Looking at Bitstamp's 5min chart reminds me of those cute memes that proudhon posts. He knew. He always knew.   |
|
|
|
|
Sensors picking corn CCMF action coming soon to a chart near you!
Thank you, proudhon.
BTW, there are several WOers that I'd like to meet IRL. You can hate me for this, but proudhon is one of them.
|
|
|
|
Man, I can literally see LFC and Arrie fuming...
Hang in there guys. $100k is not too far away. One more year at most. You HoDLed through a lifetime. What's another year?
HoDL, brothers!
One more year? Holy moley! You are really rolling your own models, no? Yeah, bearish, I know... But a realist too. There's no point in sticking to some target ($100k+ in 2021), when said target becomes increasingly unreachable. PlanB's model is all nice & cute, and it could work under certain circumstances, but here we're talking about far too many uncertain parameters. Of course, this entire price dippening / suppressening / sidewaysening could just end up being a big outlier, and the price could spring back up at any time, reasserting PlanB's model. It's just that I don't currently see the dynamics of such a large UPpity action ($40k+) being able to fit inside the space on 1 month. Early 2022? Likely. Within 2022? A certainty (for me). |
|
|
|
Kraken Intelligence — Ain’t Over ‘Til It’s OverSome Bitcoin-relevant, shitcoin-sanitized highlights: - HODLer’s Delight
Supply is rapidly exiting exchanges, a common indication that market participants may be moving funds into cold storage for long-term holding. Since June: The amount of BTC sitting on exchanges fell by 9.6% to a 3-year low of ₿2.426 million ($139.8 billion) amid greater demand and dwindling immediately marketable supply. With a smaller supply pool available for trading, further demand could tighten the supply squeeze and drive BTC prices higher.
- Not Yet ‘Overbought’
For as fast as prices have risen to new all-time highs, BTC’s Reserve Risk metric indicates that the asset is far from overbought, and that confidence in the current price level is greater than it was during prior all-time highs reached in May.
Still bullish. Still hope for soaring BTC ATHs in 2021. HoDL.
|
|
|
|
|
Man, I can literally see LFC and Arrie fuming...
Hang in there guys. $100k is not too far away. One more year at most. You HoDLed through a lifetime. What's another year?
HoDL, brothers!
|
|
|
|
OK, now what's left is some serious Bitcoin CCMF action...  |
|
|
|
[...]
[...] I do not think we are done yet. There. Ass on the line. OMG. I think you picked the wrong guy... |
|
|
|
BillyNoCoiner, sign a message from a bitcoin address with a balance of even 0.1BTC or shut the hell up & get out of the WO, you pathetic peasant.
My bitcoin is in deep cold storage so I won’t be able to do this. I have nothing to prove to you though bitch. Yeah, very deep, like at -300 °C, as a famous "scientist" once said. |
|
|
|
BillyNoCoiner, sign a message from a bitcoin address with a balance of even 0.1BTC or shut the hell up & get out of the WO, you pathetic peasant.
My bitcoin is in deep cold storage so I won’t be able to do this. I have nothing to prove to you though bitch. Just proves enough for us… You ain’t got any BTC, keep on being bitter…. Selling/gambling your entire BTC stash is the worst thing that you can ever do to yourself. It's equivalent to mental (and sometimes physical) suicide. Mindrusts and Billy-no-Willies are made of this. |
|
|
|
|
There was an alpaca named Billy.
It was a male, but had no willy.
And all his posts of Bitcoin doom,
Were always followed by a shot to moon.
|
|
|
|
Now, bitcoin, if you could just plow right through the 60k range and start bobbing around in the 70 to 80k range instead that would be just great.
It's Sunday, man! Now, if you, Bitcoin,
Could plow right through 60k,
That would be just great.#arrieswishhaiku |
|
|
|
Does this mean you don't have to eat cat food? No cat food for me.   Pet food is just human food from the parts that don't appeal as delicious/high quality to humans and is considered low quality. The manufacturers grind it all up and repackage it as "pet food". The retailers jack up prices and market it as healthier for pets. The truth is: its cheaper and healthier if you just feed them regular food that you eat too. Just make sure you dont give them food that they shouldn't eat. (chocolate, grapes, onions, garlic, salt/seasonings...) Pet food is a marketing scam. My late father was a truck driver, he owned one of those really large SCANIA trucks. I remember when I was a kid, he told me a funny story. He was travelling abroad with a couple of fellow drivers. So one night they went to the local supermarket to buy some canned food to eat. The food tasted really delicious, and they commented that this country had some really tasty canned food. When they collected the empty cans and remaining stuff to throw away, one of them noticed that the food was in fact dog food. They didn't spot it when they bought it from the supermarket! Nothing happened to them. They didn't buy it again though. When he came back he spoke normally, he didn't bark or anything. It's fine to eat. But may be less safe due to the fact that pet food does not have to follow the same regulations as human food. Our aversion to eating pet food comes from the fact that its called "pet food". That makes it seem alien and dirty in our minds. Yes, that's how I think about it. I wouldn't ever eat it. But I don't think it would hurt me if I ate it. Same with human flesh. (Most) humans would feel sick to their stomach to even attempt to eat human flesh, for psychological reasons, but it could actually taste delicious. I'd guess it would taste like pork meat. |
|
|
|
Does this mean you don't have to eat cat food? No cat food for me. Pet food is just human food from the parts that don't appeal as delicious/high quality to humans and is considered low quality. The manufacturers grind it all up and repackage it as "pet food". The retailers jack up prices and market it as healthier for pets. The truth is: its cheaper and healthier if you just feed them regular food that you eat too. Just make sure you dont give them food that they shouldn't eat. (chocolate, grapes, onions, garlic, salt/seasonings...) Pet food is a marketing scam. My late father was a truck driver, he owned one of those really large SCANIA trucks. I remember when I was a kid, he told me a funny story. He was travelling abroad with a couple of fellow drivers. So one night they went to the local supermarket to buy some canned food to eat. The food tasted really delicious, and they commented that this country had some really tasty canned food. When they collected the empty cans and remaining stuff to throw away, one of them noticed that the food was in fact dog food. They didn't spot it when they bought it from the supermarket! Nothing happened to them. They didn't buy it again though. When he came back he spoke normally, he didn't bark or anything. |
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind if Bitcoin reaches $100k within 2022 instead of 2021.
What I would not like is another ice-cold Bitcoin winter, like 2018-2020. I'd still HoDL, but it would get pretty boring. $100k is, for me, a level when I'd slowly start spending "tiny" amounts for pleasure and dreams-come-true stuff. But not before it reaches $100k. It's just a psychological threshold for me. It used to be $50k, but I've decided to double up for safety, so that I have a 100% safety margin.
Plan B's S2F model is nice, and I hope corn price follows it, but nothing is guaranteed when it comes to King Daddy. Predicting what will happen, based on any model, is of no use to me, as I won't be buying or selling anything based on such info. So I just sit back, relax, and wait it out.
2021? 2022? It's a when, not an if, and that's what matters.
|
|
|
|
Well, that's a bit personal question, but I am 29. Is that could be a matter to be annoying? I don't think that age could be a reason be the ugly guy. Bill gates are 66 and still, he is one of the richest men. Soborno Isaac bari is (9) the youngest professor globally and people knew him as an Einstein of our time. So, I think age and size, don't matter. You started off OK, but you seem to be degenerating into an arrogant, annoying troll. Copying-pasting others' text as your own to earn merits and now mentioning some supposedly smart Bengali-Bangladeshi kid you call "Einstein", whose con-artist father is milking him for money and fame. What's next? Deepak Chopra? Aliens? Urgently asking for 3 BTC? I sense a good bat-slappening, followed by a long, thick, rusty pipening are coming your way... |
|
|
|
Yes, indeed, now is as it switched to OA, but it used to be much less, but it is paid from grants anyway, not from the own pocket. But the true new outrage is the review charge (~2K euro). Now, I mostly teach (don't want to write grants anymore), but when i published there last, there was no charge for review...it is quite ridiculous.
Arxiv is great (and very popular) for physics, much less so for Biology.
Holy goat fucking, I have been out of the business for awhile. The whole point was subscriptions (esp library subs) covered the cost of paper review, only the Open Access journals were charging review and publish fees. Didn't realize Nature and Science were doing it. Times change. But as they say all God's creatures have to EAT. I've published several articles in various prestigious scientific journals, the last one was in 2020. I never had to pay a cent! The only limit was the size of the article. If it exceeded a certain number of pages (I think the limit was about 10 pages of two-column format), then I would have to pay for the extra pages. 2000 € / review is outrageous! Arxiv is great, Perelman published his proof of the Poincaré Conjecture there. Free, and serves its purpose just fine. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is a strange thing.
-- Before you understand it, it is extremely confusing and makes no sense. This outright kills 99% of all potential adopters.
-- When you understand it, everything becomes crystal clear and falls into place. This happens to the remaining 1%, who HoDL like there's no tomorrow.
-- Traders belong to the first 99%, they just don't know it.
I don't think I've ever encountered anything quite like this in my life.
I agree with the overall sentiment of your post AlcoHoDL.. but something strikes me quite wrong about your 99/1 numbers... [...] As I was composing the above, I thought of adding a sentence saying that 99/1 is purely out of my own personal experience. As you say, it could well be 90/10 or even 80/20, although the latter seems far too optimistic to me. Whenever I go out for drinks/dining, I make a habit of asking the waiter if I can pay in Bitcoin (I have LFC's prize money in my phone, so I can always pay if they say yes). No one has yet responded positively to my request. The vast majority don't know much about it, some think it's another type of credit card, others think it's a kind of PayPal, many think it's a Ponzi/pyramid scheme, a few even mentioned Elon Musk FFS! Not a single one has yet to comment favorably about it, let alone agree to be paid in BTC... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
