Looks like the bet was a lose. http://secondstrade.com/tx.jsp?tx=bc38cd6b250ee881f096e870c693f5ba78e54b0b98901c7b7705b21bdfe10de1Betting Transaction id : bc38cd6b250ee881f096e870c693f5ba78e54b0b98901c7b7705b21bdfe10de1 Betting address : 18XN15qXY8NuoBfLnK6xnSft4rUAt1ek3W Betting asset : BTCUSD30 DOWN Betting BTC : 0.05 Betting start date : 2015-10-14T05:31:54 Betting start date(miliseconds) : 1444800714799 Betting end date : 2015-10-14T06:01:54 Betting end date(miliseconds) : 1444802514799 Betting price : 253.59 Betting expire price : 253.63 Result : LOSE Sorry buddy
|
|
|
Congrats on your win but if you had only read you would see that the names of whom you were gonna bet for were placed beside the addresses given Why? then I would have lost. I am not sure how it happened tbh. Probably I copied the bb address first assuming it to be of Rollin, then I copied the rollin address when I realized it was the wrong one which didn't actually get copy (have had issues with ctrl button on this PC) or it could be that I just assumed the first was the Rollin address or maybe theymos edited OP (switched the addresses) to make me win.
|
|
|
I intended to bet for Rollin but actually made the bet for Betterbets. idk how that happened when I checked the rollin address I couldn't find my bet lol. Wow. WARZ LINES Deposit Betterbets: 1PbTsdGxtfE7Ar48hs6wgU5Mmqiiz2rEJU Deposit Rollin.io: 1GQTTvYifBPynG2miTmLSCxMe2uF8Yq39E In the image Rollin is placed first and betterbets later, but in lising the addresses Betterbets was placed first and Rollin.io later. So I bet for BB while I thought I was betting for Rollin to win it and won. Epic. Edit: Now I know where I got the 0.13 BTC from.
|
|
|
3NAdLw6qqc7F2YVgqgVDnCcRfSfTz4HnpM 4
|
|
|
Good find. Appears to be the same guy
|
|
|
@ndnhc, the method of choosing the "boss" hasn't been declared,
The site lacks information on how the boss is picked and also what the payout on win is.
so until then the game is negative edge to players at 1.8x. No, you don't understand. I am saying it is 0% edge to the player because the boss is NOT the house at the moment. It was 1JUVegNWquDxHJN37CHPp6V7rLTnaDcgmS (could be the house or a player. idk) and now me. All I am stating is house edge was 0%. Not 10%. Not 20%. I do not disagree with anything else you said.
|
|
|
isn't better you simple restart it?
just pay this lasts unconfirmed one winners (less then 0.003 BTC)
use a new hotwallet and start again
Yes, Devs are working on this , thank you very much for supporting our game Is the big boss feature still working? If it is wouldn't it pose a risk to the house since the EV of the player would be 10%? Archived. https://archive.is/FkQ82 in case you lose which ones to pay once they get removed. To be honored after these transactions vanish. 1JUVegNWquDxHJN37CHPp6V7rLTnaDcgmS 0.0002 BTC To compensate for https://archive.is/kjnEr Type: boss payment 15E2LwizX6Hr4LGxkRZ1CpBZKYV19QEpBH 0.0018 BTC https://archive.is/drXrz win payout? 1LWtZsYMNCuEn5TmawNGPHmu2W3udrYeWK 0.00144 BTC https://archive.is/NfhUs win payout 1LWtZsYMNCuEn5TmawNGPHmu2W3udrYeWK 0.0004 BTC https://archive.is/dTajy boss payment
|
|
|
Conventional definition of house edge is “the ratio of all money lost by players to the total money they wagered.” Unless you consider players individually, the house edge in the previous set up was indeed 0%.
wizardofodds seem to disagree with you. The house edge is defined as the ratio of the average loss to the initial bet. The house edge is not the ratio of money lost to total money wagered. No, both are the same. (you are ignoring the role of "boss" while taking into account the average loss) Case scenario. Players have say 10% chance of becoming a boss and getting refund. 45% to win and 45% to lose. Player makes 100 bets. 45 wins. 36 profit. 45 loss. 45 loss. 10 boss. Expected profit is 9. (20%*10*10*0.45) Or simply, the EV of the player and the EV of the house adds up to zero. In this case, the house has no advantage, so the player has no advantage either. (when the payout was 1.8x) tl;dr when the payout was 1.8x, the house edge was 0%.If the payout is made to 2x and the house also gives 20% of lost bets to the boss, the house edge would be -10% and the player's EV would be +10%. Edit: EV seems to be 10% to the players now I said high instead of 20% because of self-moderated thread.
It is either 10% if you go by shorena's interpretation, or 0% if you go by mine (i.e. house edge is EV of the house).
|
|
|
Conventional definition of house edge is “the ratio of all money lost by players to the total money they wagered.” Unless you consider players individually, the house edge in the previous set up was indeed 0%. The house is not the boss at the moment (I am), so the house does not have any advantage at the moment. Ralobot.com should consider to revert it back to 1.8x instead. At the moment, the players have a high positive EV. The site lacks information on how the boss is picked and also what the payout on win is. ..show that the house edge is 20%
Even as per that interpretation the HE is 10%. OP stated 1.8x payout on win and also explained the boss feature (though not how it was won), so I don't think any misstatement was involved. He shouldn't have deleted your posts though.
|
|
|
So I was wondering, there is this thing called ban-evasion here. So if someone did this the result will be perma-ban, right? With this perma-ban, are all the alts get the same ban ? If then after that perma-ban of the account, Can the user still create another account without risking it to be banned? Ban evasion will increase your existing to the next level. Thus if you are evading your first ban you may still come back after a longer time period has passed. A ban includes all accounts, no matter the length. The only exception is to create a new account (or use an existing unbanned one) to discuss your ban in meta. Its essentially the person that is banned not the account So that means any other account created after the perma-ban is safe to use and don't have the risk of getting banned for no reason at all? So it means that the IP of that person is already on the bad list of he forum right? Nope. Creating another account after perma-ban and start posting that would simply get you another perma-ban. shorena meant after a long (Edit, clarified: like ~100 years) period of time. Yeah, the IP would get evil points.
|
|
|
Who is the Big Boss atm?
hehe, I am. Got lucky What are the odds of being a big boss?
|
|
|
Thanks I lost hehe. Noticed that the house edge is 0%? May be make it such that the Big Boss gets 19%. If you got "Congratulations! You're The Boss." msg while playing our game (On lose or win Doesn't matter) , Than You just got the bigest win we offer at ralobot, You will start getting 20% on every single losing bet made by our players and this can goes until an other player wins the same reward! as you Smiley Who is the Big Boss atm?
|
|
|
how much was DaDice sold for ?
Not published yet. They were asking for 300BTC in the auction thread. I think that they sold the site for less than 300BTC. AFAIK, the site was sold exactly for 300 BTC.
|
|
|
So the laws of math clearly show that the only person who can possibly win at this game long term is the broker!
Wait.. you thought sites (or every business) is supposed to give money away for free? It is possible for players to win in the short term (realistically speaking) and that is why players play.
|
|
|
Just complete the sentence with your thoughts... "I would sell all my Bitcoins if..."
I need them urgently or it hits a price like $1,000,000.
|
|
|
As long as you stick to one of the main popular wallets I guess there won't be any problem. Just don't trust unconfirmed transactions and check balance with multiple block explorers that is not bc. I recommend btc.blockr.io I think, the one which does not spend UTXO or at least offers a choice not to spend the UTXO, will serve the best...
I don't know which one works the best, but I do know which one works the worst definitely. Stay away from blockchain.info wallet !!! Yeah, but at the moment, blockchain.info seems to have fixed it. No more negative or huge balances.
|
|
|
|