|
I went in to the DB to modify a customers order but before I did that, I did it on a test buy of my own. I edited the quantity and the figure for whats owed but even upon a ctrl+f5 refresh of the payment page it still showed the previous info.
Thoughts ?
|
|
|
|
Exact same problem with me and a payment of 0.988 except mine was shared sent... it's snail mailin it's way down the line to a new address in what seems like every 4hrs. Here's a copy of the email and PM I sent since neither seem to be getting read. Below is a copy of an email I sent last night about a problem with my order. I have a slight update to this after talking to the Blockchain people, it looks like it will get to the orders payment address like it's supposed to. It's just taking it's time and I hope the order can still be shipped to the specified address on the order page... Ty. We are still fixing a few issues with the API. The funds are not lost. They will either get to the destination or be returned. Please wait for a bit. Sorry about the inconvenience. ----- CZ | Blockchain & ZeroBlock Support Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/blockchain Twitter: https://twitter.com/blockchain******* Begin quote of previous email ******* This is a copy of a PM I sent to you guys at he bitcointalk.org forums. ------- Order ID: 00120140320025024761MPX1Xuyt06C8 https://blockchain.info/tx/04925c39429cefd8ca277f2c0a28a23cdb73f556614dff549beb6b6d376ae7caI ordered one of the S1 Antminers, did a shared send from the block chain app... except it doesn't look like blockchain sent it to the address on your payment page even though it showed correctly when I scanned the QR code. Not sure what will happen now because the site says orders are cancelled if no payment after 1hr. |
|
|
|
The simple story is this. The Blockchain.info API (the "API") has been providing a unique address for each order. This address is provided and controlled API. Usually the API transfers the Bitcoin received immediately to the address controlled by us, TxID of which will be provided by the API. During the last few days, all the Bitcoin received by the API were hold there but not transferred to us. As the customers has paid the money as our instruction, so whatever happens we Bitmain should take all the risk. But this just make the confirmation work more slow. So please be relax if you have actually paid the orders. Some of the orders influenced have been shipped out yesterday, and the rest of it will be shipped out today.
My situation deals with this but is unique, if you could please check your PM's or webmaster email you would know what my problem is, Ty. |
|
|
|
|
Hey Bitmain, can you please check your PM or webmaster email. Have an issue with an order I placed last night and the payment being snail mailed soto speak (slowly making it's way to the BTC address).
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in no rush for the equipment, just wanted to double check on the site but the bitmaintech.com is what I was already looking at, Ty for the confirmations guys.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, so I was thinking of grabbing some of their 2.0Gh/s sticks but I hard a rumor about a fake Bitmain site. Well, so I don't have my ass handed to me with a fake site.
What's the official one ?
|
|
|
|
It seems that Bitcoin SCI was not properly identifying blockchain.info as offline. To fix it, I changed line 94 of /lib/bit-sci.lib.php from: to: if ($result === false || !is_numeric($result)) {So blockchain.info was offline but it was still returning some non-numeric value? Not sure on returned page but a buyer reported a similar unknown error message. |
|
|
|
|
Rally, almost 5 hrs without a block... and here I thought our luck was picking up yesterday.
|
|
|
|
At least Comcast is better than Cox...I miss my Comcast now  . Hey Eleuthria, with all the replies made since my last one I'm not sure if you missed it or not but I sent you a PM asking for a teeny favor ;-) Ty. |
|
|
|
With blockchain.info down, a user reported seeing "An unknown error occured. Please try again later." after filling out order information and clicking the checkout button. The order went through after a few tries. It seems that Bitcoin SCI was not properly identifying blockchain.info as offline. To fix it, I changed line 94 of /lib/bit-sci.lib.php from: to: if ($result === false || !is_numeric($result)) {Confirmed the "error" a buyer just reported to me... adding patch now. |
|
|
|
|
Hey Eleuthria, sent you a PM.
Thx.
|
|
|
|
Good or bad I'm here to stay as much as the current luck makes me want to cry.
I have my rigs split across pools to minimize variance. M I could do that too, I have in my avalon in order... 1) BTCGuild 2) Ghash 3) BitMinter If I split they'd each get about 60Gh/s |
|
|
|
|
Good or bad I'm here to stay as much as the current luck makes me want to cry.
|
|
|
|
|
I know there were othr pools with PPS and still are a select few, I was just saying I get both sides of the coin.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand both the miners and eleuthrias points on this.
Eleuthria: Doesnt want to keep hemoraging money due to really bad luck
Miners: Most will likely leave the pool now for a PPS enabled one.
While I feel for both the miners and Eleuthria here, one thing we all have to remember is even if we bitch til were blue in the face. Eleuthria will ultimtely do what he feel is right / what he wants to, after all this is his pool. So at this point all we as miners can do is try to make suggestions for maybe a modified PPS method or just forget about it.
|
|
|
|
A lot of what's hurting is too is the act that ghash has around 9Ph.
IF ONLY it were that easy!!!  Oh I know there's more to it than that but thats a good chunk of it IMO. Edit: Here's what my sad stats look like, with 30+ blocks a day like we should be doing, I avg 0.03 a day...  |
|
|
|
|
A lot of what's hurting is too is the act that ghash has around 9Ph.
|
|
|
|
Ok, so couple of suggestions I'd like to see in the next release.
1) When viewing categories via admin, if you used an over size image. It resizes fine and looks good on the home page, but you get the big in your face version in admin. What I would like to see in the admin area if the large image resized just like it is on the home page.
2) When viewing the categories tab, everything looks like this: Software Keys (2)
I'd like the see the (?) added to the category "block" on the left side as well.
In addition to these, I'd also like to suggest a testimonial tab where when one is submitted it must first be approved before it is shown. The By line could be what a lot sites use. By: J. Doe, City State 3/11/14 Got one more for ya... Haven't had this issue yet but it got me thinking after a buyer wanted to do partial payment to "lock" an order since I told him after 24hrs unconfirmeds / 0 balances orders are deleted. This is kind of a multi spectrum request... 1) Buyer clicks cancel 2) I as admin have unconfirmeds deleted Ok, so for whatever reason an unconfirmed transaction is removed be it by a buyer clickin cancel or an admin removing it. I would even pay for this feature... Would it be possible to have an address checked and if it has a balance of 0.01 or greater the deletion is halted, again like I said be it removal by a buyer clicking cancel or admin removal of unconfirmeds. Edit: When a user clicks cancel on the page where payments remitted, would it be possible to have a popup that reads the following when Cancel is clicked ? By cancelling this sale, any coins you've already sent to the payment address will be permanently lost.
Do you wish to proceed ? |
|
|
|
Funny thing is it would literally take the admins all of 10 minutes to do it.
That is if nothing goes wrong in the upgrade. And if it does people will be pissed.. they have to test before upgrading. And 2.0 has been out for if im no mistaken over 4 yrs now... either way, id bet a thousand bucks I could upgrade this site inside of 10 minutes and not break a thing. All it is doing is replacing old iles with new and modiying the DB slightly, that said if the admins here are comoetant (sp?) then they would have nightly backups to replace and even if smarter take a new backup and dump the site in maintenance mode before proceeding. I'm just sayin theres far to many excuses for not to have somethin done that is easily done without error if people know what theyre doing and by doing this fixes the so called loopholes that make them taake stuff like external avatar links etc. offline. I'd love to see tneymos take you up on this just to make an easy thousand bucks. Use escrow? This forum has many custom mods which would certainly break, no matter how much some guy on the internet insists. He wont and he'd be too invested just to set something up to where it does fail to get a thousand bucks. Sure, one could argue well why would he do that when he's sitting on over 80k in BTC. Answer: Because he could always use more money to sit on until the day something mysterious happens to the forum and everyone wonders what about all that BTC they donated over the years for promised upgrades that everyones still waiting on. |
|
|
|
Ok, so couple of suggestions I'd like to see in the next release.
1) When viewing categories via admin, if you used an over size image. It resizes fine and looks good on the home page, but you get the big in your face version in admin. What I would like to see in the admin area if the large image resized just like it is on the home page.
2) When viewing the categories tab, everything looks like this: Software Keys (2)
I'd like the see the (?) added to the category "block" on the left side as well.
In addition to these, I'd also like to suggest a testimonial tab where when one is submitted it must first be approved before it is shown. The By line could be what a lot sites use. By: J. Doe, City State 3/11/14 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
