I'm talking about now.  
Trump has been in office for almost 3 year.
Why isn't Hillary locked up?
Why hasn't Trump appointed an independent prosecutor like he promised?

Imagine how happy it would make his base.  

Why do you think nobody is pushing this issue?  Why isn't Hannity and Tucker bringing it up?

I think it's because they know the answer.



Well, for starters he tried to hide the 140k hush money payment from the FEC by having his lawyer make the payment with a shell company.  He then repaid the lawyer monthly for the next year.

Whether you like it or not, this is a federal crime, and there's more than a scrap of evidence.

The OLC opinion that says you can't indict a sitting president makes this unlikely.

He's already an unindicted co-conspirator in at least one felony.

Now you really pissed me off. You motherfucker, you know nothing about being poor and eating from the dumpsters.  I was fucking homeless, ate from the dumpsters, and slept in public parks.  You little twit.  That is who you are, you know shit and you think you can save the world with your bullshit propaganda which does nothing but instills hope in other lazy, criminal minds.

So shut the fuck up with your bullshit.

You know shit, are lazy as fuck and are looking for an easy way out, you will die poor, so will your children and grandchildren.

This is what happens when you give greedy capitalists control over a basic utility that everyone depends on.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/11/us/california-power-outage-friday/index.html

Change a few names and just imagine the outrage:
   Trump Jr gets put on board of Ukraine power Co, for lots of money with no qualifying experience. Some Ukraine lawyer opens investigation into that company. Trump Sr calls and tells Ukraine Pres that investigator needs fired, or else US will withhold aid funding. Investigator get fired, Ukraine gets US tax dollars, Trump Jr keeps wealthy position.
   How do you think that would play out.

It's ok when they do it, but god forbid a Republican even entertain the thought

You realize there were plenty of good reason to insist Ukraine got rid of the corrupt prosecutor that have nothing to do with Bidens son, right?

Also, Obama and the rest of the G8 leaders agreed that they wouldn't provide aid as long as the prosecutor was fired. Biden just delivered the message.

Also, telling a country you won't help them unless they do something isn't extortion.

If there were enough evidence to convict Biden, he would be indicted by the DOJ already.  Same with Hillary.

^Its not proactive.  Excessive wealth and hoarding is already a form of violence.  Mitigating that is defense of said violence.

It is completely based on reality.   You are only using basic intuition and preconceived ideas about how things worked and ignoring data and research that sometimes provides counterintuitive results.  

I understand how one can start off thinking that people will reproduce infinitely but there is a mountain of research and real-world evidence that shows the more education women have, the less they reproduce.  Nations with higher human devleopment have lower birth rates and many of the highest, most socialized nations with large safety nets and welfare actually have birth rates below replacement.  This is because women who have more education end up with physical autonomy and the ability to afford contraception, birth control and pursuit of professional careers.  They end up delaying motherhood and end up with only a few years of fertility by the time they are settled.  

https://www.economist.com/international/2019/02/02/thanks-to-education-global-fertility-could-fall-faster-than-expected

Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Iceland are all under 2 children per woman.  Certainly not infinite reproduction despite universal access to education, healthcare, shelter and food.  Not only do these countries still function, but they are all among the most well-off in the world.  This is not communism at all and its definitely not the crap you call communism.  

Meanwhile look at all the countries with the high rates of births and they are all countries with high levels of poverty, poor education, and poor healthcare.  The correlation and causation are undeniable.

This part:


So what crimes did they commit?


Oh, you mean these guys?


And look...

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2019/10/1862/1048/AP_19270560522716.jpg

There's a picture of them with this oily looking guy on the left, who is... drum roll... Donald Trump Jr.! Oooh would you look at that: the presidents son is carousing with people under investigation, who just happened to have sent money to a Trump super PAC!

But let me guess: its just more witch hunt right? And that statement is nowhere near an example of "rules for theeee but not for meeeeeeee" blatant hypocrisy, right?

Thanks for the mini Stalin, I'm an alt of Cracked5 though, not mOgliE but I guess for you all left French are the same.

It doesn't matter, the question is clear: is violence against rich people justified?

The correct answer is thus "yes sometimes". Because if rich people attack you need to defend yourself.

Answering "no never" can only imply two things:
1/ you suck it up so much to rich people that if they attack you you spread your ass more
2/ you think rich people will never ever attack you

Well, now you've called me a hypocrite twice.

Good, I'm glad you're satisfied with this example and I don't have to compile all the instances of you calling people a hypocrite in the past, that would take weeks.


I support all of their policy positions?? Wow, project much? Of course not. Only others do that. Just like how only other people can be hypocritical. There's no way you could be these things. 

You should have realized you weren't perfect when you got excluded from DT 4 and a half years ago. Your unwavering approach of never admitting error or exhibiting the slightest trace of humility hasn't exactly paid off since then.

But this is obfuscated by the fact that most people don't know that they are reading the words of a bought account. There is no honesty or redeemable qualities in your arguments, you're simply trying to defend borderline evil behavior for your own selfish financial reasons.

This is ridiculous!

How can 80% of Americans feel that "violence is never justified against the richs"??

You're the citizens of a country that has nearly never known peace, that has part of its constitution ensuring that you always have the means to defend yourself, but you're against violence when it comes to rich people??

You don't see the contradiction here? xD

Any normal human being should answer that violence can be justified. There are cases where violence is the only answer. Otherwise what's the point of your guns?

This is same for almost every countries around the world. It's considered a female won't fake about the matter. And no female who have provided a consent would ever blame her partner.

It's not that a court would not look for any evidence but there are enough to prove you were with some female at some time in a closed place, you could be convicted on the sole testimony of the female.

There are many cases of conditional consent which involves promises or blackmailing that can't be considered a full consent. A consent of child or a mentally unstable person and even a person with depression in some case can't be considered as a consent.

So, if you are having sex with someone, make sure she's okay with it and would be okay even in the future.
Having a monogamous relation would save you from many troubles. But again you need to keep her happy as martial rape are also a punishable crime in most of the world.

But...it's an investigation.  There has been no verdict.  What happened to innocent until proven guilty!  Witch Hunt!! Never before has Fox News treated a former vice President so unfairly!!!  SAD!!!!

PS: I'm not a Democrat.