Thank you kindly!

That is our hope as well. Given the proliferation of alts, it's quite likely simply an oversight.

Hello there.

My name is Kevin "Biomech" Putzier, General Manager of the GameCredits (formerly Gamers-coin) project. We have prior claim to the GMC ticker. Given the number of altcoins, I am proceeding from the assumption that you simply didn't know. Please choose a new ticker and inform your exchanges of the same. We are already well established with the GMC ticker, and would like to avoid confusion and conflict regarding this matter.  

Thank you!

EDIT, for more information regarding our coin, please see this thread, and reference the original. We've been around for a while https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1010745.msg10966191#msg10966191

We have prior claim. And can prove it.

It may take a few days, but we have a gentleman working on a Mac wallet.

By "we", I mean a few members of the GameCredits team, and Marcetin. Wallet dev is anonymous pending their permission to publish

OP updated, you'll note we now have a compiled OSX wallet!

Thanks to Billotronic for this. Also, have updated the pools list and a bit of cleanup... and stay tuned for some press releases in the very near future GMC is going to conquer. Don't miss out!

There is another option that occurs to me. Sfards could partner with Bitmaintech for a new gen Antminer powered by the sfards chips... Their announcement was vague enough that this could already be the case. Two chinese companies will already understand the dynamics of price wars AND collaboration. Both have been quite successful in their niches (yes, I realise that Sfards is technically a new company, but it's built on Gridseed's proven record).

One would think... but it has gone pretty stable over the course of several months. Also the inflation controls seem to work rather well. High POS coins are speculative at best, but this one has performed remarkably well over it's lifetime.

I personally know little about p2pool, but at least one outfit did successfuly port it. I would recommend contacting that pool, and see if they have the modified source. I'd greatly appreciate it if you do find out if you inform us here, and we'll add it to the OP and other resources. Sorry for the confusion. I know standard pools, and only really care for MPOS, but p2pool is outside of my experience.

Anyone else know the answer? Help a devil out

No upper limit.

Please ask in the new thread, as I don't know the answer. But there's some smart folks over there that probably do

Thanks and welcome aboard! I'll see to it you get added to the OP as well. (I don't control that account, so it might take a little bit)

yeah, the system is fubar. I just wish that the default people paid more attention... Or it was abolished altogether. On my side it was showing him at 5, and me at 30. Mine probably shouldn't be anywhere near that high, and his should have at least a couple more zeroes.

Ok...

All other things being equal, and a bit of a derail. But... Why the HELL is eleuthria's trust rating so low? Mine is higher, and I mostly just talk.

Actually pretty normal practice for a manufacturer. They'll want to get it distributed via resellers and VAR's, so they don't have to deal directly with the end user. Whether such a model will work in the digital currency world remains to be seen, but I don't see it as centralization. I'd be looking to the retailers very soon.

I know I'm a bit late to the fight here, and I usually don't bother with obvious trolls. But...
You're full of shit.

Philip has been an asset to miners in general for a LONG time. Not only that, he will help out a newbie without making them feel like an idiot. nearly a year ago, when I was making stupid mistakes with my gridseed, he very kindly helped me out via PM for no return. Just because he was cool. He and I are nothing to each other. Not friends or enemies, just miners on the same forum. Don't besmirch the reputation of a man who has earned a good one.

Sometimes I gotta wonder what drugs you trolls take...

Philip has been one hell of a resource here. I don't see any begging going on. Nothing he said implies that HE wanted a review units.

So I'll throw my two cents in, sfards. Send one to Dogie and to Phillip. Whatever you lose in shipping and those two units will pay for itself a hundred times over if the units perform well under those two gentelmen's reviewing process.

I've never even tried to dual mine with my original five chip gridseed, so this is hearsay at best, but it was my understanding that the two modes are completely separate and can be tuned as such. Can anyone confirm or clarify this? (tempted to try)

LOL!

shavers sent me to have a look. Interesting coin, I may just have to mine it And so very true about FUD. If the coin works, the only "bad" publicity is silence.

To the guy above... Bittrex delisted us while we were fixing problems. If they wish to pick it up again, we'll be happy about it, but in the meantime, we're on Poloniex, and on the voting list for Cryptopia. I'd also like to see our coin get on Cryptsy.

On to something else: When our biggest miner dropped, I panicked... and the network is still there There are miners AND pools out there that we at the foundation are unaware of. If you're mining at a pool other than GMC! or Acidpool, or the p2pool node noted in the OP, PLEASE post it up here! If you own such a pool, the same holds. The more, the better the security of the network. Just because the foundation runs and endorses a couple of pools don't mean we have any intention of being exclusive!

That being said... We need miners! At whatever pool or solo, we need more miners. We're trying to take this coin into uncharted territory, and it needs to be robust enough to handle that. I want to see GH or even TH numbers in nethashpersec when I run my daemon's getmininginfo function To those of you interested in the coin but mining others for more immediate profit, please consider load balancing and lending us a piece of your hashrate.

Also, the temporary loss of our biggest miner demonstrated something else, very positive. Our fix to the retargeting worked just fine Network dropped by two thirds, and the gap between blocks was not very much.