|
What happen with people that have not provided documents prior to the suspicious activities?
|
|
|
|
|
Hm, the way the sentences are split between multiple lines there makes it kinda awkward to translate a few parts...
|
|
|
|
|
I'll see if i can give a hand with the Brazilian Portuguese.
edit: but please have more people review what i do, somtimes when i write, regardless of language, i let silly (and somtimes stupid) mistakes slip.
|
|
|
|
|
Do atoms survive inside blackholes or are they ripped apart?
|
|
|
|
Kindly regards
WTC-SWE
Respect. The guy took a sec out of his day to pop open another tab in his browser to just let us know it was a mishap, definitely didn't have to do that, and quite shocking to see around these parts lol +1 Though i'm still curious about the details of the mishap. |
|
|
|
|
Did they deliver the ones bought at the low prices?
|
|
|
|
|
No, i mean, if they thought it was just spam/advertising, how did they come to the conclusion it was specificly a ponzi scheme?
|
|
|
|
|
Where did the ponzi accusation come from though?
|
|
|
|
|
Someone with a shitload of cash would have much more direct ways of fucking up the Bitcoin economy than by using a bot to trickle it down, no?
|
|
|
|
|
I see.
That is not how sites and stuff do it, usually when you are using a new password they show two fields on the same screen; i wasn't expecting it to ask for confirmation after submitting it the first time.
|
|
|
|
It is better that there is no human face to Bitcoin.
Until they are ready to award Satoshi the Nobel Prize for Economics. Would the prize be paid in bitcoins? |
|
|
|
|
I went to encrypt my wallet, but the client only had one password field to create the password, i don't trust my typing skills enough, i don't wanna loose my money because of a typo; please change the client so that when it first asks for a password it asks the user to enter it twice and checks if the two entries match.
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical scenario:
There is a proposal to add a safe, temporary, taste-free, sterilizer to piped water and other things so to ensure everyone gets it just by drinking and eating normally, and in order for women to get pregnant and men to produce fertile sperm, they need to take a pill that is highly controlled in order to cancel out the effect of the sterilizer, and anyone wanting to make babies must go thru the same process as people wanting to adopt in order to be given that pill.
Would you be for or against such proposal?
|
|
|
|
 Really... associating this with the mass killing of baby butterflies doesn't help... |
|
|
|
|
Aren't fetuses not much more than relatively healthy teratomas?
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't trying to keep changing things all the time result in fragmentation of the network as bunches of people get too lazy or just simply are not all that computer savvy to feel comfortable constantly upgrading things and stay with their old stuff?
|
|
|
|
|
What about tumors, do they have rights? Their DNA is pretty much our own...
|
|
|
|
|
1.01 sent your way (i spent a bit too long without sleep this weekend so i'm sending this now 'cause i dunno what time i'll wake up monday)
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, right, everything eventually turns to heat.
|
|
|
|
|
Btw, just so i already know for when it's time to repay, to which address should i send the repayment?
edit: got a reply by pm
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
