I personally harbor suspicions that nuclear fusion (free clean energy in unlimited quantities) has been for a while now an option

Group F [...] Germany will want to show that even with new players they are capable of performing well.

However one thing I am not sure and shocked, Lewis Hamilton once again at 7th place, I am sure he will get better result in qualifiers and better result in race, but this looks like it is not looking that great for Hamilton at all, sure he doesn't really race that awesome in practice because who needs that, but it also looks like there is a chance he may not be at the top of his game anymore huh?

people that support the lab leak theory aren't necessarily saying that it isn't natural, they're saying it's possible the virus was being used for gain of function research, and that it was "leaked" accidentally due to poor hygiene. So it probably is natural, in fact I think it is, but it also probably was being studied in Wuhan and was leaked.

The problem I see with respect to what you say about science is that its name is being used to avoid debate, when science should be just the opposite: open to debate.

~

vaccinated is claimed to be effective, but the reality is that the body has just reverted to natural immunity.

Many months ago, I heard the theory that COVID-19 had been created in that institute that had received funding from Fauci among others.

Theories of SARS-CoV-2 origins
It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. As noted above, the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 is optimized for binding to human ACE2 with an efficient solution different from those previously predicted. Furthermore, if genetic manipulation had been performed, one of the several reverse-genetic systems available for betacoronaviruses would probably have been used. However, the genetic data irrefutably show that SARS-CoV-2 is not derived from any previously used virus backbone. Instead, we propose two scenarios that can plausibly explain the origin of SARS-CoV-2: (i) natural selection in an animal host before zoonotic transfer; and (ii) natural selection in humans following zoonotic transfer. We also discuss whether selection during passage could have given rise to SARS-CoV-2.

herd immunity was here by March or April 2020 if not earlier, throughout almost the whole USA. But do you know what that herd immunity wasn't? It wasn't vaccine herd immunity. It was natural herd immunity. And it was the hospitals, the medical leaders, the medical lack of using working cures, and later the vaccine, that killed most of the people who died with natural herd immunity.

you will keep on failing in your silliness.

I guess you missed the MIT 'infiltration' report.

^^^ But look at all the CO2 China is spewing into the atmosphere. They are probably the greatest of the major nations in this area. In a few years, we will be thanking them for all the good they are doing in helping plants to grow, and bringing us global warming. Consider https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5341456.msg57143605#msg57143605 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5340995.msg57131434#msg57131434.

Besides, once we find out how the Covid vaccines are many times worse than the virus, we'll forget all about China and start blaming Big Pharma in the States.

its not the fastest track around the average speed is considered in the middle, its not going to help Mercedes a lot since they have better advantage in higher top speed tracks that is why I can see Vertsappen have a better advantage to finish above Hamilton in this race.

Do I need to email Bill Gates and ask him to turn me on? (Not like that. Well, maybe like that. )

So I'm gonna turn in to a Borg? Sounds awesome! Can I run a bitcoin node from my brain?

Serena Williams has been quite impressive today against Mihaela Buzărnescu at the second round of the French Open (6-3, 5-7, 6-1) I think she can reach the final of Roland Garros this year.

the deep science that the anti-vaxxers use.

a lot has happened since Malthus, who, for those who don't know, predicted a catastrophe in which there would not be enough resources to feed a growing population in the world, and the fact is that the population has continued to grow and grow, while more and more people eat more and more.

In Stage 1, which applied to most of the world before the Industrial Revolution, both birth rates and death rates are high. As a result, population size remains fairly constant but can have major swings with events such as wars or pandemics.
In Stage 2, the introduction of modern medicine lowers death rates, especially among children, while birth rates remain high; the result is rapid population growth. Many of the least developed countries today are in Stage 2.
In Stage 3, birth rates gradually decrease, usually as a result of improved economic conditions, an increase in women’s status, and access to contraception. Population growth continues, but at a lower rate. Most developing countries are in Stage 3.
In Stage 4, birth and death rates are both low, stabilizing the population. These countries tend to have stronger economies, higher levels of education, better healthcare, a higher proportion of working women, and a fertility rate hovering around two children per woman. Most developed countries are in Stage 4.
A possible Stage 5 would include countries in which fertility rates have fallen significantly below replacement level (2 children) and the elderly population is greater than the youthful population.

All the link goes to is a subscription page like we see on so much of the failing dinosaur media.  As a source of actual information, FT is not worth the space the bits use up in /dev/null.

Read my comment on that thread then.

I think the term 'vaccident' is funny, and there well may be some truth to it in fact.  Driving in the U.S. was already a spook show in that so many people are so highly medicated that you never know what a person is going to do.  If it's even worse now after the gene therapy it would surprise me very little.

   Scientists in Germany claim to have cracked the cause of the rare blood clots linked to the Oxford/AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccines and believe the jabs could be tweaked to stop the reaction happening altogether.
Rolf Marschalek, a professor at Goethe university in Frankfurt who has been leading studies into the rare condition since March, said his research showed the problem sat with the adenovirus vectors that both vaccines use to deliver the genetic instructions for the spike protein of the Sars-Cov-2 virus into the body. 
The delivery mechanism means the vaccines send the DNA gene sequences of the spike protein into the cell nucleus rather than the cytosol fluid found inside the cell where the virus normally produces proteins, Marschalek and other scientists said in a preprint paper released on Wednesday.
Once inside the cell nucleus, certain parts of the spike protein DNA are spliced, or split apart, creating mutant versions, which are unable to bind to the cell membrane where important immunisation takes place. The floating mutant proteins are instead secreted by cells into the body, triggering blood clots in roughly one in 100,000 people, according to Marschalek’s theory.
In contrast, mRNA-based vaccines, such as the jabs developed by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, deliver the spike’s genetic material to the cell fluid and it never enters the nucleus.
“When these . . . virus genes are in the nucleus they can create some problems,” Marschalek told the Financial Times.
The rare blood-clotting reaction that has disrupted the rollout of the AstraZeneca and J&J shots has been recorded in 309 of the 33m people who have received the AstraZeneca vaccine in the UK, causing 56 deaths. In Europe, at least 142 people have experienced the blood clots out of 16m recipients of the vaccine.
In response, use of the AstraZeneca jab has been restricted or suspended in more than a dozen countries. J&J began the rollout of its vaccine in Europe with a warning on its label in April after a brief delay because of the concerns.
But Marschalek believes there is a straight forward “way out” if the vaccine developers can modify the gene sequence that codes for the spike protein to prevent it splitting apart. 
J&J had already contacted Marschalek’s lab to ask for guidance and was looking at ways to adapt its vaccine to prevent splicing, he said.
The instructions for the spike protein in the J&J shot were already less prone to “splicing” than the instructions for the spike protein in the AstraZeneca jab, making the reaction less common, according to Marschalek. In the US, eight of the 7.4m recipients of the J&J shot have reported the rare reaction.
   “[J&J] is trying to optimise its vaccine now,” he said. “With the data we have in our hands we can tell the companies how to mutate these sequences, coding for the spike protein in a way that prevents unintended splice reactions.”
J&J said: “We are supporting continued research and analysis of this rare event as we work with medical experts and global health authorities. We look forward to reviewing and sharing data as it becomes available.”
Some scientists have cautioned that Marschalek’s theory is one among many, and that further evidence is needed to substantiate his claims.
“There is evidence missing to show the causal chain from the splice . . . of the spike protein to the thrombosis events,” said Johannes Oldenburg, professor of transfusion medicine at the university of Bonn. “This is still a hypothesis that needs to be proven by experimental data.”
Marschalek said he had presented his lab’s findings to the German government’s Paul-Ehrlich Institute and to the country’s advisory body on vaccination and immunisation.
“They were surprised by our findings because no one was thinking about the splice problem,” he said.

tl;dr: go get vaccinated and avoid the hassle of phases 2 through 5.

within the last week or two the 'authorized narrative' has shifted from 'spike protein harmless' to 'covid spike protein bad but the gene therapy 'vaccine' changes your body into a manufacturer of 'the good spike protein''.

Once inside the cell nucleus, certain parts of the spike protein DNA are spliced, or split apart, creating mutant versions, which are unable to bind to the cell membrane where important immunisation takes place. The floating mutant proteins are instead secreted by cells into the body, triggering blood clots in roughly one in 100,000 people, according to Marschalek’s theory.

~

door-to-door arrests of those who refuse spike protein injections [...] spike protein biological weapons [...] trade their lives for beer and donuts [...] jail time (government sector) [...]  Kinetic (military sector)

blames the unvaxxed for continued spike protein outbreaks that are killing people.

Anyway, must try harder. Let's see what the next all-bold evidence-free conspiracy thread looks like.