Nu tin neaparat sa "sparg cheful" (ca o traducere necesita munca, stiu si eu asta) dar intre timp se pare ca imaginile de pe imgur merg iar (clar, nu stiu pentru cata vreme) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5453908.0Forumul se pare ca nu mai accepta poze imgur la postarile noi, deci TalkImg ramane de retinut, dar, mai ales avand invedere restrictiile legate de dimensiunea imaginii si (evident) de topicurile blocate, ramane la latitudinea fiecaruia daca va rula scriptul sau se risca mai departe cu imgur. Probabil ca cei mai multi nu o sa isi bata capul. Eu mi-am mutat cu acel script pozele destul de devreme si pot sa zic ca merge chiar bine. |
|
|
|
Regulile sunt postate pe canalul Discord #pizza-day-event-2023 (invitatia se afla in OP).
Nu prea inteleg de ce trebuie intrat pe discord pentru acest concurs. Pe mine pana acum acela a fost un important mod de a-mi taia cheful (celalalt era ca de obice aflam de concurs un pic cam tarziu). Si acum sunt cam nepregatit, 1 iunie e joi, iar in acest week-end am dubii ca o sa reusesc sa-mi mobilizez familia sa facem acasa o pizza. |
|
|
|
It is not a spam, but not a good way of posting either.
Assuming the user continue to create the same topic in different boards or on the same board. That can be reported as spam.
Or if a post carry no meaning at all, it is also a spam.
That post carry meaning, but which is no more new to us on this forum because we all know about Microstrategy, it is what we have discussed before about MicroStrategy, also because it is copied directly from a news site. The post is not necessary at all and no one gave it merit. There are many post like that on this forum which no one has given merit and not deleted by moderator.
The post can not be deleted because it is not plagiarism too.
You are right: it carries meaning, but it's not useful, nor necessary. It's a waste of space (and readers' time). And it ends with a link (maybe to a blog of him? I don't know). Imho it's spam because it's a waste of space and probably also because of the "generic" link (but we may just have a different view on what is spam and that's also OK). And now, as you said it... hmm.. it may actually be extremely close to plagiarism since no proper source is listed, plus, as @Xal0lex pointed out very good, the guy has said nothing more than the (more or less) "quoted" text. |
|
|
|
I currently have one script installed in my Tampermonkey browser extension that puts the forum on dark mode, I can't recall the thread where I saw and copy the code from, probably got it from the search option in TamperMonkey itself.
It can be done even easier with the BPIP extension to be installed on your browser (at least firefox or chrome based). And it comes with many other benefits (features). But as said, this is a too often asked topic, just do a search please. |
|
|
|
But I don't really know how to report it based on the unofficial forum rules. ~ Can we get a new Rule saying: "No link dumps"? I would report it as spam (or link spam) since link dumps are also spam after all. However, interestingly, spam is also not clearly mentioned  (because imho spam can be different from 0-value and from off topic). But I have reported a spam many times and it was ok. So yes, I agree, a clear rule about link dumps would be welcome (and I would add a clear separate rule on spam too). But, as a "closing word", I think that one can report as anything close enough to what's the problem there, really. The mods can handle that very good even if it's not 100% by the book. |
|
|
|
we aren't logging into this website by signing a message with our wallets or something. In Meta because of bold part, what do you think? Well, let's say a newbie wants to ask questions about bitcoin. And finds out this forum, and he cannot ask because he has to learn first to sign a message or something. Won't he just say "fuck with this"? Or maybe even "fuck with all this crypto thing"? So no, it's not feasible to log in like that. On the other hand, as said, we do have recover account with signed message; that is a much better use case. |
|
|
|
|
43 NeuroticFish
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
Daca nu erai tu, cu siguranta ratam acest concurs.
De fapt, spre surpriza mea (si nu numai), locurile s-au ocupat neasteptat de greu. Si apoi a castigat exact primul care si-a ales numarul, deci ne-am straduit degeaba (ca sa zic asa). Macar m-am linistit: nu sunt prea norocos. Avem concurs nou! Multumesc! Doar ca te rog sa repari linkul  |
|
|
|
|
4 NeuroticFish
Many thanks, tldr-hodl!
|
|
|
|
Can't central bankers just buy all the bitcoin and miners? so what is the point again? to prolong are $lavery?
They can't. If they start buying coins massively the price will just rise. Some HODLers won't ever sell under a certain (very high) price and at that point they might not sell them all because they'd have more than enough fiat already. Miners? Well, mining is a business. Unless the central banks don't do something like buying a huge lot and then manipulate the price to get miners into bankruptcy (and this will not go with all, and this is illegal to be done), they cannot just "buy the miners". Did you actually try to think a little on the possible outcome(s) before asking this question? And who says that they aren't doing that already? They can buy some amounts - big or small - but extremely far from "all". |
|
|
|
All this could be handled as risk , you can remove wifi for example , biut all these risk not compared from hardware walked , they can at any moment take my private key 🤣
This is definetely not true. At least not with serious wallets. Usually wallets that are open source don't have any issue. Well, he was talking about Ledger, which is closed source and a history of sloppiness and caring more of income than their customers. Still, although I've missed a big part of the drama because of not having enough free time, I don't think that they canwill get the user's private seed unless the user will install an app on purpose for this. On the other hand: OP, if you are not 100% convinced (technically) about cold storage, then there's always SeedSigner and other similar projects, 100% open source and for more normal/general hardware. |
|
|
|
Felicitari pentru noul castig! E deja a doua oara cand castigi la Utopia hihi! Multumesc! Ce surpriza!! Incep sa castig si eu cam des ... sa incep oare sa imi pun intrebari existentiale (de genul "prea mult noroc undeva o fi ghinion altundeva")? --- Am facut si curatenia de rigoare si... hmm.. s-a cam subtiat lista de concursuri...(multumesc de postare). |
|
|
|
Any risk The biggest risk is usually you (or your family). You may forget to keep the cold storage always offline, you may misconfigure something - from thinking you're offline but actually being online to "go online only for a short while" (yeah, I've seen that) or to allow auto-run of the things there are on the USB stick you might use for transferring data between the cold storage and online watch only wallet. Ah, or you think you are safe with the cold storage setup and you actually use a compromised seed or you store it badly (for example in e-mail). I am sure I didn't cover them all, but you've got the point. |
|
|
|
Autorizarea platformelor de schimb crypto în România, sub amenințarea amenzilor de 50.000 lei - procedura propusă de Ministerul Finanțelorhttps://www.startupcafe.ro/taxe/autorizare-platforme-schimb-crypto-romania-amenzi-procedura-ministerul-finantelor.htmDesi doar am rasfoit rapid stirea, cred ca merita atentie. Da, partea cu amenzile in cuantum absurd de mic pentru o afacere inseamna ca va mai trece mult pana cand vom vedea o conformare, mai ales din partea celor care oricum operau la gri. M-a apucat rasul cand am citit partea cu deținerea a cel puțin unui cont bancar în monede fiduciare prin care își desfășoară operațiunile, deschis în Romania. adica unii, saracii cauta banci locale cu care sa lucreze si li se inchide usa-n nas de ani de zile... O alta parte de interes ar fi ca un ATM nu va mai putea opera fara full-KYC. Cam nasol. O măsură aparte se referă la automatele tip ATM de crypto. Procedura propusă prevede aici că „este interzisă desfășurarea activității de schimb între monede virtuale și monede fiduciare și de portofele digitale prin intermediul automatelor de schimb pentru alte persoane decât cele pentru care a fost parcursă procedura de cunoaștere a clientelei, conform dispozițiilor Legii nr. 129/2019, pe platforma digitală cu acces la distanță”. Na, concluzia mea este ca legislatorul nostru dovedeste din nou ca habar n-are in ce sfere traieste, dar legatura cu realitatea clar nu are. Asadar adoptia crypto in Ro, in loc de claritate, primeste inca un sut in dos si o piedica serioasa. Nu ca as fi avut asteptari...
|
|
|
|
If someone controls 100 active accounts does it harm or contribute positively to the forum? Imho it greatly deserves a ban on all of them I don't know though if there are such greatly extreme cases... Instead, I'm more interested in the 2.7 million banned accounts since that number is far too big to ignore. I agree, you may have a point here. I would however like first another opinion whether all of those 2.7 M are indeed banned. An extreme example is satoshi, archived, but because it's inactive for too long. Maybe (I don't know, I just hope) that huge number of archived accounts also contains long-inactive ones (i.e. abandoned, not banned). If you're right, then indeed, a discussion on those numbers may also be relevant. the next biggest part leaves 1 post once. And total minority leaves more messages. I saw many forums and it is a regular situation which doesn't mark a problem by itself.
Well said. |
|
|
|
I still dont know WHY people dont use a normal wallet.
* Lack of commitment - some heard that it's not so safe to keep a wallet locally and hope that an online business may cover the loses when something bad happens; they don't want to care about security, they don't want to buy a HW either * Lack of understanding - many don't understand the difference between a wallet and an account. They see bitcoin like the cash in banks. * Shallow understanding and laziness - "I can access it from the internet anytime" "I can transfer for free to my friend's account (inside the same platform)". Keep in mind that the majority of people having bitcoin (or other crypto!) don't read (or read from wrong sources), don't care, and if they visit this forum they might do it only to earn some pennies. |
|
|
|
|
What if it's not actually a "membership reduction"?
There are many use cases - from short time FUD or spam to one-time business, scams (including rinse and repeat strategies), multi-ing, ... name it - people would create just another account on the forum because, you know, it's for free.
So imho the big and ever increasing number of dead accounts means absolutely nothing (and should be just ignored).
Imho a proper way to quantify the things would be to see the evolution over time of the number of active accounts.
|
|
|
|
In this case with PHRASE IN CLOUD, yes cool you travel all the way down to the antipode of the planet and you dont have your phrase and now thanks to this tecnology you can acces
We forget one simple thing. This kind of "feature" (heh) is not meant for us who have a certain understanding of (the) technology. This is meant for those who still think that "cloud" is sort of magical thingy on the internet and it's some sort of their happy place. This is meant for those who don't understand that:  source: amazon.com |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
