The Barrel shifter is not present on 3.0 cards like the GTX760, but is already on 3.5 Titans. You can see that on Wikipedia.
I may be wrong since I don't program CUDA neither I have a 750Ti in hand, but my impression is that NVidia catched up and fixed it's own problems, not surpassed (by much) the already efficient ATI design. Turning the tables would depend in impressive engineering feat by NVidia but also ATI sloppiness in it's current line, which nobody managed to point out yet.
Then there's always the physical limit of using the same TSMC silicon and 28nm technology.
I'd be happy if both are on an even playing field , that would likely normalize prices, unless even Nvidia and AMD combined can't meet demand from miners (which I doubt). |
|
|
|
I imagine there will be a drop in price ones trades begin functioning again. In the long term, I don't see any problems. Devs are clear that this is alpha level code and problems may arise. Personally, I think we've seen that a) the devs had a fix within hours (very, very impressive), b) we have a good and responsive community, including Busoni and the white hat. So I think there is some positive takeaway here. nxt had a similar critical bug just a week ago, but without the pumping (also white hat), nothing happened to the development or even short term price There was a blockchain rollback with NXT a few months ago too, I remember as one of my trades went missing and had to ask the seller to resend at the time. I don't remember it impacting the price. I think most people realize these things can happen, better when it's early on than later. |
|
|
|
|
Did you do any reading on it at all before making this topic? It is the first to implement a decentralized exchange.
|
|
|
|
Is around 3.8 MH/s expected hash rate for a pair of 7970s?
My cards run much cooler while mining this, only around 55-60C, compared to 85C in scrypt.
How many drk coins can u mine a day? Pool estimates 20 coins, don't know if that's correct or not. Is around 3.8 MH/s expected hash rate for a pair of 7970s?
My cards run much cooler while mining this, only around 55-60C, compared to 85C in scrypt.
Whats your sgminer config? I just used the default config provided. sgminer.exe --kernel darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://pool.darkcoin.io:3333 -u u -p x -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --shaders 2048 |
|
|
|
|
Is around 3.8 MH/s expected hash rate for a pair of 7970s?
My cards run much cooler while mining this, only around 55-60C, compared to 85C in scrypt.
|
|
|
|
My CGminer shows that I am hashing at a rate of 335.6 MH/s. With Vertminer i'm at about 180kH/s. Something doesn't seem right. Does the cgminer properly report hash rate?
What card... I don't think the N factor for Vert and CACH are the same so hash rates will differ. |
|
|
|
|
Man, AMD GPU prices are insane now. I was thinking of expanding my rig but don't really want to overpay on a R9 290. Thinking about replacing the 2 780s I have in my gaming rig with a pair of 780 Tis and move the 780s over to a dedicated mining box. Good idea? Or should I wait for Maxwell stuff... heard that's still a ways off though (late Q4 / next year?).
|
|
|
|
Yeah, seems to me, for new algo coins, miner optimization and mining ("optimine") is the new premine. However, once the word gets around, and there are no optimized miners published, there will be no buyers for the optimined coins.
No way around this. For all we know, Bitcoin was massively premined early on by someone that coded a GPU miner in private too. Same with LTC |
|
|
|
WTB 100 RIC - 0.1 BTC. Pm me.
I'll sell 100 for 1 BTC. Not going lower |
|
|
|
I wanted to whole hardheartedly support this coin, but a lack of posts from the dev, the utterly crazy diff, and the lack of pool software has killed this coin before it got started.
GL with it, but I doubt it will go anywhere now
Yeah, I'm about to give up too. It's just MaxCoin v2.o -- Why release something when you've yet to have it all prepared. People much rather wait an additional week to have the coin prepared, fair, and the devs not as busy. At lest with maxcoin you could mine the thing! Who is getting these blocks? For me with 4000 cores NOT to be getting any blocks (ive had 4 and nothing since full rewards came in), means there must be an immense amount hashpower on this, or something isn't working right. And I'm not prepared to mine it without support from the developer. Shame, as I have been excited about this for months! WTS 85 RIC by the way, 0.01 each or all for 0.7 BTC, PM for derails I think it's just because there is a ton of hash power on this thing. People knew about the release well in advance and had time to prepare unlike other CPU coins recently. Plus the fact that the difficulty adjusted by the time rewards started coming in, no one got 'instamine' blocks. Dev has posted numerous times here since the release as well, there's no indication he's just letting it die. |
|
|
|
|
People shouting virus just want you to stop mining so they have more of a chance at getting coins.
If you have doubts, run on an isolated machine or compile from source. The diffs on github show this is clean.
|
|
|
|
I must be going crazy... I had this working on one machine, then think I screwed it up and have tried on 2 fresh installs and I get same result. How do I figure out what is wrong?
I got the linux-64.zip file and the rminerd_linux_x86_64.tar.gz from the official places
I unzipped them both. Created the conf as listed on page 30.. Changed password, and username (nothing else)
When starting ./rminerd -o localhost:28332 -u matchconf -p matchpconf
I get
[2014-02-12 01:52:06] HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 500 Internal Server Error
[2014-02-12 01:52:06] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
riecoind is running and I get this:
./riecoind getinfo
{
"version" : 80600,
"protocolversion" : 10070001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 0,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 0,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 1,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1392169403,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks
no connections, your wallet isn't synced up with the network that's why the RPC server is giving you a 500 error |
|
|
|
Took an hour but just found my second block.
How fast are you mining? 50 i7 machines, 700k kH/s each according to the miner. This coin is very hard to mine  |
|
|
|
|
Took an hour but just found my second block.
|
|
|
|
Found 1 block so far  |
|
|
|
So those who could solo mine at launch get rewarded 0, while everyone can prep their botnets and aws farms for block 1152, at which point solo mining will become fruitless. What fun times.
Who cares, would happen regardless, it takes less than 2 mins to setup an aws farm. Don't mine it then if you're that upset. At least this way everyone has an opportunity to get things setup |
|
|
|
So at this point we can only mine off one machine, correct? Thanks for all of your hard word btw devs. I know it isn't easy. We're behind you though. No, he released an external miner... if you have multiple machines point it to whatever IP you're running the wallet on |
|
|
|
|
CEPTION: N5boost16exception_detail10clone_implINS0_19error_info_injectorINS_21thread_res ource_errorEEEEE
boost::thread_resource_error: Resource temporarily unavailable
riecoin in AppInit()
Weird, never got this error with any other wallet before.
edit: Fixed it...
|
|
|
|
|
Assertion `block.hashMerkleRoot == uint256("0xb8fcc5eedac458fe02b8797ceff6c7ba4c05f749ff464b6ebf775e0eab0afa6c")' failed
Fails to start after fresh rebuild
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
