already some that are built in such a way that quantum computers cannot crack them. Research into this has increased enormously in recent years.

There is no specific indicator for crypto. If you are familiar with stock trading, then you can basically use the same indicators as there. However, I wouldn't rely on technical indicators. Crypto is almost exclusively news-driven. In the long run, hodling good coins has proven to be the best option anyway.

The answer is the same as to the question why in the 17th century during the tulip mania was paid 100,000 of $ (converted in today's value) for tulip bulb.  Buyers were not interested in using or growing the tulip bulb, but in reselling it as soon as possible for an even higher price. The same is the case with all the useless NFT assets for which sometimes immense prices are paid and for which hardly anyone will have any use in the future.

I think the game is important not only for Arsenal (and its coach), but also for ManCity. If they lose the game, then they would already be a few points behind the other top clubs like Liverpool, Chealsea and ManU, should they win their games (what is to be expected). The competition in the Premier League is so tight that it will be hard to make up a 5-6 point gap after a few matchdays in the long run.

No, it is well-known that many banks are interested in Bitcoin and crypto currencies in general. This was confirmed by various studies. 

Although many banks tend to be conservative and have viewed crypto with skepticism, they are increasingly driven by their own customers to offer crypto products. That's one reason. The other reason why many are still reluctant is the regulatory gap. Banks need secure legal foundations. These are not yet so elaborated and implemented in all areas that many banks cannot invest in crypto at all, even if they want to.

Coole Aktion!

Zahl - tyz

Haha, this was my first thought, too. Why the hell is he telling us he bought some Bitcoins. Thousands and thousands people do that. Noting worth to mention. My next thought then was, or maybe he means an ATM machine? But no one can be that crazy!

So what are your plans with this device? That is in my opinion the much more exciting question  

Leichester blocked every chance of taking a point in the game very early yesterday. First the early conceded goal in the 26th minute and then the deserved red card in the 40th minute. The game was actually over for Leichester until half time. West Ham played that well in the second half, but you could see the difference on having a man more on the field for over 50 minutes.

Mathematics and psychology. Preferably in good combination.

The principle of poker is, on the one hand, to be able to read the behavior of the other players, and on the other hand, to be able to calculate very quickly the probability of winning a hand with all the information I have. On the basis of these two factors, depending on the game situation, it is then necessary to weigh up whether to hold or fold.

I think the real question is: What is better, that a few rich people who have come to prosperity through ideas and entrepreneurship have the money and give this with foundations to charitable purposes or whether the state skims the money, e.g. through higher taxes, and distributes it according to its own ideas? I think both come out the same. It is a mistake that the state always makes the better decisions than private persons concerning charity and distribution.

Danke, erstere ist interessant. Bei der zweiten Grafik und externen Messdiensten bin ich immer ein bisschen skeptisch. Hatte selbst mal eine Community zu einem anderen Thema als Krypto mitgeleitet und die Zahlen von externen Diensten wie z.B. Alexa waren himmelweit von den wirklichen Aufruf- und Aktivitätszahlen entfernt.

Zu bedenken ist auch, dass durch das Ankommen von Krypto im Mainstream auch die Zahl der Kommunikationskanäle stark zugenommen haben. War früher das Forum hier die einzige vernüftige Plattform, gibt es heute viele. Ich kenne selbst einige die hier gar nicht aktiv sind, sondern vielmehr in Facebook-Gruppen, Telegram-Gruppe oder Slack bzw. Discord-Kanäle. Ich glaube das selbst die Änderung der Forensoftware diese nicht hierher locken wird.

Ich habe aktuell noch rund 150 BAT (ca. $130) auf meinem Brave-Rewards-Wallet. In den nächsten Tagen möchte ich meinen Rechner neuinstallieren, deshalb will ich sie gerne loshaben.

Darum die Frage: Hat hier jemand ein verifiziertes Uphold-Wallet mit dem der Geldwert ausgezahlt werden kann und möchte die BAT gegen ein Bruchteil des Eurowerts haben?

Andernfalls würde ich sie dann an verschiedene Contributoren spenden wollen. Kennt ihr im (deutschsprachigen) Kryptoumfeld Contributoren die gute Inhalte produzieren und BAT akzeptieren? Chris Müller von IOTAWeekly habe ich schon einige zukommen lassen.

Bin auch gerade auf dem Medium-Artikel dazu gestossen. Finde ich eine interessante Sache. Ist da schon jemand tiefer drin und kann kurz erklären wie das beim Lending mit der Sicherheit aussieht. Also, wie soll dort sicher gestellt werden, dass sich niemand Waves leiht und dann einfach verschwindet? So was wie Collaterals scheint es auf den ersten Blick ins White-Paper nicht zu geben. Auf jeden Fall ist der Bonus sehr lukrativ wenn man Waves bis Oktober dem Service zur Verfügung stellt.

Interesting news. Around 1,5 months ago, I started a thread about why Twitch secretly ended crypto payments. I don't know if there's a connection, but it seems like Twitch is being a lot more restrictive now. The funny thing about this news is that gambling streams are not banned but only the sharing of links to gambling sites. There are still a lot of streams where people run slots or play poker.

Passt zwar jetzt nicht ganz zur eigentlichen Diskussion. Aber gibt es hierfür eine Statistik wo man über einen Zeitstrahl ablesen kann wie sich die Aktivität im Forum verändert? Oder wie bist du zu dem Entschluss gekommen, dass die Aktivität hier im Forum abnimmt. Hatte bisher nicht den Eindruck, dass weniger User aktiv sind.

Thanks for pointing me to this thread. Did not know there is a particular one for the 2nd Bundesliga.

Well, Schalke lost 1-4 against Regensburg. I watched the match live on TV. Schalke never had a real chance at any time of the match. It happened what I assumed. Schalke could really get into dangerous waters now.