So, I guess you get to decide what is taught to children then?  I suppose you are fully prepared to take people's children away and kill their parents to impose your world view as well?  Sorry, but I don't want to live in your murderous and totalitarian world.

Hmm... I think I would support this too. Obviously we don't want huge amounts of spam, but it seems a bit unfortunate that such a wide ranging topic that is the most popular on the gambling section, is confined to one thread. I've played bitcoinduit before and I would disagree that it's (completely) not smart. It is one of the few "gambling" games where there is no house advantage, and you can take as much or as little risk as you choose, including (literally) zero. Anyway, this isn't a discussion about it's relative merits, people can find those out for themselves, but it would seem fair to at the very least reduce the restrictions.

I think they're all dead because people realized playing them wasn't all that smart.  I'd still like to be able to visit the gambling section and see what's happening.... if the policy was removed, it'd probably just be 90% spam again.

Can i send you a little bit of money and you add it to your investment process, and after you made more money you return it plus a fraction of the profits proportional to the amount i contributed, taking away a percentage of the profits to yourself if you want of course?

Sorry for throwing the thread back on topic.

1) I just wanted to know why this guy thinks he can still speak for the bitcoin community?

2) Why is he not currently being raped in prison?

3) Has anyone seen or spoken to him at the Occupy Wall Street event?

4) Why has no one on the east coast shot him with a paintball gun?

Are you suggesting that if a parent wishes her child to be taught creationism, and a teacher wishes to teach it, that such activity should not be allowed?

You prefer that one monolithic governing body decide what is truth and teach it universally? Can you guess what would be the state of science if education in all of history had been taught only by one monolithic organization?

Why... we'd still believe in creationism.  

That is because it is based simply on how the market has behaved given similar circumstances. This should be surprising in no way. People have been trading successfully on Bayesian analysis since the 1940's, still very few seem to understand it. The particular weakness of Bayesian analysis that I have struggled with most in this market is simply the lack of history. The more history you have the better it works. And we are just on the cusp of having enough history to make it very, very effective. I may get to a point before too long where I may have to stop publishing the output.

Bitcoinduit added to the site.  I don't know who plays these ponzi-scheme games, but apparently someone does!

To be fair, the September 15 breakout above moving averages after a double bottom was definitely a bull signal.  You can't argue with that.  I was a bit surprised we didn't have at least a minor rally myself.  And by surprised I mean I kept a bunch more mined coins than I should have which I later sold for less $.

alright
LfAxmPjizUYqAZd1Db51q4RpohubomWFnG

I take 2350 @ 0.01