american media cnn, and ny times have sickly become racism tv.
everything is about minorities demographic change, race, never it is about infrastructure, production, industry. social security, education etc.
Ofcourse they want us distracted from the actually important things, and what better way than also dividing us at the same time with their racist identity politics? How many birds can you count killed by a single stone from their actions? Take our freedom of speech.. Take our freedom to keep and bear arms.. Weaken our country with their global warming conspiracies, immigration, poor fiscal decision shilling, shilling degeneracy, anti-christian, anti-traditionalism, anti-family etc. etc. .. Their goal is to conquer the powerful United States of America and must stupefy, weaken, and divide us in order to accomplish their goal, and eventually the entire world, as they have almost succeeded in Europe.. This is obvious if you have the ability to see the big picture.. The rights the USA affords under the constitution is the final stop gap between human rights and globalist totalitarianism. With the USA subjugated to this technocratic dictatorship, there will no longer be a place where people can point to and say "I want to be free like them". This isn't just some USA #1 bullshit, the USA is host to a very rare and precious set of freedoms human civilization has never known, and it has not existed for very long and will cease to exist if we allow it to be destroyed. The United States government has plenty of flaws, but those flaws don't negate the value of the most precious ideals humanity has ever known contained within it. |
|
|
|
For me, I think vaccination should be a decision for oneself. An adult should make a decision while child should be vaccinated by default up until when he can make a decision as to whether he wants to continue or not. For someone who have lived or know someone who has been plagued by polio would know that vaccination is a serious issue that children or parents be given the option to opt out from that kind of treatment because its simply a way to excuse the life of unending pain.
Im not sure why people would opt not to be vaccinated as they're already proven to work. And parents chooaing fo not get their children vaccinated is beyond me. I mean, if you're thinking about the welfare of your kids, then you should know that you're putting then at bigger risks if you don't give them shots. Most common diseases that killed a lot of people before can be negated by simple vaccines. You are asking the wrong question. If I told there was a chance your hamburger was poisoned and you refused to eat hamburger, would you consider it a valid retort to claim you refuse to eat and that food is proven to nourish you, or would you just skip the hamburger and eat carrots? People love simplifying this debate into pro and con. The real debate is over the fact that working vaccines are not exclusive of poisonous additives, and no one should be compelled to use them. Framing the whole debate as if people are only denying vaccination is a thing completely is just horse shit. |
|
|
|
Pajeet trades for pajeet users. Next? Just make up whatever you like and pretend it is the truth... look at all these Pajeets in my trust ratings... BayAreaCoins, Hhampuz, subSTRATA, AT101ET, teeGUMES, Steamtyme, Blazed, Lesbian Cow, chronicsky, dazedfool, minerjones, DaveF, ezeminer, notserp, wheelz1200, OgNasty, Gyfts, monbux, DiamondCardz, monkeynuts... Literally almost all of them are pajeets. You are outdated with your information about this list of individuals with which you thought you had a point, but you failed royally.  What is more trust worthy is pretending to be a cop on the internet and harassing people right? Don't you have some BCH stolen via escrow to get back to?
More lies and more reasons to give you more updated negatives, which I just did. Are you going to create a new reason for me each day? You are a pajeet. Man, that was way easy to declare you irrelevant, I should have done it years ago. Just unilaterally declaring you irrelevant is way easier than using logic. All the evidence of you being involved in using your position as escrow to embezzle funds is detailed here. That kind of seems way worse than anything I have even ever been accused of. I am offering a bounty of 5 merit to anyone who can find the quote from Theymos where he explicitly states deleting and adding negative ratings over and over again in order to manipulate the trust system is considered by him to be abuse of the trust system. I looked but I can't remember when or where I read it, I just know he said it at one point. |
|
|
|
Being a bad trader still doesn't make him a scammer.
He misrepresented his abilities in every way possible, from overinflating the importance of backtest data to claiming to have a bankroll he did not have to altering his graphs to reflect a performance that did not exist. Yet you're still defending him. Objecting to the methodology used to tag him does not equal defending him. If we gave the police unlimited power to search people's homes without a warrant, no doubt they would find plenty of drug dealers and other criminals. The problem with that is it also strips the innocent of all of their rights. That has always been my complaint with this issue, it was based on speculation and guesses, not facts. |
|
|
|
|
Everything else aside, it would be a big loss to lose one of the last places on the internet where people can still speak freely.
|
|
|
|
"trading crypto" is not what happened here. CryptoSparks had no ability to do what he was claiming (risk-free winning trades) but with the help of scam apologists like yourself he still managed to collect a few hundred bucks to gamble away on his ridiculous leveraged martingale bets. Will you support the flag now or are the red flags still not "concrete" enough? The flag requires "concrete red flags", I.E. evidence, not just suspicion. This is not a valid flag.
Being a bad trader still doesn't make him a scammer. |
|
|
|
Techy, it's as if sorry you just found out Santa isn't real.  I'm gonna give you some more time to sober up on reality. Your jealousy is directing your anonymous anger to the wrong people. Nothing to win here... I think the word you are looking for is "indiscriminate" anger. |
|
|
|
Okay...
Doughnut_Headers?
That is actually what they call it, doughnut heads xD |
|
|
|
Ok, you've deflected this thread away from your trust abuse. 2020 will bring you a lot more red I think, no matter how upset you get. I know you would love it if it were, but this thread isn't about me. |
|
|
|
Too bad for him he cant just transplant some of his enormous ego onto his midget dick. He belongs in a rubber room for his own good and the good of society in general.
The jealousy is strong with you, isn't it? If only there was something to be jealous of... |
|
|
|
You don't get targeted because you sit on the sidelines and don't have strong opinions on anything. The trust system is often abused as a tool to coerce people into silence.
Point and thread - state your opinion and you'll get trust abuse from Techy. This thread is about Lauda's trust system abuse. |
|
|
|
So Vod is basically admitting what I said a long time ago about his actions being so reckless that he is putting the forum itself at risk by snitching to the IRS (and now the SEC?) on the forum's treasurer?
I guess Vod is willing to take the entire forum down as long as he can take down OGNasty.. Too bad for him he cant just transplant some of his enormous ego onto his midget dick. He belongs in a rubber room for his own good and the good of society in general. |
|
|
|
Pajeet trades for pajeet users. Next? Just make up whatever you like and pretend it is the truth... look at all these Pajeets in my trust ratings... BayAreaCoins, Hhampuz, subSTRATA, AT101ET, teeGUMES, Steamtyme, Blazed, Lesbian Cow, chronicsky, dazedfool, minerjones, DaveF, ezeminer, notserp, wheelz1200, OgNasty, Gyfts, monbux, DiamondCardz, monkeynuts... Sorry if I left any pajeets out. Lets also brush aside over 8 years of trade history, amounts trusted to me in the thousands of dollars on many occasions, and I managed a project with a market cap of over 10 million dollars. What is more trust worthy is pretending to be a cop on the internet and harassing people right? Don't you have some BCH stolen via escrow to get back to? |
|
|
|
Lauda continues to remove and replace their abusive negative rating on my account, multiple/many times by now, which I find quite humorous, so I figure I'll give this thread a bump..
I haven't bothered tracking it down, but I do remember Theymos explicitly stating directly that this is an abuse of the trust system. |
|
|
|
Cool story bro. Don't you have some calls to the IRS and SEC to make? What happened to BPIP Vod, does baby need his baba? The forum not "neutral" enough for you? Funny how that happens when you act like a deranged lunatic trying to sick government agencies on its more trusted members because your butt hurts.
And again - still - always - you post nothing but deflection. You don't belong anywhere near DT. Deflecting from what exactly? Your very on topic posts? Get medicated nutbar. |
|
|
|
Ah shit... if only there was some way of warning people that anyone dealing with CryptoSparks is at a high risk of losing money. If only people knew trading crypto was risky in general... |
|
|
|
If I have a strong opinion for people choosing BSV above BTC for being mentally ill and difunctional ... If I have a strong opinion for saying the r0ach is an internet troll who I will chose not to trust with send and receive anything, though I never saw him scamming anybody so I will not tag him for such thing, I would tag to take care with reading his content, he could bring some bad ideas into naive people  If I have a strong opinion for knowing nobody can send me PM's for trust him or him and I would follow (if someone would suggest something that I could read and chose what I do NP of-course, but I will never be able of being controlled to do something) If I have a strong opinion for that what I do I'll be standing behind my decision always I do more BTC-talking and stuff as I don't do much trading or generating income on the forum so for that matter I will obviously be less involved in such things, the only thing I did was buying a lot of stuff where I always have send money/ BTC first and receive items later, I have always been treated prompt and A+++ wise, so obviously I have given those people some good trust as the ones I had some RL deals/dealing with. I have participated in given and receiving some trust ratings, which days must I count?? Are any of these positions at all controversial or really under dispute? No. Good for you you can join bandwagons. Just do me a favor and stop pretending like everything is peachy when you are picking flowers while others are plowing the fields. |
|
|
|
Many are calling it up on them selfs by not being if one is trustworthy and don't scam or treat anyone wrong then they will be left alone, if one isn't honest or whatever then they just have to deal with the consequences its as easy as that, nobody has fun or amusement of wrongfully saying somebody is a scammer while he didn't do anything wrong.... Nobody called me a scammer on the forum as Ii never was dishonest to anyone as well.... That go's for all the members I write and talk with, non of them have been negatively treated ... WHY, cause they don't scam another person..... But when a person isn't honest and been red tagged then please just carry the tag whiteout complaining... Didn't read who this is actually about, just talking in general You don't get targeted because you sit on the sidelines and don't have strong opinions on anything. The trust system is often abused as a tool to coerce people into silence. Of course as a spectator you enjoy not having to deal with it. Become a participant and count the days. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the replies. To clarify, this has been an issue for me for a long time, not just because it is the holidays. I understand the wanting to stay out of disputes, but the problem is this aversion to making a choice ironically will lead to more disputes and off topic BS. I am fine with keeping things on topic, but if I can't get off topic posts removed then I am often compelled to respond to them off topic. I am not going to sit idly by and be attacked by various clowns for the sake of forum rules if they aren't going to be enforced, and I am sure I am not the only one.
So as you see the aversion to get involved will in fact result in more off topic posting, then eventually people start ignoring the rule completely, then the mods are forced to go on a rampage again to reinstate the standard. IMO it would be best to just do your best to make objective decisions about these kinds of reports instead of just avoiding them.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
