Banning things doesn't stop them, it just makes them go on in secret. This is another good example of a fool and his money soon being parted no matter what you do. If people are going to do dumb shit and not do any due diligence, it is just a matter of time.
You are absolutely right. The fool will lose his money anyway. I do not want people to lose money on this forum and then become disappointed in it. Neither do I, but you can't protect people from themselves. Spend that time warning them rather than trying to get new rules passed. All it will do is make these con artists refine their methods. |
|
|
|
|
This coordinated effort to go after hacker1001101001 only began once he started being openly critical of Lauda. Since then it has been a nonstop procession of all the same clowns that come after anyone who ever says anything that is not glowing praise for Lauda, working overtime to find or manufacture any justification whatsoever to exercise their retribution against this user. None of this is new, nor is it a threat to the user base even if it was. This is just more of the same abuse of any system they can get their hands on to punish people who openly disagree with them.
|
|
|
|
|
Banning things doesn't stop them, it just makes them go on in secret. This is another good example of a fool and his money soon being parted no matter what you do. If people are going to do dumb shit and not do any due diligence, it is just a matter of time.
|
|
|
|
Do you think that the current political system is run by just and fairness?
What about upgrading it to something I would suggest the techno autonomous government conscious A.I in control automata away from the old greedy ego of men that started the old law of triangle. I think it will be peaceful if this conscious A.I hybrid from combined to our code to form a new genetic code that builds a neural network of combined good leadership trait code from past leaders to the current one forming a Skynet kind of hive government run by just and fairness.
Sorry if I talk like sluggish ahead of our time but I think this is where we are heading the future of Automata Hive Government. Feel free to post your opinion and please bear with me understand what I am stating so we can drink more vodkas. cheers!
How do you know you don't already have it? BTW, what you describe is not a new idea. See Technocracy and trans-humanism. |
|
|
|
If I were a betting man I would place my last cent on hacker0101000101 not directly answering the questions regarding more and more of these alt-accounts or sock-puppets accounts connected to him because his buddies will come here to defend him by using that old trick called deflection again. I noticed the positive trust Mr "pay me and I will bump your ICO thread with fake information and I have plenty of alt-accounts to help" left for me a few months ago was deleted, probably after I pulled him up on his scratch-my-back-and-I-will-scratch-yours relationship with some very questionable individuals after he was exposed as receiving money to bump ICO ANN threads. After he had his chance to own up to all his ill-doings he decided to hide whatever he could and step by step thanks to excellent investigative efforts by marlboroza it all started unravelling. When he eventually does post here, let us all see what his excuse will be for failing to mention another set of alt-accounts connected to him. ~snip~
Why the fuck are all these ICO bump accounts connected to hacker? Why the fuck would he respond to you, no matter what happened? You baboons aren't interested in doing anything but dishing out retribution for those that dare criticize you or your clown gang buddies. So much fraud going on here, but day after day after day you are here crying about this guy as if he just stole The Declaration of Independence. There is a good reason I call you all clowns, because you are a joke. |
|
|
|
LOL not a ton of pork in it. It is literally 98.6% pork. The 1.4% accounts for the checks people will be getting. |
|
|
|
|
Inb4 some one pushes ol' senile Joe out a window and they pull a new contender out of their ass for the Dem nom at the last second. Either that or he dies 30 seconds after inauguration, they kick over his corpse, and swear in his VP.
|
|
|
|
Why on earth was this thread created? Was it really created just for some low-level titillation for the OP? Seriously, all the hullaballoo within the thread consisting of hot air and nothing of substance just for the sake of some personal revenge against marlboroza who is one of the most active contributors to this forum? Surely this sort of unethical conduct should not be allowed. A well thought out and rational argument marlboroza, as usual. You have my argument in that red text. I am not sure what other arguments you want but shilling hard for fraud group is more than enough for me. I don't know what we could actually discuss here. You know what is great about dingleberries like you? You think you are smart, but in your strain to use circular logic to push your lies, you patronize everyone reading. I am sure you really believe that your strategy of accusing me of everything that is being perpetrated against me will work, but all it will serve to do is put your rep in a dumpster. People around here might be too chicken shit to speak out about things like this, but they do read them, and they aren't stupid. They can see exactly what you are doing. No one believes marlboroza is a victim here. You know why that is? Because this thread documents clearly his repeated attempts to abuse the trust system against me in an attempt to silence my criticism of him and his red nosed buddies. Why on earth was this thread created?
It was created because I tagged tecshare and placed "troll" on his trust page. OP is paranoid cunt who see conspiracy theory everywhere and majority of information he post is not true.
@TECSHARE Please update topic with new tag, it doesn't say "troll" any more, now you have: marlboroza 2020-04-12 reference " Shilling hard for exposed payed ICO bump account. Deflecting investigation about this fraudulent group on the level of shill account. " And please update it with my argument: PUBLIC WARNING:
Account TECSHARE is shilling hard for fraudulent payed positive ICO reviews and interfering with investigation of such fraudulent service
>>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.0;all <<<
"ICO bump service" is highly deceptive and malicious service which highly misleads potential investors and leads to money loss
Thank you, shill! Yeah who ever heard of people abusing systems of justice to protect themselves and their friends from criticism? I might as well believe the Earth is flat right? What a conspiracy! Yes marlboroza, this thread was created as a result of you abusing the trust system against me because you want me to stop criticizing you and your buddies. Unfortunately for you that is not what that system is for, and your repeated hamfisted attempts to justify it in the past paint a very clear picture of your motivations. If you gave a fuck about people losing money, you wouldn't be abusing the system designed to protect them from it as your own personal plaything to attack people who say things you don't like. Or you know, continue with your strategy of accusations of secondary guilt via association. What could go wrong allowing people to use the trust system to punish people for objecting to the use of the trust system? I am sure that won't have any negative consequences. |
|
|
|
No, not liking some one's opinion is not valid reason for excluding them. You are supposed to include and exclude people based on whether you think their use of the trust system is valid or not. I don't remember saying death threats were acceptable, but please feel free to quote me.
A person's use of the trust system is usually based on them forming an opinion and taking the action they think is appropriate. Also, my quip about the death threats appears under a quote of another member, so it is not directed at you. Kinda stretching your reasoning a little thin aren't you? No, not liking some one's opinion is not valid reason for excluding them. You are supposed to include and exclude people based on whether you think their use of the trust system is valid or not.
If you don't trust someone's judgement you can surely exclude them without waiting for them to start [ab]using the trust system. There was also this lunatic DT1 member who claimed to be including people based on whom they argue with, I wonder how that squares with your valid reasons. Cute. I like how you absolve yourself from responsibility from your statements by being vague. Too bad that was never actually said, you and others just implied it and ran with it as if it were fact. |
|
|
|
...Can radioactive dust spread over long distances by winds? Yes. |
|
|
|
did you even read.
i was saying conspiracy freaks think 1 or 10
i was saying that i prefer to look at the scale and weigh things up.
im not the one that jumps from 1 to 10
im more of a 3-6 kind of guy swaying judgement by whichever side is making mistakes, incompentant, dumb or have a independant hidden agenda
i dont beleive its a whole government club for the simple reason that the people involved change every few years so it would be impossible to hold such a secret with so many coming in and out of government
when it comes to government involvement in a issue, event, mistake, overreach i feel it is more like personal greed/stupidity of humans of someone with a name badge and title(6).. not some weird lizard race hiding under silicon printed skin to hide global alien invasion..(10) Government is not a monolith Ricky Retardo. There are many factions within it fighting for different goals. Furthermore there are many groups outside of government that are not elected that exert significant influence on whoever does get in. Impossible to keep secrets? It is called compartmentalization. Look it up. On another note- China: Calling it a Chinese virus is racist! Also China: Black people are banned. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj86ScjIIX4 |
|
|
|
Complain to your objective standard guild members, shill. A well thought out and rational argument marlboroza, as usual. |
|
|
|
So in summary, you don't like his opinion?
I think liking/not liking someone's opinion is sufficient criteria for deciding who to include/exclude from my trust list, no?
Can you explain the difference. I mean your poo poohing seems worse?
If you don't know the difference in gravity between calling for someone's death and any of the other things you mentioned, I can't help you. Exactly, there is a difference with discussions that starts to get into threats of the physical actions in the real world, versus just throwing around words on the interwebs. Sometimes discussions of race might end up going in that physical actions direction, but merely differing of opinion about race or one person’s ability to talk about racial topics or their substantive opinions about race would not necessarily, on its face, rise to the same level of egregiousness as actual physical threats, or trying to entice or encourage others to carry out physical violence, whether death or some lesser physical assault. I find problematic death threats and even lesser threats (less than death) to physically harm someone in the real world (like beat him up) if such threat is either seriously suggesting such action should be carried out (of course, sometimes there are jokes that are just meant symbolically rather than real advocation of physical violence) or such threat could be read by a reasonable person as advocating such real world physical violence action... one time posts might be considered less serious.. because the idea is more fleeting, rather than putting the matter in a signature or in personal text as an ongoing message. No, not liking some one's opinion is not valid reason for excluding them. You are supposed to include and exclude people based on whether you think their use of the trust system is valid or not. I don't remember saying death threats were acceptable, but please feel free to quote me. |
|
|
|
I see no problem at all. What are the real motives for starting this thread against marlboroza?
Right, what could go wrong setting a precedent that it is ok to negative rate people for simply disagreeing with your use of the trust system and having a different opinion than you? No problem whatsoever. Clearly I have ulterior motives of making marlboroza abuse the trust system against me so I have an excuse to call him out on it in this thread. The amount of circular logic you clowns continually present as logical is amazing. 1. Criticize abuse of the system 2. Get the system abused against you 3. Post about abuse of the system Making a post about abuse is abuse! |
|
|
|
I don't have a clue as to what you may refer to as "this kind of technology".
After you answer basic questions about watts and frequencies, I'll take it from there regarding it's possible application in phased array. Don't need your help and certainly wouldn't trust your conclusions on that (assuming they are non-numerical, on the same level of your assertions on the 911 event. But be my guest and show the actual calculations anytime). I don't agree with your conclusions about leprechauns, therefore all your other arguments are invalid. Your questions have already been answered. You have fun repeatedly eating your own vomit and puking it back up again though if that is what you want to spend your time doing. |
|
|
|
the problem with conspiracy sheep is that they dont understand grey areas. they only see black and white
take a scale
god government
natural 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 orchestrated
9-11 was it earthquake or tsunami(1)-no it was plane flown by nutters angry at gov then leap to 10 blame gov
pandemic did people walk on water(1)-no gov allowed planes to fly even after lockdown. leap to 10 blame gov
no matter what it is if they can find something to not class it as 1 they want to leap it to 10
thenwhen they have gov to blame they meander it next into how gov planned it, designed it, executed it
they dont think that there is a grey area in between. where gov is not planning/controlling. but instead goc just cant react fast enough, doesnt plan ahead they are just rich guys just tying to hold a job for 4 years
they dont think that people make mistakes and that al human decision can be independant.
take 9-1 them nutters flying the plane. yea they hated US gov.. but they were also a little insane to want to kill themselves and others for the cause of their hate. they did not have the smarts to thin of other ways to get attention
take corona yea repatriating people to the us brought the virus over the ocean. a mistake. but doesnt mean it was a eugenics plan or a hidden plot.
if only people stopped leaping to 10 about everything. and atleast research the details and figure out somethings can be a 3-6 which are just mistakes that cause big problems later
then they can actually start making rational decisions and actually start making a point.
but leaping to 10 skipping all the reasons for deserving a 10 makes their conspiracy theories void of substance
if they instead stuck with thinking something was a 3-6 and specified why its not a 2 and not a 7 they could actually have something productive to say
The problem with people who make appeals to authority is that they don't understand the concept of dual use. A hammer can build a house. A hammer can also collapse some one's skull. Funny, you talk about grey areas when you are literally making the argument that it has to be one or the other when it can clearly be both. It sounds to me like you are the one with the problem conceptualizing "grey areas." Cognitive dissonance at work ladies and gentlemen, with a side of projection. More related: "Explosive Report: Wuhan Biolab Captured Bats From Caves Traced To COVID-19 Outbreak, Had US Funding" https://www.zerohedge.com/health/explosive-report-wuhan-biolab-captured-bats-caves-traced-covid-19-outbreak-had-us-funding"Watch: Police Tell Pastor "Your Rights Are Suspended" While Busting Up 'Drive-In' Church Service" https://www.zerohedge.com/political/your-rights-are-suspended-police-tell-pastor-while-busting-drive-easter-service |
|
|
|
There is nothing legitimate in your..."discussion", shill. As the one being questioned and abusing the trust system in retribution for disagreeing with you, that is a rather convenient unilateral claim to make isn't it? |
|
|
|
Do these come with gas mask filters?
Yes sir- can be seen at the craigslist link. ( sealed NOS NATO German NBC filter) This is a pretty good deal then. Those usually run $20-$30 alone. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
