....
I think the main difference is that Pete is an openly gay man, married to another man. Hillary is an openly straight woman, married to a man.
Naw... He's just not the Chosen One. You and all your Dem friends are getting signals from the fat guys in the back room as usual. Subtle signals, about who you should choose. Just obey, don't question. Or question, but within the allowed confines. What should I question? Pete is openly gay, or Hillary is not openly gay. That's what we're talking about right? No, that is what you are talking about. It amazes me how bigoted people trying to virtue signal are. They run around wagging their fingers at everyone when they are the biggest racist/sexists/homphphobe/etc in the room. I suppose it is an effective technique to distract from that fact. |
|
|
|
Neither of these fuckers give an inch of slack, they deserve none. Take every Satoshi they promise and laugh heartily at them.
Classy as ever. Reminder: Local rules: this particular bet, as well as betting on 2020 presidential election in general, and discussing the election itself is on topic. Everything else, including the usual P&S bullshit (you know who you are) is not.
I am addressing the bet, which is very much on topic. As far as the rest, cry me a river. |
|
|
|
You don't need to pay anything that has to do with that, lol..
I took it to mean more like +150 but I will only ask for +100 or .01 no matter.. I'm not trying to rob anyone..
I'll give you a redo on that if you want @nutildah to make it clear 1:1..
What I said about the whole loan thing was just kidding Twitchy trying to get him to sign a real staked address..
I'm starting to think that the concept of signing agreements is not as well spread as I had thought, or something.. Neither of these fuckers give an inch of slack, they deserve none. Take every Satoshi they promise and laugh heartily at them. |
|
|
|
Thats the whole point. You're finally starting to understand. Most socialists have abandoned things that don't benefit the public and only adopt socialist principles that would benefit the public. I don't think you will find any socialists who want to convert to communism overnight.
Its almost like we are pick and choosing only things that work best and trying to build a world out of those instead of extreme purities of one system or another. Hence why the most successful societies in the world are more "mixed" economies where certain industries are collectivize, publicly owned, workers have a high degree of control, and other industries that work well are privately owned. Its called nuance.
Its only people like you who think giving everyone healthcare is the same thing as giving the government authoritarian control over every aspect of our lives.
No, it is more like you are picking and choosing the parts of reality you want to acknowledge and abandoning or denying the rest. After all, what would relativism be without it Captain Postmodern? |
|
|
|
Scooby: RRUT ROH, Shaggy! I rusta said sumfin right rabout Mr. Rasty
Shaggy: TECSHARE is mad and has no way to deflect! Like letsss get outta heeerree Scoooob!!!!
LOL what you you even trying to do here with this ridiculous sockpuppeting? Give more reasons for TECSHARE to derail the thread? Well done. That's a dog shit Scooby Doo impersonation too. I would love for the thread to stay on topic about how Twitchy Seal is speculating about where those funds went, but since the bullshit story is blown now, the perps have the incentive to derail. |
|
|
|
The biggest difference is that Cenk was describing what other people do while Trump was describing what he does and has done. As Ana pointed out, Cenk was wrong for excusing the bad behavior of other people. Even if it wasn't a joke, this is a bad thing that is permissible by law. At no point did he say anything about taking part in said behavior. Trump on the other hand, bragged about doing something that is specifically illegal in every state. You could say it was a joke, but we have the matching allegations from 25 different women. Do we have anyone accusing Cenk of beastiality?
I accuse Cenk of bestiality. Anyone else want to join me to demonstrate how easy it is to accuse people without proof? Fuck off with your injection of Trump into everything like there aren't a billion threads for you to jerk off horses while you make shit up about Trump. I suspect you secretly want to blow him because you can't stop talking about him. It must have been all the talk of horse cock that got you worked up. FYI bestiality is illegal in most states and that fat sweaty meatball is a degenerate. |
|
|
|
Sooooo he potentially withheld ~1144BTC from his investors in a ponzi passthrough, then was asked some time later to hold 500BTC and get paid BTCs for doing it, which in turn puts him into a highly trusted position to continue swindling others with his nasty fan club for long term gains. All along allowing him to beef up his pad and personal mining operation and using the forum as a sole source of income. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=86854.msg965141#msg965141^^^ plus his home address and identity are well known by many on this forum and his "shareholders" since before 2012. FIRST !! He'd be a fucking moron to run away with 500BTC of forum funds. He's not stupid so stop sucking his dick because he returned these funds. He would have had to change his entire lifestyle, put his entire family at risk, all in the blink of an eye when thermos asked for it back. Not happenin captain. SECOND !! Just because he is not an exit scammer doesn't mean he isn't a LONG CON artist you fucking imbeciles. THIRD !! OG twists the shit out of things at times too, sometimes Trumping others into corners over their words like a genius, sometimes just embarrassing himself over the whole pedo link bullshit..
Otherwise, I very much trust OG..
EDDIE!!! Trumping others into corners over their words is NOT FUCKING GENIUS ---- it's a way to draw attention away from the point someone is making. Fucking politician. Click..
Insane..
INSANE because its a boldfaced lie done to make a statement (i.e. prove a point). Bold: Bold lies, otherwise known as bold-faced or barefaced lies, are obvious to people who hear the lies. These types of lies are so egregious that they’re seen in children more often than adults.
Deceptive: Deceptive lies are crafted carefully and skillfully, with the intent to mislead the person on the receiving end. These lies are often subtle and hard to detect.
Denial: Denial involves refusing to acknowledge something that’s true.
Error: Lies can happen by mistake. People may believe what they’re saying is true, even if that isn’t the case.
Exaggeration: Exaggerations make the false assertion that something is greater or better. For instance, people may try to paint a more attractive picture of themselves by saying they’re more successful than they are. Another example is people over-promising something to make up for a mistake.
Fabrication: Fabrications deliberately make up a story or something that’s not true. These types of lies tend to be overt and can be a mark of desperation.
Minimization: Minimizations lessen the extent of something. Often, these types of lies involve rationalization and take place when people can’t completely deny the truth. Minimizations are the opposite of exaggerations.
Omission: Lies of omission leave out part of the truth. For many people, omission is easier to engage in than other types of lies because omission is passive and doesn’t involve making up anything.
https://online.husson.edu/why-do-people-lie/Why care more bout bold faced lies he done to prove a point, than Mr. Nasty's multiple types of lies? Mr. Nasty been deceptively lying, cleverly omits things -- cherry pickin, exaggerates his lies AND trustiness, Fabricates lies about other legendaries being thieves. And, animatedly denies any lie when shown to be lying. And now that the alts are starting to burn their reputations pushing too hard with their endless targeted speculation, of course out come the blatant noob grade sock puppets. Grow a spine and post under your primary account dickless. |
|
|
|
I took a photo of Mars this morning (below) Is that not a photo of Creptune? Or is it Mer crepey? Sorry, not sorry.You had me at Creptune but jumped the shark with Mercrepe. |
|
|
|
Funny how to socialists, socialism is a seemingly amorphous term changed to fit the needs of any specific scenario needed, not being socialism any time it fails, and being socialism any time something positive is accomplished.
How so? Never changed the definition of the term. Socialism is when you have a society where means of productions are collectively possessed. That's all. I don't see a debate here. Only you and iluvbitcoin trying to fit the Nazis inside this definition, which is obviously difficult yeah ^^ Good of you to unilaterally declare there is no debate. It is amazing that no matter how many times socialism tried to acheive this goal of "collective possession of production" and fails, the failure itself is touted as the justification of why it is not socialism. Socialism is nothing but a means to the end of totalitarianism. Your naive fantasies of collectivization are nothing but a conduit for delivering dictatorship as is inevitably the result any time socialism is tried, every moment in between touted as the success of socialism while its failures are never socialism. By your own metric the USSR was socialism. Mao's China was socialism. Shit, even China today is socialism according to this metric. Socialists are relativist retards who have no actual principles but the ones that sound good in any given argument, because they believe the ends justifies the means of their utter bullshit. |
|
|
|
|
Funny how to socialists, socialism is a seemingly amorphous term changed to fit the needs of any specific scenario needed, not being socialism any time it fails, and being socialism any time something positive is accomplished.
|
|
|
|
I'd say they were put in a no win situation. Do you see where that truck stopped? Don't take out the shooters, and you or others are dead at the hands of the shooters. Take them out, and possibly hit nearby innocents. Lets be honest here, they were absolutely put in a bad position, but they most certainly did fuck up. If they wanted cover they should have used their cruisers, not the random occupied vehicles of bystanders. They didn't even bother telling the bystanders to exit the vehicles. Also as you know as a trained police officer, one of the primary things they drill into your head in training is to be aware of what is down range and behind your target. This was an utter failure of basic police procedure and tactics. If this was a civilian who acted this way with these results in self defense, he would absolutely be going to prison. |
|
|
|
I haven't followed these investigations closely being non-American but it's just funny that they've trying to get rid of the man even before he stepped into the White House but look now. It's almost 2020, another election cycle and they still haven't succeeded in removing him. If anything, they only made him look sympathetic with how they are treating him. This is why his win is virtually assured at this point. For how big of an asshole Trump can be, the democrat party has topped him as being so revolting that even people who don't like Trump will vote for him because they are so absolutely exhausted with the democrat's bullshit. Their inability to recognize this dynamic is the cause of their own self destruction. Most people would vote for a bag of rocks over any of the current democrat candidates. |
|
|
|
Then why do you continue to support it? We have socialist highways and millions of people have died since the highway act of 1956. Why aren't you pushing for private highways?
Everytime public highways have been tried, its led to a lot of deaths but commies like you never get it. If you were at all genuine, you'd boycott all socialism by staying off of all public roads. I am not even going to dignify your insane ramblings with a serious attempt at a response except to say you seem to define anything as a public benefit as socialism and anything that is a detriment to the public as "not socialism". |
|
|
|
So you found a off clip from 2013 and are going to let a bad joke define him as if its his platform. All while we have a president who is a serial sexual criminal and has bragged (not joked) about being one on tape.
It wasn't a joke. Just because people were laughing at him doesn't mean he was joking. I laugh at you but you aren't funny. Additionally your off topic accusations never occurred except for in your mind. |
|
|
|
I love how even when he talks about what Trump got wrong. He practically says that 'we didn't illegally spy/wiretap the trump campaign' Yeah man, it wasn't fucking illegal because you got a secret FISA court to sign off on it while you lied to them about why he needed to be spyed on. So while it's not illegal, there were serious issues with this guy even getting the warrant in the first place.
Puts into perspective how horrible they treat private American citizens rights. No, it absolutely was very illegal, and people are going to be prosecuted over it like I have been saying for some time. |
|
|
|
No, just more vigilant and use some common sense. Be street smart. Unfortunately that can't be taught in school.
Too bad you are neither street smart not book smart. What is stopping people form just making their own guns? Importing unlocked guns? Using explosives, fire, vehicles, knives, airguns, to kill people? Are you not getting any kind of clue why "your ideas" are half baked failures? The world is not your science experiment. You have to prove ideas before they are implemented, especially when the safety of hundreds of millions is at risk. Uh, I don't know. Because it's easier to buy (off the street) or steal a gun than to make one? So, how do I go about to try to prove my ideas? Where do I start? You can't even form a coherent reply to my question, but you claim to have the solution to all the worlds problems. They are "your ideas" jackhole, you tell me. |
|
|
|
In the general sense, this is an effort to understand and forecast the abusive use of crypto currencies by governments.
It's definitely something that will happen repeatedly. This particular scheme allegedly by China isn't a game changer.
The gold/oil backed yuan part is the game changer, crypto is just something that will multiply the effect and speed it up, it is not the linchpin itself. |
|
|
|
We should keep in mind, however, that China is a one-party, communist state. While the issue of surveillance and privacy are certainly important, I wouldn't expect anything like this to become reality in the United States any time soon. We are begging to crack down on data-harvesting and privacy issues as a whole, and while the technology used to limit our privacy is increasing, many legal actions are in place to try and counter that. Take all of the recent allegations towards Facebook as an example.
Furthermore, other ways to balance this new phenomena are being created with technology as well. Even taking bitcoin or other crypto for instance...
Taking a major aspect of our individual lives, money and it's location, and keeping it secure, out of the hands of those who pull the strings in our society. With more creations hopefully on the rise to allow us to keep our privacy in different ways, I hope we will one day have the ability to choose what we want to keep private and what we dont. It is already happening in the US, don't fool yourself. Public resistance is only slowing it, if anything. The Chinese people don't get a choice, they are under a dictatorship and they all know it. In the USA they have to spin it like it is a good thing and obfuscate the project as well as the negative effects of implementing such systems, but they are in fact being created here too. |
|
|
|
No, just more vigilant and use some common sense. Be street smart. Unfortunately that can't be taught in school.
Too bad you are neither street smart not book smart. What is stopping people form just making their own guns? Importing unlocked guns? Using explosives, fire, vehicles, knives, airguns, to kill people? Are you not getting any kind of clue why "your ideas" are half baked failures? The world is not your science experiment. You have to prove ideas before they are implemented, especially when the safety of hundreds of millions is at risk. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
