There's nothing wrong with flexing your win, especially with odds of 100.00. That's for sure a very lucky bet for you, man, something you should be happy about. Personally, if I had won with those kinds of odds, I would do the same, as that would somehow give me satisfaction. After all, us gamblers do not win all the time; in fact, we lose most of the time, that's a fact.

^  The guys who want further down side are the ones who are prolly mostly sidelined with most of their bankroll still in stables.  I was kinda thinking 25k would've broken down by now after seeing how the US stock market is being pummeled.  But it seems like crypto doesn't care what happens during US session these days.

And speaking of which...  Looks like BTC came alive for no reason.  Lol.  Good to see it tho.  Hopefully it gathers enough momentum to break out 28k around the first couple of weeks of October.  It's due for a long green one for the month.  

Boxing is a business, and no matter how good a boxer is, if he doesn't know how to market a fight and promote himself, promoters may be hesitant to keep him in the spotlight. Casimero understands that Inoue is his best chance to become a popular boxer, so he is doing everything he can to gain Inoue's attention, hoping that one day Inoue's camp will sign a contract for a fight. Casimero might have a rougher journey compared to Inoue, but we have to admit that he is the closest rival to Inoue right now, and people see that as the reason they are supporting Casimero with his taunting style.

Can we have an official source to these? As far as Inoue is concerned, he is not a type of boxer that target a certain boxer in terms of he really want that to be his opponent. Marlon Tapales isn't on Inoue's radar but since the Pinoy boxer got the championship belt, then he needs to fight him as that was a mandatory to become the undisputed champion in the Super Bantamweight Division.

Maybe that list is those who wants to face Inoue instead and try to keep the monster at the Super Bantamweight for the meantime.

Luis Nery is honestly just full of talks. He won't stand a chance against Inoue. On the list, it's really John Riel Casimero as a better opponent for him although even I will support Quadro Alas here, Inoue is seems to be the better fight over him. Casimero have a hard time dominating the unranked boxer he faced on his last fight. If that performance will be applied against Inoue, it's a clear win already for the Japanese.

While watching TV with my kid, I've watched various advertisements of gambling nature (let's say for example, Rummy123, RummyCircle, A23 Rummy, etc.)
These are all specifically Indian ads, but I'm sure you may have seen various gambling advertisements, some banners at boundaries when cricket is ongoing, even in any other sport.

How would a kid ignore those things, they might just come and ask you about what is it. Till when can we lie to them? Don't you think that the frequency of such ads must be less in order to let the kids not get trapped into gambling and don't do it at such a small age?

Yeah the east is getting better and at anytime the power can shift from the west back to the east and vice versa.  Who knows who is gonna have a breakout year or what these young guys are gonna do from one year to the next.  Anything could happen especially injuries which unfortunately shapes the league every year.

Why would anyone think that a casino is safe and trusted just because they don't ask their customers to verify their identity? Sure, it's a plus especially for those who value their privacy but it has nothing to do with safety or trustworthiness.
Besides, personally I don't believe anyone who claims that his casino never ask for kyc be it licensed or not. I witnessed many of those claims and after a while some of their customers start complaining about being requested to verify their identities. Sure, some of them are more lenient than the others but not to the extent to say they will never do it.

I think you are right I'm not sure if there is any other big time players playing over there right now.  Honestly I haven't even been watching, what was his stats while he was over there?  I can't see him not dominating the paint in that league.  I don't have hate against the guy it's just he is a 37 year old big man who bangs down low.  His carrier is pretty much done at this point.

I really wanted to see Canelo win this fight and wait for Crawford to climb weight and have a huge match of the decade against him in the US. That would be one of the greatest achievements ever recorded in boxing history if Crawford managed to defeat Canelo. Because many have speculated that's not possible because Canelo is too much for him. therefore, if he proves them wrong, then he will earn the best of all boxers in his time. By the way, he also needs to beat Spence again in order for this fight to have a high chance of happening.

You're right. Well, I believe that you've done research about the said project, and asking you what you think, is this can be trusted or worthless?

And whatever you said, still I don't easily fall into trusting new projects. Why? I will stand believing that most of them are scams. Though they will show promising project fundamentals, good whitepaper, and big names behind them, still no assurance for their success, and most of the time fail because of the lack of support from the community.

I agree that the bear market is far from over,  the crypto bear market may transition to a bullish market probably after the Bitcoin halving.  We all know that Bitcoin halving is the catalyst for the Bitcoin market to become bullish.  So we still have many months left to experience a bear market and we still have lots of months to accumulate Bitcoins.  In case anyone is worrying that the bear market will last forever, I believe that the market has its cycle where a bear market transitions to a bull market and vice-versa so just have patience and see for ourselves how the bear market transition to a bullish one after the Bitcoin halving.

Not me. I truly believe the first fight was just a fluke. But Joyce looks very scared already even in the first round.  That right hook was planned, Zhang knew he was about to KO Joyce.
It's a good thing that I have not seen this thread up yesterday for I would have bet for Joyce to win thinking Zhang's win was just a lucky win due to Joyce's eyesight. I was focused on UFC FFight Night.

Joyce did not say anything about retiring but I think this is his last already.

The speed of advancement of AI is incredible. It took about 10 years from the initial AlexNet (the winner of the Visual Recognition Challenge 2012) to now having generative AI advancements every year basically.

Even months is a short amount of time with all the big techs competing against each other to win the AI race

I agree with the Non-KYC because this is the experience of the crypto becoming anonymous and being transparent. You don't need to get worried about your data we know how does people use the data of other people even though they say that "we protect your data." There's no safe on the internet right now the cons only I've seen here is the recovery of the account the assurance of the player for their accounts are lessen if their devices get comprise by other people the casino does not have the capability if there's no KYC for verification the real owner.  Having a level 1 KYC is enough for me im not a large gambler large withdrawal is not too much issue.

Excessive transaction fees are a big problem for everyone. Those who are small investors can't trade any coins with extra transaction fees even if they want to. Those who are small investors mostly invest in bitcoins and in case of investing bitcoins they trade bitcoins in different places which makes them pay extra transaction fee from bitcoins. Bitcoin and other ALT coins also had to be transacted with high transaction fees. Transaction fees may depend a lot on Bitcoin transaction fees. If the transaction fee of Bitcoin increases, the effect may be on the transaction of other ALT coins in the market. If transaction fees were normal then maybe no one would have any objection to transact or no one would have any complaints about extra transaction fees.

I have a feeling that bitcoin may not hit another ATH pre-halving. Usually it would fall several months after the halving.
Just like how the last 3 halving have turned out. Everyone were expecting another ATH, and the value were unprecedentedly higher than what was everyone was expecting, well expect for those who were over hyped with their 6 digit predictions.
Bitcoin may still fall below $25k even if we are getting closer to the date of the halving, but I'm pretty sure it'll kinda bounce back stronger a few months after.

It may not be a superstition but a requirement for that person.  If they received a tip or some involvement with the players in a match what events will take place, any inside info as to who is sick or missing from that game then he has no choice.   Its quite sensible to protect your sources if you should have any.   
  I'm not arguing with anyone who could say this to me, they cant explain themselves and I dont want the trouble for them or myself.

Man, that’s a bummer. I wonder what went wrong. It seemed like a done deal. Those reports seem like they’re from accurate sources though. Dwight Howard seemed like a perfect fit for them. He must either still be a chaotic individual off the court, or old age has come at him fast. He was just winning a championship ring 3 years ago.

De Los Santos views this as an opportunity, and why wouldn't he accept it if he believes in himself? We've seen similar scenarios, like Ugas vs. Pacquiao, where Ugas was a replacement and won the fight. There are many possibilities in such situations, and one should never underestimate a hungry fighter eager to reach the top. Shakur needs to be cautious here because, while De Los Santos may not be widely known, his record shows a high KO ratio.