I fuck goats.
Man, debate is easy when you just make up quotes! |
|
|
|
This is why we need to end this atmosphere of guilty until proven innocent and digging into everyone's business just because some bored assholes have fantasies, suspicions, or vendettas or else privacy will be a thing of the past here.
Show us how it's done and remove your trust abuse. Then you won't be a hypocrite and people may listen to you. (BIG may) You mean the rating I left you for doxing and reporting OGNasty to the IRS that even Theymos agreed deserved a red tag? Unlike the accusations against OGNasty, the fact that you acted in this unacceptable way is not under debate. Remind me again what this has to do with the topic? Oh right nothing, not that you or the mods give a shit about that. No, I don't mean that. Stop deflecting pervert. Practice what you preach, end your attitude of OG being guilty of nothing with no proof, just because you are bored, he's your pal, and you have a vendetta against me. Take the first step, remove some of your abusive feedback trust, and start a wave.  It make even convince OG to take the first step in turning honest. What do you mean then? I have left about an average of 2 negative ratings a year since I have been on this forum, can you even count how many you have left? So I am a pervert now too? That is a new one. I don't even particularly like OGNasty and have had minimal contact with him over the years. I have a vendetta against YOU? That would be funny if it weren't totally batshit insane considering your years of stalking and abusing the trust system against me. I put the part where you inverted the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused in bold. I don't have to prove anything. I am by far not the only one who thinks the evidence in this case is ambiguous at best. Now if you are done being an unstable wingbat and projecting everything you do upon me, perhaps you can actually post on topic. |
|
|
|
THIS IS HOW IT WORKS FOR GODS SAKE!!! THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION ARE OWNED BY THE UNIONS AND THE UNIONS DECIDE COLLECTIVELY WHAT TO DO WITH THOSE MEANS OF PRODUCTION!!! AND HOW DO THEY DECIDE?  THEY REGROUP EVERYONE AND HAVE A VOTE THAT'S HOW IT WORKS This is it! You won! You're definitively too stupid to discuss with! this is insane, how do you manage to do anything daily? Is it like this all the time? You're the kind of people because of whom companies must write "do not ingest" on detergent packaging because otherwise you would drink it then sue them saying "Yeah well it was not written and I'm not going to take 2 seconds of my life to THINK u know?" This is absurd. I've never seen anyone either with such bad faith or so stupid. Unions are hierarchical organizations subject to all the same flaws of governments. Centralizing the means of production into unions is not decentralization no matter how much you vote on it. What you have is the facade of the proletariat controlling the means of production, the same system that was in place every other time socialism was tried and failed with horrible results. |
|
|
|
Your article is based on an opinion piece in Bloomberg that doesn't carry any actual weight. Semantics and wishful thinking aside, there's no way Pelosi won't deliver the articles of impeachment. Actually it is based on statements by Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman, but don't let that stop you from attacking the source in order to discredit the content. I am sure you know way more than a Harvard law professor. |
|
|
|
What does the fact that anyone can create one have anything to do with the fact it is a hierarchical organization with a centralized control structure? I can create my own version of Bitcoin too, that doesn't mean it has any control over anything or any influence whatsoever. The fact that I can create my own Bitcoin fork doesn't change the fact that a small group controls most of the mining capacity just like the ability for anyone to create a unions doesn't necessarily give them any control of the means of production. This is only decentralization in your imagination.
I don't know what to say... If you don't see the difference between concentration of mining capacity and the inherent decentralization of voting power what can I do? You need an education man, I pity you. Oh I see, now we are talking about voting power and not collectivization of the means of production. Like I said, constantly shifting definitions. |
|
|
|
Yes I've never gave the example of the French unions controlling heavy parts of the industry and the whole healthcare and retirement system until 1995.
I'm tired of you and your inability to read. Stay in your ignorance, keep thinking free market is the only possibility in the world. So now unions are not centralized organizations are they? Keep shifting those definitions each time flaws in your argument are pointed out, clearly it is working well for you. Not in France no. Anyone can create one, completely free process without any kind of limit. You just have to be a group of at least 2. Then you get a decision power proportionated to the number of people in your group. The only thing you can do to get even more decentralized is by giving a voting power directly to each individual. That's what I said before. Again, read. Stop talking for an hour please and fucking read. What does the fact that anyone can create one have anything to do with the fact it is a hierarchical organization with a centralized control structure? I can create my own version of Bitcoin too, that doesn't mean it has any control over anything or any influence whatsoever. The fact that I can create my own Bitcoin fork doesn't change the fact that a small group controls most of the mining capacity just like the ability for anyone to create a unions doesn't necessarily give them any control of the means of production. This is only decentralization in your imagination. |
|
|
|
I was honestly just trying to help, but you obviously don't want it, so I'll butt out.
Have a terrific day! Sure you were cupcake, sure you were. |
|
|
|
Yes I've never gave the example of the French unions controlling heavy parts of the industry and the whole healthcare and retirement system until 1995.
I'm tired of you and your inability to read. Stay in your ignorance, keep thinking free market is the only possibility in the world. So now unions are not centralized organizations are they? Keep shifting those definitions each time flaws in your argument are pointed out, clearly it is working well for you. |
|
|
|
You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me.
You're not being red trusted for holding an opinion. This is what the referenced link says: Reading up made it evident that you are dishonest, a hypocrite and are intentionally trying to distract away from the users that are actually willing to objectively look into this (and apparently attack those as well). You were doing quite a bit of attacking in that thread. Maybe if you would have presented your opinion in a more neutral tone, it wouldn't have been seen as an attack designed to distract attention from the main issue, and possibly silence others. It all really depends on whether the majority of the community agrees more often with you or with Lauda. You'll really have to make a better case for yourself if you want your rating removed. I would honestly suggest being more humble and open-minded - and less hostile - going into the future. Right, the fact that it was left now for an event that happened months ago is just a total coincidence is it? By "attacking" you mean pointing out the accusers have no evidence of theft and a history of making baseless accusations against OGNasty? Now my tone needs to be approved by you? Silencing others? How exactly, by disagreeing with them and receiving unjustified negative ratings? Are you fucking kidding me? If you did any more projecting you would need to get a part time job at a movie theater. I would honestly suggest you go fuck yourself with your feigned moderation. |
|
|
|
|
I am curious how long the moderators will continue ignoring these off topic posts.
|
|
|
|
"direct control" = centralization
WTF? you kidding right? Direct control by the population is the DEFINITION of decentralization! Stop talking please, just buy a dictionnary and come back after!!! Yet this magical unexplained control system still only exists in your mind and not in reality. You keep shifting definitions all you like. Decentralized collectivization is an oxymoron. |
|
|
|
Yes, the whole impeachment proceeding is only unifying his base and turning off the undecided.
I think this is just a conservative talking point. Trump never had very much support. The only reason he won is because Hillary was so despised by both parties. She still managed to win the popular vote, by a lot. I think her problem is unique. As I've said before, you never heard about a "Never Biden" or "Never Bernie" camp. To get an idea of how out of touch the majority of the forum (P&S, anyway) is with what's actually happening in politics, here are the results from a poll I posted back in October. https://i.imgur.com/tgvh0nW.pngThe majority of votes went to "He won't be impeached." The majority of voters in this poll chose "Yes" to the question will Trump win a second term. Quite frankly, you guys just don't know as much as you think you do. Right now I'd put "Other" at about 60% and Trump at 40%. Most people here I'm sure are 1o0% TRuMp. |
|
|
|
It turns out that explosives can buy anyone in the sports shop. Scared for his life becomes of such news
Believe me, the explosives can be made from simple substances that are used at home. You don't even know what linking they give such an effect. So bans will do nothing. Explosives can be made from easily available substances, but the potency of such explosives will be very low. If you want to make very powerful explosives, then you need to purchase a large number of hard-to-obtain chemicals. Tannerite itself is easily created with commonly available substances. The possibility of effectively regulating this is about zero. If you do it right, you can blow up a house with a bag of flour and some firecrackers. It is even possible to make high explosives from common grocery store items. All this FUD over Tannerite is just more fear mongering designed to push the fearful population into the warm regulatory bosom of the state with no other result than removing freedoms. |
|
|
|
I can place Amazon orders across UK, France and Germany, Spain and I'm looking for partners who can pick up(lockers or from a address) and reseller and pay back my small percentage share which is around 15-20%..
if interested PM me thanks. see you soon. There is a high probability this user is looking for some one to receive and fence his stolen goods. Be aware. |
|
|
|
Of course you are the great and powerful Nutulduhhhh and you get to declare anyone who challenges your baseless conclusions as "dishonest" and "less than honorable", and your baseless conclusions as facts, then justify the use of the trust system in retribution for challenging this conclusion.
To me, all you are doing is declaring "facts" to be "baseless conclusions". That in itself is dishonest. I don't need your approval to hold an opinion on the matter. Neither does anybody. You are free to your opinion, but my "opinion" is invalid and is deserving of a negative trust rating is it? Sounds rational to me. |
|
|
|
You seem to be more concerned about this than Theymos is, considering it was his property, I would say there is no conflict. I said the baseless accusations need to stop, I never said anything about FUD or trust ratings you wingbat. Also, just for the record, I was paid a flat fee for my signature and get paid no more or less depending on how much I post. Also for the record, I have no allegiance to OGNasty and have barely even talked to him. I am just tired of you fucking obsessive loons leaving a trail of diarrhea everywhere you go. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
