Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 07:29:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 318 »
1781  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 26, 2015, 06:38:36 AM
[img.]https://i.imgur.com/Z30gOvZ.jpg]https://i.imgur.com/Z30gOvZ.jpg[/img]

[img.]https://i.imgur.com/QZkxvmw.jpg]https://i.imgur.com/QZkxvmw.jpg[/img]

[img.]https://i.imgur.com/oPgfg11.jpg]https://i.imgur.com/oPgfg11.jpg[/img]

these are 3 biggest losers last week

all 3 lost a total of 36btc

Add them up. Tongue

To get those stats they need 20,000 such players who wager some 7000BTC each. If don't think you actually know what I or NLNico is talking about.

The actual stats tend towards 100,000 to 200,000, though I can estimate a maximum though unlikely of 500,000.
1782  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 26, 2015, 06:31:49 AM
i also have to say when playing slots the amount wagered is massive. even if you lose just a little or win alittle the amount wargered is big


casino games amount wagered goes up x10 faster than dice


when they had weekly contest i would have 2500rdd a spin on slots on all day long. atthe end of the day i may have lost 100-200k rdd but i wagered like 30 million rdd


just saying they have a lot of casino games and casino rev is way diffrent than dice rev.

Yeah, I think you are talking about Fortune Slots. It is true, most spins will lose or win only a small amount. But the bitcoin wagered amount is impossibly high, imo. 14 million Bitcoins is NOT possible.


14 million bitcoin is all alt coins added up together

LOL. I personally did the estimate including ALL altcoins. It could be at maximum only around 500,000BTC.  Cool

Other stats given in FortuneJack does not relate to the wagered amount shown on homepage. I am 100% sure it is inflated intended or otherwise.
1783  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 26, 2015, 06:00:31 AM
i also have to say when playing slots the amount wagered is massive. even if you lose just a little or win alittle the amount wargered is big


casino games amount wagered goes up x10 faster than dice


when they had weekly contest i would have 2500rdd a spin on slots on all day long. atthe end of the day i may have lost 100-200k rdd but i wagered like 30 million rdd


just saying they have a lot of casino games and casino rev is way diffrent than dice rev.

Yeah, I think you are talking about Fortune Slots. It is true, most spins will lose or win only a small amount. But the bitcoin wagered amount is impossibly high, imo. 14 million Bitcoins is NOT possible.
1784  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 26, 2015, 05:44:41 AM
Quote
Also, I am not sure whether this guy we are talking to is fully aware of everything to answer it. AFAIK, he could be the admin or a staff handing a completely different department.
I do agree with that. I agree that the "FortuneJack" account on this forum might not even know what these "wagered.php" URLs are and therefor not realize that my table was 100% correct. This would make their latest reply to "wrong because not properly informed by tech dep" instead of "wrong because lying", so I guess that would be better.

Yeah, that is quite likely. If this dev/admin of the site is accessible through support or something the info would be more helpful. Right now, speaking to the dev through OP would give a lot of scope for misunderstanding and wrong info.


Quote
I also agree to just wait for their reply now first, lol.

I have no idea how they are going to handle it. IMO, they should fix it first. Whatever be the explanation they give, it won't be justifying the 14 million wagered as right stats, so they SHOULD fix it, and stop showing misleading info right on the home page.



Quote
@ndnhc: just FYI I do still think they are legit for playing/withdrawals, "just" fake stats (and at this point: probably on purpose), which is important enough to bring up to discussion imo. I am not on some war and I haven't considered any neg trust. I simply do not like lies and I want site operators to be honest. That is all.

It is quite possible that whoever handing these parts decided to add some extra amounts to show off their site. Or it could be pure negligence or something wrong on how amounts are calculated. For example, for binary bet, a bet of 0.01 for 60 seconds may be counted as 0.6BTC.. who knows?
It is also very possible they knew the issue and did nothing since they didn't see scoring it down "would help their site to grow". Wink
1785  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 26, 2015, 05:30:13 AM
[img.]https://i.imgur.com/cL0yUVQ.jpg[/img]


I can only speak for myself. but im  up 12btc at fj



its the only site ive won at TBH  Grin

Yeah, I don't see any other issues with FortuneJack except this inflated wagered amount. That is why I am defending them.  Cool

Well, if it is actually inflated by them on purpose then it is seriously unprofessional. Either way they should change the wagered amount to real stats.
1786  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 26, 2015, 05:20:49 AM
The bug they described cannot be the cause because I got original alt coins amounts.

Of course, I know that. I don't think that was the real issue that caused that high wagered amount either.


Quote
Overall I agree we should just wait for their reply and see how much they adjust their stats.

Also, I am not sure whether this guy we are talking to is fully aware of everything to answer it. AFAIK, he could be the admin or a staff handing a completely different department.



First, get them to fix the wagered amount on the home page. then seek for the explanation, imo.
1787  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 26, 2015, 04:45:19 AM
Yes. They removed it today. That's why they are lying by saying "no way you could have access" because they know I was using that URL since it's removed today.

Probably they knew the data was inaccurate, because of say an error they had known which may be why they removed particular altcoin stats from the home page. So they didn't fix it coz they didn't know you or anyone was looking at that stats.

Either way, they should correct is asap.
1788  Economy / Gambling / Re: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game on: September 26, 2015, 04:40:18 AM
I just love this casino, and i`m not a shill here, this is my first bitcoin casino i`ve played at and i instantly loved it.

I just love that the API is so fast and when i bet manually it give a nice gambling feeling and experience, i just love that nice sound when you win Cheesy


Also in terms of money, well look here, if you were to bet like 1 BTC with these settings and win:

[IMG.]http://i61.tinypic.com/r0coqf.png[/img]

It would be a nice profit , 64290.8 BTC jackpot, that would rock Cheesy

lol, there is a max cap to profit.  Grin

Well still look here:

[IMG.]http://i61.tinypic.com/jab4o7.png[/img]

The guy won 1920 BTC by betting only 0.03 BTC, and paid out to bitcoin address! This guy was the luckiest person alive Cheesy

Man I hope I can win that one day, I will never give up trying Cheesy


But that is 3 years ago, I dont think bitcoin price is that high and may be they still can earn around 1 btc only using faucets  Grin. Who dare to bet 0.03 nowadays using that odds? You will sure lose all of your balance though  Grin

Yep. Also the max win is nowhere near that amount. You can't "Bet 1 BTC with that settings" to win in the first place. That is what I mean. Smiley
1789  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 25, 2015, 06:04:20 PM
Which error are you talking about? Did you read my post?  Tongue Please explain me how an exchange rate error affects the original alt coin amounts. It should only affect the BTC amounts.


No, I didn't read any posts properly. Grin

Where did you get the alt coin wagered amount from?
That is in my previous post :p

Basically they used to show "per currency" stats in January on the website. I made a crawler for my site at that time and got the full data once. Then for months they didn't show those stats but that URL was still working. So yesterday I ran my script and got full data of "per currency" stats again. Rest/details are really in my previous post :p The numbers really add up compared to their total stats.

I get 404 not found. the URL isn't working anymore Huh
1790  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 25, 2015, 05:50:18 PM
Which error are you talking about? Did you read my post?  Tongue Please explain me how an exchange rate error affects the original alt coin amounts. It should only affect the BTC amounts.


No, I didn't read any posts properly. Grin

Where did you get the alt coin wagered amount from?
1791  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 25, 2015, 05:10:33 PM
Nah, I just think they were careless, lol.
They didn't bother to update the bonus terms about the changes in how the bonus is implemented. The Bonus terms given for the 100% deposit bonus are incorrect and also didn't bother to reset the wagered amount published on the home page of the site to the correct amount after the error was fixed.

I don't want a Nico v. potentially suspicious site war to go on all over again. so, I think we should give them time to fix these two things before adding a negative trust or consider it a scam.

Deadline : 1st October 2015.

1. Most importantly, correct the wagered amount shown on the home page to actual data. The current amount is inflated around 30 to 100+ times as per my estimate. If it is not possible to accurately estimate it, ignore the wagered amount for that particular period in which the error happened.
It is an important material data and decides how people see it. Ignoring it for so long is very unprofessional. Please fix it asap.

2. Update the bonus terms to reflect how things actually work at the moment.
1792  Economy / Gambling / Re: SatoshiDICE.com - The World's Most Popular Bitcoin Game on: September 25, 2015, 02:51:11 PM
I just love this casino, and i`m not a shill here, this is my first bitcoin casino i`ve played at and i instantly loved it.

I just love that the API is so fast and when i bet manually it give a nice gambling feeling and experience, i just love that nice sound when you win Cheesy


Also in terms of money, well look here, if you were to bet like 1 BTC with these settings and win:



It would be a nice profit , 64290.8 BTC jackpot, that would rock Cheesy

lol, there is a max cap to profit.  Grin
1793  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 25, 2015, 02:48:31 PM

Those numbers and tables you are trying to bring up are wrong and has nothing to do with our database, and there is no way you could have access to that kind of information.
However, we approve there was a bug counting it. One of the games (fortune wheel) was excluded from the trigger for a short period of time (when we changed our currency rates provider) and the bets were summed up without multiplying it on an exchange rate. The issue was fixed later, but the wager forgetfully remained untouched. It took some time to analyse the code and history of FortuneJack updates.

We think exaggerating total wager would be a cheap marketing trick and would never distribute wager that high on the landing page on purpose, knowing it would raise a lot of questions in a highly curious community like Bitcointalk.

Yep, so the altcoins WERE equated to bitcoins for some time as I thought. Cheesy

May be you should correct it? It is inflated around 40 to 100 times at the moment..
1794  Economy / Gambling / Re: Fortunejack Bonus Question on: September 25, 2015, 02:13:59 PM
I don't know if bonus T. & C. have been changed since this thread was opened but right now I can EASILY read (in original post linked promo page) this statement:

..."If you withdraw money before reaching the minimum wagering requirements, your bonus and winnings will become void."


So you canwithdraw your initial deposit without having to fulfill bonus playtrough requirements.

Anyway best suggestion I read here is this one:

assuming that the bonus is mandatory why not deposit .01 get the bonus and lose it then deposit the other .990 if you wanna depo 1btc total?

AFAIK, the bonus is not mandatory.

FJ's bonus system does not work the usual way either I think. But the T&C the one in the quote does not seem to relate to the way they are actually giving the bonus. (not that I am complaining, but it doesn't really explain things


Edit: lol, this is what I am saying. Smiley
alla is correct, the bonus term is hidden, and totally different from their description,
1795  Economy / Gambling / Re: Advanced Betting strategy (low risk, low reward) on: September 25, 2015, 01:56:37 PM

Do you believe your strategy is positive EV? Wink
No, and i never said I will give any edge, I just said that this strategy can help gamble in a "safer" way.



You are stating the EV is not positive and is the same. (correct)

You are stating ROI % that implies a positive EV (contradictory and incorrect)



Suppose you make 1,000,000,000,000 rolls and got all heads, for the next head assuming the game to be a fair one, the odds are 50%, and for the tails the odds are 50%.

I think you are taking it in a way where in a probability distribution of say 1000 rolls, ~500 are heads and ~500 are tails, and if you get 100 heads, the next flip would most likely land a tail. This concept DOES NOT apply in this case. Because the distribution you are talking about is INFINITE. Even if the probability distribution happens to be evenly distributed (is it?) say in centillions (tending towards infinity to be stated properly) of hash combinations, it still gives you an astronomically insignificant effect (1/infinity tending to 0)
1796  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 1 BTC BONUS on: September 25, 2015, 07:41:19 AM
The data is most certainly wrong.  Shocked Shocked

Edit: The total wagered amount shown on the site doesn't match with any other data on site. NLNico is right. May be there is some error? like 1 DOGE/REDD = 1 BTC? So, a 10000 DOGE bet would add 10000 BTC to the counter. or it could be dollar/cents for slot games that was equated to a BTC.

Also, it is possible that the error was already fixed. Even if it happened for say a week, it would completely distort the data. and may be FJ didn't bother to reduce it back? Tongue

Edit2: I estimated actual wagered amount to be around 100,000BTC to 400,000BTC
1797  Economy / Gambling / Re: Primedice.com | Most Popular & Trusted Bitcoin Game | Huge Community | Free BTC on: September 25, 2015, 05:51:24 AM
Someone's ddosing the site lol. That guy must have lost a lot of money.
I think you can't ddos too much a site that is using cloudflare, is impossible for an attacker to know the ip address.
it's harder, but I don't think it's impossible... if it was then everyone would be using cloudflare Tongue
(don't take my word for it though!)
And a lot of people use cloudflare including primedice.

You can't attack a server via ddos from a botnet using ddos clients, so you will have to replay packages but cloudflare as a proxy will repell malicious attack automatically because they have ddos protection integrates.

AFAIK, cloudflare makes it difficult. But not impossible.
1798  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [NEW] [Da Dice] Roll Prediction Contest! | 2 BTC in PRIZES! | RESULTS ANNOUNCED! on: September 25, 2015, 05:40:29 AM
Hello,

My username is dsmithatx and my BTC address is 1KdtDKPAncZAMFmf8xhaW5YhQ3BU9r8uKA.


Thanks!

Added. Smiley





Da Dice Roll Prediction Contest Results!

The winning 1,000,000,000th roll : #97.01


A massive congratulations to all the winners! Cheesy



DD username

di3el
SyGambler
Hulk
marsh
maxhor
Cybernick
Marcoserbank
saurav
fox19891989
jayce
B4RF
bountyhunter
ajareselde
Lutpin
actmyname
dsmithatx
Kuz345
birdcat
echye
mcoi
freaks
bank
somuchee
dondondon
        Prize!

0.5
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
        Bitcoin address

1Di3ELBuNs55msqGhzns7KW6JYqwrMptib
1EaGP2oXVLQszr22hjhZQWYwsGZ1vHk9tN
1EwzJiqvBbroagbBUqM9qATWBawLqZhY5V
3F1xrq5eMgV1CGJyEopdP5mVAmSm18uFna
1Q3qPaepv3p7Q9AVwWcv5PF5xuykhvMQi6
12iLTrfVpoSGmcLJaZgsed9zBqVKG14vDf
1TrigxAy2MpBjxEJDTmcNnMMtkJ9eZYHe
1EjMchjQL6Q6QeX6D8ChvaGSPBVgAVgvU
1JBCRAPDNovUDAi5fSq39NMkzAZGSwe865
1DzyGwaLoo8tKo5dShGo9FEjrWW1SxFfUy
1B4RF3h4nnj2yTAnc2e8hAkaieb65LAzBF
118pJMrvk2W34aR2kVgotaaZ6Asc9cHPe
1MZvjgQFQdAUUx5n6Prxw4oGuRycVmaZYR
1KEi5H2MuigwpoSR6YM1zdkMcY1RCW9gfd
1Lwc4Hq28nnT6w31nj6QCPNwUxdPM7QTYS
1KdtDKPAncZAMFmf8xhaW5YhQ3BU9r8uKA (new)

1LJzN7TyT8DhyVevyuQSMVPmRbzUA4e5X2
19sEB7NCoHPe4poKT8k2RwqDtZDd92WRk6

1AuiJSwtrVmfQwWTw5UTedj4Cq2ettxBRz
1DLQQjGEMKoDpUosVtAizac5sfA9vruCML
1DNDLX6TvA81nmd1VfjxVCnZRY9jxFKaFP
1food14NCLas1FssyKnf2MgGZcwUFRKXE (Feed Some Children by Dabs donation address)

1799  Other / Meta / Re: Why bitcointalk.org Looks so Bad on: September 24, 2015, 06:10:45 PM
I think I will miss this look and theme when the new one rolls out.
1800  Economy / Gambling / Re: Is betsoft blackjack rigged? on: September 24, 2015, 06:04:58 PM
Hi, guys, i bet 3btc in one hand, and I won it!!!!!!!!!!!  I think it is fair cause if it is rigged so I can't win a big bet.

This game must be fair, and betsoft is one of the best supplier, no doubt.   Cheesy

The rigging is done by Proprietary Rigging Software backed by High Level Artificial Intelligence. It detects that you are a highroller (yes, right before you even sign up) and makes the first bet a win. So the player's psychology approves the site, and he will always be tempted to make another bet and another and another... till all his funds become theirs.  Cool

jk. Not meant to be taken seriously./size]
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 318 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!