Holy shit your still doing this I bought years ago!
Yes sir, new stuff all the time! How did you like it? (please don't give specifics on what was inside so as to not spoil the fun) |
|
|
|
Indeed, so many people on both sides make money arresting, fining and imprisoning people. I like the idea of the legality being the state's prerogative. States that don't want to have anything to do with it can ban it and the users/producers can just move elsewhere. Would also increase competition among states where it's legal to produce.
The plant kratom was showing quite effective for treating pain and helping people beat addition, especially opiate addiction. Of course the federal government immediately sought to schedule it in spite of its very mild psychoactive effects. Luckily push back from the general public prevented this. Funny how any useful medicinal plants are quickly regulated out of use of the general public. |
|
|
|
|
Pics & prices? Can you link it on Amazon so I know for sure which model number? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
2 KillYou coins and a picture of TMAN's testicle. WTF is a KillYou coin, and right or left? Also wasn't it expensive to rent an electron microscope for that pic? |
|
|
|
2 Chicken( Male + Female ) + 13 Eggs !
What kind of chickens, and what country do you live in? |
|
|
|
What I did do is quickly skim over them but haven't dug into them to see what's really there. Either way, I'm not the one posting things that say they contain something they may not. I didn't see anything about those things during my skim through them which is why I didn't say anything definitive about it at the time. I could have done what some of you do is just make claims about things that then wouldn't be backed up with fact, and then refuse to admit I was wrong or could be wrong. Cause it's all about spreading propaganda as opposed to any truth right? TL;DR "I didn't read the source documents. Your conclusions are propaganda and my conclusions are truth." Didn't make any conclusions and don't have any at this point. You just like to twist things to mislead etc in order to suit your agenda. I see, so you aren't concluding it is "propaganda" before even reading it? Good show. Didn't make any conclusions and don't have any at this point. You just like to twist things to mislead etc in order to suit your agenda.
Don't waste your time. This is what he does, every time he opens a thread here: 1. Posts some misleading b.s. from a disreputable source and declares it to be fact. 2. Defends his b.s. by conducting a series of long-winded personal attacks against anyone who questions the source. 3. Claims victory when people get tired of attempting to help him to understand how he is wrong. That's all he's ever done. It's all he'll ever do. Whenever TS posts a new topic here, just assume the opposite is true, and then watch his wrongness unfold in more ways than was previously imaginable. When I saw him open this thread, I knew Trump must be in some serious shit. And lo and behold, he is. Meanwhile Biden has his biggest lead in the primary polls since Sept. 2nd. Whatever TS was hoping to unfold over the last month, the exact opposite has happened. For posterity: Oh plenty will come of this, don't worry cupcake. Biden's legacy is over, and many other high level officials are going to face prosecution. You argue about meaningless peripheral issues all you like. The truth is coming out, and your butt is going to be so hurt you are going to suffer a prolapse from the sheer force of your head being yanked out of your ass when the news breaks.
When's the news going to break TS? You honestly still believe Trump isn't going to be impeached? When is it going to happen Nutilduhhhhhhhh? When are you going to produce those subpoenas. When is the proof of the Russia collusion coming out? The proof against Kavanaugh? How far do you want to go back? Seems to me like you are projecting your way down your own list. |
|
|
|
HA - HA. First, she blamed the entire Russian section for not being friendly and did not vote for her “chic” dress. Now she has come here to influence everyone else. Looks like this lady wants to force her art into. We tried to explain to her that you should not be so intrusive as a fly. But it doesn't seem to work for her.  Now she will declare that the whole forum is angry and does not allow her to develop in her business. She is right, this forum is jammed packed full of cunts with nothing better to do than harass people minding their own business. |
|
|
|
What I did do is quickly skim over them but haven't dug into them to see what's really there. Either way, I'm not the one posting things that say they contain something they may not. I didn't see anything about those things during my skim through them which is why I didn't say anything definitive about it at the time. I could have done what some of you do is just make claims about things that then wouldn't be backed up with fact, and then refuse to admit I was wrong or could be wrong. Cause it's all about spreading propaganda as opposed to any truth right? TL;DR "I didn't read the source documents. Your conclusions are propaganda and my conclusions are truth." |
|
|
|
Are you on drugs or something? What the hell are you talking about? My boss? WTF.
My "point", is that you just seem to post propaganda as opposed to actually validating it. Did you go and look at the actual documents to see if the article was accurate or not? They're available. I've downloaded them but haven't had the time to dig into them yet. What about you? Do you even care about the truth or just to spread stuff that could be misinformation cause it suits your bias? [doesn't verify documents and makes conclusions] [chastises others for not verifying documents] |
|
|
|
....
The whole "Biden didn't want Burisma to be investigated" is a false narrative.
Are you sure about that? Yes. The Burisma investigation, which stems from incidents that occurred before Hunter Biden ever had anything to do with it, had been shelved by the time Shokin was removed as prosecutor. Just because Hunter Biden was on the board of a potentially corrupt company it doesn't mean he knew it was corrupt or played any role in furthering its corruption, despite whatever Quickseller or PrimeNumber7 has to say about it. That timeline is absolutely false. "The e-mail shows that the meeting was for the purpose of getting Ukraine to back off of its corruption probe of Burisma. The e-mail, shown below, argued that Burisma had been unfairly targeted by Shokin without evidence and outside of due process. It also noted very pointedly that two “high profile US citizens” worked with Burisma, and named Hunter Biden explicitly: https://hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/burisma-1-768x360.png" https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/05/uh-oh-hunter-bidens-name-pops-2016-state-dept-e-mails-discussing-end-burisma-corruption-probe/Are you really arguing that Hunter Biden was just some unwitting bystander as a board member of some "formerly corrupt" company which suddenly ceased being corrupt once Hunter joined the board? Are you saying a board member of the company not only was unaware of these operations in the past, but continued to be unaware of the attempts to cover up these facts as he was on the board? Seems like a long list of "coincidences" You aren't interested in rule of law, you are interested only in serving your bias. You need only insinuation and speculation to condemn Trump and anyone associated with him, but you are eager to ignore documented factual evidence of very high level corruption when it is the party that serves your bias. You are either a liar or a moron, or both. |
|
|
|
....
The whole "Biden didn't want Burisma to be investigated" is a false narrative.
Are you sure about that? Yes. The Burisma investigation, which stems from incidents that occurred before Hunter Biden ever had anything to do with it, had been shelved by the time Shokin was removed as prosecutor. Just because Hunter Biden was on the board of a potentially corrupt company it doesn't mean he knew it was corrupt or played any role in furthering its corruption, despite whatever Quickseller or PrimeNumber7 has to say about it. What about what The State Department has to say about it? https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/state-department-releases-detailed-accounts-biden-ukraine-corruption |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
