Anyone selling some Cache?  Starting the offering at 0.01 BTC per 100,000. PM me "moneysupply" : 144112.93000000 That's like 70% of the current supply, don't think anyone has that much lol |
|
|
|
|
I have 30K to sell at 0.13 BTC / 10K MOL
PM if interested.
Offer no longer available.
|
|
|
|
It's not the most recent and has some flaws, so the current source isn't ready to be used in a production environment. I don't think BTC-E will consider listing until the latest source is published. Regardless I think it might be better for NXT if it's more developed before it hits a major exchange. Things like a better client etc. |
|
|
|
|
That's very strange. I haven't used BTER in awhile but they were always quick to respond to any issues in the past. Wonder if ownership changed hands?
|
|
|
|
|
Scammers now scamming the scammers.
|
|
|
|
VSC and Visacoin name are good, I do not think it is necessary to change the name. BTW, the website www.visacoin.info is under developing. Let's be patient to beat those doubting for this project!!! Keep moving, I am always support this perfect project!!! I would say that MSC/NXT be careful, we are after you. LOL. Time will prove everything. Looks legit  |
|
|
|
Thanks for the update Visacoin.
We will have to work hard to surpass quickly nxt. First step is making good intro vids for promotion, contacting cryptocoincharts etc.
How about a single shred of evidence that this actually exists first lol. |
|
|
|
QQC is selling for 0.0000361 PER coin on coinedup.com right now. You guys selling so cheap are crazy.
QQC also only has 30 million coins vs 1 billion with Particle. Big difference there  |
|
|
|
Cryptsy is significantly faster than coinedup, it seems that some of you haven't been back since they adjusted to the massive influx of traffic.
Most likely, coinedup is in the exact same situation cryptsy was in....About ready to be scaled up due to their dramatically increasing traffic.
It only takes a second to verify that I am correct and you guys seem to forget an initially low-volume exchange that is actually able to handle massive traffic from day one has yet to be
demonstrated to this community.
That said, I'll use 'em both.
I don't think people are referring to the general speed of the site, Cryptsy does win there. Deposits can be pretty slow however, on occasion it has taken up to six hours for them to add my funds, which I feel is unacceptable. My account was also created around when the site first opened, but I do not trade a whole lot, so maybe that's why it's slower for me. |
|
|
|
|
I wonder where the modified client was posted originally, I can't find any record of it on Google using the links provided in this thread, odd... maybe the main NXT site was compromised briefly?
I think it's very important that SHA-256 hashes are provided with any release builds posted from now on. They aren't visible on the main site anywhere which isn't a good thing
|
|
|
|
I can vouch for insanehero. Just did a trade at .35 BTC for 500K Particle, he went first and we split the transaction into 4 parts. All went smoothly |
|
|
|
offline mining of all NXT accounts in parallel
problem gets worse the more NXT accounts there are
this attracts more hackers the more NXT is worth
This will create an equilibrium effect like a boat anchor to a hot air balloon. The more NXT succeeds, the more it will be hacked.
CfB, tell me there is a solution that is more effective than the user needs to not be unlucky
James
If they can do this with NXT why can't they do it with Bitcoin? Need to have access to your wallet.dat file to attack it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but all account numbers and passwords are encoded into the NXT blockchain, and it is this that is being brute forced, if there really is an attack. Don't need wallet.dat, someone could try brute forcing the private key of any given address. Statistically it's near impossible to brute force though. NXT should just generate the passphrase itself, don't give the user an option to enter one - user generated passphrases are always going to be less secure than a truly random one. |
|
|
|
Windows daemon is not connecting for me.
Source is not compiling on linux...lots of sph_keccak256 errors.
Oh well.
Yep. Not compiling on Linux, same error |
|
|
|
|
I started using Coinex yesterday, best exchange period in my opinion. I like how everything auto updates without having to refresh. Layout is nice and clean too.
|
|
|
|
|
EarthCoin is just a simple clone wrapped in a nice PR campaign, see: WorldCoin. You may be able to get some short-term gains out of it by playing the market - but long-term, I wouldn't touch it.
With NXT, there's a lot of promises that have yet to be delivered on, but it has a strong community and plenty of room for growth. Since the code isn't forked from Bitcoin I think you'll see that development is much more agile. I think it's worth betting on and I've bought some myself a few weeks ago. As always, I recommend investing a small % only so you won't get burned badly if it becomes worthless, going all in would be foolish.
|
|
|
|
There was no premine.
Massive hype + crashing servers + a few blocks found by miners in the chaos IS NOT pre-mine
per this link: https://www.multipool.us/blocks.php?curr=moon (go to last page) block between 49 and 1081 isnt mined by multipool and first block mined is 17 so first block till 17 is directly mined by you, blocks between 49 and 1081 also mined by you as the source was not available at that point and multipool isnt mined that, so if you can give a clear answer to that i am ok, but if you cant than everything will be pretty clear Why would anyone even bother with this, the dev clearly has no idea what he's doing if he can't manage to compile a Windows build himself. Giving multipool the source before releasing it publicly was also shady. Props for hyping it up though, it definitely pulled a good amount of hash power away from other coins, maybe that was his intent. |
|
|
|
That's just a syndicated press release not an actual article. Still, more visibility is always good. |
|
|
|
Please forgive my OCD/Paranoia/ADHD tone while asking, but I much rather have those than deal with the potential future PTSD... OK... so one has chosen a super secure passphrase... you know one of those that will take a billion gazillion trillion years of non-stop brute force to crack... Considering that he/she needs to have his/her wallet unlocked to forge and at the same time that wallet needs to have a decent amount of NXT in order to have a chance generating a block... Shouldn't the client ask for the passphrase AGAIN when trying to send NXT? How far can a super secure passphrase take you if all a hacker needs is to remotely access your computer and hope you are forging? Even though I have voted for the partially done features to be completed first... I believe that it is CRITICAL for the client to ask for the passphrase when trying to send NXT. ...yes, you will have to type in your super long passphrase every time... If anyone could clear the fog without adding the feature, it is FINE with me!  Peercoin works the same way, when activating PoS you need to leave the wallet unlocked, which doesn't prompt for passphrase when sending money, creating new addresses, etc. I agree though, just as a precaution it would be nice if it always prompt for your passphrase when sending money. Although if someone has remote access to your computer they'd get it eventually, would just take silently installing a keylogger to capture the initial request next time you launch NXT. |
|
|
|
You should post in the video that NxT's are going for 500,000% of what they sold for by the original democratically selected stakeholders. And then stress that in a month or two, you'd have to use Mega percents because that's how rocket fast this is growing!  it is a nice profit for that risk. Yes, for $4,000 worth (21 BTC in October-Nov) of risk split between 73 people. Easy to say for people on the other side, but for those who are looking to get in, you should have a little empathy. How is some people making a profit in what is basically an IPO hurting people who didn't invest? They didn't invest, so aren't losing something, nor are they forced to invest now. If they choose to invest, that is their business and their choice. I have a hard time figuring out what your point is other than in your opinion "it isn't fair". He just wants to buy NXT cheaper. Tough luck for him. |
|
|
|
|
It's funny people are comparing this to MSC and NXT. Do your research, both of those were much more solid than this, albeit still risky. I won't bother pointing out all the red flags, but the OP hasn't shared any real technical details and his writing comes across as very vague. Plus creating things like an empty github to make it seem more legit to people that might not know any better. This has scam written all over it...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
