I have no idea what that is. But okay, so if it's not a deathly ray deal, then you you maybe cut an arm or two off with the 5G tower?
That would be useful.
How about targeting and vaporizing mosquitos? Your view of technology seems to be based in a 1990 mindset. 5 minutes on youtube will show you people building laser rifles at home capable of setting pretty much anything flammable of fire nearly instantaneously, but you keep pretending like this type of technology is fantastical. |
|
|
|
FYI, once you take these out of the package they no longer are rated for Chemical protection, only in the short term. Also, these appear to be expired. That said they may potentially offer some protection from nuclear/biologicals assuming they aren't rotting.
They are new old stock, not rotting. New as the day sealed, still vacuum sealed in mylar. Yes, any NBC suit once opened degrades over time because it contains active charcoal. They aren’t expired, there is no expiration date on them but packed in the 90s. $55 bucks, brand new suits cost hundreds. Well the photos you showed had dates like 1986... But $55 is a fair price expired or not. I just wanted people to know what they were getting. Especially with emergency gear. Good luck with your sales. |
|
|
|
I think that if this technology has any negative impact on human health and the environment, at least such information will be kept secret.
Guys, lately, I've been seeing more and more information on the Internet about exceeding the permissible levels of radiation near the towers. What do you think about that? Did any of you guys measure the radiation background?
This danger is well known to tower climbers. They know they are shortening their life doing their job climbing active antennas. This is part of why they get paid well. |
|
|
|
The thing has already stuck. It is the Occam's Razor of what happened. You had plenty of chances to refute said thing, but you instead chose to verbally assault me, which makes it appear all the more so that said thing was correct. You had plenty of opportunity to explain why you listed you account for sale. Since you didn't answer my demands for a response, I can only assume you did it for personal gain at the expanse of others, and that my assumption is 100% correct. Weird how its offensive when its you, but assumptions are ok to be applied to everyone else isn't it? |
|
|
|
Not really, as of now, it is confirmed that more than 18k people has died in the USA alone due to the virus, and the last when it was reported, it was around 1300 deaths in a single day! It is not a deception, that's like 6 times the 9/11 casualties and increasing at an accelerated rate everyday. I donot understand economics much to argue that if printing 2 trillion dollars was a tactic or situational advantage or not, but surely covid-19 is not a deception.
The virus doesn't have to be fake for it to be used as a deception. |
|
|
|
We're in agreement with one important exception. YOU are the only one saying "Explosives, explosives, explosives, blah, blah, blah."
Any transfer of energy may be assumed somewhat inefficient. For example, suppose that two falling beams hit each other, just right, and one receives a energy transfer enough to create the 11 m/s vector force. The impact likely created considerable heat, and perhaps the 2nd beam moved in some direction also. Therefore, perhaps the total energy transferred was 250 joules, and the part of interest to us is 192 joules. Amazing how something so statistically improbable happened so many times that day isn't it? |
|
|
|
Oh, my error, that was tcvcof.
But people who are so knowledgable about lethal aspects of 5G to be discussing it on Internet forums certainly should be able to cite frequencies and power ranges for the effects they discuss. Frequency was already cited. Power levels vary. |
|
|
|
|
FYI, once you take these out of the package they no longer are rated for Chemical protection, only in the short term. Also, these appear to be expired. That said they may potentially offer some protection from nuclear/biologicals assuming they aren't rotting.
|
|
|
|
|
You keep telling me the energy required to move the mass. I keep telling you that more than that amount of energy needs to be released in order to move that mass, because your calculation only accounts for the kinetic energy transferred to it, not the total energy required under the conditions to deliver that sum of energy to the mass. It is not complicated. You are calculating the bare minimum amount of explosives assuming 100% efficiency. Maybe you can argue with me some more about the question if glass is weaker than steel.
|
|
|
|
Huh? A high energy cosmic ray particle - one particle - can have the energy of a 5.3 ounce baseball thrown by a profession pitcher. You are not going to get anywhere close to that with your couple hundred milliwatts.
And that one particle isn't anywhere close to what it would take to kill a human. It would just bust up a number of brain cells and cause you to see a flash in the vision field. Who said anything about a single particle? I also didn't say anything about a couple hundred miliwatts. I am not responsible for what you or anyone else says, only what I say. The point was the energy levels are not the only variable. The frequency is part of what determines how lethal a source of EM is. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone have a saltwater tank with some aquatic snails? I just need like 3 of them to control algae in a small tank. Anyone based in the USA have some to spare? PM me.
|
|
|
|
|
This whole push for compulsory vaccinations over the past year wasn't a coincidence. In before they start mandating vaccinations for the CCP virus before you can travel, go to work, or leave your homes.
|
|
|
|
And the required strength for a death ray?
(Hint: There MAY BE A reason why we don't have any handy Ray-Guns?) What if it was ionizing radiation? That is not much energy compared to what you are describing as a mechanism for pure energy transfer to heat a target now is it? It sure will cause death tho won't it? The frequency at which the energy applied is important. |
|
|
|
...You might as well calculate the total energy of the Earth's spin and throw that in there the way you are engaging in your premise.
Yes, it does matter, because that means a tiny fraction of that force will be applied to the object.
It matters? No, it results in about a one meter offset in the landing position from straight vertical. And the force is quite trivial. See, there you go again. Saying something based on your brain's wild guess without actually knowing anything. So, you are wrong again. Wrong by relying on a gut "feeling" about the level of a physical force. [/quote] You are telling me about "feelings" about the level of force as you arbitrarily pull numbers like "one meter offset" out of your ass. This isn't a wild guess. It is a fact. Even if enough air pressure was available, it could NEVER be efficient enough to blow out a 22 ton mass by collapse pressure alone because it would simply blow out the windows and then the force would no longer be applied to the panels. This is exactly why a high explosive pressure wave would be required, because anything else wouldn't be fast enough to overcome the loss of pressure via the path of least resistance from windows and other gaps being blown out. Like I said before, your calculations depend on 100% of your calculated force being applied to the mass. In reality much more force would be required, because most of that energy would be lost via the path of least resistance. |
|
|
|
Those are your ideas, not mine. I'm just saying that we can figure the forces on that beam fragment. Not the same as advocating that as what happened.
I get the impression that you still don't really understand my approach to this problem. It is simply to show, via a variety of proofs at the level of beginning physics, that there are many ways these things could have happened, and thus to refute the argument that "high explosives were REQUIRED"...
which is a totally ridiculous assertion when the total energy in kinetic and potential of one of the WTT falling is a significant fraction of the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Deal with it, it is what it is.
Regarding...
Glass is weaker than steel, air pressure takes the path of least resistance, thus once the windows are blown, the vast majority of that pressure simply would go around the panels and would have no where near the force required to eject them hundreds of feet laterally.
Be my guest, show your work, prove that is true. You don't get to assume it's true because you feel that way. As for "The vast majority of that pressure" ? That does not matter, the force of the air is 400x greater, isn't it?
So yet again we see how truly puny and insignificant the 22 ton MASSIVE BEAM is... You keep presenting "proofs" and I keep detailing why they make no sense even by your own terms. I understand you perfectly, I just reject your conclusions because they aren't supported by the facts or the laws of physics. You might as well calculate the total energy of the Earth's spin and throw that in there the way you are engaging in your premise. Yes, it does matter, because that means a tiny fraction of that force will be applied to the object. Wait, you want me to mathematically prove glass is weaker than steel? Seriously? This is is just a pathetic roundabout game because you have nothing. |
|
|
|
|
Because of the slow pace of filling raffle slots, I decided I am simply going to give away the remaining wood rounds to anyone who donates $20 or more to Bruno's fund until they run out. The same shipping terms apply as in the OP. Free USA shipping, contact me then Minerjones for international. If you entered the raffle and didn't win one feel free to claim one also. Thanks everyone for participating!
|
|
|
|
That might make sense if everything was perfectly sealed, but it was not. That kind of air pressure would blow out windows, then the force would escape, not blow 22 ton panels 600feet. You are really stretching now desperate to come up with anything that even sounds close to a potential to find a reason why several 22 ton masses of steel traveled hundreds of feet laterally from their resting positions.
Nope, you don't understand my intent. I only show the force in the air in a volume size of a single floor of WTC if a sudden collapse halves the volume. Then I explore how that compares to your MASSIVE BEAM. Now you have asserted " That kind of air pressure would blow out windows, then the force would escape, not blow 22 ton panels 600feet. " You are welcome to show the math and the numbers to support that. I suspect you are wrong, but you might be right. I KNOW that 20 square feet on the interior face of any beam will be subjected to the force I described during the collapse as described. Because I got a MASSIVE FORCE. Your MASSIVE BEAM is 1/400 of that force. It is what it is. Your breathtaking, awesome, massive forces that REQUIRE HIGH EXPLOSIVES just aren't and don't. So next, why don't we take a 200 foot section of beam tilting under gravity only from the base point, and at 45 degrees the 50 top feet breaking off, and ask another simple, 1st semester physics problem. How far does it go sideways before hitting the ground? Now why would we do that? Because that's actually the way, and the only way, to examine problems of this sort. Your intent has no bearing on the validity of your assertions. So you are implying that such a pressure wave would blow a 22 ton panel hundreds of feet but wouldn't blow out windows? This isn't rocket science, it is a simple comparison of materials. Glass is weaker than steel, air pressure takes the path of least resistance, thus once the windows are blown, the vast majority of that pressure simply would go around the panels and would have no where near the force required to eject them hundreds of feet laterally. Your tipping theory might make sense if the panels were not blown several different directions. For your model to make sense the panels would all have to peel off effortlessly like a banana peel on all sides, that makes zero sense. |
|
|
|
~ Another peanut for your collection.
It seems like it is A-OK to make jokes around here, until it is at the expense of the "special" people, then suddenly everything is "off topic" in spite of clearly being relevant to the OP. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. your head any further up Lauda's ass.
Pictures or it didn't happen. Lauda is constantly abusing the trust system, and Nutilduuuh is hoping to earn favors by inserting his head up Lauda's ass as far as possible. The picture speaks for itself. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
