It does provide a pretty convenient excuse for China's failing economy, and also lets them point fingers that the US is trying to use bio-weapons against them, as well as gives them the ability to declare martial law, quarantine everyone, and lock everything down preventing dissent.

I don't care what he did or says. A moderator deleted those posts, this is a fact as evidenced by the quotes. Him claiming not to have done it in a section he is in charge of and just saying it was "some one else" is not a resolution, even if he thinks it is for him. I have absolutely no way to verify anything he says. Me having a log of these acts harms no one, and the only reason this thread exists is so the usual dingle berries have some ass hair to cling on to and create a circus out of it. Be my guest. Clown away and draw even more attention to it.

You aren't above justifying your use of the trust system to penalize me. You are using all of the force and trust of the community as a weapon against me and you refuse to justify your actions, simply stating past accusations that were themselves unproven are true. The only reason you have that authority is because the community allows it.

Your inability to justify your behavior clearly demonstrates you are only interested in abusing the trust system as a cudgel to force users into compliance with your totalitarian behavior. You keep writing these long winded screeds about how great you and Vod are, how you are above justifying yourself, and how right you are, without ever actually demonstrating anything. Both Vod and Nullius have overstepped their bounds here and are using negative ratings as a punitive tool to punish people with ideas they don't like. Either the trust system maintains base standards for everyone, or all it will be is a joke used to abuse its most long standing and trusted members. You think they are going to stop with me? You are next.

Even posts deleted from self moderated threads by the op don't say. "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator." in the message. Are you accusing me of manufacturing the quotes now?

Even if you didn't do it, it still very clearly wasn't a self moderated thread. I don't know why you feel the need to make stuff up that is clearly untrue.

Funny, usually when people delete posts in a self moderated thread it doesn't say "A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator."

As predicted, you were preparing yet another accusation before even substantiating any of the previous ones. Thanks for the definition, that fits your posts perfectly.





I caused no damages to Hhampuz. There was no explicit agreement to keep our PMs private. He was speaking as if I was presenting myself rudely privately to the public while we had a perfectly polite conversation that was of no other consequence than it being perfectly polite. There was no lie about it, and Hhampuz hasn't presented any grievance over the matter, you are simply latching on to it as an excuse to attempt to extort me into changing the negative rating which you very much deserve for the publicly documented doxing of OGNasty and claiming to report him to the IRS because you had a petty dispute with him.

Do you care to try to support any of the other claims you have made against me?


Vod   2020-02-04   Reference   "Mentally ill stalker who will post private messages then lie about it as revenge for ignoring him. Avoid. "

Vod   2019-09-09   Reference   "This profile has fundamentally abused the trust system, trading positive trust with as many others as possible to get on Default Trust. See reference and the BPIP DT Change Log for examples. Do not trust this profile's trust of others by adding ~TECSHARE to your personal trust list. "

Your second rating is merely a link to another accusation based on nothing more than spurious correlation, and creative writing skills.

Both you and Nullius are claiming that this accusation is substantiation. You are merely linking your accusation to another accusation that was itself never established.

That original or a repost?

When do you get to the part where you substantiate your accusations against me?

That is some nice freedom of speech you have there. It would be a shame if some one labeled it as hate speech and censored it wouldn't it?

Hacker 4chan at it again. I bet the Russians were behind it as well.

Suddenly side discussions become officially off topic when I reply.

We are all aware you can make accusations. That is not under dispute. Would you substantiate any of your claims against me when you get a break from lecturing people and writing huge pointless screeds?

That is a interesting excuse to not substantiate any of your accusations Vod, also very off topic.

This sounds reasonable. The section is very overcrowded as is.

No, not really. See! We are conversing.

I never stopped you from having a conversation. I am here. Let's converse.

That is the perfect place for stage props, in the stage show.

You should sweeten the pot... a little salt always makes the stake taste better.

I have. By proving you can not substantiate any of your accusations against me.

I found this threat most interesting...







Then of course not being silent enough, sufficient to meet his demands, he starts leaving me negative ratings.

(P.S. Vod, I can see you obsessively refreshing both of our profiles in BPIP, just FYI)



Doing a little research for your next ass covering accusation are we Vod?