Cool story bro. Don't you have some calls to the IRS and SEC to make? What happened to BPIP Vod, does baby need his baba? The forum not "neutral" enough for you? Funny how that happens when you act like a deranged lunatic trying to sick government agencies on its more trusted members because your butt hurts.

So are you going to bother telling me what you think I did to you?

EDIT: FYI, because you are obviously retarded, I thought I should spell it out for you. I didn't add ABitNut back to my trust list, he never left it. I was not on default trust, now I am. I was going to remove him to help you out, but then you left me frivolous negative ratings and started talking mad shit.

Trust me I haven't thought about you for a second until we last spoke a few months ago, and the 3 seconds it would have taken to add ABitNut back on to my trust list just to spite you would be a wasted 3 seconds. Please do cry some more about this situation entirely of your own creation though, the threats of more negative ratings from your nobody alts are a nice touch too. All very entertaining.

What exactly did I do to you? Didn't you just get done chastising me for a negative rating I didn't even give you? I don't owe you shit little boy. I offered you help and you spit in my face. Now you can deal with the results of me doing nothing for you. Cry me a river.

bump

Don't participate in speculative work. https://www.nospec.com/

If you hang on to them for a few years they might be worth something. As is right now, just an interesting thing to show kids what $20 used to look like. Maybe hang onto the more crisp ones and spend the rest.

Can anyone tell me what I might expect to get for these? I don't really follow Polymerbit notes and only purchased them as a set to get some other included collectables. This is why I did not include a price.

Maybe you can get him to post an actively updated index of which UIDs belong to which usernames. He seems to appreciate the external data aggregator type services, so I don't see why he wouldn't if he has the time.

Aw look who it is. So I conspired to make ABitNut leave you a negative rating years ago, then worked to get on DT all to make sure some retard I don't even know and at the time had zero interactions with, got a negative rating did I? I know you are probably too brain damaged to remember, but YOU ASKED ME for help and I was the one trying to help you get that rating removed. Of course once you got what you wanted you started talking shit and threw me under a bus for my troubles. I guess in your partially functional brain stem I would never be back on default trust, so it didn't matter because you got what you wanted one way or another. Guess you were wrong and you told the one guy who could help you to fuck off and left him a negative rating yourself. Oopsey doopsey.

"StonerStanley   2019-12-27      Dishonest person who manipulate the trust list and opinion."


Hmmm... sounds pretty prescient to me. Thanks for being the perfect example of my point by the way.

I don't even necessarily disagree with you. The problem is that "lying" is often subjective and is subject to large amounts of interpretation regardless if you are right or not. My opinion on the matter is the ratings you left are counter productive to your own goals, and your fight against these lies would better be served by removing those ratings and simply drawing attention to this abuse via public discussion. You seem to be some what familiar with my history here. I shed no tears for the forum bitstasi. I am speaking only from a position of what I think would honestly help you serve your stated goals here. Right now your abuse of the trust system strips you of any moral authority in the situation, removing those ratings gives you a distinct advantage and would make people much more willing to hear your grievances. That is all. No one can make you do anything, just offering some friendly advice.

It is actually a solid mass that apparently can be flipped around. The wonders of thotty modification.




Here is a picture of Dom DeLuise as a pallet cleanser.

I have been in contact with individuals who have had psychotic breaks and thought they were targeted. I have also been in contact with others who have seemingly been otherwise coherent and for all I know are actually being targeted. With the technology available today it is hard to tell, but I would spend some time thinking very carefully and doing some self examination if it is in your head or if it is actually happening. Statistically speaking, you are probably having some psychological issues, but it is a fact that targeted individuals are a real thing, and I am familiar with some of the technology they use. The reasons for being targeted vary. Some times it is a pragmatic reason such as for money or revenge. Some times it is just the fact that they are an easy target and they are psychopaths who enjoy torturing people. There are some organizations for targeted individuals who may be able to at least offer you some support either way.

A few things worth trying.

-Travel
-Stay with others
-Get a physical examination from a doctor you know
-Sweep your home for surveillance equipment
-Set up hidden audio and video recording gear in your home
-Report any externally observable suspicious activity to the police
-Start publishing a vlog
-Contact local support groups for TIs

There are other things that can help, but it really depends on the symptoms you are suffering. Whatever your problem is good luck.

It makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside attacking a source because its popular to doesn't it? Almost like a little mini version of virtue signalling. How many times do I have to explain to you Zero Hedge is primarily an aggregator linking stories from all over, in this case Politico. Of course if it was just Politico linked you wouldn't be able to take that opportunity to virtue signal for your dopamine hit now would you?

The difference is what you describe as my "actions" rely heavily on opinions, interpretation of my words, and just flat out imagination. Your actual actions are documented in your long history of abusing the trust system, and is not a matter of debate. One only needs to review your left ratings. You break out the NO U though if you like, no one is buying it.

Cool story bro. You play your denial games all you like, the record of your actions is clear.

I don't know about that. You have a long history of trying to justify the use of the trust system to penalize people whom you have a difference of opinion with. Your negative rating left for me for example, supposedly for a months old discussion, but left exactly as I was becoming more vocal pointing out the lack of evidence in accusations against OGNasty leaves the motivations behind it very transparent. Of course you know I am not involved in any kind of fraudulent activity but the words I speak make it difficult for you to target your opponents with impunity, so you feel it necessary to leverage the trust system to try to coerce people to cooperate with your opinions and goals.

I don't know a whole lot about the background of either user here or their activities, but upon summary review of left trust ratings, it seems to me both parties are being frivolous and or abusive of the trust system. Without condemning KTChampions here, not knowing much about their activities, it seems they are using the trust system to leave ratings related to forum rules, which really should be reported and handled by staff and not be dealt with using the trust system.

johhnyUA, while I agree with his general consensus that there are cliques of users controlling the trust system here and purposefully keeping certain individuals and groups out, his use of the trust system here is not what it is intended for and is largely counterproductive to his stated goals. At the end of the day you are just abusing the trust system in the polar opposite way.

All of this said, you are each technically free to leave these ratings for whatever reason you decide, but the uses I see here are antithetical to the purpose of the trust system and the cohesion of this community in general. The trust system is supposed to be a way to help warn users of and prevent theft and fraud. These uses are counterproductive to those goals on both sides.

I would advise johhnyUA to remove these ratings and make his grievances via public discussion. While I disagree with KTChampion's use of the trust system, I find the types who take it upon themselves to be forum police most often are unwilling to change their behavior. The only effective method of combating this is public discussion of the damages it causes, not by using the trust system to fight out these battles.

Not true at all. I would say it is accurate that most Americans don't feel one way or another about Russia. Most Americans don't concern themselves with international affairs. You wouldn't get this impression from our media, but normal folks really aren't concerned with such things. I personally think Russia could be an important ally in keeping China in check, but unfortunately there has been a lot of unnecessary antagonism towards Russia from US leadership. I would wager this is in an effort to keep the US and RU from aligning efforts against globalist and internationalist forces. The US and Russia actually share quite a bit of common culture, so of course the strategy is divide and conquer.

Who is Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi?

Yes. Yes. Maybe.

-Former "liberal"