Funny answers! I would have expected more choice below $1000k Honestly, I have never bought any Bitcoin over 4k. And for 4k I bought last year only because the price had collapsed so violently by Corona that I was sure that it would rise again sooner or later, and because I had some cash left to invest. The most Bitcoin I bought somewhere between $80 and $600. Over the time, I have sold some Bitcoins from time to time, which of course have a high value, but relative to all purchased I have sold only about 50% so far.

The choice for Donnarumma was okay for me. As you wrote, there was no real standout player who could have made it otherwise. Donnarumma held up well and saved several balls in two penalty shootouts.
Personally, I would have chosen Eriksen. Just as a sign. I don't think anyone would have objected to that.

What do you mean the payment process has been updated? Beside credit cards the following payment options are currently available

Do you mean the crypto payments has been integrated with one of the other available payment options?

I also find it strange that you can't find any news or official announcement about this.

I don't think the video shows what you are trying to say. As far as I have seen from other sources, it was about the people who tried to get into the stadium without tickets. The scene happened before kickoff, so it has nothing to do with disappointed England fans.
One should always be very skeptical of such videos if one does not know exactly from which source they come.

Hallo zusammen,
auch Glückwünsche von mir, an die drei Sieger 1r0n1c, BTCLiz und seek3r. War spannend bis zum letzten Spiel. Hätte ich so nicht gedacht und war bei anderen Tippspielen in der Vergangenheit an denen ich teilgenommen hatte, spätestens nach dem Halbfinale eine klare Sache Wäre toll wenn man so etwas bald wieder machen könnte, wäre auf jeden Fall dabei.

Auch noch ein Dank an Willi für den Escrow und Julia von Bitcasino für die Organisation

I wouldn't generalize, but I myself experience that in my environment no one is in favor of England. Not because England is England, but because they simply don't deserve it. Italy played the better football in this tournament, beat the harder opponents and didn't stand out for multiple unfairness (bad crowd behavior, whistles during the national anthems at every game as hosts, Sterling's swallow, laser point attack etc). If England had not been in the easy half of the tournament tree, they would not have made it to the final at all.

To make the answer to your questions short:
You are completely free to provide this information or not. You can theoretically even enter any fun or fake data. I have already seen that with some users here. If you don't fill in the data, it won't have any disadvantages for you.

You've successfully identified that you can kick the market cap numbers to the curb for most projects. Exactly for the reason that the quantity in circulation is sometimes extremely scarce, which leads to such high valuations. Even with Bitcoin, the market cap also includes coins that no one actually has access to anymore or that are no longer available. Various analyses assume that up to 1/3 of the existing Bitcoins have been lost and should therefore no longer be included in the market cap, even though they are theoretically still there.

I have written this a few times in other threads. Airdrops are 99% not worth it nowadays. The days are gone when you could easily earn several thousand dollars a week with airdrops if you sold in time. Today most airdrops are just fake and the few really good ones set high requirements for participation or happen without notice, like Uniswap where only users got tokens who had made a transfer on Uniswap the last months. This was not announced, so many were surprised when they suddenly had tokens worth $1-2k in their wallet.

Admittedly, I have little idea about Cosmos. I have not been very involved with the project so far and I am not invested. But I also wanted to invest in projects that can compete with Ethereum. During my research, I came across Solana and Waves and invested in both around a year ago. Both have developed extremely well in recent months. Much better than Bitcoin and Ethereum. Maybe these projects would be worth a look for you.

It's usually the case that when crypto is the talk of the town, regulators and governments start cracking down on crypto. You rarely read such actions in bear markets, but always in bull markets. It's a striking pattern if you look at the last five to six years.

There are no studies, but in recent years there have been repeated bans on cryptocurrencies in some countries and you could not see that there was less trading in crypto. Partly the opposite was the case, as countries mostly introduced such bans to avoid capital flight and not to weaken their own national currency. In China, for example, this led to even more crypto being bought.

Normally yes! But not in times where you hardly have to pay interest for borrowing money. Suppose you borrow money for less than 1% per year. The stock market has brought an average return of 7-8% in the last years (blue chips). After taxes and interest, that would be about 5% profit. Of course you have a certain risk, but you always have that when investing, even with equity.
But I would not invest borrowed money in crypto as the risk is much much higher.

Nope, payment was processed by Bitpay. Therefore, it's not a big deal for Twitch. They have nothing to do with crypto-payments processing at all. Besides, Twitch offers nine different payment options (at least in my country), some of which are likely to be even more complicated than crypto. So that's certainly not the reason.


You could recently pay not only in BTC, but also in six other currencies including BCH. After the fees for BTC increased so much, I just made the payments in BCH and paid around $0.1-0.15 fees what is acceptable.

Yes, there were three things that were funny about that penalty and why it shouldn't have counted. First, it wasn't a foul, second, as you wrote, there was a second ball on the field so the referee should have blown his whistle before Sterling even got into the box. And third, there was a vice pointer attack on the goalie Schmeichel during the penalty. The English seem to want to steal the long-awaited title by any means. It's like on their first and only title 1966, when they became world champion at home(!) with a goal which was not a goal.

Die Sache mit UpBit war mir bekannt, aber dass so ein eher weltweit unbedeutender Exchange so eine Abwärtsspirale auslösen kann, hätte ich nicht erwartet. Hätte Binance Komodo delisted, dann okay.
Zumindest scheint sich heute wieder irgendwas zu tun Volumen verfünfzigfacht sich einfach mal so innerhalb von wenigen Tagen.

Normally, such sums would be paid for such a great and effective young striker as Haaland, if there would not have been such a crisis and the resulting loss of income for all clubs. With Dortmund keeping him for at least one more season, the situation may look better again next year for many top clubs and then a Premier League club or a Sheikh club will put $100+ million on the table. I don't think that's out of the question, especially if he plays another season like the last one.

Oyarzabal alone had three great chances to score and missed. Spain was the better team yesterday, but Italy was smarter and more composed, especially then in the penalty shootout. But it's usually the case that if you don't take your good chances, you end up losing everything unhappily. That's a pattern that happens in football again and again, strangely enough. I would have liked to see a Spain vs Denmark final, but it will probably be Italy vs England now.

No, it has always been the case that more influential people have tried to manipulate prices in their direction. Before Elon Musk got really interested in crypto and caused some pumps and dumps, McAfee, for example, was very strong in this kind of game (or rather manipulation).

Even if they can move the prices it's not like all the traders just wait for a reaction from them and then go in the same direction. It may work like that for a while, but after a while the influence wears off.

I dove into the crypto scene in 2011. Out of idealism, not to get rich. That's a major difference from many who dive into the scene today. They want to get rich quick without having any knowledge at all about the goals and workings of the technology. By the way, this is also the reason why so many end up making a loss. They buy when they hear about it in the news. But then it is usually already too late and the peak is already reached or is about to be reached.