3825
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Is Bitcoin placebo-money?
|
on: June 24, 2011, 05:14:55 AM
|
its only worth what someone's willing to pay for it Which is what concerns me. Is there anything that is worth more than someone is willing to pay?
|
|
|
3830
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin price is too high at 20$/BTC
|
on: June 24, 2011, 12:03:11 AM
|
I think current prices are highly speculative, and even if bitcoins will be a huge success story cannot be sustained for the next few years.
Here's why, counter-arguments welcome. If you think I'm just trolling or trying to buy cheap, simply ignore this thread please.
I'll assume a price of 20$/BTC from here on, even though the top was at 30.
1.
2.6 million coins a year are mined until 2013, 1.3 million coins a year after that. at 20$/BTC, that's equivalent to more than 50 million dollars in one year, or approx. 170 million dollars within 5 years, that have to flow into the system to sustain this price.
i.e. people have to buy BTCs for 170 million dollars! what are the circumstances to make that happen?
(that's of course only if miners sell all of their gains, but if miners keep some of their coins it only means they expect to sell it for even more in the future!)
2.
bitcoin can draw its value only from demand from circulation, and temporarily from speculation.
money supply definitions are very diverse and incomparable, but just to give you an idea: M1 money supply of the eurozone is about 28% of annual GDP, M1 money supply of the US about 14% of GDP.
a bitcoin economy with a money supply of even 30% annual GDP would be valued at 21 million BTC, or 430 million $ a year. what do you think the bitcoin economy amounts to a year? 5 figures? 6 figures? what demand for bitcoins do you think that creates?
3.
in addition to that, by the above numbers and 6.5 million BTC supply now, the BTC money supply grows by 40% within a year, or by 18% a year over the next 5 years.
that's huge inflation, unless there is ADDITIONAL demand from circulation and/or speculation.
a bitcoin economy valued at 430 million dollars a year now at 20$/BTC is at 600 million $ in a year, or 1 BILLION $ a year in 5 years.
==>
20$/BTC is HIGHLY speculative. maybe the bitcoin economy explodes and these prices are sustained, but to think that the price even rises substantially would mean the scenario above would have to be outperformed, or demand from speculation increase even more so, for years to come.
edit: corrections. I miscalculated the GDP numbers.
Bitcoin - learn it. At block 210,000 the reward is reduced to 25BTC/block. edit: maybe you did know that. Regardless, 1 billion dollars is like 16 cents per person which is like .009 cents per day.
|
|
|
3831
|
Economy / Economics / Re: Is Bitcoin placebo-money?
|
on: June 23, 2011, 10:49:24 PM
|
It defiantly doesn't work as a money if no one thinks it's a money. People think it is a money because it looks an awful lot like one. I guess that's the same with a sugar pill. I think it's fair to call it a placebo. But maybe not helpful since nothing can act as a money unless people think it is a money and anything that people treat as a money becomes a money.
|
|
|
3833
|
Other / Meta / Marketplace subforum: Gambling games
|
on: June 23, 2011, 10:44:54 PM
|
Since the main marketplace forum no longer has buying or selling posts in it it's been overrun with gambling games. I think a gambling games subforum is appropriate.
Bigger picture I think it needs to be Goods, Services, Currency Exchange, Gambling Games.
The main Marketplace forum can be for general bitcoin market topics like advertising tips and reputations and shopping cart interfaces.
|
|
|
3840
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitCams.com
|
on: June 23, 2011, 09:02:46 PM
|
That is a good idea, make it a truly independent site with low over head, and true anonymity. However there must be a way to verify age so that we are in compliance with basic international laws. I don't want the anonymity aspect to get to the heads of some bad people. This will be a very clean site (as clean as any other adult site) with the exception that people can pay on shows like if it were cash at a strip club (bitcoins baby), and anyone can technically participate as long as they follow basic guidelines. Not all of these complicated and invasive credit card sign ups.
I'm sure some (most) companies will ID girls, but I bet there are pretty girls who would rather not give you their name and address. Maybe someone will find a way to serve them too without too much risk from the goons. Has anyone thought this through? You take IDs from girls, then presumably some freak from a bureaucracy wants to see them and now he has their info, but he has to make sure it's really them right? So what, he goes to visit them all or just the youngest ones? Maybe a service that just sells technical help to girls who then publish themselves could follow the letter of the law without the need to ID them. Ha, I guess the girls would be required to ID themselves.
|
|
|
|