|
If you went ahead with the NXT clone idea not sure I'd agree the distribution is better (assuming you just count deposits from the people who sent VisaCoin money). At least one guy sent 29.4 BTC which would be close to 20% of the currency. NXT's is kinda better as it had a 1 BTC cap even though only like 71 people participated. And also, we don't know if VisaCoin himself sent money to that account to make it look like BTC was flowing in to entice people to jump on the bandwagon.
Regardless, it's a good initiative, I hope this guy is caught and brought to justice.
|
|
|
|
|
You should read up on prepared statements and learn to use them. The way you are sending queries to your DB is rather insecure.
|
|
|
|
|
0.5.3 is running great for me as well. With prior versions I had to restart my server a few times per day, so far it's been running a little over 24 hrs without a hitch.
|
|
|
|
jeez my 660 ti PE with 2gb is only getting .95 with the scrypt-jane compiled by the kind guy a page back (Thanks btw)
I let it autotune and it came out to 9x1. Are yall using cpu as well> cuz I put -H 2 in my config
The performance isn't as good on Windows. My 780 only gets 1.9 kH/s. I'm probably going to install Linux on another drive this weekend. |
|
|
|
Am I doing it wrong on a GTX 660 2GB?
-a scrypt-jane -d 1 -i 0 -l K10x1 -C 2
Getting 0.48khash/s anything higher than 10x1 gives me the too much memory error.
Got my -d 1 card to work but using both cards does not work. -d 0 card crashes and only works in -i 1 mode. getting 1.76khash/s out of my second card though. yes, I've noticed with scrypt-jane that mining on more than one GPU in a single cudaminer instance will crash it ( at least on Windows) Solution is to open up two instances and assign one GPU to each, that worked for me. |
|
|
|
// Yacoin defaults
unsigned int Ntimestamp = 1367991200;
unsigned int minN = 4;
unsigned int maxN = 30;
if (strlen(jane_params) > 0) {
if (!strcmp(jane_params, "YAC") || !strcasecmp(jane_params, "Yacoin")) {} // No-Op
else if (!strcmp(jane_params, "YBC") || !strcasecmp(jane_params, "YBCoin")) {
// YBCoin: 1372386273, minN: 4, maxN: 30
Ntimestamp = 1372386273; minN= 4; maxN= 30;
} else if (!strcmp(jane_params, "ZZC") || !strcasecmp(jane_params, "ZZCoin")) {
// ZcCoin: 1375817223, minN: 12, maxN: 30
Ntimestamp = 1375817223; minN= 12; maxN= 30;
} else if (!strcmp(jane_params, "FEC") || !strcasecmp(jane_params, "FreeCoin")) {
// FreeCoin: 1375801200, minN: 6, maxN: 32
Ntimestamp = 1375801200; minN= 6; maxN= 32;
} else if (!strcmp(jane_params, "ONC") || !strcasecmp(jane_params, "OneCoin")) {
// OneCoin: 1371119462, minN: 6, maxN: 30
Ntimestamp = 1371119462; minN= 6; maxN= 30;
} else if (!strcmp(jane_params, "QQC") || !strcasecmp(jane_params, "QQCoin")) {
// QQCoin: 1387769316, minN: 4, maxN: 30
Ntimestamp = 1387769316; minN= 4; maxN= 30;
} else if (!strcmp(jane_params, "GPL") || !strcasecmp(jane_params, "GoldPressedLatinum")) {
// GoldPressedLatinum: 1377557832, minN: 4, maxN: 30
Ntimestamp = 1377557832; minN= 4; maxN= 30;
} else {
if (sscanf(jane_params, "%u,%u,%u", &Ntimestamp, &minN, &maxN) != 3)
if (sscanf(jane_params, "%u", &Nfactor) == 1) return Nfactor; // skip bounding against minN, maxN
else applog(LOG_INFO, "Unable to parse scrypt-jane parameters: '%s'. Defaulting to Yacoin.", jane_params);
}
}
Multiple coin support for scrypt-jane! Let me know which others you want (see above code to check what's available) --algo=scrypt-jane directly specify N factor 12 --algo=scrypt-jane:12 mine Freecoin (likewise for other coins) --algo=scrypt-jane:FEC --algo=scrypt-jane:FreeCoin The most flexible way: specify parameters for Gold Pressed Latinum manually --algo=scrypt-jane:1377557832,4,30 Note that N factor changes during mining will most likely lead to a crash. You have been warned  Awesome, thanks for adding this. Have you tried out QQCoin? If so what hash rates are you seeing? With a 780 under Windows I max out at 55kH/s which is a lot lower than the 1.8 MH/s my 7970 gets with ybcminer. I'm just wondering if it is less efficient with lower N factors or something. That said someone else here mentioned they could open up multiple instances of cudaminer and it didn't lower their hash rate while mining QQcoin, for me it just halves it though. |
|
|
|
Of course ghash.io would do something about it. Like any mining pool would want to bring down the network, their source of massive income ........
Still we couldn't just count on the good will of the mega pool like we did every time in the past(Deepbit, BTC Guild...), it's intriguing why miners keep flocking to the biggest pool and whether something could be done about it. Do we know how much hash power is from CEX.io mining contracts (which go through ghash.io) vs independent miners? |
|
|
|
Pool wallet is running on dedicated server, works 24/7 and is stable. Forging wallet is restarted every 8 hours for stability. Is the wallet running on the same server you host the site? If so that is extremely dangerous. Even if the site itself is 100% secure, never rule out internal sabotage from your host. It can happen when lots of money is at stake- slush encountered this with OVH on his Bitcoin pool awhile back. I hope you are keeping the wallet open on an isolated machine that is ONLY used for NXT. |
|
|
|
what would be the breakeven on using an xbox one farm, say 5 Mhashes? what kind of gpu does it have?
You'd need a lot of Xbox Ones The GPU is close to a 7850, probably around 300 kH/s PS4's is closer to a 7870 - ~350 kH/s |
|
|
|
|
There's no way to run unsigned code on a PS4 or Xbox One yet, so this isn't possible at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Made a deal with bybitcoin. He is golden. Highly recommend.
+1 just made a deal with him as well. Excellent trader. |
|
|
|
|
I'm buying at x.
PM me if you have coins to sell.
Order filled thanks!
|
|
|
|
This is just an explanation of the coin, but not exchange, right? For now. But that it's listed on there is a very good sign. See: http://www.btc38.com/altcoin/ |
|
|
|
It looks like he lives Turkey, found him using that pic on another site http://www.cointurk.net/topic/49-altcoin-wallet-i%C3%A7in-server-k%C4%B1sm%C4%B1/Bigger version of photo - http://imgur.com/WGypKdrThe whois details for bitdice.cc, which seems to be one of the sites he maintains, list Turkey under country as well. The rest of the details seem to be fake, name could be real. That's all the info I could piece together. Hope that helps anyone trying to track him down. He doesn't seem to be very good at covering his tracks. |
|
|
|
Very, very disappointed, @ Block_Erupter you it would ruin their reputation, and FZ's.
Anyway, I hope you can find ways to recoup their losses for investors.
I'm trying my best to recouple the loses by selling some of my Fz I specifically said in the thread I'm not in control of the wallet. That is risk you investors took. I also took the risk and lost about 10K in BTC. I'm also furious because I believed this could be the next big Crypto Currency that people actually want to mine, instead of just pumping and dumping for a quick buck. You are apparently in possession of the source code to Shares, however. Why not release it now? Assuming those screenshots weren't just faked... The Source Code I was given was only half the source code. The Client I have is linked to me and only me. That's how every client was going to be. Linked to a IP address when you first startup therefore no could steal your Shares. Therefore If I upload the Client their would be no point as the Client is registered to my IP address. Half the source code is good enough, upload it. It would at least prove you weren't completely lying. |
|
|
|
Very, very disappointed, @ Block_Erupter you it would ruin their reputation, and FZ's.
Anyway, I hope you can find ways to recoup their losses for investors.
I'm trying my best to recouple the loses by selling some of my Fz I specifically said in the thread I'm not in control of the wallet. That is risk you investors took. I also took the risk and lost about 10K in BTC. I'm also furious because I believed this could be the next big Crypto Currency that people actually want to mine, instead of just pumping and dumping for a quick buck. You are apparently in possession of the source code to Shares, however. Why not release it now? Assuming those screenshots weren't just faked... |
|
|
|
Chinese@63.com ? Lol That domain doesn't even exist, btw. OP is a terrible liar. Folks he ran off with your money.
|
|
|
|
Mhh, I've three questions:
1. I suspect you have some proof for your accusations? (Haven't seen that)
2. I understand your accusations are about the "Shares" project? I think in the initial post Block_Erupter says that he is not the dev of that project?
And please know, there are more people working for and supporting Frozen!
As far as I see these two topics are not related at all. If you've something to complain about Shares, please do it in the Shares-Thread.
Regards
He used this frozenshit as some kind of reference for his IPO ,trying to lure more people by making him more believable. No matter how many other people are "supporting" this , the coin has been tainted by a guy who plays sdice with people's money and doesn't return the money when asked. Anyhow , it's just another alt with no future:) I respect your opinion. Still, I see strong accusations and no proof. I think bashing Frozen because of something completely else is simply off-topic and unfair. Imho... There's several people in the Shares thread that haven't been refunded, there's transactions going out to SatoshiDICE on the address he used for collecting IPO payments, and he just created another 'announcement' thread for Shares while ignoring all the complaints in the other one. Probably a last-ditch attempt at siphoning more BTC. You draw your conclusions from that... If you want to continue supporting Frozen knowing this, go ahead. |
|
|
|
Quoted for truth. Frozen has no future, the dev is a blatant scammer. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
