a. mar a lago was trumps house
meaniing he set the guest list.
b. the video of the lawyer said that trump had info that helped the case against epstein
c. the video with the lawyer was talking about virginia roberts who was raped at 17 meaning that to be introduced to epstein shw had to be younger than 17.. (thats how time flows.. intro, then assault)
its logic.. atleast review the evidence and dont review how deep you can stick head in the sand Did this happen or didn't it? You seem to have revised your claim. 1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES I would take the time to explain the massive gaps in your logic, but everyone else already sees and you don't care, so lets just skip it. |
|
|
|
1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote.
even funnier is techshares own link at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago who owned mar a lago trump 1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote. Also, tell me how is it you came to be aware what happened in Trumps mind, and how exactly you expect to prove this?
and also quotes in 2002 from trump http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/ And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges.
Ive known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy, Trump booms from a speakerphone.
Hes a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it Jeffrey enjoys his social life. oh and yes i quoted your quotes of you quoting my quotes where i quoted the sources. that way you cant keep playing ignorant because you quoted me giving you the information. thus obviously you cannot pretend to have never seen the sources before P.S trump banned epstein in 2008. yt was quoting him in 2002 as someone that liked young girls. trump was partying with epstein and had under 18's attending the party. (virginia roberts) You also quoted yourself as my quote. Don't do that, I don't want your words ever confused for mine. See that's interesting speaking of quotes... 1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES They said no such thing in the video, I was just making sure there wasn't some like ultrasonic frequency speech hidden in the clip or something. This is a great example of the kind of bullshit you call evidence along with your Photoshop job. Your interpretations and assumptions are not evidence, that is called fantasy. |
|
|
|
1. the video YOU linked both says that trump invited underage girls to his parties to meet epstein. and how trump knew of epsteins proclivities YEARS before it went to court. and how trump only "banned him from mar-a-lago AFTER IT STARTED TO CAUSE LEGAL ISSUES
2. trump knew about it in the 90's and millenia but didnt distance himself untill AFTER the lawyers started calling trump.
thats not finding out about epstein coz the lawyers said trump provided good info that helped the case
also was the quotes from trump praising epstein for his proclivities
what he then did was just try to distancing himself from being tied to any legal issues AFTER THE FACT. once it started getting dicey with lawyers phone calls
do you not even bother to listen to the video. or just found a website that said it was a trump defence and you blindly accepted a websites summary and linked the video without checking it out 1. Great, just tell me the minute and second mark and quote. Also, tell me how is it you came to be aware what happened in Trumps mind, and how exactly you expect to prove this? 2. Once again, with those psychic abilities being able to know what is in the minds of others you should be working for Mrs. Cleo making the big bucks instead of wasting your time here. Most people would call a claim to know what a person knew and intended at a certain point in time in the past without substantiation a flimsy premise, but you have those special ESP powers, so that doesn't apply here. |
|
|
|
even funnier is techshares own link at 6:50 it shows that one of epsteins victims who was not even 18 was at mar a lago who owned mar a lago trump its funny how tecshare tried to use a link to defend trump. but the link actually reveals trumps involvement That's not funny. What is funny is the pile of shit on your chest. If they were such great pals why did he bar Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago resort after he was exposed? Its almost like I already addressed this and Trump banned him from Mar-a-Lago once he found out... You keep imagineering Trump crimes while the real evidence against Epstein and the Clinton's stacks up to the sky. Maybe some one will buy your pathetic attempts to distract from it. |
|
|
|
This could be called a "derivative" work of art possibly, but it is an original painting with its own features. This is not plagiarism and Yatsan is well within their rights to do this as parodies are also protected. It seems like a few people here are intent on casting aspersions upon Yatsan. |
|
|
|
inb4 game-protect debt outpaces block rewards and we can develop GPcoin
He protec but he also attac. When he gonna give da money bac? |
|
|
|
So the original source of that Biden article is on Interfax-Ukraine... A news site owned by the Russian company Interfax. Interesting thing is that the story seems to have comes from MP Derkach. He seems to be tagged on that site for a variety of similar things about Biden that seemed to have started in, big surprise, October. Just a tad suspect given he's all of a sudden making these sorts of statements. As far as I can tell, his family has been part of the "power structure" there for a long time.
Yeah that's so weird people report on topical subjects in a timely manner. Definitely suspect. |
|
|
|
This is perfect actually. Sanders is the most popular candidate running Democrat, but the DNC will never let him get the nomination. Then at that point a very large percentage of Bernie supporters are going to vote Trump just to make sure their foot is broken off in the ass of the DNC who continues to disenfranchise them, giving Trump a very comfortable margin. Feel the Bern. Bern it all down. |
|
|
|
^^^ Talk, talk, talk. Can't even show a pic, or even a link.  He's got Photoshop. |
|
|
|
|
INB4 some one else points out the irony in some one accusing people who want to expose pedophiles as having child porn in lieu of an argument.
|
|
|
|
Stop confusing the Bitcoin Forum with your beloved 8chan, incel.
How big is your loli collection? I mean in terms of gigabytes? Did anyone hear something? I couldn't hear anything over the overwhelming din of totalitarians justifying silencing free speech by accusing those that support it as being "the other" and less than the general population therefore justifying persecution of them. Never mind, it was probably just a fart in the wind. |
|
|
|
here's a ceeeeraaazzzy theory
let's not be surprised if some internet watchdog brands the whole of bitcointalk.org as a "extremist recruiter's website" because of the people behaving like dickheads in this Politics & Society sub-forum Get real, that's any place people are allowed to speak freely. |
|
|
|
i think its time you stopped taking drugs now.
firstly your defending trump like he is your pop idol.. then in the same breath trying to hide your loyalty by saying anyone that links him to bad stuff is his fan
sorry but your 'cover up' to hide your obsession makes no sense to a sober person.
the only reason why he is mentioned is because clinton is old old news and not a relevant person today. but trump is in the white house right now meaning his actions are relevant as they can affect people.
but your denial of trumps grotesque quotes about his own daughter and other women and even how he has been seen for 15 years having social parties with epstein and cheer leaders and such. just shows how ignorant you are to see the evidence and prfer to be blind to it to defend trump
you said little social intraction and
sorry but blind loyalty is not contagious people wont become trump fans and follow your lead
and people can see your loyalty even if you try to hide it
its just a shame that you dont see it because it looks like you will end up just defending him as if your life depends on it.
you said 'Trump had a minor business relationship with Epstein that fell through, had very little social contact with him,'
i debunked the minor business relationship as theres proof everywhere it was more then a decade of refriendship
i debunked the lack of social contact again via the proof of their interactions lasting over a decade
the only thing i could possibly think you meant was a game of word play
'trump had a minor business relationship'
'trump had a 'underage child' business relationship. meaning he was manager of a child sex trafficking ring alongside epstein..
is that the hint you are trying to suggest?
You aren't linking him to anything. All of your assertions require assumptions, interpretations, and other conclusions generally unsupported by evidence. You winge on about blind loyalty to distract people from your own evident blind hatred. The difference between you and me is I am asking for evidence, you are manufacturing it via interpretation. The relationship between Bill Clinton and Epstein is not equivalent to the relationship between Trump and Epstein, and the assertion that it is is disingenuous and based in your need to have Trump shit on your chest because it is the only way you know to make the pain go away. |
|
|
|
Makes sense. When we were all messing around with it we were saying that it was just a straight image -- had no depth perception or anything like that. Which I guess is to be expected out of something which is just illuminating and is $120.
Big boy toy......
I can only imagine what the government / cia is using.
The real night vison/thermal goggles will instantly make you realize that is a big boy toy. They run off of moonlight and shit like that (or even just star light), its pretty nuts. You don't have to be the government, just spend $500-$5000. Another fun use for the illuminator... take it outside at night and see stars you have never seen because they only give off IR light. |
|
|
|
If you edit the post after the deadline you can act on information that others can't act on. It doesn't matter if you win. Some cheaters don't win but that doesn't make it not a cheat.
I admit editing the post after the deadline is not a good way around, but it definitely doesn't mean I was willing to manipulate the game, I just participated to show interest. So did HH allow you to edit the post after the deadline? It's funny how you dance around the key issue.
Yes, he said me to do so as the price was over lapping with another participant. You can makeup many ways of looking at the situation, but the only truth is none of me or HH had any shady intention behind it. One can make whatever theory's he wants over this like OP. If some of the participant from the spiculation game thread think it was unfair, I would happily back out of the game and still support it fully.An easy way to solve this conundrum would be to preemptively refuse any prize winnings before the fact. Then at that point all any accusations are, are just some weak potential accusation with no harm done. This is an easy way to stamp out any doubt and controversy and turn this into a non-issue. |
|
|
|
gotta laugh at your trump supporter loyalty, but trying to say those calling him out are the trump fetishes
funnier part is how the interview video you linked actually counters your narrative
1. lawyer contacted trump due to having connections - proof trump involved
2. lawyer is happy to drop legal proceedings for a price 'settled for undisclosed amount' - lawyer happy to be bribed to keep quiet
3. trump gave evidence which helped go against epstein - proof trump knew something
4. trump wasnt deposed(financial handshakes) and distanced himself(personally) from epstein only after lawyers got involved.. not as soon as learning about epsteins proclivities a decade earlier
if you make one more post defending trump. then you might as well just war a trump loyalist shirt
also that video proves epstein stuff was going on more than just 2-3 years ago. thus making this topic about a bombshell redundant
again its all been public info for decades
Trump wipes his ass with toilet paper. You know who else wiped their ass with toilet paper? HITLERProof Trump was involved with Hitler. You know who knew something about Hitler? TRUMPProof Trump knew about the concentration camps in WW2 and was complicit. You should seek treatment for Trump Derangement Syndrome, letting people shit on your chest is not hygienic. |
|
|
|
~ There is a brown stain on your chest. You might want to take care of that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
