Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 08:33:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 »
1221  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 22, 2014, 02:40:38 AM
So 1024 in the miner and on worker page of the pool guarantees no issues outside of a problem with the pool or the miner. That said, am I correct with the worker setting of 128 for my Prospector200 machine since the next jump up is 256 for 256Gh + ?

Yes, 1024 for a dragon is the recommended setting, and should guarantee proper results while mining without any weird stats popping up.  I'm not familiar with the prospector 200, but if it's under 250 GH/s, then 128 is the recommended setting, yes.

However, as far as I'm aware, the only ASIC where the setting *can* cause a problem is the Dragon Miners.  Anything else is just a recommendation, it should have no material effects on other hardware.
Hey Michael, Do you know if the BTCGarden machines have dif issues like the dragons ?

Sorry, but my experience with ASICs outside of Avalon (batch 1 & 2), BE Blades and USB Erupters is pretty much limited to anecdotes and observations.  As such, the only one I *know* has the issues with difficulty are Dragon Miners, but that doesn't mean others might not have similar problems.
Just figured I'd ask even though the only diff min setting is 256 since the next one up is 512 and the machines are rated 310Gh/s.
1222  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 22, 2014, 02:29:58 AM
So 1024 in the miner and on worker page of the pool guarantees no issues outside of a problem with the pool or the miner. That said, am I correct with the worker setting of 128 for my Prospector200 machine since the next jump up is 256 for 256Gh + ?

Yes, 1024 for a dragon is the recommended setting, and should guarantee proper results while mining without any weird stats popping up.  I'm not familiar with the prospector 200, but if it's under 250 GH/s, then 128 is the recommended setting, yes.

However, as far as I'm aware, the only ASIC where the setting *can* cause a problem is the Dragon Miners.  Anything else is just a recommendation, it should have no material effects on other hardware.
Hey Michael, Do you know if the BTCGarden machines have dif issues like the dragons ?
1223  Economy / Digital goods / Re: BitShop - digital bitcoin shop script [PHP/MYSQL] (v1.0.0) on: July 21, 2014, 02:20:45 AM
I'll keep the image thing in mind for the next release. Shouldn't be too hard.
So I can say that I asked, if you work on the code but dont plan on a new release for a while. I'd like it passed along if it's not too complicated. I actually have things I kinda need more than five images for.

Even if I didn't need more then 5 images, the squished 5th image is a pet peeve of sorts lol.

Ty.

Edit: Oh, one thing I did notice that I forgot to mention. When items are bought / paid for using the Coinbase API. They're not added to the RSS when it's enabled.
Any thoughts on the edit ?
1224  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 18, 2014, 11:58:10 PM
Ya but none that will offer the same earnings. Some could argue bitminter is good and while they are. They have days where thy don't find blocks and with the 3.2 Ths I have I should be seeing around 0.09x. So while Ghash has their downfalls, I will always go to them as a backup for earnings.


Another greedy miner ready to join in on sinking the whole experiment for their short term gain, good work, I applaude thee.

Quote
Ive tried others like slush etc. and while some also argue that a pools size doesn't mean much in the way of earnings the bottom line is that it does. Ghash has the blocks found for people to earn around what they should be seeing with the hash they have available.

A pool's size doesn't matter in the long run if there are no bad actors.  You're just tripping up on daily numbers.

It aint about greed, it's about me not going to a pool with 3.2 Th/s which should earn 0.09x a day and settling for whatever I get even if it was something like 0.04. I'm not the only one with this school of thought but probably the only one to speak up and not fear people like you who think were greedy when it has nothing do to with greed.
Take a look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=416933.0

It's a pretty good experiment showing the earnings across multiple pools.  It has the benefit of being long-running as well.  There are other options than GHash.io.  They all pay pretty comparably to what you're seeing here.
I'll definitely give that a look, Ty.

Just funny that a lot of people jump to greed when Ghash is involved without considering other things like what the person paid for their hardware etc.

Cost of hardware aside, everyone has a tipping point. I doubt dropt would be like ok, I've got 10Th and am seeing about 0.1 a day but that's ok bec shit happens. One of two days fine because that's luck for ya, but I know for a fact he wouldn't be singing that jolly ol tune if he kept seeing 0.1 a day for a week or more on 10 Th/s.
1225  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 18, 2014, 09:18:59 PM
Ya but none that will offer the same earnings. Some could argue bitminter is good and while they are. They have days where thy don't find blocks and with the 3.2 Ths I have I should be seeing around 0.09x. So while Ghash has their downfalls, I will always go to them as a backup for earnings.


Another greedy miner ready to join in on sinking the whole experiment for their short term gain, good work, I applaude thee.

Quote
Ive tried others like slush etc. and while some also argue that a pools size doesn't mean much in the way of earnings the bottom line is that it does. Ghash has the blocks found for people to earn around what they should be seeing with the hash they have available.

A pool's size doesn't matter in the long run if there are no bad actors.  You're just tripping up on daily numbers.

It aint about greed, it's about me not going to a pool with 3.2 Th/s which should earn 0.09x a day and settling for whatever I get even if it was something like 0.04. I'm not the only one with this school of thought but probably the only one to speak up and not fear people like you who think were greedy when it has nothing do to with greed.
1226  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 18, 2014, 12:03:14 AM
Well, if this ends up coming to fruition then I guess ghash will be getting a big bump from people because that's where I'll be going as I suspect others will too when the pool closes if it ever does.

I'll go to everywhere, except GHASH.IO. There are lot of good guys still remaining. SLush, Eligius, p2pool, etc...
Ya but none that will offer the same earnings. Some could argue bitminter is good and while they are. They have days where thy don't find blocks and with the 3.2 Ths I have I should be seeing around 0.09x. So while Ghash has their downfalls, I will always go to them as a backup for earnings.

Ive tried others like slush etc. and while some also argue that a pools size doesn't mean much in the way of earnings the bottom line is that it does. Ghash has the blocks found for people to earn around what they should be seeing with the hash they have available.
1227  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 17, 2014, 11:53:08 PM
And so it begins.  New York regulators are now proposing things which would make it essentially illegal for anybody to use Bitcoin in that state without being registered. It is so over-reaching that it would even catch things like the Bitcoin tipbot on reddit, which would be an illegally operating entity if it allows you to tip a New York resident.

http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press2014/pr1407171-vc.pdf
Where are you / the pool based ?

I'm in PA.

Nevada currently, but this regulation would affect the pool if it has users in New York.  And I doubt a "I agree I'm not a resident of New York" checkbox would be enough.  Luckily this has 45 days of commenting, then review, and then there are 45 days after it's put into effect before it is enforced.  Quite frankly, if something even remotely close to what is currently open for comment goes into effect, the pool will probably be forced to close.

Living in the US makes trying to sidestep/ignore this a non-option.  I doubt they'd chase international pool owners, but depending on what country they're in, I wouldn't exactly assume they're safe (US doesn't have a history of respecting international borders when it comes to internet businesses).
Well, if this ends up coming to fruition then I guess ghash will be getting a big bump from people because that's where I'll be going as I suspect others will too when the pool closes if it ever does.
1228  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 17, 2014, 11:25:11 PM
And so it begins.  New York regulators are now proposing things which would make it essentially illegal for anybody to use Bitcoin in that state without being registered. It is so over-reaching that it would even catch things like the Bitcoin tipbot on reddit, which would be an illegally operating entity if it allows you to tip a New York resident.

http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press2014/pr1407171-vc.pdf
Where are you / the pool based ?

I'm in PA.
1229  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 17, 2014, 10:23:03 PM
Would a simple solution be to only process automatic withdrawals from the hot wallet for accounts holding < X BTC, and anything over that gets sent to manual handling?
That way it is the person using the pool as a bank who is inconvenienced, rather than everyone else, but you aren't imposing any additional fees.


Simple and elegant

Genius!!!

+1
Good idea.
1230  Economy / Goods / Re: Looking for someone with PayPal to buy something off eBay for me... on: July 17, 2014, 07:27:54 AM
N/A
1231  Economy / Goods / Looking for someone with PayPal to buy something off eBay for me... on: July 17, 2014, 01:58:54 AM
Yes I prefer Escrow, would like to use Coinbase price at time of agreement. Item value is $15.

PM for info on the item.

Also FWIW, in case your wondering. No I do not have a PayPal account nor do I want one. Yes it is a seller who allows account-less purchases. I tried to use two different cards of mine to no avail.

Ty in advance.
1232  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 17, 2014, 01:25:22 AM
Edit: Basically what it comes down to for me is this... why "complain" about something that will most likely never stop unless your willing to actually do something about it.

A friendly suggestion with a thorough explanation is not the same thing as a complaint.
A suggestion that may or may not bare any actual fruit because it is just that, a suggestion.

That is often the way of suggestions.  You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink, or so I'm told.
You can make the horse drink which is what I sort of suggested to Michael but he shot it down as a form of theft.

I mean, if people want to use the pool as a bank, then why not charge them extra fees of say 2-5% if it's causing issues with the wallets when one persons like hey, I think I'll withdraw 10 BTC today which messes up withdraws for everyone else until Michael moves some funds around which is what his suggestion / complaint was about.
1233  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 16, 2014, 10:56:37 PM
Edit: Basically what it comes down to for me is this... why "complain" about something that will most likely never stop unless your willing to actually do something about it.

A friendly suggestion with a thorough explanation is not the same thing as a complaint.
A suggestion that may or may not bare any actual fruit because it is just that, a suggestion.
1234  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 16, 2014, 10:25:49 PM
Any more fees and people will keep leaving for the evil ghash.
Just setup an email reminder that is triggered at a set amount of BTC to remind them to withdraw.

Still no reason for them to comply, so unless Michael adds some sort of a preventative measure then chances are at least half or more of the people using the guild as a bank will continue to do so and Michael will just continue to make a post every so often asking people to stop doing this knowing that they have no reason to listen.

Edit: Basically what it comes down to for me is this... why "complain" about something that will most likely never stop unless your willing to actually do something about it.

I know this seems like a direct poke at Michael, while that's not my intention I do feel that unless something is actually done about it then the practice of people using the guild as a bank will most likely never end thus causing thee continuous wallet issues he talks about.
1235  Economy / Digital goods / Re: BitShop - digital bitcoin shop script [PHP/MYSQL] (v1.0.0) on: July 15, 2014, 01:32:24 PM
Hey,

I might be interested to buy the script. I just need some additionnal information about it.

I would like to sell non digital products and don't understand why it is not possible with your script.

I see websites selling keys, using your script. If i understand well, they send e-mails with the key inside.

Why is it not possible to send e-mails using the script to say that the command has been taken into account, and then ship the products to the customer ?

Just asking.

Thank you for your help.
I sell physical items as well as digital ones, if you take a look at this page. You'll see how I've modified the code some to be more user friendly when dealing with physical goods.

http://spend-ur-bits.com/index.php?page=buy&pid=14&quant=1
1236  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTB] Antminer U2 USB sticks... looking for at least 17 of them. on: July 15, 2014, 12:23:24 PM
I have 26 Antminer U2s I am willing to sell and another 20 I am keeping but might sell with interest.
I would like to request 0.02BTC per unit, so 0.52 BTC total.
I am willing to round this to 0.5 BTC.

This includes free shipping to the EU (or, if you are located anywhere else, please add 0.03BTC for shipping.

$300+ for 52 Gh/s? OUCH!
I can get 200Gh for that right now so I'll pass but ty.
1237  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 15, 2014, 01:06:44 AM
Quote
Why not make everyone login to their account and confirm their BTC address, and then do forced withdraws once their balance goes over a certain amount?

Accounts that are not confirmed within a reasonable period of time (say 30 days) can be suspended.
Not a bad idea but I say the higher fees for these accounts would be the best deterrent.

Say anything over 1 BTC incurs a 5-10% extra daily "maintenance" fee which is deducted from the accounts balance.

That is essentially theft in my mind.  The same with suspending accounts for inactivity.  Every coin earned should be capable of being withdrawn, up until the site is no longer operational.  Even then, the stated policy is *at least* a 3 month window for inactive users to come back and get their coins out.
So with all due respect then, just because you "complain" about these users doesn't mean they have to make any changes. They may just figure, well hell, if he's not gonna do anything about it then I'll just keep doing my old tried and true of using the pool as a bank and withdrawing when I feel the need to.

Seriously though, unless you willing to actually do something about this "problem" then you might be lucky if only a third of these people actually give a damn and make a change.
1238  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 15, 2014, 12:39:16 AM
So why not set a forced withdraw if / when a users account balance gets to something like .2 since I assume what your talking about is people saving up with .5 or higher.

Edit: Or just impose higher fees on these people to try and deter them from doing it.

I don't do forced withdraws because there is always a chance that somebody has a wallet on their account that is no longer valid (lost keys, online wallet, defunct exchange, etc).  And if the wallet is locked, there is a chance in the case of old+inactive accounts that the wallet points to something like MtGox or one of the many online wallet scams, meaning sending the payout would just give the coins to a thief.

Why not make everyone login to their account and confirm their BTC address, and then do forced withdraws once their balance goes over a certain amount?

Accounts that are not confirmed within a reasonable period of time (say 30 days) can be suspended.
Not a bad idea but I say the higher fees for these accounts would be the best deterrent.

Say anything over 1 BTC incurs a 5-10% extra daily "maintenance" fee which is deducted from the accounts balance.
1239  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [11000 TH] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers on: July 14, 2014, 08:57:22 PM
This is one of the ways BTC Guild *could* be forced to shut down as well.  Just like dooglus, I would not keep the site running in the face of new legislation that was too vague as to who it is aimed at.  The problem with JustDice and mining pools is that there is no reason for a user to comply with any type of KYC rules.  There are plenty of other sites they can go to hosted in other countries which wouldn't require it, so the moment a US law comes in that threatens the need for KYC it would immediately kill any US-based pool.  There's simply nobody that would volunteer that information when there is absolutely nothing preventing them from moving to ghash.io/slush/bitminter, which are all run by people not in the United States.

I feel like most of the US KYC laws are only going to be targeted at BTC/USD conversions and possibly vice versa.

Regardless - it's a fair warning to make even though it seems based on an incredible abundance of caution rather than an indication of a forthcoming policy shift.

Yes, so far the US has been very focused on simply regulating the point where virtual currencies are converted into fiat currency.  However, depending on how widely accepted Bitcoin becomes, that may end up being changed.

But still, the warning is mostly just to try to get people to keep their balances lower.  It's a big headache/liability to have to constantly play this balancing act between the hot and cold wallet.  There shouldn't be single users that have balances in excess of 10-20% of the hot wallet balance.

So why not set a forced withdraw if / when a users account balance gets to something like .2 since I assume what your talking about is people saving up with .5 or higher.

Edit: Or just impose higher fees on these people to try and deter them from doing it.
1240  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTB] Antminer U2 USB sticks... looking for at least 17 of them. on: July 14, 2014, 05:38:29 AM
I don't have any u-1's or u-2's .

 I do have some icefury sticks. 2 or 3 of them

 I point them at bitminter or bitsolo.net depends on my mood.
Isnt the fury line comparable to the U2's in terms of speeds around 2Gh/s ?
Pages: « 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 [62] 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!